Effects of different preservation treatments on storage quality and preservation effect of Muscat Hamburg grapes

  • JI Haipeng ,
  • LI Chao ,
  • GAO Congcong ,
  • DONG Chenghu ,
  • CHEN Cunkun ,
  • ZHU Zhiqiang ,
  • GUAN Junfeng ,
  • ZHANG Na ,
  • YU Jinze
Expand
  • 1(National Engineering Technology Research Center for Preservation of Agricultural Products, Key Laboratory of Storage of Agricultural Products,Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Postharvest Physiology and Storage of Agricultural Products,Tianjin 300384,China)
    2(China Household Appliance Research Institute, Beijng 100000, China)
    3(Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650000, China)
    4(Institute of Genetics and Physiology, Hebei Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050000, China)

Received date: 2019-09-17

  Online published: 2020-02-02

Abstract

This paper aimed to explore the influence of new green preservation methods on the quality of Muscat Hamburg grapes for the optimization of the best new safe preservation technology of Muscat Hamburg grapes. In this experiment, Muscat Hamburg grapes were stored at (-0.5±0.5) ℃. CT chemical preservative agent (provided by the national agricultural product preservation engineering technology research center) and other new preservation methods (1-MCP, O3, ClO2) were adopted. The results showed that CT+O3 increased with the storage time compared with control group. The preservation effect of CT+ O3, CT+ClO2 and CT+ 1-MCP was better than that of CT. In addition, the respiratory intensity of Muscat Hamburg grapes treated with CT+ClO2 was significantly weaker than the other three, and the indexes such as hardness, tensile strength could be well maintained within a certain range. And the declining trend of hardness, soluble solids and titratable acid content was slowed down. Besides, the activity of PPO and POD and APX were decreased. In conclusion, CT+ClO2 treatment was the best condition for the preservation of Muscat Hamburg grapes.

Cite this article

JI Haipeng , LI Chao , GAO Congcong , DONG Chenghu , CHEN Cunkun , ZHU Zhiqiang , GUAN Junfeng , ZHANG Na , YU Jinze . Effects of different preservation treatments on storage quality and preservation effect of Muscat Hamburg grapes[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2020 , 46(6) : 127 -132 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.022295

References

[1] 杨立鹏, 马巧玲, 李金红. 玫瑰香葡萄贮藏保鲜技术[J]. 保鲜与加工, 2001, 1(6):29.
[2] 袁军伟, 赵胜建, 魏建梅, 等. 葡萄采后生理及贮藏保鲜技术研究进展[J]. 河北农业科学, 2009, 13(4):80-83.
[3] 张锐, 陈玉成, 于天颖, 等. 葡萄贮藏保鲜技术[J]. 农业科技与装备, 2012(8):73-74.
[4] 赵猛, 冯志宏, 王春生. 国内外葡萄贮藏保鲜技术及山西省葡萄产业化贮藏技术进展[J]. 山西果树, 2016(2):21-23.
[5] 关筱歆, 李江阔, 张鹏,等. 冰温结合CT-2保鲜剂对玫瑰香葡萄贮藏品质及生理的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2011,37(9):230-234.
[6] 朱志强, 高丕生, 张平, 等. 不同保鲜剂结合冰温对玫瑰香葡萄贮藏品质和生理生化的影响[J]. 食品工业科技, 2013,34(5):333-337.
[7] 刘丽青, 王燕楠, 仪慧兰, 等. 二氧化硫对玫瑰香葡萄果实采后保鲜的机理[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2016,22(2):338-341.
[8] 高海燕, 张华云, 王善广, 等. 不同用量SO2处理对两类葡萄冷藏中抗氧化性能的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2006, 22(9): 210-214.
[9] 贺光祖, 张才智, 晏宇, 等. 葡萄贮藏保鲜技术研究进展[J]. 现代农业科技, 2009(22):339-340.
[10] 杨敦敦, 张平, 赵飞, 等. 不同保鲜剂处理对红地球葡萄贮藏期间SO2残留量的影响[J]. 保鲜与加工, 2014,14(5):8-13.
[11] 张华云, 王善广, 高海燕, 等. 葡萄SO2伤害与影响因素研究[J]. 保鲜与加工, 2002, 2(5):17-19.
[12] 魏述亮, 东明学, 杨成发, 等. 贮藏红地球葡萄容易出现的问题及应对措施[J]. 落叶果树, 2004, 36(1):39-40.
[13] 林江丽, 朱亚娟, 王金霞,等. SO2处理对新疆3种葡萄香气成分的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2016, 37(6):116-120.
[14] 韩洁, 陈存坤, 王文生,等. 保鲜剂不同组合对袋内SO2积累及葡萄保鲜质量的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2015, 36(24):319-325.
[15] 周江.二氧化硫(SO2)间歇熏蒸对红地球葡萄采后品质的影响[D]. 乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学, 2016.
[16] 田金强, 张子德, 陈志周. 红提葡萄贮藏保鲜过程中SO2伤害的防止技术研究[J]. 食品科学, 2006, 27(1):250-252.
[17] 李志文, 张平, 黄艳凤, 等. 贮藏保鲜中SO2伤害对红提葡萄香气组分的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2011, 31(2):385-392.
[18] 张华云, 王善广, 修德仁, 等. SO2对红地球葡萄的伤害及调控技术[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2000(3):19-21.
[19] 张国海, 郭香凤, 史国安, 等. 鲜食葡萄采后贮藏研究进展[J]. 河南科技大学学报(农学版), 2003, 23(3):31-34.
[20] 赵飞, 张平, 朱志强,等. SO2气态熏蒸结合固态缓释保鲜剂处理对红地球葡萄贮藏品质的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2013, 39(12):182-186.
[21] 周江, 魏佳, 张辉,等. 二氧化硫(SO2)间歇熏蒸对红地球葡萄贮藏品质的影响[J]. 食品科技, 2015,40(12):295-299.
[22] 王宁, 邓冰, 李珍,等. 低温贮藏结合SO2保鲜剂对无核白葡萄保鲜效果研究[J]. 食品工业科技, 2016, 37(6):330-334.
[23] 曹建康,姜微波,赵玉梅.果蔬菜后生理化实验指导[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,2007.
[24] CHEN C, ZHANG X, ZHANG H, et al. Label-free quantitative proteomics to investigate the response of strawberry fruit after controlled ozone treatment[J]. RSC Advances, 2019, 9(2): 676-689.
[25] 张哲, 张志强, 张治权, 等. 贮藏温度对葡萄果胶含量及相关酶活性的影响[J]. 制冷学报, 2019,40(3):140-150.
[26] 薛桂新, 陈志军, 李永红. 木醋液对京亚葡萄保鲜效果的研究[J]. 食品科技, 2009,34(12):46-50.
[27] WAKABAYASHI K. Changes in cell wall polysaccharides during fruit ripening[J]. Journal of Plant Research, 2000, 113(3):231-237.
[28] 丁薪源, 曹建康. 果蔬过氧化物酶酶学特性研究进展[J]. 食品科技, 2012,37(10): 62-66.
[29] WEEMAES C A, LUDIKHUYZE L R, VAN D B I, et al. Activity, electrophoretic characteristics and heat inactivation of polyphenoloxidases from apples, avocados, grapes, pears and plums[J]. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 1998, 31(1):44-49.
Outlines

/