Please wait a minute...
 
 
食品与发酵工业  2021, Vol. 47 Issue (9): 191-200    DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.025657
  生产与科研应用 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
基于主成分分析的木通属植物果实品质评价
杨玉宁1,4, 陈松树2, 高尔刚3, 李园园1,4, 潘秀珍1, 刘红昌1,4*, 辛雪辉5
1(贵州大学 农学院,贵州 贵阳,550025)
2(贵州大学 教学实验场,贵州 贵阳,550025) 3(黎平林业局,贵州 黎平,557300)
4(贵州省药用植物繁育与种植重点实验室,贵州 贵阳,550025)
5(黎平盛竹联创木通农林发展有限公司,贵州 黎平,557300)
Fruit quality evaluation of Akebia Decne based on principal component analysis
YANG Yuning1,4, CHEN Songshu2, GAO Ergang3, LI Yuanyuan1,4, PAN Xiuzhen1, LIU Hongchang1,4*, XIN Xuehui5
1(College of agriculture,Guizhou University,Guiyang 550025,China)
2(Teaching Experimental Field of Guizhou University,Guiyang 550025,China)
3(Forestry Bureau of Liping County for Guizhou province,Liping 557300,China)
4(Key Laboratory of medicinal plant breeding and planting in Guizhou Province,Guiyang 550025,China)
5(Shengzhu Lianchuang Mutong agricultural and Forestry Development Co.Ltd.,in Liping of Guizhou,Liping 557300,China)
下载:  HTML  PDF (1674KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 比较了3种木通属植物(木通、白木通、三叶木通)21份种质果实品质差异,为选育优异种质资源提供参考。分别记录21份种质的外形参数并对其进行感官评价,比较种质间外观及内在品质差异性,分析了种内品质的变异大小,并进行主成分分析。结果显示,21份种质间的各品质指标差异显著,种间及种内存在着不同程度的变异,21份种质在不同性状上各有优势。主成分分析结果显示,白木通种质较优秀,三叶木通种质有优有劣,木通虽有优秀种质,但结合感官评价来看品质较差。综合内在品质、外观品质与感官评价,白木通种质更佳,三叶木通次之,木通最差;白木通中的B2、B4、B5与三叶木通中S4、S8因其外观与内在品质较优,可作为水果食用,而B3、B6~B8虽然内、外在品质优秀,但果色略差,可考虑用于深加工产业。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
杨玉宁
陈松树
高尔刚
李园园
潘秀珍
刘红昌
辛雪辉
关键词:  木通属  主成分分析  种质果实品质    
Abstract: In this paper, fruit quality of 21 germplasms of Akebia (Akebia quinata (Thunb.) Decne, Akebia trifoliata (Thunb) Koidz.var. australis (Diels) Rehd, Akebia trifoliata (Thunb.) Koidz) were compared in order to provide reference for breeding excellent germplasm resources. Twenty-one germplasms of shape parameters and the sensory evaluation were respectively recorded and appearance quality and internal quality in 21 different germplasms were comparatively analyzed. The results showed that there were significant differences in the quality indexes among the 21 germplasms, and there were different degrees of variation among the interspecific and intraspecific. The 21 germplasms had advantages in different characters. The results of the principal component analysis showed that the top germplasms were Akebia trifoliata (Thunb) Koidz.var. australis (Diels) Rehd (B2, B4-8), W4 of Akebia quinata (Thunb.) Decne and S4 of Akebia trifoliata (Thunb.) And Koidz were in the seventh and ninth places respectively. It could be seen that the germplasms of Akebia trifoliata (Thunb) Koidz.var. australis (Diels) Rehd was better than that of Akebia trifoliata (Thunb.) Koidz. Although W4 ranks the seventh in Akebia quinata (Thunb.) Decne, its sensory evaluation index was low. The results showed that the Akebia trifoliata var. australis germplasms was better than the Akebia trifoliata germplasms, and the Akebia quinata germplasms was the worst. Akebia trifoliata var.australis germplasms of B2, B4, B5 and implant Akebia trifoliata germplasms of S4, S8 because of its appearance and inner quality was best which could be used as fruit; and B3, B6-8 although internal and external quality were excellent, the fruit color was poor which could be used for the development of industry processing.
