Please wait a minute...
 
 
食品与发酵工业  2020, Vol. 46 Issue (8): 105-110    DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.022810
  研究报告 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
本土酿酒酵母发酵梅鹿辄干红动态变化研究
赵雪平1, 郑海武1, 雷蕾1, 李婷2, 张美枝1*, 李正英1
1 (内蒙古农业大学 职业技术学院,内蒙古 包头,014109)
2 (内蒙古农业大学,内蒙古 呼和浩特,010018)
Study on the dynamic change of Merlot red fermented by local Saccharomyces cerevisiae
ZHAO Xueping1, ZHENG Haiwu1, LEI Lei1, LI Ting2, ZHANG Meizhi1*, LI Zhengying1
1 (Vocational and Technical College, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Baotou 014109, China)
2 (College of Food Science and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China)
下载:  HTML   PDF (1150KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为得到优良的本土酿酒酵母,对已筛选得到的优良耐性及发酵特性的酵母进行了葡萄酒发酵品质研究。以梅鹿辄为原料,测定其发酵过程及终点的总酸、残糖、酒精度、花色苷、单宁和总酚含量,发酵结束后进行感官评价。对照商业酵母,本土酿酒酵母WJ1发酵液总酸和酒精度含量与商业酵母差异不显著,还原糖、单宁、花色苷、总酚均介于商业酿酒酵母CECA、CEC01及XR发酵液之间;Q12发酵液中还原糖含量略高于商业酿酒酵母发酵液,花色苷含量低且与商业酿酒酵母差异显著,其他指标与商业酿酒酵母发酵液差异不显著。本土酿酒酵母WJ1发酵液具典型果香、但酒香略微不足,酸涩味略重,不柔和,酒体结构一般,但澄清度、色泽、香气优于商业酿酒酵母CECA发酵液。本土酿酒酵母Q12色泽与典型梅鹿辄葡萄酒色泽不符,略失光泽,果香不足,回味较短,酒体寡淡,酒体欠平衡、粗糙,澄清度、香气、滋味和典型性都不及商业酿酒酵母。经过与商业菌株的对比研究得出2株本土酵母Q12、WJ1经过后期驯化有望为我国葡萄酒酿造提供新的本土菌种,同时为本土酿酒酵母多样性研究提供理论依据。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
赵雪平
郑海武
雷蕾
李婷
张美枝
李正英
关键词:  本土酿酒酵母  梅鹿辄  单宁  花色苷  总酚    
Abstract: In order to obtain good local Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the wine fermentation quality of selected yeast with good tolerance and fermentation characteristics was studied. The contents of total acid, residual sugar, alcohol, anthocyanin, tannin and total phenol in the fermentation process as well as at the end point of Merlot fermentation were measured, and the sensory evaluation at the end of fermentation was compared with that of the commercial yeast. The results showed that in the fermentation process of Merlot wine, there was no significant difference in the contents of total acid and alcohol between WJ1 and the commercial yeast. The contents of reducing sugar, tannin, anthocyanin and total phenol were all in between of those of CECA, CEC01 and XR. The content of reducing sugar in Q12 fermentation liquor was slightly higher than that in commercial yeast fermentation liquor, while the content of anthocyanin was slightly lower. There was no significant difference between other indexes. WJ1 fermentation liquid of local Saccharomyces cerevisiae had typical fruit fragrance, but the wine fragrance was slightly insufficient. It had a slightly heavy sour and astringent taste, not soft. The structure of this wine was general, but its clarity, color and aroma were better than those of commercial Saccharomyces cerevisiae CECA. The color of local Saccharomyces cerevisiae Q12 fermented wine was not consistent with that of typical Merlot wine, with slight loss of luster, insufficient fruit flavor, short aftertaste, light body, unbalanced and rough body, less clarity, aroma, taste and typicality than those of commercial Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Through the comparative study with commercial strains, we found that two strains of local yeast Q12 and WJ1 were expected to provide new local strains for wine brewing in China after later domestication, and provide theoretical basis for the diversity research of local Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Key words:  native Saccharomyces cerevisiae    Merlot    tannin    anthocyanins    total phenol
收稿日期:  2019-11-14                出版日期:  2020-04-25      发布日期:  2020-05-20      期的出版日期:  2020-04-25
基金资助: 内蒙古自治区教育厅产学研科技创新平台项目(NJCXY-19-05)
作者简介:  赵雪平(硕士,讲师)和郑海武(硕士,助教)为共同第一作者(张美枝副教授为通讯作者,E-mail:nndzyzmz@126.com)
引用本文:    
赵雪平,郑海武,雷蕾,等. 本土酿酒酵母发酵梅鹿辄干红动态变化研究[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2020, 46(8): 105-110.
ZHAO Xueping,ZHENG Haiwu,LEI Lei,et al. Study on the dynamic change of Merlot red fermented by local Saccharomyces cerevisiae[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2020, 46(8): 105-110.
链接本文:  
http://sf1970.cnif.cn/CN/10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.022810  或          http://sf1970.cnif.cn/CN/Y2020/V46/I8/105
[1] International Organization of Vine and Wine(OIV 国际葡萄与葡萄酒组织). Statistical report on world vitiviniculture (2013 年全球葡萄栽培酿酒统计报告)[R].2013.http://www.oiv.int
[2] 于春涛,刘超.优选酿酒酵母生理特性的研究[J].食品科技,2017,42(2):14-17.
[3] 张侃. 冰葡萄酒酿酒酵母筛选与生产工艺优化[D].湘潭:湘潭大学,2012.
[4] 李蕊蕊,赵新节,孙玉霞.葡萄和葡萄酒中单宁的研究进展[J].食品与发酵工业,2016,42(4):260-265.
[5] 李蕊蕊. 葡萄酒酿造过程中单宁的变化规律[D].济南:齐鲁工业大学,2016.
[6] CARCIA-ALONSO M,MINIHANE A M,RIMBACH G,et al. Red wine anthocyanins are rapidly absorbed in humans and affect monocyte chemoattractant protein1levelsandantioxidant capacity of plasma[J].Nutritional Biochemistry,2009,20(7):15-18.
[7] 葛谦,杨春霞,牛艳,等.贺兰山东麓酿酒葡萄成熟过程中花色苷组分含量及其主成分分析[J].北方园艺,2017(8):14-19.
[8] 王维茜,邓洁红,魏一枝,等.葡萄花色苷的合成及稳定性研究进展[J].中国酿造,2014,33(5):10-14.
[9] 孙建霞,张燕,胡小松,等.花色苷的结构稳定性与降解机制研究进展[J].中国农业科学,2009,42(3):996-1 008.
[10] 唐莹莹.干红葡萄酒优良酵母菌株的筛选[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2018.
[11] 魏冬梅,张莉,梁艳英,等.电位间隔电位滴定法测定桑葚酒中的总酸[J].食品工业, 2015(10):268-269.
[12] 莫允焕,梁美琼,薛健长,等.自动电位滴定准确检测酱油还原糖含量的研究[J].中国调味品, 2019,44(4):168-171.
[13] 郭新光,马佩选,王晓红,等.GB/T 15038—2006葡萄酒、果酒通用分析方法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2016.
[14] 李爱华,孙玮璇,刘玥姗,等.赤霞珠葡萄β-葡萄糖苷酶活性与成熟指标间的关联分析[J].中国食品学报,2018, 18(4):209-216.
[15] 冯晓翎,曹诗瑜,徐晓瑜,等.11个鲜食葡萄品种总酚含量和抗氧化活性的评价[J].食品工业科技, 2019,40(6):68-75.
[16] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会. GB/T 15037—2006葡萄酒[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008.
[17] 王春燕.九峰山南坡栽培的两种酿酒葡萄及其葡萄酒品质研究[D],呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2018.
[18] 彭忠魁.葡萄酿酒的酸度控制[J].中外葡萄与葡萄酒,2003(6):46-47.
[19] 陈继峰,杨美容.葡萄酿造过程中调酸方法研究[J].酿酒,2005,32(1):35-39.
[20] 李瑞国,韩烨,周志江.葡萄酒苹果酸乳酸发酵研究进展[J].食品研究与开发,2010, 31(8):228-233.
[21] 隋明.葡萄酒的自然酿造的加工工艺研究[J].酿酒,2017,44(3):80-82.
[22] CHILDS B C, BOHLSCHEID J C,EDWARDS C G.Impact of available nitrogen and sugar concentration in mustson alcoholic fermentation and subsequent wine spoilage by Brettanomyces bruxellensis[J].Food Microbiology,2015,46:604-609.
