醋糟固态厌氧消化特性及微生物群落结构分析

doi:10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.030736

Abstract
References
Related Articles
Metrics

Download: PDF(3012 KB)

HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

Abstract As the generation of vinegar residue is increasing, its appropriate disposal is important. Anaerobic digestion is an important way to realize the resourcization and reduction of vinegar residue. A high solid-state continuous anaerobic digestion system was constructed for the vinegar residue treatment by using a full-mixed anaerobic reactor, the biogas generation performance, changes of intermediate metabolites and microbial community structure were investigated under different organic loading rate (OLR). The results indicated that the optimum anaerobic digestion performance was obtained when the organic loading rate reached 6.06 g/(L·d), with the biogas and methane yield of 423 and 226 mL/g, respectively. The relative abundances of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes were 45.6% and 53.1%, respectively. And the relative abundance distribution of 4 species of microorganism related to lignocellulose metabolism was evenly distributed, which was helpful to the formation of various metabolic pathways to promote substrate hydrolysis. The analysis of archaea showed that Methanobacterium and Methanosarcina were the dominant microorganism, hydrotrophic and mixed-trophic methanogenesis pathways had synergetic effect. When the system was stable, the mass concentrations of total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) and volatile fatty acids (VFAs) were maintained at about 2 and 9 g/L, respectively. High VFAs concentration could inhibit the activity of methanogens and reduce the methane generation rate. Therefore, the fully-mixed high-solid anaerobic digestion system could efficiently treat the vinegar residue. The diversity of microbial community was high, different hydrolysates could be all utilized by methane production pathways in the system.

Keywords vinegar residue anaerobic digestion organic loading rate biogas generation performance microbial community

Issue Date: 18 November 2022

URL:

http://sf1970.cnif.cn/EN/10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.030736 OR http://sf1970.cnif.cn/EN/Y2022/V48/I20/44

