Effects of natural compound preservatives on storage quality of ma bamboo shoots

  • ZHENG Jiong ,
  • TANG Ting ,
  • ZENG Rui-qi ,
  • ZHANG Fu-sheng
Expand
  • 1 (College of Food Science, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China)
    2(National Demonstration Center for Experimental Food Science and Engineering Education (Southwest University), Chongqing 400715, China)

Received date: 2017-12-01

  Online published: 2018-12-25

Abstract

In this paper, 8 kinds of natural preservatives were screened and best compound preservative on bamboo shoots was selected. Then the bamboo shoots were treated with the natural compound preservative and compared with the control (untreated bamboo). The results showed: +0.05% natamycin +1.5% tea polyphenols could be used as an effective natural compound preservative, compared with the control group, the storage period of treated bamboo shoots extended to 36 d. Respiration intensity of bamboo shoots with compound preservatives treated group showed a downward trend during storage and was lower than that of the experimental control group of 1.5% chitosan. During the storage, compared with the control group, PAL and POD activities were low in both 1.5% chitosan and compounded preservatives groups, and both showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing. The peak time of enzyme activity was delayed to 27 d. Bamboo shoots during storage lignin content was the lowest and least increased during the storage time for natural compound preservative treatment group. During the late storage period, the bamboo hardness decreased, and texture soften, but still had a good sensory quality. At the same time, natural compound preservative could delay the degradation of Vc and retained the nutritional content of bamboo shoots to its maximum extent.

Cite this article

ZHENG Jiong , TANG Ting , ZENG Rui-qi , ZHANG Fu-sheng . Effects of natural compound preservatives on storage quality of ma bamboo shoots[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2018 , 44(11) : 229 -236 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.016400

References

[1] 赵丹. 大叶麻竹笋采后品质劣化机理的研究[D]. 重庆:西南大学, 2007.
[2] 余学军,裘贤龙.不同储藏条件对绿竹笋酶活性与纤维化的影响[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2011, 28(3): 380-385.
[3] SANDHYA. Modified atmosphere packaging of fresh produce: current status and future needs [J]. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 2010, 43(3): 381-392.
[4] 王洪霞,张敏. 新鲜竹笋气调保鲜技术的研究[J]. 包装工程, 2013, 34(17): 20-25.
[5] 陈惠云,孙志栋,吴峰华,等. 乙烯及1-MCP处理对毛竹春笋木质化进程的影响[J]. 宁波农业科技, 2013(3):11-13.
[6] YANG Hui-qing, ZHOU Cun-shan, WU Feng-hua, et al. Effect of nitric oxide on browning and lignification of peeled bamboo shoots[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2010, 57(1): 72-76.
[7] 沈玫,王琪,赵宇瑛,等. 外源草酸对冷藏绿竹笋的保鲜效果及其生理基础[J]. 园艺学报, 2013, 40(2): 355-362.
[8] 汪开拓,唐利,李静,等. 茉莉酸甲酯处理对冷藏雷竹笋内源激素水平及木质素合成相关酶活性的影响[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2012, 9(2): 48-54.
[9] 任邦来,靳文生. 赤霉素对番茄保鲜效果的影响[J]. 中国食物与营养, 2012, 18(4):22-25.
[10] 马龙传,张红印,姜松,等.水杨酸用于水果采后贮藏保鲜的研究进展[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2009, 30(7):141-143,165.
[11] SALA J M, LAFUENTE M T. Antioxidant enzymes activities and rindstaining in ‘Navelina’ oranges as affected by storage relative humidity and ethylene conditioning[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2004, 37(3): 277-285.
[12] 王杉,揭琴丰,邱伟华.食品防腐剂的应用现状、问题及对策[J]. 中国食品添加剂, 2011(6): 163-166.
[13] 杨霞,王大平. 天然生物保鲜剂Nisin不同处理对鲜切莲藕的保鲜效果[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2012, 40(12):178-180.
[14] ALI A, MEHDI M, SENTHIL R, et al. Gum arabic as a novel edible coating for enhancing shelf-life and improving postharvest quality of tomato (Solanumlycopersicum L.)fruit[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2010, 58(1): 42-47.
[15] MENG Xiang-hong, LI Bo-qiang, LIU Jia, et al. Physiological responses and quality attributes of table grape fruit to chitosan preharvest spray and postharvest coating during storage[J]. Food Chemistry, 2008, 106(2): 501-508.
[16] 杨明月.双孢蘑菇天然保鲜剂筛选的试验研究[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学, 2007.
[17] 王继芝. 迁西板栗天然复合保鲜剂保鲜技术研究[J]. 河北工业科技, 2014, 31(6):494-497.
[18] 陈惠云. 竹笋绿色保鲜贮藏研究与应用[D]. 杭州:浙江农林大学, 2015.
[19] 张彩珍.采后处理对春笋贮藏品质的影响研究[D]. 福州:福建农林大学, 2008.
[20] 杨月.电磁辐照技术对竹笋活体保鲜的研究[D]. 重庆:西南大学, 2011.
[21] 杨乐,王洪新.不同可食性涂膜对方竹笋保鲜效果的影响[J]. 食品工业科技,2011, 32(2): 305-308.
[22] 申德省.鲜切雷竹笋木质化和褐变的控制研究[D]. 杭州:浙江工商大学, 2015.
[23] 蒋益虹,熊义勤. 竹笋MA冷藏保鲜技术的研究[J]. 中国食品学报, 2008, 8(1):95-98.
[24] WU Fu-wang, ZHANG Dan-dan, ZHANG Hai-yan, et al. Physiological and biochemical response of harvested plum fruit to oxalic acid during ripening or shelf-life [J]. Food Research International,2011,44(5):1 299-1 305.
[25] YINGSANGA P, SRILAONG V, KANLAYANARAT S, et al. Relationship between browning and related enzymes (PAL, PPO and POD) in rambutan fruit (Nepheliumlappaceum Linn.) cvs. Rongrien and See-Chompoo[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2008, 50(2/3): 164-168.
[26] VALENTINESM C, VILAPLANA R, TORRES R, et al.Specific roles of enzymatic browning and lignification in apple disease resistance[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2005, 36(3): 227-234.
[27] YANG Shao-lan, SUN Chong-de, WANG Ping, et al. Expression of expansin genes during postharvest lignification and softening of ‘Luoyangqing’ and ‘Baisha’ loquat fruit under different storage conditions[J].Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2008, 49(1): 46-53.
[28] YANG Wen-jian, DU Heng-jun, ALFRED M M, et al. Hot air drying process promotes lignification of Lentinus edodes[J]. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 2017, 84: 726-732.
[29] 罗晓莉.不同处理对竹笋采后木质化及品质的影响[D]. 重庆:西南大学, 2007.
Outlines

/