乳固形物浓度对酸羊乳品质的影响

doi:10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.014952

Download: PDF(3539 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

Abstract In this study, goat milk was concentrated by vacuum concentration to study the effect of different concentration of goat milk (12%, 14%, 16% and 18%) on the quality of yogurt.The quality of goat milk yogurt was analyzed by determination of the coagulation characteristics, texture, flavor substances, and viable counts of lactic acid bacteria. Meanwhile, the microstructure of yogurt fermented with different concentration goat milk was observed by scanning electron microscope. The results showed that the fermentation time decreased with the increase of goat milk concentration, accompanied by the increment in acidity and water holding capacity; High concentrations of 2,3-butanedione and acetaldehyde were recorded in yogurt fermented with goat milk with solids of 16%. The viscosity of goat milk yogurt increased by 149.07% with the total solids of goat milk increased.Yogurt fermented with goat milk with solids of 16% displayed with goodtexture characteristics evaluated by the hardness, adhesiveness and gumminess and cohesiveness; The viable counts of lactic acid bacteria in the yogurt was 6.35×10⁹?cfu/mL which is the highest among different milk concentration.The most compact microstructure was measured in yogurt fermented with 16% goat milk with pore diameter of 2.85?μm. In conclusion, when the concentration of goat milk is 16%, goat milk yogurt showed the best quality measured by the flavor and texture characteristics, and viable counts of lactic acid bacteria.

Keywords goat milk yogurt ')" href="#"> concentrate total solids')" href="#"> total solids quality

Issue Date: 29 November 2017

URL:

http://sf1970.cnif.cn/EN/10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.014952 OR http://sf1970.cnif.cn/EN/Y2017/V43/I11/112

[1]	ZHAN Minxuan, WEI Qingjiang, LIN Xiong, LI Hongxiang, CHEN Jinyin, MA Qiaoli. Comprehensively analyze the effect of harvest ripening degree maturity on storage quality of Taoxi pomelo based on PCA[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2021, 47(9): 183-190.
[2]	YANG Yuning, CHEN Songshu, GAO Ergang, LI Yuanyuan, PAN Xiuzhen, LIU Hongchang, XIN Xuehui. *Fruit quality evaluation of Akebia* Decne based on principal component analysis**[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2021, 47(9): 191-200.
[3]	ZHENG Tao, SU Kexing, CONG Guizhi, CHEN Mingjie, SUN Bingyin, LIU Shuming. Quality analysis and comprehensive evaluation of the ‘Shushanggan' apricots and apricots[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2021, 47(9): 201-207.
[4]	FU Xudong, CHEN Heshen, ZHOU Caiqiong. Influence of different pretreatments on the flavor quality of garlic puree[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2021, 47(9): 231-239.
[5]	WANG Jie, YANG Juan, ZHONG Yingfu, WU Quan, XU Ze, YUAN Linying. Effect of baking treatments on aged black tea sensory quality and major biochemical components[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2021, 47(9): 240-244.
[6]	LIU Qi, MAO Yijie, CAI Ming. Exploration and integration of ideological and political elements from the perspective of “Major Ideological and Political”: Taking Food Quality and Safety as an example[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2021, 47(9): 343-348.
[7]	LIN Jiangtao, GUO Xiaodan, SU Dongmin. The effect of water absorption speed of wheat flour on dough characteristics and quality of steamed bread[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2021, 47(8): 40-45.
[8]	ZHENG Ouyang, SUN Qinxiu, LIU Shucheng, PAN Yanmo. The effect of spice extracts on the quality and biogenic amines of dry sausage[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2021, 47(8): 90-95.
[9]	XU Jiandong, ZHANG Shujuan, ZHENG Xiaonan, XUE Jianxin, SUN Haixia. Study on the detection of sweet potato freezing damage based on hyperspectral technology and variable selection method[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2021, 47(8): 197-203.
[10]	HUANG Zhanwen, WANG Ying, LI Mingjuan, YOU Xiangrong, ZHANG Yayuan, ZHOU Kui, WEI Ping, WEI Linyan. Effect of harvest maturity on the quality of ‘Longtan’ pearl plum[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2021, 47(7): 203-210.
[11]	LI Jiangkuo, GAO Jing, ZHANG Peng, HUO Junwei. Micro-environmental modified atmosphere on storage quality and antioxidant enzymes of blue honeysuckle fruits[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2021, 47(6): 152-159.
[12]	GUO Jing, CHEN Yulong, WANG Ping, WANG Ling, CHEN Feiping, LUO Zheng, YU Xin. The effect of different packaging methodology on Litchi quality during storage[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2021, 47(6): 169-175.
[13]	YAN Xinpeng, ZHANG Runguang, LIANG Qiqi, GUO Xiaocheng, YAO Gang, LI Yuying, ZHANG Youlin. Effects of low temperature combined with 1-MCP on postharvest quality of Tunisia soft-seed pomegranate[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2021, 47(5): 147-155.
[14]	LIU Rui, TAO Leren, WAN Kang. The effect of microwave treatment on the storage quality of ‘Xindaping' potato[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2021, 47(5): 168-173.
[15]	WANG Ming, WANG Xiao, , CHEN Jiajie, WU Yixuan, KE Runhui. SLE-GC-MS recognition method of characteristic chiral substances in Baijiu[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2021, 47(5): 180-185.