[1]	FENG J Y, ZHANG J Y, ZHANG J F, et al.Enhanced methane production of vinegar residue by response surface methodology (RSM)[J].AMB Express, 2017, 7(1):89.
[2]	李倩, 许之扬, 阮文权.黄孢原毛平革菌后处理深度提升醋糟产甲烷潜力[J].浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(5):904-911.LI Q, XU Z Y, RUAN W Q.Improvement of methane production potential by post-treatment of vinegar residue with Phanerochaete chrysosporium[J].Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2020, 32(5):904-911.
[3]	SHEN J, ZHAO C, LIU G Q, et al.Enhancing the performance on anaerobic digestion of vinegar residue by sodium hydroxide pretreatment[J].Waste and Biomass Valorization, 2017,8(4):1 119-1 126.
[4]	张梅娟, 钱朋智, 董力青, 等.农产品副产物半纤维素水解糖的分离纯化及单糖组成分析[J].食品与发酵工业, 2020, 46(20):72-77.ZHANG M J, QIAN P Z, DONG L Q, et al.Isolation, purification and monosaccharide composition analysis of hydrolysis sugar from hemicellulose of agricultural processing by-products[J].Food and Fermentation Industries, 2020, 46(20):72-77.
[5]	周冠男, 陈琳, 郑涛, 等.醋糟与猪粪、鸡粪不同配比的厌氧共消化产气潜力研究[J].农业环境科学学报, 2019, 38(6):1 357-1 364.ZHOU G N, CHEN L, ZHENG T, et al.Potential of anaerobic co-digestion of vinegar residue with different ratios of pig and chicken manure[J].Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2019, 38(6):1 357-1 364.
[6]	WANG L G, FENG J Y, CAI F F, et al.Anaerobic digestion and lignocellulosic compositions alteration of industrial vinegar residue after different pretreatments[J].Environmental Technology & Innovation, 2021, 24:109141.
[7]	师杨蕾, 蔡凡凡, 宁志芳, 等.碱性过氧化氢预处理对醋渣厌氧消化性能的影响[J].北京化工大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 47(1):1-7.SHI Y L, CAI F F, NING Z F, et al.Impact of alkaline hydrogen peroxide pretreatment on the anaerobic digestion of vinegar residues[J].Journal of Beijing University of Chemical Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 47(1):1-7.
[8]	国家环境保护总局. 水和废水监测分析方法[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2002.State Environmental Protection Administration of China.Water and Wastewater Monitoring and Analysis Methods [M].Beijing:China Environmental Science Press, 2002.
[9]	HU X L, DU H, REN C, et al.Illuminating anaerobic microbial community and cooccurrence patterns across a quality gradient in Chinese liquor fermentation pit muds[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2016, 82(8):2 506-2 515.
[10]	CAI Y F, WANG J G, ZHAO Y B, et al.A new perspective of using sequential extraction:To predict the deficiency of trace elements during anaerobic digestion[J].Water Research, 2018, 140:335-343.
[11]	李倩, 许之扬, 周云龙, 等.瘤胃微生物强化醋糟厌氧消化及其机制[J].环境科学研究, 2020, 33(10):2 370-2 377.LI Q, XU Z Y, ZHOU Y L, et al.Bio-augmented anaerobic digestion of vinegar residue by rumen microbes and its mechanisms[J].Research of Environmental Sciences, 2020, 33(10):2 370-2 377.
[12]	WANG Z J, XU F Q, LI Y B.Effects of total ammonia nitrogen concentration on solid-state anaerobic digestion of corn stover[J].Bioresource Technology, 2013, 144:281-287.
[13]	戴晓虎, 于春晓, 李宁, 等.有机负荷对醋糟厌氧消化系统启动的影响[J].环境科学, 2017, 38(3):1 144-1 150.DAI X H, YU C X, LI N, et al.Effects of organic loading rate on startup performance of anaerobic digestion with vinegar residues[J].Environmental Science, 2017, 38(3):1 144-1 150.
[14]	CHEN L, ZHOU G N, ZHENG T, et al.Effect of the organic loading rates increase on process stability and microbial community composition during the anaerobic digestion of fresh vinegar residue[J].Waste and Biomass Valorization, 2021, 12(10):5 505-5 516.
[15]	赵明星, 高常卉, 李娟, 等.餐厨垃圾厌氧干发酵制氢及其强化研究[J].食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(22):157-161.ZHAO M X, GAO C H, LI J, et al.Hydrogen generation from food waste by anaerobic dry fermentation and its enhancement technology[J].Food and Fermentation Industries, 2021, 47(22):157-161.
[16]	蒋滔, 韦秀丽, 肖璐, 等.玉米秸秆固态和液态厌氧发酵产气性能与微生物种类比较研究[J].农业工程学报, 2020, 36(3):227-235.JIANG T, WEI X L, XIAO L, et al.Comparison of biogas production and microbial species of corn straw in solid-state anaerobic digestion (SS-AD) and liquid anaerobic digestion (L-AD)[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(3):227-235.
[17]	李丹妮, 高文萱, 张克强, 等.分层接种对猪粪厌氧干发酵产气性能及微生物群落结构的影响[J].农业工程学报, 2021, 37(1):251-258.LI D N, GAO W X, ZHANG K Q, et al.Influences of layer inoculation on biogas production and microbial community in solid-state anaerobic fermentation of pig manure[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2021, 37(1):251-258.
[18]	WANG Y Y, LI G X, CHI M H, et al.Effects of co-digestion of cucumber residues to corn stover and pig manure ratio on methane production in solid state anaerobic digestion[J].Bioresource Technology, 2018, 250:328-336.
[19]	HAMEED S A, RIFFAT R, LI B Q, et al.Microbial population dynamics in temperature-phased anaerobic digestion of municipal wastewater sludge[J].Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 2019, 94(6):1 816-1 831.
[20]	TEIXEIRA F L, SILVA D N D S, PAUER H, et al.The role of BmoR, a MarR family regulator, in the survival of Bacteroides fragilis during oxidative stress[J].International Journal of Medical Microbiology, 2013, 303(8):443-448.
[21]	HUANG Y, HOU X L, LIU S T, et al.Correspondence analysis of bio-refractory compounds degradation and microbiological community distribution in anaerobic filter for coking wastewater treatment[J].Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 304:864-872.
[22]	ZHOU Y L, XU Z Y, ZHAO M X, et al.Construction and evaluation of efficient solid-state anaerobic digestion system via vinegar residue[J].International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 2018, 133:142-150.
[23]	ZHOU J J, HOLMES D E, TANG H Y, et al.Correlation of key physiological properties of methanosarcina isolates with environment of origin[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2021, 87(13):e0073121.
[24]	ZHI S L, LI Q, YANG F X, et al.How methane yield, crucial parameters and microbial communities respond to the stimulating effect of antibiotics during high solid anaerobic digestion[J].Bioresource Technology, 2019, 283:286-296.
[25]	ZHANG W L, WANG X, XING W L, et al.Links between synergistic effects and microbial community characteristics of anaerobic co-digestion of food waste, cattle manure and corn straw[J].Bioresource Technology, 2021, 329:124919.

[1]	LIN Yukuan, WU Shengwen, YOU Yong, LIAO Chang, LIN Pei, DING Zhongtao, WU Xiaoyu. Effects of different Daqu culture techniques on microbial community structure and physicochemical indices in Texiang Daqu[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2022, 48(6): 188-194.
[2]	ZHANG Chengming, LI Yanfei, DONG Baocheng, LIU Xiaoling, BAI Yaobo, CAO Dan, LIU Jie, LI Shizhong. Effect of alkali treatment on the microbial community structure in solid-state anaerobic digestion of corn straw[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2022, 48(4): 69-74.
[3]	YANG Xi. Effects of salt concentration on prokaryotic microbial diversity and physicochemical properties during broad bean paste fermentation[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2022, 48(4): 200-206.
[4]	BI Tianran, HUANG Jun, ZHANG Suyi, CHEN Xiaoru, CHEN Suqi, MU Yu, CAI Xiaobo, QIU Chuanfeng, ZHOU Rongqing. Difference of the microbial community and metabolite in pit mud with different age and position[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2022, 48(2): 231-237.
[5]	LIU Haipo, KAN Tao, LIU Caixia. Analysis of non-volatile flavor substances and microbial community structure during alcohol fermentation in vinegar[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2022, 48(19): 65-69.
[6]	LIU Yuxuan, REN Guanjie, LU Jiaxuan, CHEN Yuling, ZANG Mingyang, TANG Xiaoling, YANG Liuqing, LI Jianlong, LIU Shuliang, HE Li, CHEN Shujuan, LI Qin, YANG Yong. Microbial community structure and biogenic amine content in commercial Sichuan bacon[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2022, 48(16): 163-168.
[7]	XUE Bei, YU Jiajun, YANG Fan, LU Haoze, SHI Jun, ZHANG Xiaomeng, MA Wenrui, ZHANG Jingjing, CHEN Lu, WANG Yanling, XUE Jie. Microbial diversity of wine grapes from Ningxia wine-growing areas using high-throughput sequencing[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2022, 48(14): 75-83.
[8]	SUN Zhe, HUANG Zhishan, LIU Youqiang, CAO Rongbing, HUANG Guidong, ZHONG Xianfeng. Effects of herbal leaves on bacterial diversity of Chi-flavor Baijiu Jiuqu[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2022, 48(13): 63-69.
[9]	LU Mei, SONG Congcong, SHI Guizhen, YANG Qing, LI Deqing, DOU Yining. Correlation analysis of prokaryotic microbial community and physicochemical factors during the acetic acid fermentation of Chishui sun-dried vinegar[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2022, 48(10): 219-225.
[10]	YANG Xu, MENG Xiangyu, SONG Lili, ZHANG Zhiping, MA Geli, WEI Tao. Analysis of biogas production capacity of dry corn stover silage with wastes by single-phase anaerobic co-digestion[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2022, 48(1): 188-194.
[11]	HUANG Heqiang, CHE Fuhong, CHEN Zhanxiu, QI Wanjun, KONG Lingwu, LI Shanwen, FENG Shengbao. Determination of microbial diversity and core microbiota in highland barley Daqu[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2021, 47(23): 305-310.
[12]	LIU Xiyue, ZHU Qi, YANG Fan, ZHANG Juan, ZHANG Qiaoling, LI Jianghua, WANG Li. Multi-omics reveal the formation of flavor compounds in sauce-flavor Daqu[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2021, 47(22): 35-41.
[13]	CHEN Kedan, WU Xiaojiang, CHEN Yanru, LIU Ting, WAN Yin, LIU Chengmei, WU Choufei, FU Guiming. Effect of peak temperature on the succession of physicochemical index andmicrobial community of Special-flavor Daqu[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2020, 46(5): 52-58.
[14]	SONG Sijia, HUANG Ziyu, LIN Yingying, GUO Huiyuan. Microbial community diversity in egg curds with different shelf life revealed by Illumina MiSeq sequencing[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2020, 46(24): 24-30.
[15]	LI Wei, LUO Shenbin, QIU Zerui, LAI Denglei, WANG Hongwei, SUO Huayi. Microbial community structure and dynamic succession in traditional fermentation ofMucor-type Yongchuan Douchi[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2020, 46(23): 60-67.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed