研究报告

基于全基因组测序的黄水芽胞杆菌Bacillus aquiflavi 3H-10安全性评价

  • 程坤 ,
  • 刘蕊 ,
  • 孙思佳 ,
  • 翟磊 ,
  • 郑佳 ,
  • 姚粟
展开
  • 1(中国食品发酵工业研究院有限公司,中国工业微生物菌种保藏管理中心,北京,100015)
    2(宜宾五粮液股份有限公司,四川 宜宾,644000)
第一作者:程坤高级工程师和刘蕊助理工程师为共同第一作者(姚粟教授级高级工程师为通信作者,E-mail:milly@china-cicc.org)

收稿日期: 2021-10-13

  修回日期: 2021-11-29

  网络出版日期: 2022-10-01

基金资助

中国轻工业浓香型白酒固态发酵重点实验室开放基金项目(2019JJ008)

Safety evaluation of Bacillus aquiflavi 3H-10 based on whole genome sequencing

  • CHENG Kun ,
  • LIU Rui ,
  • SUN Sijia ,
  • ZHAI Lei ,
  • ZHENG Jia ,
  • YAO Su
Expand
  • 1(China National Research Institute of Food and Fermentation Industries Co.Ltd., China Center of Industrial Culture Collection, Beijing 100015, China)
    2(Wuliangye Yibin Co.Ltd., Yibin 644000, China)

Received date: 2021-10-13

  Revised date: 2021-11-29

  Online published: 2022-10-01

摘要

黄水芽胞杆菌Bacillus aquiflavi 3H-10分离自我国四川省宜宾地区传统发酵浓香型白酒黄水样品,具有产生蛋白酶和多种风味物质的能力。对黄水芽胞杆菌3H-10进行高通量基因组测序,并开展耐药基因、毒力基因和致病性分析,以及药物敏感性检测、小鼠毒力实验,以综合评价黄水芽胞杆菌3H-10的安全性。结果显示,黄水芽胞杆菌3H-10基因组为一条环状的DNA,大小3 806 094 bp,G+C含量为35.66%(摩尔百分含量),基因组中预测到4 031个基因、81个tRNA基因、27个rRNA基因、16个sRNA基因;3H-10基因组中未检测到潜在耐药基因,且对常见的9大类、10种抗生素表现为敏感,判断菌株无横向转移耐药性的风险;3H-10基因组中未检测到潜在毒力相关基因,受试小鼠不产生毒性反应或死亡,判断菌株无毒力或人体致病性。黄水芽胞杆菌3H-10在耐药性、毒力与致病性方面无安全性风险。

本文引用格式

程坤 , 刘蕊 , 孙思佳 , 翟磊 , 郑佳 , 姚粟 . 基于全基因组测序的黄水芽胞杆菌Bacillus aquiflavi 3H-10安全性评价[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2022 , 48(17) : 49 -56 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.029691

Abstract

Bacillus aquiflavi 3H-10 was isolated from yellow water of strong-flavor Chinese Baijiu in Yibin, Sichuan province, China, and it had significant ability in producing protease and various flavor substances. High-throughput genome sequencing of strain 3H-10 was carried out and antimicrobial resistance genes, virulence factors genes, pathogenicity, antimicrobial susceptibility testing and virulence test in mice were analyzed to comprehensively evaluate the safety of the strain. The result showed that the genome of strain 3H-10 was a circular DNA with a size of 3 806 094 bp and the G+C content was 35.66 mol%. A total of 4 031 genes were predicted along with 81 tRNA, 27 rRNA and 16 sRNA. No potential antimicrobial resistance genes were detected in the genome of 3H-10 and the strain was sensitive to 10 common antibiotics affiliated with nine classes, indicating no risks of horizontally transferring antimicrobial resistance. No potential virulence genes were detected in the genome of strain 3H-10, and the virulence test demonstrated no toxic reaction or death in mice, implying that the strain 3H-10 was non-virulent or non-human pathogenic. It was concluded that strain B. aquiflavi 3H-10 possesses no safety risks in the aspect of antimicrobial resistance, virulence or pathogenicity.

参考文献

[1] FAO/WHO, Joint FAO/WHO Working group report on drafting guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food[R].London, Ontario, Canada,2002, May.
[2] EUROPEAN FOOD SAFETY AUTHORITY (EFSA).Introduction of a Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS) approach for assessment of selected microorganisms referred to EFSA - Opinion of the Scientific Committee[J].EFSA Journal, 2007, 5(12):587.
[3] United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA).Guidance for industry:enzyme preparations:recommendations for submission of chemical and technological data for food additive petitions and GRAS notices[A].2010.
[4] 益生菌的科学共识(2020年版)[J].中国食品学报, 2020, 20(5):303-307.
Scientific consensus on probiotics(2020)[J].Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 2020, 20(5):303-307.
[5] KOUTSOUMANIS K, ALLENDE A, ALVAREZ-ORDONE A, et al.Scientific opinion on the update of the list of QPS recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA (2017—2019)[J].EFSA Journal, 2019, 15(3):e04664.
[6] BOURDICHON F, ALPER I, BIBILONI R, et al.Inventory of microbial food cultures with safety demonstration in fermented food products[R].Update of the Bulletin the International Dairy Federation No 455-2012,2018.
[7] 姚粟, 于学健, 白飞荣, 等.中国传统发酵食品用微生物菌种名单的研究[J].食品与发酵工业, 2017, 43(9):238-258.
YAO S, YU X J, BAI F R, et al.Research on the inventory of microbial species in Chinese traditional fermented foods[J].Food and Fermentation Industries, 2017, 43(9):238-258.
[8] XIE J Y, CHENG K, ZHAO D, et al.Bacillus aquiflavi sp.nov., isolated from yellow water of strongly flavored Chinese Baijiu[J].International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2020, 70(5):3 406-3 412.
[9] ALCOCK B P, RAPHENYA A R, LAU T T Y, et al.CARD 2020:Antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database[J].Nucleic Acids Research, 2019, 48(D1):D517-D525.
[10] BORTOLAIA V, KAAS R S, RUPPE E, et al.ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes[J].Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2020, 75(12):3 491-3 500.
[11] LIU B, ZHENG D D, JIN Q, et al.VFDB 2019:A comparative pathogenomic platform with an interactive web interface[J].Nucleic Acids Research, 2018, 47(D1):D687-D692.
[12] MALBERG TETZSCHNER A M, JOHNSON J R, JOHNSTON B D, et al.In silico genotyping of Escherichia coli isolates for extraintestinal virulence genes by use of whole-genome sequencing data[J].Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2020, 58(10):e01269-e01220.
[13] CLSI document M45-2 016.Methods for antimicrobial dilution and disk susceptibility testing of infrequently isolated or fastidious bacteria:approved guideline-second edition[S].Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), 2016.
[14] RYCHEN G, AQUILINA G, AZIMONTI G, et al.Guidance on the characterisation of microorganisms used as feed additives or as production organisms[J].EFSA Journal, 2018, 16(3):e05206.
[15] LOGAN N, VOS P.Genus I.Bacillus.Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology.Second Edition.Volume three, the Firmicutes[M].2nd ed.Springer, 2009:21.
[16] ZHOU Y X, LIU G H, LIU B, et al.Bacillus mesophilus sp.nov., an alginate-degrading bacterium isolated from a soil sample collected from an abandoned marine solar saltern[J].Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 2016, 109(7):937-943.
[17] GUPTA R S, PATEL S, SAINI N, et al.Robust demarcation of 17 distinct Bacillus species clades, proposed as novel Bacillaceae genera, by phylogenomics and comparative genomic analyses:Description of Robertmurraya kyonggiensis sp.nov.and proposal for an emended genus Bacillus limiting it only to the members of the subtilis and cereus clades of species[J].International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2020, 70(11):5 753-5 798.
[18] ADIMPONG D B, SØRENSEN K I, THORSEN L, et al.Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacillus strains isolated from primary starters for African traditional bread production and characterization of the bacitracin operon and bacitracin biosynthesis[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2012, 78(22):7 903-7 914.
[19] VAN HOEK A H A M, MEVIUS D, GUERRA B, et al.Acquired antibiotic resistance genes:An overview[J].Frontiers in Microbiology, 2011, 2:203.
[20] WHO.Critically important antimicrobials for human medicine 6threvision 2018.Ranking of medically important antimicrobials for risk management of antimicrobial resistance due to non-human use[A].2018.
[21] WHO.Global antimicrobial resistance surveillance system (GLASS) report:early implementation,2 017-2 018.
[22] 庄子慧, 何丽, 郭云昌, 等.我国食源性蜡样芽孢杆菌毒力基因和药物敏感性研究[J].中国食品卫生杂志, 2013, 25(3):198-201.
ZHUANG Z H, HE L, GUO Y C, et al.Virulent gene profiles and antibiotic susceptibility of foodborne Bacillus cereus in China[J].Chinese Journal of Food Hygiene, 2013, 25(3):198-201.
[23] 刘秀峰, 潘洁茹, 林萍.应用多重PCR技术检测120株蜡样芽胞杆菌毒力基因[J].现代预防医学, 2018, 45(21):3 972-3 976.
LIU X F, PAN J R, LIN P.Detection of 120 strains of Bacillus cereus virulence genes by multiplex PCR[J].Modern Preventive Medicine, 2018, 45(21):3 972-3 976.
[24] SULTHANA A, LAKSHMI S G, MADEMPUDI R S.Genome sequencing and annotation of Bacillus subtilis UBBS-14 to ensure probiotic safety[J].Journal of Genomics, 2019, 7:14-17.
[25] SAROJ D B, GUPTA A K.Genome based safety assessment for Bacillus coagulans strain LBSC (DSM 17654) for probiotic application[J].International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2020, 318:108523.
文章导航

/