研究报告

西藏不同产区曲拉细菌群落结构的比较分析

  • 刘振东 ,
  • 毕娜 ,
  • 李哲 ,
  • 李梁 ,
  • 罗章 ,
  • 薛蓓 ,
  • 汪雯翰
展开
  • 1(西藏农牧学院 食品科学学院,西藏 林芝, 860000)
    2(西藏自治区藏药审评认证中心,西藏 拉萨,850000)
    3(上海市农业科学院食用菌研究所,上海, 201403)
博士研究生,副教授(薛蓓副教授和汪雯翰研究员为共同通讯作者,E-mail:13658940092@163.com,wangwenhan@saas.sh.cn)

收稿日期: 2019-10-10

  网络出版日期: 2020-04-24

基金资助

科技部重大专项民族特色食品工业化关键技术(2018YFD0400102);西藏农牧学院食品科学与工程重点学科建设(502218009)

Comparative analysis of the bacteria community structure of Qula in different producing areas in Tibet

  • LIU Zhendong ,
  • BI Na ,
  • LI Zhe ,
  • LI Liang ,
  • LUO Zhang ,
  • XUE Bei ,
  • WANG Wenhan
Expand
  • 1(College of Food Science, Tibet Agriculture and Animal Husbandry University, Nyingchi 860000,China)
    2(Tibetan medicine evaluation and certification center of the Tibet Autonomous Region, Lasa 850000,China)
    3(Institute of Edible Fungi, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403,China)

Received date: 2019-10-10

  Online published: 2020-04-24

摘要

为探究西藏不同产区传统发酵乳制品曲拉中细菌多样性及其微生物安全性,该研究通过Illumina MiSeq测序平台,对西藏拉萨(LS)、日喀则(RKZ)、山南(SN)、昌都(CD)、林芝(LZ)、那曲(NQ)和阿里(AL)共7个地区的曲拉样品细菌多样性及群落结构进行了系统分析。结果表明,曲拉具有高度的细菌多样性,并且不同地区的样品存在一定的共性和差异。在门的水平上,7个地区的优势菌均集中在厚壁菌门(Firmicutes)和变形菌门(Proteobacteria),其相对丰度分别在(12.82±5.63)%~(96.54±1.39)%和(3.46±1.39)%~(75.09±9.37)%。相比门的种类,拉萨(LS)最多,为24个门,阿里(AL)最少,为2个门。在属的水平上,拉萨地区(LS)曲拉样品中的优势菌属为雷尔氏菌属(Ralstonia)、假单胞菌属(Pseudomonas)和苍白杆菌属(Ochrobactrum),其相对丰度分别为(17.25±7.05)%、(16.05±3.22)% 和(9.52±3.19)%;其他6个产地的曲拉样品中优势菌属主要为乳球菌属(Lactococcus)和乳杆菌属(Lactobacillus),其相对丰度分别为(85.13±2.99)%~(25.82±1.42)%和(4.15±1.38)%~(57.21±3.11)%;而在属的种类上,LS最多,为409个属,AL最少,为15个属。聚类分析显示,不同曲拉样本的菌群与地理位置存在一定关系,同一个采样区的样本具有一定的聚类趋势,同时发现LZ、RKZ和CD可聚为一类,而其他4个地区的样品较为离散,且各自独立。

本文引用格式

刘振东 , 毕娜 , 李哲 , 李梁 , 罗章 , 薛蓓 , 汪雯翰 . 西藏不同产区曲拉细菌群落结构的比较分析[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2020 , 46(6) : 60 -66 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.022500

Abstract

In order to investigate the bacterial diversity and microbial safety of Qula (traditional fermented dairy products) in different producing areas of Tibet, high-throughput sequencing technology was used to analyze the bacteria diversity and community structure systematically in Qula samples collected from 7 regions including Lhasa(LS), Shigatse(RKZ), Sannan(SN), Changdu(CD), Nyingchi (LZ), Nagqu (NQ), Ali(AL) in Tibet .The results showed that the Qula samples had a high degree of bacterial diversity, and there were certain commonalities and differences in the samples of different regions. Firmicutes and Proteobacteria were the dominant phylum in different samples at the phylum level, and the relative abundance were (12.82±5.63)% -(96.54±1.39)% and (3.46±1.39)%-(75.09±9.37)%, respectively. The type of phylum was up to 24 phyla in Lhasa (LS) sample and 2 in Ali (AL) sample, which was the least. At the genus level, the dominant bacterial genera in LS were Ralstonia, Pseudomonas and Ochrobactrum, and the relative abundance were (17.25±7.05)%, (16.05±3.22)% and (9.52±3.19)%, respectively. While the dominant bacterial genera in the other six regions were Lactococcus and Lactobacillus at the genus level, and the relative abundance were (85.13±2.99)% -(25.82±1.42)% and (4.15±1.38)%-(57.21±3.11)%, respectively. LS samples had a maximum of 409 genera and AL had the least of 15 genera at the genus level. The cluster analysis showed that the diversity and community structure of bacteria in different Qula samples had a certain correlation with the geographical location. The samples in the same sampling area had a certain clustering trend. At the same time, it was found that LZ, RKZ and CD could be clustered into one category, while the other four regions were discrete and independent.

