研究报告

树脂对小麦秸秆水解液中丁醇发酵抑制物的脱除效果

  • 刘国强 ,
  • 易卓林 ,
  • 何开泽 ,
  • 杨林 ,
  • 方扬 ,
  • 赵海 ,
  • 靳艳玲
展开
  • 1(中国科学院成都生物研究所,四川 成都,610041)
    2(中国科学院大学 生命科学学院,北京,100049)
    3(中国科学院环境与应用微生物重点实验室,四川 成都,610041)
硕士研究生(赵海研究员和靳艳玲研究员为共同通信作者,E-mail:zhaohai@cib.ac.cn;jinyl@cib.ac.cn)

收稿日期: 2021-03-29

  修回日期: 2021-05-15

  网络出版日期: 2022-02-28

基金资助

国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFB1501401)

Removal effect of resins on butanol fermentation inhibitors in wheat straw hydrolysate

  • LIU Guoqiang ,
  • YI Zhuolin ,
  • HE Kaize ,
  • YANG Lin ,
  • FANG Yang ,
  • ZHAO Hai ,
  • JIN Yanling
Expand
  • 1(Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Science, Chengdu 610041, China)
    2(College of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049, China)
    3(Key Laboratory of Environmental and Applied Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Science, Chengdu 610041, China)

Received date: 2021-03-29

  Revised date: 2021-05-15

  Online published: 2022-02-28

摘要

酸水解产生的副产物会严重抑制小麦秸秆水解液丁醇发酵。该文针对树脂对小麦秸秆水解液中丁醇发酵抑制物的脱除效果进行研究。通过强酸性苯乙烯系阳离子交换树脂732及大孔树脂XAD-4对小麦秸秆水解液进行抑制物脱除处理,以未处理组作为对照。离子交换树脂732处理后丁醇得率及含量均高于大孔树脂XAD-4处理。离子交换树脂732处理后在糖质量浓度为33.23 g/L的条件下发酵,丁醇和总溶剂质量浓度可达到7.58、13.09 g/L,得率分别可达到0.23、0.40 g/g,相对于对照组产量分别提高了5.3、5.9倍。在发酵前期,对照组丙酮丁醇梭菌的ATP和烟酰胺腺嘌呤二核苷酸(nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide,NADH)积累缓慢,在发酵进行到24 h的时候达到峰值。随着发酵的进行,对照组中丙酮丁醇梭菌的乙醇脱氢酶和丁醇脱氢酶活性最高仅能达到初始状态的29%和44%,而在离子交换树脂732处理组中可以达到初始状态的171%和142%。

本文引用格式

刘国强 , 易卓林 , 何开泽 , 杨林 , 方扬 , 赵海 , 靳艳玲 . 树脂对小麦秸秆水解液中丁醇发酵抑制物的脱除效果[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2022 , 48(2) : 26 -32 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.027540

Abstract

By-products from acid hydrolysis of wheat straw can seriously inhibit butanol fermentation. The removal effect of resins on butanol fermentation inhibitors was studied here. Strong acid styrene cation exchange resin 732 and microporous resin XAD-4 were used for the removal of inhibitors in wheat straw hydrolysate, while the untreated group was set as control. Higher yield and concentration of butanol were obtained from the fermentation with resin 732 treatment than those from macroporous resin XAD-4 treatment. Additionally, after resin 732 treatment, fermentation was conducted at a sugar content of 33.23 g/L, and the concentration of butanol and total solvent reached 7.58 and 13.09 g/L, with the yield of 0.23 and 0.40 g/g, which were 5.3 and 5.9 times higher than those from the control group, respectively. In the control group, the accumulation rates of ATP and NADH were slow at the early fermentation stage and reached top values at 24 h. More importantly, during the fermentation, the highest activities of ethanol dehydrogenase and butanol dehydrogenase only reached 29% and 44% of the initial value, while in resin 732 treated group, these could reach as high as 171% and 142%, respectively.

参考文献

[1] 高越, 郭晓鹏, 杨阳, 等.生物丁醇发酵研究进展[J].生物技术通报, 2018, 34(8):27-34.
GAO Y, GUO X P, YANG Y, et al.Research progress of biobutanol fermentation[J].Biotechnology Bulletin, 2018, 34(8):27-34.
[2] VEZA I, MUHAMAD SAID M F, LATIFF Z A.Recent advances in butanol production by acetone-butanol-ethanol (ABE) fermentation[J].Biomass and Bioenergy, 2021, 144:105919.
[3] KEIS S, SHAHEEN R, JONES D T.Emended descriptions of Clostridium acetobutylicum and Clostridium beijerinckii, and descriptions of Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum sp.nov.and Clostridium saccharobutylicum sp.nov[J].International Journal of Systematic Evolutionary Microbiology, 2001, 51(6):2 095-2 103.
[4] KLINKE H B, THOMSEN A B, AHRING B K.Inhibition of ethanol-producing yeast and bacteria by degradation products produced during pre-treatment of biomass[J].Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2004, 66(1):10-26.
[5] SUN Y, CHENG J Y.Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production:A review[J].Bioresource Technology, 2002, 83(1):1-11.
[6] OLSSON L, HAHN-HÄGERDAL B.Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates for ethanol production[J].Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 1996, 18(5):312-331.
[7] DONG J J, HAN R Z, XU G C, et al.Detoxification of furfural residues hydrolysate for butanol fermentation by Clostridium saccharobutylicum DSM 13864[J].Bioresource Technology, 2018, 259:40-45.
[8] CEBREIROS F, RISSO F, CAGNO M, et al.Enhanced production of butanol and xylosaccharides from Eucalyptus grandis wood using steam explosion in a semi-continuous pre-pilot reactor[J].Fuel, 2021,290:119818.
[9] HARDE S M, JADHAV S B, BANKAR S B, et al.Acetone-butanol-ethanol (ABE) fermentation using the root hydrolysate after extraction of forskolin from Coleus forskohlii[J].Renewable Energy, 2016, 86:594-601.
[10] GREEN E M, BOYNTON Z L,HARRIS L M, et al.Genetic manipulation of acid formation pathways by gene inactivation in Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824[J].Microbiology, 1996, 142(8):2 079-2 086.
[11] WIESENBORN D P, RUDOLPH F B, PAPOUTSAKIS E T.Coenzyme A transferase from Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 and its role in the uptake of acids[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1989, 55(2):323-329.
[12] 孙彦平. 玉米芯纤维素发酵生产燃料丁醇的研究[D].成都:中国科学院成都生物研究所, 2010.
SUN Y P.Studies on the butanol fermentation from corn cob cellulose[D].Chengdu:Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Science, 2010.
[13] ZHU Y, YANG S T.Adaptation of Clostridium tyrobutyricum for enhanced tolerance to butyric acid in a fibrous-bed bioreactor[J].Biotechnology Progress, 2003, 19(2):365-372.
[14] 苏增平. Ca2+对玉米秸秆水解液丙酮丁醇发酵的影响[D].郑州:河南农业大学, 2018.
SU Z P.Effect of Ca2+ on acetone-butanol fermentation from corn stalk hydrolysate[D].Zhengzhou:Henan Agricultural University, 2018.
[15] DURRE P, KUHN A, GOTTSCHALK G.Treatment with allyl alcohol selects specifically for mutants of Clostridium acetobutylicum defective in butanol synthesis[J].Fems Microbiology Letters, 1986, 36(1):77-81.
[16] HIU S F, ZHU C X, YAN R T, et al.Butanol-ethanol dehydrogenase and butanol-ethanol-isopropanol dehydrogenase:Different alcohol dehydrogenases in two strains of Clostridium beijerinckii (Clostridium butylicum) [J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1987, 53(4):697-703.
[17] ROSE I A. Acetate Kinase of Bacteria (Acetokinase)[M].Methods in Enzymology, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1955:591-595.
[18] ACETI D J, FERRY J G.Purification and characterization of acetate kinase from acetate-grown Methanosarcina thermophila.Evidence for regulation of synthesis[J].Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1988, 263(30):15 444-15 448.
[19] 李骆冰, 王永红, 庄英萍, 等.乙醇发酵中酿酒酵母辅酶NAD+及NADH测定方法[J].食品与生物技术学报, 2011, 30(2):287-294.
LI L B, WANG Y H, ZHUANG Y P, et al.Determination of coenzyme NAD+ and NADH of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells in ethanol production[J].Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology, 2011, 30(2):287-294.
[20] 王镜岩. 生物化学[M].第三版.北京:高等教育出版社, 2007.
WANG J Y.Biochemistry[M].3th ed.Beijing:Higher Education Press, 2007.
[21] 邱学剑, 刘江, 杨成志, 等.硫酸钙晶须对磷的静态吸附[J].化工环保, 2014, 34(5):405-409.
QIU X J, LIU J, YANG C Z, et al.Static adsorption of phosphorus on calcium sulfate whisker[J].Environmental Protection of Chemical Industry, 2014, 34(5):405-409.
[22] YU Y, CHRISTOPHER L P.Detoxification of hemicellulose-rich poplar hydrolysate by polymeric resins for improved ethanol fermentability[J].Fuel, 2017, 203:187-196.
[23] IJZER A C, VRIEZEKOLK E, ROLEVINK E, et al.Performance analysis of aromatic adsorptive resins for the effective removal of furan derivatives from glucose[J].Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 2015, 90(1):101-109.
[24] 何景昌, 张正波, 裘娟萍.生物丁醇合成途径中关键酶及其基因的研究进展[J].食品与发酵工业, 2009, 35(2):116-120.
HE J C, ZHANG Z B, QIU J P.Progress in crucial enzymes and gene involved in biobutanol synthesis[J].Food and Fermentation Industries, 2009, 35(2):116-120.
[25] GAO K, REHMANN L.Combined detoxification and insitu product removal by a single resin during lignocellulosic butanol production[J].Scientific Reports, 2016, 6:30533.
[26] 顾春凯, 王根宇, 刘宏娟, 等.玉米芯半纤维素水解液中抑制物对丁醇发酵的影响[J].生物技术通报, 2016, 32(7):178-185.
GU C K, WANG G Y, LIU H J, et al.Effects of inhibitors in corncob hemicellulose hydrolysate on butanol fermentation[J].Biotechnology Bulletin, 2016, 32(7):178-185.
[27] WANG S H, ZHANG Y P, DONG H J, et al.Formic acid triggers the “Acid Crash” of acetone-butanol-ethanol fermentation by Clostridium acetobutylicum[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2011, 77(5):1 674-1 680.
文章导航

/