Anti-oxygen stress ability of Lactobacillus salivarius and optimization of its aerobic fermentation conditions

  • ZHOU Lijun ,
  • YANG Miaomiao ,
  • WEI Chunyan ,
  • PAN Changpei ,
  • HUANG Shihai
Expand
  • (College of Life Science and Technology,Guangxi University,Nanning 530000,China)

Received date: 2019-10-10

  Revised date: 2020-02-24

  Online published: 2020-12-11

Abstract

High-density fermentation of Lactobacillus salivarius was conducted under aerobic conditions and the number of viable bacteria was measured.Using total viable count as the indicator to study the optimal conditions for aerobic respiration of L.salivarius,the number of viable bacteria and the survival time were improved for large-scale industrial fermentation.A Lactobacillusstrain named GDW1994 was screened and identified as L.salivarius by 16S rDNA sequencing.The effect of acid and hydrogen peroxide on the growth of strain L.salivarius GDW1994 revealed that the activation of its respiratory chain required the simultaneous addition of heme and tetraene naphthalene (VK2).The optimized medium was peptone 10 g/L,yeast extract 2.5 g/L,glucose 20 g/L,beef paste 15 g/L,anhydrous sodium 2 g/L,MgSO4 0.6 g/L,MnSO4·H2O 0.2 g/L.The optimal conditions were 37℃,inoculation volume 4%,pH 6.4,160 r/min and catalase 30 g/L.With the acquisition of heme and tetraene methanone,and the participation of oxygen,the GDW 1994 strain could be preserved for up to 30 d at 4 ℃.The total viable count reached 108 CFU/mL and survival rate was 100 times higher than that of the medium without heme,tetraene naphthalene and oxygen.It was 20 times higher than that of the culture medium added with exogenous catalase.

Cite this article

ZHOU Lijun , YANG Miaomiao , WEI Chunyan , PAN Changpei , HUANG Shihai . Anti-oxygen stress ability of Lactobacillus salivarius and optimization of its aerobic fermentation conditions[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2020 , 46(22) : 98 -105 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.022509

References

[1] KHAN,UMER S.Probiotics in dairy foods:A review[J].Nutrition &Food Science,2014,44(1),71-88.
[2] REN Dayong,LI Chang,QIN Yanqing,et al.Evaluation of immunomodulatory activity of two potential probiotic Lactobacillusstrains by in vivo tests[J].Anaerobe,2015,35:22-27.
[3] HOJO K,MIZOGUCHI C,TAKETOMO N,et al.Distribution of salivary Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species in periodontal health and disease[J].Biosci Biotechnol Biochem,2007,71(1):152-157.
[4] KÕLL-KL>ÄIS P,M>ÄNDAR R,LEIBUR E,et al.Oral Lactobacilli in chronic periodontitis and periodontal health:Species composition and antimicrobial activity[J].Oral Microbiol Immunol,2005,20(6):354-361.
[5] PEREZ-CANO F J,HONGLIN D,YAQOOD P.In vitro immunomodula-tory activity of Lactobacillus fermentumCECT5716 and Lactoba-cillus salivarius CECT5713:Two probiotic strains isolated from human breast milk[J].Immunobiology,2010,215(12):996-1 004.
[6] JIA G C,CHE N,XIA Y J,et al.Adhesion to pharyngeal epithelium and modulation of immune response:Lactobacillus salivarius AR809,a potential probiotic strain isolated from the human oral cavity[J].Journal of Dairy Science,2019,102(8):6 738-6 749.
[7] MARTÍN V,CÁRDENAS N,OCAÑA S,et al.Rectal and vaginal eradication of streptococcus agalactiae (GBS) in pregnant women by using Lactobacillus salivarius CECT 9145,a target-specific probiotic strain[J].Nutrients,2019,11(4):810.
[8] LARA-VILLOSLADA F,SIERRA S,MART>ÍN R,et al.Safety assessment of two probiotic strains,Lactobacillus coryniformisCECT5711 and Lactobacillus gasseriCECT5714[J].Appl Microbiol,2007,103(1):175-184.
[9] ARROYO R,MART>ÍN V,MALDONADO A,et al.Treatment of infectious mastitis during lactation:Antibiotics versus oral administration of Lactobacilli isolated from breast milk[J].Clin Infect Dis.2010,50(12):1 551-1 558.
[10] 王刚,金星,印伯星,等.1株具有拮抗空肠弯曲杆菌作用的唾液乳杆菌的研究[J].中国食品学报,2014,14(12):6-12.
[11] 白凤翎,张柏林,蒋湘宁,等.乳酸菌有氧呼吸代谢研究进展[J].食品科学,2009,30(13):262-267.
[12] FERNÁNDEZ L,CÁRDENAS N,ARROYO R,et al.Prevention of infectious mastitis by oral administration of Lactobacillus salivarius PS2 during late pregnancy[J].Clin Infect Dis,2016,62(5):568-573.
[13] LEE J Y,HAN G G,LEE H B,et al.Prohibition of antibiotic growth promoters has affected the genomic profiles of Lactobacillussalivarius inhabiting the swine intestine[J].PloS One,2017,12(10):e186 671.
[14] MACFARLANE S,DILLON J F.Microbial biofilms in the human gas-trointestinal tract[J].J Appl Microbiol,2007,102(5):1 187-1 196.
[15] 陈晓峰,王淼.Lactobacillus salivarius FBC05 益生特性的研究[D].无锡:江南大学,2007.
[16] WANG Z,ZENG X M,MO Y M,et al.Identification and characterization of a bile salt hydrolase from Lactobacillus salivarius for development of novel alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters[J].Appl Environ Microb,2012,78(24):8 795-8 802.
[17] 倪敬轩,孙晓磊,杨英,等.苦豆籽粕-两歧双歧杆菌-唾液乳杆菌合生元微胶囊的研制[J].动物医学进展,2012,33(6):64-68.
[18] HUANG Y,WANG H Y,ZHU C H.Effect of lactic acid bacteria fermentation on antioxidation and bioactivity of hawthorn pulp[J].IOP Conference Series:Earth and Environmental Science,2019,267(6):1 755-1 315.
[19] 刘文文,李洋,李键,等.高抗氧化乳酸菌发酵剂的筛选及其最佳发酵条件[J].中国乳品工业,2019,47(2):4-9.
[20] 付龙云.乳酸菌抗氧胁迫及有氧生长的研究[D].济南:山东大学,2013.
[21] GAUDU P,VIDO K,CESSELIN B,et al.Respiration capacity and consequences in Lactococcus lactis[J].Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek,2002,82(1-4):263-269.
[22] STEVENS M J A,WIERSMA A,VOS W M D V,et al.Improvement of Lactobacillus plantarum aerobic growth as directed by comprehensive transcriptome analysis[J].Appl Environ Microbiol,2008,74(15):4 776-4 778.
[23] 郭兴华,凌代文.乳酸细菌现代研究实验技术[M].北京:中国科学出版社,2019:91-121.
[24] 李晓军,马跃英,龚虹,等.具高抗氧化能力乳酸菌菌株的筛选与鉴定[J].中国微生态学杂志,2018,30(6):663-666.
[25] 中国人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会,国家食品药品监督管理总局.GB 4789.35——2016 食品国家安全标准 食品微生物学检验 乳酸菌检验[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2016.
[26] 桑跃,刘力,欧扬雯珊,等.唾液乳杆菌FDB86小试高密度发酵培养基的优化研究[J].中国奶牛,2015(15):40-43.
[27] 修立颖,韩雪冰,孙远芳,等.唾液乳杆菌发酵条件的研究[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2018(15):28-33.
Outlines

/