参考文献

[1] 王军,王琳琳,韩玲,等.曲拉热风干燥工艺参数筛选及色泽品质评价[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(16):296-304.
[2] 张蓓. 藏族传统曲拉制作过程中乳酸菌群变化及曲拉中益生性乳杆菌的筛选和功能性评价[D].郑州:郑州大学,2017.
[3] 于桂荣,张兰威.提高曲拉精制干酪素色泽质量的研究[J]. 东北农业大学学报,2006,37(6):775-778.
[4] LIU H N, ZHANG C, ZHANG H, et al. pH treatment as an effective tool to select the function and structural properties of yak milk caseins[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2013, 96(9): 5 494-5 500.
[5] 罗丽,孙科,鲁迎瑞,等.顶空固相微萃取-气质联用技术分析曲拉干酪素挥发性成分及来源[J].食品工业科技,2016,37(14):83-89.
[6] 卿蔓君,白梅,张勇,等.西藏曲拉和云南乳饼中酵母菌的鉴定及其生物多样性[J].微生物学报,2010,50(9):1 141-1 146.
[7] 郭婷,张健,杨贞耐.基于不同发酵方法制作的曲拉中挥发性风味物质分析[J].食品工业科技,2017,38(8):209-213;238.
[8] GIRAFFA G,NEVIANI E. DNA-based,culture-inde-pendent strategies for evaluating microbial communities in food-associated ecosystems[J].International Journal of Food Microbiology,2001,67(1-2):19-34.
[9] WANG B, PENG Y, GUO Y, et al.Illumina MiSeq sequencing reveals the key microorganisms involved in partial nitritation followed bysimultaneous sludge fermentation, denitrification and anammox process. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 207: 118-125.
[10] NIEMINEN T T, KOSKINEN K, LAINE P, et al. Comparison of microbial communities in marinated and unmarinated broiler meat by metagenomics[J]. Int J Food Microbiol, 2012,157(2):142-149.
[11] 张敏,张艳,黄丽丽,等.基于16S rDNA高通量测序方法比较新疆西北部地区乳品中微生物的多样性[J].食品科学, 2017,38(20): 27-33.
[12] 曹磊,梁春御,曹瑛瑛,等.甘南地区牦牛曲拉中细菌群落结构研究[J]食品科学,2019,40(22):103-109.
[13] BAE K H, SHIN K S, RYU H Y, et al. Identification and fermentation characteristics of lactic acid bacteria isolated from the fermentation broth of Korean traditional liquor Andong-Soju[J]. Korean J Microbiol Biot, 2007, 35(4): 310-315.
[14] PARK Y K, LEE J H, MAH J H. Occurrence and reduction of biogenic amines in traditional Asian fermented soybean foods: A review[J]. Food Chem, 2019,278:1-9.
[15] SUN Z H,LIU W J,GAO W,et al.Identification and characterization of the dom inant lactic acid bacteria from kurut: The naturally ferm ented yak m ilk in Qing-hai,China[J].The Journal of General and Applied M icrobiology,2010,56(1):1-10.
[16] 刘亚华,王宇,徐海燕,等. 基于PacBio SMRT技术的鲜马奶细菌多样性研究[A]. 中国食品科学技术学会.益生菌:技术及产业化——第十三届益生菌与健康国际研讨会摘要集[C].北京:中国食品科学技术学会,2018:2.
[17] 其木格苏都. 自然发酵酸马奶细菌多样性及其基因动态变化研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2017.
[18] 高佳媛,邵玉宇,雷飞艳,等.陕西关中地区羊乳中细菌多样性的分析[J].食品与发酵工业,2018,44(1):52-59.
[19] 剧柠,夏淑鸿.原料乳中微生物的多样性[J].食品与发酵工业,2013,39(2):150-155.
文章导航

/