Sensitivity improvement of indirect competitive ELISA for the detection of aflatoxin M1 based on nanobody multimerization assay

  • LIU Yingda ,
  • LIU Haiyuan ,
  • SU Na ,
  • LI Qinghui ,
  • LIU Jia ,
  • TUYATSETSEG Jambel ,
  • YI Li ,
  • JI Rimutu
Expand
  • 1(Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agriculture University, Hohhot 010018, China)
    2(China-Mongolia Joint laboratory for Biomacromolecule Research, Ulaanbaatar 016199, Mongolia)
    3(Inner Mongolia China-Kazakhstan Camel Research Institute, Alxa 737300, China)

Received date: 2023-12-29

  Revised date: 2024-03-18

  Online published: 2024-10-14

Abstract

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has the advantages of high throughput, simple operation and obvious results, which makes it a more ideal immunoassay technique for detecting fungal contaminants in food.However, traditional ELISA methods have major limitations, such as the use of antibodies susceptible to temperature, easy denaturation, short storage period, susceptible to false positives or false negatives due to the interference of other substances in the detection environment, etc.In this experiment, we used the anti-AFM1 nanobody (Nb-M4) obtained in the laboratory in the previous stage to fuse with the C-terminal fragment of C4-binding protein (C4 bpα) to form a self-assembled heptameric fusion protein (Nb-M4-C4 bpα), and based on this heptamer, we developed an indirect competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (icELISA) applied to AFM1 in dairy products.Under the optimal experimental parameters, the IC50 of AFM1 was 0.038 ng/mL and the LOD was 0.009 ng/mL, which were 8.63-fold and 5.56-fold higher than those of monomeric Nb-M4.Negligible cross-reactivity with AFM1 analogs and other common mycotoxins and good recoveries and reproducibility in spiked milk samples were obtained.In addition, the developed method was applied to the analysis of AFM1 in real samples, and the results correlated well with those of HPLC (R2=0.995).This work shows that self-assembled heptamerized nanobodies are an effective strategy for improved affinity and signal amplification, which could be used in the future for sensitive, selective and rapid detection of mycotoxins and other small molecule contaminants in food.

Cite this article

LIU Yingda , LIU Haiyuan , SU Na , LI Qinghui , LIU Jia , TUYATSETSEG Jambel , YI Li , JI Rimutu . Sensitivity improvement of indirect competitive ELISA for the detection of aflatoxin M1 based on nanobody multimerization assay[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2024 , 50(18) : 291 -299 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.038416

