Proteolytic properties of Pseudomonas isolated from raw milk and consistency of their phenotypic distribution with three typing methods:A comparative study

  • ZHAN Cuiqing ,
  • QI Yan ,
  • YOU Chunping
Expand
  • 1(College of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China)
    2(State Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Functional Dairy Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Dairy Biotechnology,Dairy Research Institute, Bright Dairy & Food Co.Ltd., Shanghai 201103, China)

Received date: 2026-04-08

  Revised date: 2026-04-23

  Online published: 2026-09-21

Abstract

Raw milk is prone to quality deterioration during cold storage due to the proteolytic activity of psychrotrophic spoilage bacteria, particularly those belonging to the genus Pseudomonas.This study was conducted to clarify the proteolytic phenotypic characteristics of raw milk-derived Pseudomonas and to evaluate the applicability of different molecular typing methods in the consistency analysis of their spoilage phenotype clustering.A total of 31 Pseudomonas strains (including 26 isolates from raw milk in Shanghai and 5 type strains) were used as research subjects, and molecular typing was performed based on 16S rRNA gene sequences, ribotyping fingerprints, and a combination of housekeeping genes and protease genes using multi-locus sequence typing-like typing (MLST-like), respectively, to systematically compare the consistency of each typing result with the distribution of proteolytic phenotypes.The results showed that 67.7% of the strains produced clear zones on skim milk agar plates, and the average protease activity of the proteolytic-positive strains was 0.56 ΔA·h-1·mL-1.In species-level identification, ribotyping exhibited higher discriminatory power than 16S rRNA gene sequencing, with 48.4% of the strains identified as Pseudomonas fluorescens.The proteolytic capacity of the P. fluorescens group was significantly higher than that of the non-P. fluorescens group (P<0.000 1).Regarding consistency with the distribution of proteolytic spoilage phenotypes, the clustering results of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis and ribotyping showed similar overall trends in the distribution of proteolytic phenotypes, while MLST-like typing exhibited the clearest correspondence with proteolytic capacity and the risk classification of proteolytic spoilage.This study revealed the distribution characteristics of proteolytic phenotypes of Pseudomonas in raw milk and evaluated the applicability of the three typing methods for identifying spoilage risk.These findings provided a reference for the identification and graded control of spoilage risk posed by Pseudomonas in raw milk.

Cite this article

ZHAN Cuiqing , QI Yan , YOU Chunping . Proteolytic properties of Pseudomonas isolated from raw milk and consistency of their phenotypic distribution with three typing methods:A comparative study[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2026 , 52(17) : 61 -73 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.046854

References

[1] Liang L J, Wang P, Wang Z R, et al. Species-level source tracing of psychrotrophic bacteria contamination in raw milk from large-scale farms via SMRT sequencing[J]. Food Research International, 2025, 203:115840.
[2] Saha S, Majumder R, Rout P, et al. Unveiling the significance of psychrotrophic bacteria in milk and milk product spoilage–A review[J]. The Microbe, 2024, 2:100034.
[3] de Souza Correia S, Bruzaroski S R, de Araújo K E, et al. The influence of the population of psychrotrophs in raw milk on the characteristics of natural yogurt[J]. International Dairy Journal, 2024, 157:106003.
[4] Cheng J Q, Gao Y, Liu J X, et al. Effect of heat-resistant protease of Pseudomonas fluorescens on the quality of liquid milk: A physicochemical and proteomic perspective[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2026, 109(2):1052-1064.
[5] Chang G H, Li Q H, Wang T, et al. Characterization of Pseudomonas spp. Contamination and in situ spoilage potential in pasteurized milk production process[J]. Food Research International, 2024, 188:114463.
[6] Aouadhi C, Tbarki R, Boukari W, et al. Impact of psychrotrophic bacteria in raw milk on the quality and stability of UHT milk in Tunisia[J]. International Dairy Journal, 2025, 167:106262.
[7] Ávila M, Sánchez C, Calzada J, et al. Diversity and spoilage potential of Pseudomonas spp. From Spanish milk and dairy products: Impact on fresh cheese and milk quality[J]. Food Research International, 2025, 202:115700.
[8] Aguilera-Toro M, Kragh M L, Thomasen A V, et al. Proteolytic activity and heat resistance of the protease AprX from Pseudomonas in relation to genotypic characteristics[J]. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2023, 391:110147.
[9] Huang Y Y, Flint S H, Yu S B, et al. Phenotypic properties and genotyping analysis of Bacillus cereus group isolates from dairy and potato products[J]. LWT, 2021, 140:110853.
[10] Yan M H, Luo L W, Li D D, et al. Biofilm formation risk assessment for psychrotrophic Pseudomonas in raw milk by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry[J]. LWT, 2023, 176:114508.
[11] Hosseini H, Hippe B, Denner E, et al. Isolation, identification and monitoring of contaminant bacteria in Iranian Kefir type drink by 16S rDNA sequencing[J]. Food Control, 2012, 25(2):784-788.
[12] Ravaioli S, Campoccia D, Ruppitsch W, et al. Comparison of automated ribotyping, spa typing, and MLST in 108 clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from orthopedic infections[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2022, 23(3):1660.
[13] Schumann P, Pukall R. The discriminatory power of ribotyping as automatable technique for differentiation of bacteria[J]. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 2013, 36(6):369-375.
[14] 王玢, 黄演君, 潘子康, 等. 中药片剂微生物污染鉴定和溯源分析及风险评价[J]. 中南药学, 2024, 22(5):1345-1349.
Wang F, Huang Y J, Pan Z K, et al. Identification and traceability of microbial pollution in traditional Chinese medicine tablets and its risk evaluation[J]. Central South Pharmacy, 2024, 22(5):1345-1349.
[15] Andollina A, De Cesare A, Bertoni G, et al. Identification and genetic characterisation of orthopaedic Staphylococcus isolates collected in Italy by automated EcoRI ribotyping[J]. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 2004, 234(2):275-280.
[16] Wiedmann M, Weilmeier D, Dineen S S, et al. Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Pseudomonas spp. isolated from milk[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2000, 66(5):2085-2095.
[17] Dogan B, Boor K J. Genetic diversity and spoilage potentials among Pseudomonas spp. Isolated from fluid milk products and dairy processing plants[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2003, 69(1):130-138.
[18] Maiden M C J, van Rensburg M J J, Bray J E, et al. MLST revisited: The gene-by-gene approach to bacterial genomics[J]. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2013, 11(10):728-736.
[19] Narvhus J A, Nilsen Bækkelund O, Tidemann E M, et al. Isolates of Pseudomonas spp. from cold-stored raw milk show variation in proteolytic and lipolytic properties[J]. International Dairy Journal, 2021, 123:105049.
[20] Yuan L, Sadiq F A, Liu T J, et al. Spoilage potential of psychrotrophic bacteria isolated from raw milk and the thermo-stability of their enzymes[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University: Science B, 2018, 19(8):630-642.
[21] Hamdan N H, Mohamed Rehan M, Ogita S, et al. Novel sustainable bio-fertilizer formulated with mangrove-associated bacteria enhances duckweed growth and protein content[J]. Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science, 2024, 47(3):819-841.
[22] Hall B G. Building phylogenetic trees from molecular data with MEGA[J]. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2013, 30(5):1229-1235.
[23] 崔方超, 王芸婷, 王当丰, 等. 外源AHLs培养下荧光假单胞菌qPCR内参基因的筛选[J]. 中国食品学报, 2024, 24(2):32-42.
Cui F C, Wang Y T, Wang D F, et al. Screening of reference genes for qPCR of Pseudomonas fluorescens under exogenous AHLs culture[J]. Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 2024, 24(2):32-42.
[24] Chen W J, Kuo T Y, Chen C Y, et al. Whole genome sequencing and Tn5-insertion mutagenesis of Pseudomonas taiwanensis CMS to probe its antagonistic activity against rice bacterial blight disease[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2020, 21(22):8639.
[25] 胡少震, 代良超, 张书文, 等. 原料乳和牧场环境中嗜冷菌多样性及蛋白酶水解特性研究[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2024, 50(8):24-30.
Hu S Z, Dai L C, Zhang S W, et al. Diversity and protease hydrolysis characteristics of psychrophilic in raw milk and pasture environment[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2024, 50(8):24-30.
[26] Zarei M, Yousefvand A, Maktabi S, et al. Identification, phylogenetic characterisation and proteolytic activity quantification of high biofilm-forming Pseudomonas fluorescens group bacterial strains isolated from cold raw milk[J]. International Dairy Journal, 2020, 109:104787.
[27] Lalucat J, Mulet M, Gomila M, et al. Genomics in bacterial taxonomy: Impact on the genus Pseudomonas[J]. Genes, 2020, 11(2):139.
[28] Du B Y, Meng L, Liu H M, et al. Diversity and proteolytic activity of Pseudomonas species isolated from raw cow milk samples across China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 838:156382.
[29] 于淑池, 邢文君, 冯紫蓝, 等. 基于群体感应研究苦丁茶多酚对荧光假单胞菌腐败特性的抑制作用[J]. 食品工业科技, 2021, 42(21):148-157.
Yu S C, Xing W J, Feng Z L, et al. Inhibition of Kuding tea polyphenols against the spoilage characteristics of Pseudomonas fluorescens based on quorum sensing[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(21):148-157.
[30] García-Valdés E, Lalucat J. Pseudomonas: Molecular phylogeny and current taxonomy[M]. Pseudomonas: Molecular and Applied Biology. Cham: Springer, 2016:1-23.
[31] Gendel S M, Ulaszek J. Ribotype analysis of strain distribution in Listeria monocytogenes[J]. Journal of Food Protection, 2000, 63(2):179-185.
[32] 刘继超, 姜铁民, 姜阿赤, 等. 应用全自动核糖体RNA基因指纹技术快速鉴定细菌菌种[J]. 食品工业科技, 2013, 34(13):170-172; 177.
Liu J C, Jiang T M, Jiang A C, et al. Rapid bacterial identification with Dupont Qualicon RiboPrinter system[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2013, 34(13):170-172; 177.
[33] Longhi R, Correia S S, Bruzaroski S R, et al. Pseudomonas fluorescens and Pseudomonas putida from refrigerated raw milk: Genetic diversity and lipoproteolytic activity[J]. The Journal of Dairy Research, 2022:1-4.
[34] Wang Y, Sun J L, Deng Y W, et al. Whey protein influences the production and activity of extracellular protease from Pseudomonas fluorescens W3[J]. LWT, 2022, 154:112865.
Outlines

/

〈 〉