Key words:  Akebia Decne    principal component analysis    frnit quality of germplasm
收稿日期:  2020-09-16      修回日期:  2020-11-04           出版日期:  2021-05-15      发布日期:  2021-06-03      期的出版日期:  2021-05-15
基金资助: 贵州省自然科学基金项目(黔科合基础[2019]1061号)
作者简介:  硕士研究生(刘红昌副教授为通讯作者,E-mail:604957649@qq.com)
引用本文:    
杨玉宁,陈松树,高尔刚,等. 基于主成分分析的木通属植物果实品质评价[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(9): 191-200.
YANG Yuning,CHEN Songshu,GAO Ergang,et al. Fruit quality evaluation of Akebia Decne based on principal component analysis[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2021, 47(9): 191-200.
链接本文:  
http://sf1970.cnif.cn/CN/10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.025657  或          http://sf1970.cnif.cn/CN/Y2021/V47/I9/191
[1] 王乐乐, 周绍琴,宋小娟.三叶木通及其果实研究进展[J].现代农业科技,2018(22):252-253.
WANG L L,ZHOU S Q,SONG X J.Research advances of Akebia trifoliata (Thunb.) Koidz and its fruits[J].Modern Agricultural Science and Technology,2018 (22):252-253
[2] 国家药典委员会.中华人民共和国药典[S].北京:中国医药科技出版社,2015.
State Pharmacopoei Commission.Pharmacopoeia of the People's Republic of China [S].Beijing:China Pharmaceutical Science and Technology Press,2015.
[3] LU W L,YANG T,SONG Q J,et al.Akebia trifoliata (Thunb.) Koidz seed extract inhibits human hepatocellular carcinoma cell migration and invasion in vitro[J].Journal of Ethnopharmacology,2019,234(24):204-215.
[4] 郭林新, 马养民,李梦云,等.三叶木通利尿活性部位筛选及其化学成分[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2017,23(3):66-70.
GUO L X,MA Y M,LI M Y,et al.Screening of diuretic activity fractions and chemical compositions in rattan of Akebia trifoliate[J].Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae,2017,23(3):66-70.
[5] 刘岩庭, 侯雄军,谢月,等.木通属植物化学成分及药理作用研究进展[J].江西中医学院学报,2012,24(4):87-93.
LIU Y T,HOU X J,XIE Y,et al.Overview of research on chemical constituents and pharmacological activities of Akebia[J].Journal of Jiangxi University of traditional Chinese medicine,2012,24(4):87-93.
[6] 熊大胜,曾庸,牟子平.三叶木通开发利用研究初报[J].经济林研究,1993,1(1):67-68.
XIONG D S,ZENG Y,MU Z P.Preliminary report on the development and utilization of Akebia trifoliata[J].Economic Forest Research,1993,1(1):67-68.
[7] 徐娟,郑志锋,刘祥义,等.8种谷类食物中矿质元素的测定分析[J].西部林业科学,2016,45(5):140-143.
XU J,ZHENG Z F,LIU X Y,et al.Determination of mineral elements in eight cereals[J].Journal of West China Forestry Science,2016,45(5):140-143.
[8] 李磊, 张权,刘文政,等.酸水解法测定大米中17种氨基酸的含量[J].微量元素与健康研究,2020,37(1):2.
LI L,ZHANG Q,LIU W Z,et al.Determination of 17 amino acids in rice by acid hydrolysis method[J].Microelements and Health Research,2020,37(1):2.
[9] KRISHNA G G,KAPOOR S C.Potassium depletion exacerbates essential hypertension[J].Annals of Internal Medicine,1991,115(2):77-83.
[10] WILLIAMS G H,HOLLENBERG N K.Non-modulating hypertension-A subset of sodium-sensitive hypertension[J].Hypertension,1991,17(1):181-185.
[11] 刘沂华, 程勤海,杨丽,等.硼肥不同喷施方式对槜李产量和品质的影响[J].上海农业科技,2016,6(4):79-80.
LIU Y H,CHENG Q H,YANG L,et al.Effects of different spraying methods of boron fertilizer on yield and quality of plum[J].Shanghai Agricultural Science and Technology,2016,6(4):79-80.
[12] 刘新华. 因子分析中数据正向化处理的必要性及其软件实现[J].重庆工学院学报(自然科学版),2009,23(9):152-155.
LIU X H.Necessity and software operation of positive management in factor analysis[J].Journal of Chongqing Institute of Technology (Natural Science),2009,23(9):152-155.
[13] 王文博, 陈秀芝.多指标综合评价中主成分分析和因子分析方法的比较[J].统计与信息论坛,2006,21(5):19-22.
WANG W B,CHEN X Z.Comparison of principal component analysis with factor analysis in comprehensive multi-indicators scoring[J].Statistics & Information Forum,2006,21(5):19-22.
[14] BARRETT D M,BEAULIEU J C,SHEWFELT R.Color,flavor,texture,and nutritional quality of fresh-cut fruits and vegetables:Desirable levels,instrumental and sensory measurement,and the effects of processing[J].Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition,2010,50(5):369-389.
[15] 赵剑波, 姜全,郭继英,等.桃果实风味品质指标测定与品种筛选[J].江苏农业科学,2007,35(6):165-168.
ZHAO J B,JIANG Q,GUO J Y,et al.Determination of fruit flavor quality indexes and variety selection of peach[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Science,2007,35(6):165-168.
[16] 李海普,李彬,欧阳明,等.直链淀粉和支链淀粉的表征[J].食品科学,2010,31(11):273-277.
LI H P,LI B,OUYANG M,et al.Advances in characterization of amylose and amylopectin starch[J].Food Science,2010,31(11):273-277.
[17] 宋少华, 刘勤,李曼,等,甜柿果实矿质元素与品质指标的相关性及通径分析[J].果树学报,2016,33(2):202-209.
SONG S H,LIU Q,LI M,et al.Correlation and path analysis between mineral elements and quality parameters in non-astringent persimmon[J].Journal of Fruit Science,2016,33(2):202-209.
[18] 匡立学, 聂继云,李志霞,等.不同苹果品种果实矿质元素含量的因子分析和聚类分析[J].中国农业科学,2017,50(14):2 807-2 815.
KUANG L X,NIE J Y,LI Z X,et al.Factor analysis and cluster analysis of mineral element contents in different apple varieties[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica,2017,50(14):2 807-2 815.
[19] 王萍, 刘立云,董志国,等.不同品种嫩果椰水主要品质性状、矿质元素含量分析[J].果树学报,2008,25(4):601-603.
WANG P,LIU L Y,DONG Z G,et al.Characteristics and mineral elements of tender coconut water in different coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) cultivars[J].Journal of Fruit Science,2008,25(4):601-603.
[20] 唐成林,杨斌,陶光灿,等.八月瓜果实营养成分分析和评价[J].食品工业科技,2021,42(3):299-303.
TANG C L,YANG B,TAO G C,et al.Analysis and evaluation of nutritional components in Akebia trifoliate fruit[J].Science and Technology of Food Industry,2021,42(3): 299-303.
[21] 牛丽影, 刘春菊,李大婧,等.不同采收期鲜食玉米氨基酸变化分析[J].食品与发酵工业,2019,45(6):209-214.
NIU L Y,LIU C J,LI D J,et al.Analysis of amino acids in fresh-edible corns harvested at different time[J].Food and Fermentation Industries,2019,45(6):209-214.
[22] YIN J,REN W K,YANG G,et al.L-Cysteine metabolism and its nutritional implications[J].Molecular Nutrition & Food Research,2016,60(1):134-146.
[23] VALLABHA V S,TAPAL A,SUKHDEO S V,et al.Effect of arginine:Lysine ratio in free amino acid and protein form on L-NAME induced hypertension in hypercholesterolemic Wistar rats[J].Rsc Advances,2016,6(77):73 388-73 398.
[24] 仲伟敏, 马玉华.三叶木通优选单株果实的营养品质特性[J].贵州农业科学,2015,43(1):140-142.
ZHONG W M,MA Y H.Fruit nutrition quality of a good Akebia trifoliate plant[J].Guizhou Agricultural Sciences,2015,43(1):140-142.
[25] 万明长, 刘学武,班小重,等.三叶木通栽培条件下果实性状及营养成分分析[J].贵州农业科学,2008(3):121-122;198.
WAN M C,LIU X W,BAN X C,et al.The fruit character and nutrition composition of Akebia trifoliata (Thunb.) Koidz under the cultivation condition[J].Guizhou Agricultural Sciences,2008,36(3):121-122,198.
[1] 占敏宣, 魏清江, 林雄, 李宏祥, 陈金印, 马巧利. PCA再分析采收成熟度对桃溪蜜柚贮藏品质变化模式的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(9): 183-190.
[2] 郑涛, 苏柯星, 丛桂芝, 陈明杰, 孙丙寅, 刘淑明. 树上干杏和梅杏果实品质分析与综合评价[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(9): 201-207.
[3] 姚文生, 蔡莹暄, 刘登勇, 张明成, 马双玉, 杨晶, 苟紫慧, 张浩. 基于HS-GC-IMS和HS-SPME-GC-MS的熏鸡腿肉挥发性风味成分分析[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(9): 253-261.
[4] 张敏, 余佶, 王琪琰, 张锦程, 游湘淘, 姚茂君, 麻成金. 藤茶感官特征定量描述分析与风味轮构建[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(8): 134-139.
[5] 刘丹丹, 李昕沂, 罗晶晶, 王启会, 罗静, 王海燕. 超高压微射流均质技术对猕猴桃果酒品质的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(8): 165-169.
[6] 胡雪, 李锦松, 唐永清, 张良, 钱宇, 赵金松. 基于GC-MS结合化学计量学的浓香型白酒分类方法[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(8): 212-217.
[7] 郭金喜, 马燕, 范田丽, 杨光勇, 马君刚. 微波消解-电感耦合等离子体串联质谱法测定新疆黑枸杞红酒中微量元素的主成分分析[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(8): 243-249.
[8] 李晓朋, 曾欢, 林柳, 陶宁萍, 徐逍, 丛建华. 不同煎炸用油制备河豚鱼汤挥发性风味成分的差异性[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(7): 251-259.
[9] 张维, 付复华, 罗赛男, 赖灯妮, 朱向荣, 张群. 湖南红心猕猴桃品种品质评价及综合分析[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(5): 201-210.
[10] 杨学芳, 张继光, 吴万富, 吕世懂. 南瓜籽油中角鲨烯含量及特征指标比较[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(5): 217-223.
[11] 金文刚, 陈小华, 耿敬章, 姜鹏飞, 裴金金. 基于气相-离子迁移谱分析不同产地“汉中仙毫”气味指纹差异[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(5): 231-237.
[12] 张彦聪, 李昀哲, 张军, 唐磊. 柠檬椰汁复合果酒的工艺研究及香气特征分析[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(4): 173-181.
[13] 韦杰, 尹雅洁, 江伟, 宋层业, 魏灵, 廖志力, 韩兴林. 七种竹叶品种挥发性化合物的统计学评价[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(3): 181-187.
[14] 胡家艺, 牟方婷, 石黎琳, 华蓉, 王继飞, 曾凡坤. 夏季和冬季普定县韭黄韭菜的营养与香气成分分析[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(3): 197-204.
[15] 张孟琴, 徐路, 孙亚真, 石建辉. 月季花瓣营养成分评价及主成分和聚类分析[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(2): 274-278.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《食品与发酵工业》编辑部
地址:北京朝阳区酒仙桥中路24号院6号楼111室
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn