Food and Fermentation Industries >

2022 , Vol. 48 >Issue 4: 266 - 273

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.027170

Comparison and comprehensive analysis the quality of Cyphomandra betacea from different provenance

  • DONG Qiong ,
  • LI Shimin ,
  • GAO Shangjie ,
  • LI Yuxin ,
  • DUAN Huachao ,
  • ZHENG Xinhua ,
  • YAO Xianfu ,
  • ZI Qiang
Expand
  • 1(College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)
    2(Mangshi forestry and grassland Bureau, Mangshi 678400, China)
    3(Forestry and Grassland Service Center of Sipai Mountain Township, Gengma 677500, China)

Received date: 2021-03-02

  Revised date: 2021-04-19

  Online published: 2022-03-16

Fold

Abstract

The fruit quality of Cyphomandra betacea from 7 different provenances was comprehensively analyzed to provide theoretical reference for improved variety selection, planting promotion, comprehensive development and utilization of Cyphomandra betacea. The fruit weight, transverse diameter, vertical diameter, soluble solids, titratable acid, soluble sugar, vitamin C and total phenols of Cyphomandra betacea fruits were measured and compared. Six core indexes for evaluating the fruit quality of Cyphomandra betacea were selected by correlation and principal component analysis, and the seven different provenances of Cyphomandra betacea were sorted according to the comprehensive score. The systematic cluster analysis was further done. The results showed that there were significant differences in fruit quality indexes among different producing areas and different varieties (P<0.01). Both influence their quality to a certain extent, and the influence degree of producing area factor was much greater than that of the variety factor. Besides, the coefficients of variation of single fruit weight, solid-acid ratio, sugar-acid ratio, total phenols and flavonoids content of the same variety were all more than 17%, and the variation coefficient of fruit transverse diameter was the smallest. There were great differences in the contents of bioactive components among different varieties. Four common factors with eigenvalues greater than 1 were extracted by principal component analysis. The top three comprehensive scores of principal component analysis were DH-1, DH-2, and BS-2, and the lowest score was LC-1. seven tomatoes of different seed sources were classified into three categories using cluster analysis. The results of the comprehensive analysis showed that DH-1, DH-2, and BS-1 had a better appearance and nutritional quality and could be promoted as fresh food and food processing ingredients. Moreover, LC-1 had more characteristics in flavor and could be considered for development and utilization as seasoning products. However, PE-1 and XS-1 had a higher content of antioxidant substances such as vitamin C, total phenols, and flavonoids and were suitable as sources for the development of health products.

Key words： Cyphomandra betacea; fruit quality; principal component analysis; cluster analysis; comprehensive analysis

Cite this article

DONG Qiong , LI Shimin , GAO Shangjie , LI Yuxin , DUAN Huachao , ZHENG Xinhua , YAO Xianfu , ZI Qiang . Comparison and comprehensive analysis the quality of Cyphomandra betacea from different provenance[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2022 , 48(4) : 266 -273 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.027170

References

[1] 中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会. 中国植物志[M].北京:科学出版社, 1978.
Chinese Plant Editorial Committee, Chinese Academy of Sciences.Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae[M].Beijing:Science Press, 1978.
[2] 张庆良, 张凤霞, 丰宗新, 等.树番茄引种栽培试验初报[J].山东林业科技, 2005, 35(3):25-26.
ZHANG Q L, ZHANG F X, FENG Z X, et al.Preliminary report on the introduction of Cyphomandra betacea cultivation trials[J].Journal of Shandong Forestry Science and Technology, 2005, 35(3):25-26.
[3] 胡金. 木本番茄栽培技术[J].中国蔬菜, 2002(3):43-44.
HU J.Woody Cyphomandra betacea cultivation technology[J].China Vegetables, 2002(3):43-44.
[4] 郑在声. 树番茄(Cyphomandra befacea Sende)[J].中国蔬菜, 1989(6):48.
ZHENG Z S.Cyphomandra betacea(Cyphomandra befacea Sende)[J].China Vegetables, 1989(6):48.
[5] 蔡永敏. 中药药名辞典[M].北京:中国中医药出版社, 1996.
CAI Y M.Dictionary of Chinese Medicinal Names[M].Beijing:China Press of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 1996.
[6] 郭碧瑜, 周伟华, 叶青莲, 等.树番茄的生物学特性及栽培技术[J].广东农业科学, 2007, 34(12):102-103.
GUO B Y, ZHOU W H, YE Q L, et al.Biological characteristics and cultivation techniques of Cyphomandra betacea[J].Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2007, 34(12):102-103.
[7] 王馨雨, 王蓉蓉, 王婷, 等.不同品种百合内外鳞片游离氨基酸组成的主成分分析及聚类分析[J].食品科学, 2020, 41(12):211-220.
WANG X Y, WANG R R, WANG T, et al.Principal component analysis and cluster analysis for evaluating the free amino acid composition of inner and outer lily bulb scales from different cultivars[J].Food Science, 2020, 41(12):211-220.
[8] 冉军舰, 孙华迪, 陈晓静, 等.基于主成分与聚类分析的35个苹果品种多酚综合评价[J].食品工业科技, 2017, 38(8):139-144;155.
RAN J J, SUN H D, CHEN X J, et al.Comprehensive evaluation of polyphenols from 35 apple varieties based on principal component and cluster analysis[J].Food Industry Technology, 2017, 38(8):139-144;155.
[9] 高惠璇. 应用多元统计分析[M].北京:北京大学出版社, 2005.
GAO H X.Apply Multivariate Statistical Analysis[M].Beijing:Published by Peking University Press, 2005.
[10] MILOŠEVIC′ T, MILOŠEVIC′ N.Phenotypic diversity of autochthonous European (Prunus domestica L.)and Damson(Prunus insititia L.)plum accessions based on multivariate analysis[J].Horticultural Science, 2012, 39:8-20.
[11] 李伟, 郜海燕, 陈杭君, 等.基于主成分分析的不同品种杨梅果实综合品质评价[J].中国食品学报, 2017, 17(6):161-171.
LI W, GAO H Y, CHEN H J, et al.Evaluation of comprehensive quality of different varieties of bayberry based on principal components analysis[J].Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 2017, 17(6):161-171.
[12] 李跃红, 冉茂乾, 徐孟怀, 等.不同产地红心猕猴桃品质的主成分及聚类分析[J].食品工业科技, 2021, 42(10):222-228.
LI Y H, RAN M Q, XU M H, et al.Principal component and cluster analysis of quality of red-centred kiwifruit from different habitats[J].Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(10):222-228.
[13] 刘丙花, 孙锐, 王开芳, 等.不同蓝莓品种果实品质比较与综合评价[J].食品科学, 2019, 40(1):70-76.
LIU B H, SUN R, WANG K F, et al.Comparison and comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality of different blueberry (Vaccinium spp.) varieties[J].Food Science, 2019, 40(1):70-76.
[14] 林奇, 杨振生, 陈宝润.树番茄系列产品的加工技术[J].云南热作科技, 1992, 15(2):40-41;43.
LIN Q, YANG Z S, CHEN B R.Processing technology of Cyphomandra betacea series products[J].Journal of Yunnan Tropical Crops Science & Technology, 1992, 15(2):40-41;43.
[15] 张东华, 汪庆平, 马晓芳.具有开发前景的热带果蔬植物——树番茄[J].资源开发与市场, 1998, 14(5):209-210.
ZHANG D H, WANG Q P, MA X F.A promising tropical fruit and vegetable plant─Cyphomandra betacea[J].Resource Development & Market, 1998, 14(5):209-210.
[16] 张妍, 刘太林.苯酚-硫酸法与蒽酮-硫酸法测定麦冬中麦冬多糖含量的比较研究[J].现代食品, 2018(18):95-102.
ZHANG Y, LIU T L.Comparison of phenol-sulfuric and anthrone-sulfuric acid methods for determination of polysaccharide in Radix ophiopogonis[J].Modern Food, 2018(18):95-102.
[17] 曹建康, 姜微波, 赵玉梅.果蔬采后生理生化实验指导[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,2007.
CAO J K, JIANG W B, ZHAO Y M.Physiological and Biochemical Experiment Guidance for Fruits and Vegetables After Harvest[M].Beijing:China Light Industry Press, 2007.
[18] 吴旻丹, 陈瑜, 金邦荃.储藏期猕猴桃质构变化的研究及人工咀嚼的建立[J].食品工业科技, 2010, 31(12):146-148;152.
WU M D, CHEN Y, JIN B Q.Detection of texture properties of kiwi fruits by texture profile analysis and simulation of manual chewing[J].Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2010, 31(12):146-148;152.
[19] 张维, 付复华, 罗赛男, 等.湖南红心猕猴桃品种品质评价及综合分析[J].食品与发酵工业, 2021,47(5):201-210.
ZHANG W, FU F H, LUO S N, et al.Quality analysis and evaluation of Hunan red kiwifruit varieties[J].Food and Fermentation Industries, 2021, 47(5):201-210.
[20] LIU Y F, QI Y W, CHEN X, et al.Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity in red-and in green-fleshed kiwifruits[J].Food Research International, 2019, 116:291-301.
[21] BARRETT D M, BEAULIEU J C, SHEWFELT R.Color, flavor, texture, and nutritional quality of fresh-cut fruits and vegetables:Desirable levels, instrumental and sensory measurement, and the effects of Processing[J].Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 2010, 50(5):369-389.
[22] 刘美迎, 李小龙, 梁茁, 等.基于模糊数学和聚类分析的鲜食葡萄品种综合品质评价[J].食品科学, 2015, 36(13):57-64.
LIU M Y, LI X L, LIANG Z, et al.Comprehensive quality assessment of table grapes varieties using fuzzy mathematics and cluster analysis[J].Food Science, 2015, 36(13):57-64.
[23] 赵剑波, 姜全, 郭继英, 等.桃果实风味品质指标测定与品种筛选[J].江苏农业科学, 2007, 35(6):165-168.
ZHAO J B, JIANG Q, GUO J Y, et al.Determination of fruit flavor quality indexes and variety selection of peach [J].Jiangsu Agricultural Science, 2007, 35(6):165-168.
[24] 田茂成, 邓小华, 陆中山, 等.基于灰色效果测度和主成分分析的湘西州烟叶物理特性综合评价[J].核农学报, 2017, 31(1):187-193.
TIAN M C, DENG X H, LU Z S, et al.Gray effect measure and principal component analysis-based comprehensive evaluation for physical properties of flue-cured tobacco leaves eaves from Xiangxi area[J].Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 31(1):187-193.
[25] PATRAS A, BRUNTON N P, DOWNEY G, et al.Application of principal component and hierarchical cluster analysis to classify fruits and vegetables commonly consumed in Ireland based on in vitro antioxidant activity[J].Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 2011, 24(2):250-256.
[26] 刘嘉彬, 武媛林, 刘平, 等.用“合理-满意度”方法筛选鲜食优良酸枣类型[J].山西果树, 2012(4):12-13.
LIU J B, WU Y L, LIU P, et al.Use “reasonable-satisfaction” method of screening good table type of Zizyphus jujube[J].Shanxi Fruits, 2012(4):12-13.
[27] 吴澎, 贾朝爽, 范苏仪, 等.樱桃品种果实品质因子主成分分析及模糊综合评价[J].农业工程学报, 2018, 34(17):291-300.
WU P, JIA C S, FAN S Y, et al.Principal component analysis and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality in cultivars of cherry[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018, 34(17):291-300.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉

Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd,.