References

[1] VAZ A, CABRAL SILVA A C, RODRIGUES P, et al. Detection methods for aflatoxin M1 in dairy products[J]. Microorganisms, 2020, 8(2):246.
[2] HUANG G X, MA J, LI J S, et al. Study on the interaction between aflatoxin M1 and DNA and its application in the removal of aflatoxin M1[J]. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2022, 355:118938.
[3] FAN J, YUAN X Y, LI W X, et al. Rapid and ultrasensitive method for determination of aflatoxin M1 in milk[J]. Food and Agricultural Immunology, 2020, 31(1):849-858.
[4] MINCU M, STEFAN-VAN STADEN R I, VAN STADEN J F. Molecular recognition of aflatoxin M1 in water and milk samples[J]. Electroanalysis, 2019, 31(6):1034-1039.
[5] GIROLAMI F, BARBAROSSA A, BADINO P, et al. Effects of turmeric powder on aflatoxin M1 and aflatoxicol excretion in milk from dairy cows exposed to aflatoxin B1 at the EU maximum tolerable levels[J]. Toxins, 2022, 14(7):430.
[6] SABATELLI S, GAMBI L, BAIGUERA C, et al. Assessment of aflatoxin M1 enrichment factor in cheese produced with naturally contaminated milk[J]. Italian Journal of Food Safety, 2023, 12(2):11123.
[7] MOLLAKHALILI-MEYBODI N, NEMATOLLAHI A. The occurrence of aflatoxin M1 in milk samples of Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2023, 195(6):786.
[8] BUZÁS H, SZABÓ-SÁRVÁRI L C, SZABÓ K, et al. Aflatoxin M1 detection in raw milk and drinking milk in Hungary by ELISA-Aone-year survey[J]. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 2023, 121:105368.
[9] ARAN G C, BAYRAÇ C. Simultaneous dual-sensing platform based on aptamer-functionalized DNA hydrogels for visual and fluorescence detection of chloramphenicol and aflatoxin M1[J]. Bioconjugate Chemistry, 2023, 34(5):922-933.
[10] MASSAHI T, KIANI A, SHARAFI K, et al. A systematic literature review for aflatoxin M1 of various milk types in Iran: Human health risk assessment, uncertainty, and sensitivity analysis[J]. Food Control, 2023, 150:109733.
[11] AFSAH-HEJRI L, JINAP S, HAJEB P, et al. A review on mycotoxins in food and feed: Malaysia case study[J]. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 2013, 12(6):629-651.
[12] GIACOMETTI F, TOMASELLO F, SAVINI F, et al. Impact of the implementation of tailored management strategies to reduce the occurrence of aflatoxin M1 in milk-supply chain in Italy[J]. Food Control, 2023, 149:109720.
[13] CHHAYA R S, MEMBRÉ J M, NAG R, et al. Farm-to-fork risk assessment of aflatoxin M1 in milk under climate change scenarios-A comparative study of France and Ireland[J]. Food Control, 2023, 149:109713.
[14] ZHOU C Y, PAN S X, LIU P Y, et al. Polystyrene microsphere-mediated optical sensing strategy for ultrasensitive determination of aflatoxin M1 in milk[J]. Talanta, 2023, 258:124357
[15] GU G Y, BOLTEN S, MOWERY J, et al. Susceptibility of foodborne pathogens to sanitizers in produce rinse water and potential induction of viable but non-culturable state[J]. Food Control, 2020, 112:107138.
[16] SHI Y, XU W, NI D W, et al. Identification and application of a novel deoxynivalenol-degrading enzyme from Youhaiella tibetensis[J]. Food Chemistry, 2024, 435:137609.
[17] CORASSIN C H, BOROWSKY A, ALI S, et al. Occurrence of aflatoxin M1 in milk and dairy products traded in São Paulo, Brazil: An update[J]. Dairy, 2022, 3(4):842-848.
[18] PAVLEK Z, BOSNIR J, KUHARIC Z, et al. The influence of binding of selected mycotoxin deactivators and aflatoxin M1 on the content of selected micronutrients in milk[J]. Processes, 2022, 10(11):2431.
[19] LEBEER S, VERHOEVEN T L A, PEREA VÉLEZ M, et al. Impact of environmental and genetic factors on biofilm formation by the probiotic strain Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2007, 73(21):6768-6775.
[20] ASHRAF W, REHMAN A, AHMAD M U D, et al. Assessment of aflatoxin M1 exposure and associated determinants in children from Lahore, Pakistan[J]. Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A, 2023, 40(1):121-133.
[21] RAMALINGAM S, ELSAYED A, SINGH A. An Aflatoxin-M1 biochip using graphene quantum dot-gold hybrid nanoparticles[J]. Food Chemistry, 2023, 403:134302.
[22] 刘颖达,刘海媛,苏娜等.免疫分析技术在检测真菌毒素中的研究进展[J].中国食品卫生杂志,2023(11):35.
LIU Y D,LIU H Y,SU N, et al. Research progress of immunoassay technology in the detection of mycotoxins[J]Chinese Journal of Food Hygiene,2023(11):35.
[23] 曹冬梅. 抗黄曲霉毒素B1纳米抗体的免疫学性能分析及其体外定点改造[D]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2016.
CAO D M. Immunological performance analysis and site-directed modification of anti-aflatoxin B1 nanoantibody in vitro[D].Nanchang: Nanchang University, 2016.
[24] 苏娜, 明亮, 何静, 等. 免疫检测技术在食源性致病菌中的应用研究进展[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2024, 50(12):343-352.
SU N, MING L, HE J, et al. Research progress on application of immunodetection technology in food-borne pathogens[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2024, 50(12):343-352.
[25] KHAN F, JAVAID A, KIM Y M. Functional diversity of quorum sensing receptors in pathogenic bacteria: Interspecies, intraspecies and interKingdom level[J]. Current Drug Targets, 2019, 20(6):655-667.
Outlines

/