[23] WIGHTMAN J D,PRICE S F,WATSON B T.Some effects of processing enzymes on anthocyanins and phenolics in pinotnoir and cabernet sauvignon wines[J]. American Joural of Enology Viticulture,1997,49:37-48.
[24] BUSSE-VALVERDE N, GO' MEZ-PLAZA E. Effect of different enological practices on skin and seed proanthocyanidins in three varietal wine[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,2010,58(21):11 333-11 339.
[25] ESCRIBANO-BAILON T,ALVAREZ-GARCA M. Color and stability of pigments derived from the acetaldehyde-mediated condensation between malvidin-3-O-glucoside and(+)-catechin[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,2001,49(3):1 213-1 217.
[26] 刘红艳,刘忠义,吴小艳,等.刺葡萄混酿对巨峰冰葡萄酒色泽与品质的影响[J].食品与发酵工业, 2019,45(15):164-169.
[27] 牛见明,张波,史肖,等.三种澄清方式对‘美乐’甜型桃红葡萄酒品质的影响[J].食品与发酵工业,2019,45(16):128-135.
[1] 耿雪营, 郭藏, 米生权, 张艳贞, 郭俊霞, 陈文. 单宁的血糖调节活性功能研究进展[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(7): 301-306.
[2] 戴亚峰, 王东慧, 卿鹏程, 吴浩, 纵瑞叶, 马少帅, 郭晓晖, 王增利. 霍山石斛花的热风干燥特性、品质及其护色应用研究[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(1): 193-197.
[3] 鲍诗晗, 李诗雯, 何玉英, 李佳琪, 王家琪, 兰天, 孙翔宇, 马婷婷. 烹饪方式对胡萝卜感官品质及营养素含量的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2020, 46(8): 149-156.
[4] 王琳, 赵裴, 刘洋, 刘杨洁, 韩富亮. 干化处理对霞多丽葡萄酒质量的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2020, 46(7): 83-88.
[5] 刘孝平, 刘路, 鲁炫池, 段昕梅, 张玲, 陈安均. 不同高压均质条件对罗望子浊汁稳定性及抗氧化活性的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2020, 46(4): 125-130.
[6] 刘彩婷, 周鸿翔. 不同发酵工艺对蓝莓果酒品质的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2020, 46(4): 172-179.
[7] 冯雨, 贺明阳, 王晶, 王日葵, 傅云梅, 洪敏. 贮藏温度对‘Tarocco’血橙花色苷积累及抗氧化活性的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2020, 46(4): 211-218.
[8] 史肖, 张波, 牛见明, 刘琦, 李宁宁, 陈欣然, 王凯丽, 马腾臻, 韩舜愈. 甘肃武威地区不同成熟期‘黑比诺’葡萄中的多酚测定[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2020, 46(4): 258-265.
[9] 蔡铭, 谢春芳, 王龑, 邹仙果, 杨开. 直接膜法与顺序膜法处理蓝莓汁的工艺比较[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2020, 46(20): 148-153.
[10] 李晓娇, 何健民, 韩德仙, 何春燕, 侯洪波. 粗梗稠李中花色苷的提取及其理化性质和稳定性研究[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2020, 46(15): 208-216.
[11] 黄小晶, 牛锐敏, 沈甜, 许泽华, 陈卫平. 不同整形方式对‘梅鹿辄’葡萄酒品质及CIELAB色空间特征的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2020, 46(14): 28-33.
[12] 李华, 马丹妮, 吴莹晗, 徐同成, 宗爱珍. 五种黑小麦的营养价值、抗氧化活性和淀粉消化性[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2020, 46(12): 80-86.
[13] 苏春雷, 王强, 黄洁君, 王启军. 新型余甘子酵素发酵工艺的优化[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2019, 45(9): 128-136.
[14] 喻最新, 王日葵, 王晶, 贺明阳, 袁小淞, 洪敏. 草酸处理对塔罗科血橙采后花色苷积累和糖酸含量的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2019, 45(8): 63-70.
[15] 陈欣然, 张波, 张欢, 解迎双, 王波, 周小平, 李敏, 韩舜愈. 红葡萄酒中花色苷的超高效液相色谱串联三重四级杆质谱检测方法建立[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2019, 45(7): 262-268.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《食品与发酵工业》编辑部
地址:北京朝阳区酒仙桥中路24号院6号楼111室
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn