Characterization of Lactobacillus co-aggregation with Helicobacter pylori

  • LI Lulu ,
  • WANG Junhao ,
  • YE Yaming ,
  • ZHAO Xuechao ,
  • XIANG Weibing ,
  • ZHU Pengfei ,
  • ZHAI Qixiao
Expand
  • 1(School of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China)
    2(Juneyao Grand Healthy Drinks Co.Ltd., Yichang 443100, China)

Received date: 2022-03-01

  Revised date: 2022-03-21

  Online published: 2022-12-02

Abstract

As a recognized pathogen, Helicobacter pylori can cause chronic gastritis, peptic ulcers, and gastric cancer. More than 50% of the world’s population is infected with this stomach bacterium. Studies have shown that disease severity in infected patients is related to the amount of H. pylori in the body. Currently, the conventional therapeutic option is triple therapy or bismuth-containing quadruple therapy, as recommended by the Maastriacht IV/Florence Consensus Report, which has a 10-day treatment eradication rate of over 90%. In addition to antibiotic therapy, there are many dietary treatments and Lactobacillus bacteria supplement therapy for H. pylori infection. Co-aggregation of Lactobacillus bacteria and pathogenic bacteria is described as the process by which genetically distinct bacteria are linked to each other by specific molecules. In disease states, specific co-aggregation as a means of restoring homeostasis has been widely discussed. Many studies have reported that Lactobacillus can prevent the development of pathogenic biofilms by co-aggregating pathogenic bacteria in the mouth, vagina, and gastrointestinal tract, thus alleviating the development of disease. To date, some studies have shown that reducing the load of H. pylori in the stomach via selective bacterial-bacterial cell interaction is a neoteric and efficient method against H. pylori infection. In this study, an in vitro screening model was constructed to evaluate the co-aggregation of 56 Lactobacillus strains with H. pylori, and the structural composition of the aggregates was observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM). These Lactobacillus strains, collected by the Biotechnology Center, School of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, came from wild-type strains of diverse origins, such as food sources or the gut flora of long-lived people. Then the effects of the time, temperature, pH, incubation speed, ultrasonic and surface hydrophobicity on the aggregation were further investigated. Due to the low pH of the human stomach and the peristalsis associated with digestion, these factors were considered in this study to evaluate Lactobacillus with the ability to co-aggregate H. pylori. Finally, a comparative genomics approach was used to analyze the differences of functional genes in strains with different aggregating abilities. The results showed that the co-aggregation ability of Lactobacillus and H. pylori was different between strains. Among them, Lactobacillus kitasatonis Guxi82GMM and Lactobacillus reuteri 984 had better co-aggregation effect, and their co-aggregation rate could reach 42%-59% within 10 min. There was a significant correlation between the co-aggregation rate and pH value and surface hydrophobicity of strain, but was not related to temperature, incubation speed and ultrasonic treatment. In addition, there were significant differences in amino acid expression levels among strains with different co-aggregative abilities, suggesting that the material basis of the co-aggregation of Lactobacillus and H. pylori might be surface protein on Lactobacillus. Therefore, the co-aggregation of Lactobacillus and H. pylori can occur rapidly and stably in the human stomach. The selected Lactobacillus can combine to the dissociative H. pylori surface through some specific surface components (such as surface proteins), and form larger aggregates to promote the elimination of pathogenic bacteria from the body. The co-aggregation ability of Lactobacillus and H. pylori is an effective way for targeted screening probiotics to alleviate H. pylori infection.

Cite this article

LI Lulu , WANG Junhao , YE Yaming , ZHAO Xuechao , XIANG Weibing , ZHU Pengfei , ZHAI Qixiao . Characterization of Lactobacillus co-aggregation with Helicobacter pylori[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2022 , 48(21) : 1 -8 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.031353

References

[1] DO A D, CHANG C C, SU C H, et al.Lactobacillus rhamnosus JB3 inhibits Helicobacter pylori infection through multiple molecular actions[J].Helicobacter, 2021, 26(3):e12806.
[2] MALFERTHEINER P, MEGRAUD F, O’MORAIN C, et al.Current concepts in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection:The Maastricht III Consensus Report[J].Biomedicines, 2007, 56(6):772-781.
[3] MALFERTHEINER P, MEGRAUD F, O’MORAIN C A, et al.Management of Helicobacter pylori infection-the Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Report[J].Gut, 2017, 66(1):6-30.
[4] RIBEIRO A R S, DINIZ P B F, ESTEVAM C S, et al.Gastroprotective activity of the ethanol extract from the inner bark of Caesalpinia pyramidalis in rats[J].Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 2013, 147(2):383-388.
[5] SREEJA P S, ARUNACHALAM K, SAIKUMAR S, et al.Gastroprotective effect and mode of action of methanol extract of Sphenodesme involucrata var.paniculata (C.B.Clarke) Munir (Lamiaceae) leaves on experimental gastric ulcer models[J].Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 2018, 97:1 109-1 118.
[6] CHEN M J, CHEN C C, HUANG Y C, et al.The efficacy of Lactobacillus acidophilus and rhamnosus in the reduction of bacterial load of Helicobacter pylori and modification of gut microbiota:A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial[J].Helicobacter, 2021, 26(6):e12857.
[7] SCHELLENBERG J, SMORAGIEWICZ W, KARSKAWYSOCKI B.A rapid method combining immunofluorescence and flow cytometry for improved understanding of competitive interactions between lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and methicillin-resistant S.aureus (MRSA) in mixed culture[J].Journal of Microbiological Methods, 2006, 65(1):1-9.
[8] TANZER J M, THOMPSON A, LANG C, et al.Caries inhibition by and safety of Lactobacillus paracasei DSMZ16671[J].Journal of Dental Research, 2010, 89(9):921-926.
[9] LANG C, BÖTTNER M, HOLZ C, et al.Specific Lactobacillus/mutans Streptococcus co-aggregation[J].Journal of Dental Research, 2010, 89(2):175-179.
[10] EKMEKCI H, ASLIM B, OZTURK S.Characterization of vaginal lactobacilli coaggregation ability with Escherichia coli[J].Microbiology and Immunology, 2009, 53(2):59-65.
[11] HOLZ C, BUSJAHN A, MEHLING H, et al.Significant reduction in Helicobacter pylori load in humans with non-viable Lactobacillus reuteri DSM17648:A pilot study[J].Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins, 2015, 7(2):91-100.
[12] KOS B, ŠUŠKOVIĆAĆ J, VUKOVIĆAĆ S, et al.Adhesion and aggregation ability of probiotic strain Lactobacillus acidophilus M92[J].Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2003, 94(6):981-987.
[13] NIKOLIC M, JOVCIC B, KOJIC M, et al.Surface properties of Lactobacillus and Leuconostoc isolates from homemade cheeses showing auto-aggregation ability[J].European Food Research and Technology, 2010, 231(6):925-931.
[14] YUNGAREVA T, URSHEV Z.The aggregation-promoting factor in Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp.bulgaricus:Confirmation of the presence and expression of the apf gene and in silico analysis of the corresponding protein[J].World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2018, 34(7):97.
[15] BEAUSSART A, EL-KIRAT-CHATEL S, SULLAN R M A, et al.Quantifying the forces guiding microbial cell adhesion using single-cell force spectroscopy[J].Nature Protocols, 2014, 9(5):1 049-1 055.
[16] SCHACHTSIEK M, HAMMES W P, HERTEL C.Characterization of Lactobacillus coryniformis DSM 20001T surface protein CPF Mediating coaggregation with and aggregation among pathogens[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2004, 70(12):7 078-7 085.
[17] DUNNE C, DOLAN B, CLYNE M.Factors that mediate colonization of the human stomach by Helicobacter pylori[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2014, 20(19):5610.
[18] ARENAS J, NIJLAND R, RODRIGUEZ F J, et al.Involvement of three meningococcal surface-exposed proteins, the heparin-binding protein NhbA, the α-peptide of IgA protease and the autotransporter protease NalP, in initiation of biofilm formation[J].Molecular Microbiology, 2013, 87(2):254-268.
[19] KOLODZIEJEK A M, SINCLAIR D J, SEO K S, et al.Phenotypic characterization of OmpX, an Ail homologue of Yersinia pestis KIM[J].Microbiology, 2007, 153(9):2 941-2 951.
[20] KURODA M, ITO R, TANAKA Y, et al.Staphylococcus aureus surface protein SasG contributes to intercellular autoaggregation of Staphylococcus aureus[J].Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications, 2008, 377(4):1 102-1 106.
[21] JACOBS A, CHENIA H Y.Biofilm formation and adherence characteristics of an Elizabethkingia meningoseptica isolate from Oreochromis mossambicus[J].Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, 2011, 10:16.
[22] ROSEN G, SELA M N.Coaggregation of Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum PK 1594 is mediated by capsular polysaccharide and lipopolysaccharide[J].FEMS Microbiology Letters, 2006, 256(2):304-310.
[23] OZDOGAN D K, AKCELIK N, ASLIM B, et al.Probiotic and antioxidative properties of L.lactis LL27 isolated from milk[J].Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, 2012, 26(1):2 750-2 758.
[24] THELLIN O, ZORZI W, ZORZI D, et al.Lysozyme as a cotreatment during antibiotics use against vaginal infections:An in vitro study on Gardnerella vaginalis biofilm models[J].International Microbiology Official Journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology, 2016, 19(2):101-107.
[25] BASCHONG W, SUETTERLIN R, LAENG R H.Control of autofluorescence of archival formaldehyde-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue in confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM)[J].The Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry, 2001, 49(12):1 565-1 572.
[26] TATUSOV R L, GALPERIN M Y, NATALE D A, et al.The COG database:A tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution[J].Nucleic Acids Research, 2000, 28(1):33-36.
[27] KATAKURA Y, SANO R, HASHIMOTO T, et al.Lactic acid bacteria display on the cell surface cytosolic proteins that recognize yeast mannan[J].Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2010, 86(1):319-326.
[28] COLLADO M C, MERILUOTO J, SALMINEN S.Adhesion and aggregation properties of probiotic and pathogen strains[J].European Food Research & Technology, 2008, 226(5):1 065-1 073.
[29] TONOIKE R, MOMOSE H.Studies on the aggregation of yeasts caused by lactobacilli[J].Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 1969, 35:D1.
[30] VINDEROLA C G, MEDICI M, PERDIGÓN G.Relationship between interaction sites in the gut, hydrophobicity, mucosal immunomodulating capacities and cell wall protein profiles in indigenous and exogenous bacteria[J].Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2004, 96(2):230-243.
[31] WAĆAS'G1ĞKO A, POLAK-BERECKA M, PADUCH R, et al.The effect of moonlighting proteins on the adhesion and aggregation ability of Lactobacillus helveticus[J].Anaerobe, 2014, 30:161-168.
[32] LIU Y, XIAO W, YU L, et al.Evidence from comparative genomic analyses indicating that Lactobacillus-mediated irritable bowel syndrome alleviation is mediated by conjugated linoleic acid synthesis[J].Food & Function, 2021, 12(3):1 121-1 134.
[33] CHEN Y, SONG J M, SUI S F, et al.DnaK and DnaJ facilitated the folding process and reduced inclusion body formation of magnesium transporter CorA overexpressed in Escherichia coli[J].Protein Expression and Purification, 2003, 32(2):221-231.
Outlines

/