Please wait a minute...
 
 
食品与发酵工业  2020, Vol. 46 Issue (18): 85-90    DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.023731
  研究报告 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
四株益生菌对发酵酸奶保质期理化特性和益生菌数的影响
任然, 唐善虎*, 李思宁, 马国丽, 刘慧伦
(西南民族大学 生命科学与技术学院,四川 成都, 610041)
Effect of four probiotics on the physicochemical properties and probiotics viability of fermented yogurt
REN Ran, TANG Shanhu*, LI Sining, MA Guoli, LIU Huilun
(College of Life Science and Technology, Southwest Min Zu University, Chengdu 610041, China)
下载:  HTML   PDF (925KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 该文以鲜牛乳为原料,采用基础发酵剂分别与双歧杆菌(Bifidobacterium animalis,A-Ba)、植物乳杆菌(Lactobacillus planarum,A-Lp)、干酪乳杆菌(Lactobacillus casei,A-Lc)、嗜酸乳杆菌(Lactobacillus acidophilus,A-La)复合发酵制备凝固型酸奶,通过检测酸奶活菌数、酸度、双乙酰含量、乙醛含量、持水力研究酸奶在4℃条件下贮藏28 d理化特性和益生菌数的变化,并分析各个指标间的相关性。结果表明,在贮藏过程中,干酪乳杆菌的存活率最高,其余依次为双歧杆菌、植物乳杆菌、嗜酸乳杆菌(P<0.05),各组嗜热链球菌存活率均呈先上升后下降的趋势(P<0.05);滴定酸度均上升,A-La组的酸度在4株益生菌酸奶中最高,而A-Ba组最低;A-Lc组在贮藏期双乙酰含量较高,奶油香味更佳;A-Lc组贮藏7 d之后乙醛含量较高,优于其余处理组;酸奶持水力在贮藏期呈上升趋势,A-La组在1~21 d仅低于A-Lp组,28 d持水力下降为各组中最低(P<0.05);A-Ba组与A组在贮藏过程中持水力相差不大(P>0.05);A-Lc组持水力为各组中最低(P<0.05)。酸奶贮藏28 d,嗜酸乳杆菌的产酸能力最强,其次为植物乳杆菌、干酪乳杆菌,产酸能力最弱的为双歧杆菌。根据相关性分析得到4株益生菌酸奶在4 ℃条件下贮藏28 d,滴定酸度与活菌数,双乙酰含量均呈负相关,与乙醛含量、持水力呈正相关。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
任然
唐善虎
李思宁
马国丽
刘慧伦
关键词:  复合发酵  理化特性  益生菌数    
Abstract: Fresh milk was used as raw material, and the yogurt cultures was co-fermented with Bifidobacterium animalis (A-Ba), Lactobacillus plantarum (A-Lp), Lactobacillus casei (A-Lc) and Lactobacillus acidophilus (A-La) to prepare solidified yogurt, respectively. Viability of lactic acid bacteria, acidity, diacetyl contents, acetaldehyde contents and water holding capacity (WHC) were measured and the changes of physicochemical properties and probiotics were evaluated for the yogurt stored at 4 ℃ for 28 days, and the correlation between the measurements was analyzed. The results showed that the viability of L. casei was the highest, followed by B. animalis, L. plantarum, and L. acidophilus (P<0.05) in the storage period. The survival rates of S. thermophilus in the treated group and the control group elevated first and then decreased (P<0.05). Moreover, A-Lc had relatively higher diacetyl content and better butter flavor during storage period. After 7 days of storage, the content of acetaldehyde of A-Lc was better, which was better than that of other treatment groups. During the storage period, the WHC of yogurt showed an increasing trend. A-La was only lower than A-Lp on day 1~21, and the WHC on day 28 was the lowest in each group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between A-Ba and group A in WHC during storage (P>0.05). The WHC of A-Lc was the lowest in each group (P<0.05). When yogurt was stored for 28 days, L. acidophilus had the largest capacity for acid production, followed by L. plantarum and L. casei, and the weakest was B. animalis. According to the correlation analysis, after stored at 4 ℃ for 28 days, the acidity was negatively correlated with the viability and diacetyl content, while positively correlated with acetaldehyde and WHC.
Key words:  co-fermentation    physicochemical properties    viability of lactic acid bacteria
收稿日期:  2020-02-23      修回日期:  2020-04-08                发布日期:  2020-10-23      期的出版日期:  2020-09-25
基金资助: 研究生创新项目(CX2019SZ118);四川省科技项目(2017CC0024;2018NZ0003)
作者简介:  硕士研究生(唐善虎教授为通讯作者,E-mail: stang01@126.com)
引用本文:    
任然,唐善虎,李思宁,等. 四株益生菌对发酵酸奶保质期理化特性和益生菌数的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2020, 46(18): 85-90.
REN Ran,TANG Shanhu,LI Sining,et al. Effect of four probiotics on the physicochemical properties and probiotics viability of fermented yogurt[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2020, 46(18): 85-90.
链接本文:  
http://sf1970.cnif.cn/CN/10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.023731  或          http://sf1970.cnif.cn/CN/Y2020/V46/I18/85
[1] AFRC R F. Probiotics in man and animals[J]. Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 1989, 66(5):365-378.
[2] SIDIRA M, SAXAMI G, DIMITRELLOU D, et al. Monitoring survival of Lactobacillus casei ATCC 393 in probiotic yogurts using an efficient molecular tool[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2013,96(5):3 369-3 377.
[3] EJTAHED H S, MOHTADI-NIA J, HOMAYOUNI-RAD A, et al. Effect of probiotic yogurt containing Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium lactis on lipid profile in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2011, 94(7):3 288-3 294.
[4] KORBEKANDI H, JAHADI M, MARACY M, et al. Production and evaluation of a probiotic yoghurt using Lactobacillus casei ssp[J]. International Journal of Dairy Technology, 2010,62(1):75-79.
[5] MANI LÓPEZ E, PALOU E, LÓPEZ-MALO A. Probiotic viability and storage stability of yogurts and fermented milks prepared with several mixtures of lactic acid bacteria[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2014, 97(5):2 578-2 590.
[6] 尚楠, 刘丽莎, 任发政, 等. 产细菌素双歧杆菌L-SN对酸奶后酸化及品质的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2013,18(4):178-182.
[7] LI Sining, TANG Shanhu, HE Qiang, et al. Physicochemical, textural and volatile characteristics of fermented milk co-cultured with Streptococcus thermophilus, Bifidobacterium animalis or Lactobacillus plantarum[J]. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 2020,55(2):461-474.
[8] 陈世贤, 安颖, 靳烨, 等. 不同益生菌的加入对酸奶贮藏期内风味的影响[J]. 中国乳品工业, 2008,36(5):12-15.
[9] MISHRA S, MISHRA H N. Effect of synbiotic interaction of fructooligosaccharide and probiotics on the acidification profile, textural and rheological characteristics of fermented soy milk[J]. Food & Bioprocess Technology, 2013, 6(11):3 166-3 176.
[10] CHANG Chunhui, KONG Baohua, ZHAO Xinhuai. Quality attributes of the set-style yoghurt from whole bovine milk as affected by an enzymatic oxidative cross-linking[J]. CyTA - Journal of Food, 2014, 12(3):249-255.
[11] BUJALANCE C, JIMÉNEZ-VALERA M, MORENO E, et al. A selective differential medium for Lactobacillus plantarum[J]. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 2006,66(3):572-575.
[12] SUTULA J, COULTHWAITE L, VERRAN J. Culture media for differential isolation of Lactobacillus casei Shirota from oral samples.[J]. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 2012,90(1):65-71.
[13] 曹永强, 张健, 余志坚, 等. 传统乳制品来源乳酸菌的发酵特性及其在酸奶中的应用[J]. 食品工业科技, 2017, 38(7):145-150.
[14] 贡佳欣, 李思宁, 唐善虎, 等. 双歧杆菌与乳酸克鲁维酵母共发酵对酸奶品质及风味的影响[J]. 食品工业科技, 2018,39(2):98-101;107.
[15] 邵亚东.传统发酵乳制品中乳酸菌产双乙酰特性的研究[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2007.
[16] 刘宁宁, 郭红敏, 葛春美, 等. 酸奶中乙醛和双乙酰含量对其风味的影响[J]. 中国食品添加剂, 2012(S1):269-273.
[17] RIENER J, NOCI F, CRONIN D A, et al. The effect of thermosonication of milk on selected physicochemical and microstructural properties of yoghurt gels during fermentation[J]. Food Chemistry, 2009,114(3):905-911.
[18] MOHAMMADI R, YOUSEFI M, SARLAK Z, et al. Influence of commercial culture composition and cow milk to soy milk ratio on the biochemical, microbiological, and sensory characteristics of a probiotic fermented composite drink[J]. 2017,26(3):1-9.
[19] GILLILAND S E, SPECK M L. Instability of Lactobacillus acidophilus in yogurt[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 1977, 60(9):1 394-1 398.
[20] DAVE R I, SHAH N P. Viability of yoghurt and probiotic bacteria in yoghurts made from commerical starter cultures[J]. International Dairy Journal, 1997,7(1):31-41.
[21] 丹彤, 包秋华, 孟和毕力格, 等. 发酵乳风味物质乙醛、双乙酰的合成途径及其调控机制[J]. 食品科技, 2012,37(7):75-79.
[22] 胡王艳, 韦福广, 蒋宗辰, 等. 南瓜汁对酸奶发酵特性的影响[J]. 中外食品工业:下, 2014(11):75-77.
[23] GÜZEL-SEYDIM Z B, SEYDIM A C, GREENE A K, et al. Determination of organic acids and volatile flavor substances in kefir during fermentation[J]. Journal of Food Composition & Analysis, 2000,13(1):35-43.
[24] 李靖, 陈伟, 程芳, 等. 灵芝-白灵菇酸奶配方的优化及其营养成分分析[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2012,38(6):122-127.
[25] 王红叶, 李丽华, 陆淳, 等. 乙醛、丁二酮对发酵乳风味的影响[J]. 中国乳品工业, 2010,38(10):32-34.
[26] 韩永佳.功能型酸奶的理化特性、抗氧化活性及微观结构的研究[D]. 合肥:合肥工业大学, 2016.
[27] DAN Tong, JIN Rulin, REN Weiyi, et al. Characteristics of milk fermented by Streptococcus thermophilus MGA45-4 and the profiles of associated volatile compounds during fermentation and storage[J]. Molecules, 2018,23(4):878.
[28] 李莎, 马成杰, 徐志平, 等. 不同发酵特性的嗜热链球菌与保加利亚乳杆菌共发酵的特性[J]. 食品科学, 2015,36(15):123-127.
[29] 罗玲泉, 刘成国, 黄永锋. 乳酸菌胞外多糖及其对酸乳品质的影响[J]. 食品工业科技, 2007,28(6):233-236.
[1] 陈晓思, 贺稚非, 王泽富, 李洪军. 过氧自由基对兔肉肌原纤维蛋白理化性质及结构的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(8): 54-61.
[2] 郑欧阳, 孙钦秀, 刘书成, 潘燕墨. 香辛料提取物复配对风干肠品质和生物胺的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(8): 90-95.
[3] 叶彤, 聂聪怡, 李林强. 羊乳巴氏杀菌条件的筛选[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(8): 152-157.
[4] 李红娟, 刘婷婷, 邹璇, 赵树静, 李丹, 李媛, 李洪波, 于景华. 乳清蛋白-黄油乳液凝胶对低脂酸奶理化特性及品质的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(7): 71-77.
[5] 张俊, 胡玲, 张三杉, 余梦玲, 雷激. 不同发芽阶段高粱粉理化及功能特性的变化[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(6): 68-74.
[6] 李萍, 普绍荣, 李凤英, 左方骏, 张欣, 赵飞, 刘建. 碾磨度对粳稻外观品质和食味理化特性的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(4): 21-26.
[7] 陈茹, 曾令英, 李洪军, 王春幸, 贺稚非. 复合黏合剂对兔肉排重组过程中理化特性的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(2): 130-136.
[8] 王乐, 包娜莎, 金征宇, 赵建伟, 周星, 田耀旗. 添加谷氨酰胺转氨酶对糙米蛋糕品质的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2020, 46(5): 174-180.
[9] 余阳玲, 仝兆斌, 江昊, 赵清. 淀粉原料3D打印特性[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2020, 46(3): 194-200.
[10] 刘玉凌, 任亭, 彭玉梅, 曾胜, 贺云川, 杨波, 栾兴霞, 李君红, 罗远莉. 老盐水中乳酸菌的筛选鉴定及其在青菜头泡菜中的应用[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2020, 46(2): 208-213.
[11] 谭天仪, 李璟, 夏锐, 李梦飒, 叶发银, 赵国华, 朱海妮. 超细化豆渣作为皮克林乳液稳定剂的特性研究[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2020, 46(2): 47-54.
[12] 朱娟娟, 马海军, 李敏, 刘雅琴, 倪志婧, 王薇, 陈凤英, 李亚罡. 不同酿酒酵母共发酵对干红葡萄酒理化特性和香气组分的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2020, 46(2): 194-202.
[13] 何晓琴, 李苇舟, 夏晓霞, 雷琳, 赵吉春, 明建. 蒸汽爆破预处理的苦荞麸皮不溶性膳食纤维理化特性及结构研究[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2020, 46(18): 47-53.
[14] 韩昕苑, 从娇娇, 樊震宇, 于立志, 王锡昌. 冻融循环对冷冻罗非鱼片品质的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2020, 46(18): 136-142.
[15] 张玥, 薛雨菲, 李芳, 杨罡, 戴志伟, 刘伟, 孔令明, 孙乾. 糖基化修饰对核桃谷蛋白结构和功能特性的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2020, 46(17): 60-66.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《食品与发酵工业》编辑部
地址:北京朝阳区酒仙桥中路24号院6号楼111室
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn