研究报告

乳杆菌与幽门螺杆菌共聚集的特性研究

  • 李露露 ,
  • 王钧豪 ,
  • 叶亚明 ,
  • 赵学超 ,
  • 向卫兵 ,
  • 朱鹏飞 ,
  • 翟齐啸
展开
  • 1(江南大学 食品学院,江苏 无锡,214122)
    2(湖北均瑶大健康饮品股份有限公司,湖北 宜昌,443100)
硕士研究生(翟齐啸教授为通信作者,E-mail:zhaiqixiao@sina.com)

收稿日期: 2022-03-01

  修回日期: 2022-03-21

  网络出版日期: 2022-12-02

基金资助

江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK20200084)

Characterization of Lactobacillus co-aggregation with Helicobacter pylori

  • LI Lulu ,
  • WANG Junhao ,
  • YE Yaming ,
  • ZHAO Xuechao ,
  • XIANG Weibing ,
  • ZHU Pengfei ,
  • ZHAI Qixiao
Expand
  • 1(School of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China)
    2(Juneyao Grand Healthy Drinks Co.Ltd., Yichang 443100, China)

Received date: 2022-03-01

  Revised date: 2022-03-21

  Online published: 2022-12-02

摘要

乳杆菌与致病菌的共聚集可以减少病原体在体内的定殖。已有研究表明,通过特定细菌共聚集幽门螺杆菌(Helicobacter pylori)从而降低其在胃内的载量是一种有效拮抗H. pylori的新方法。该研究首先构建体外筛选模型,评价56株乳杆菌与H. pylori的共聚作用,使用扫描电子显微镜和激光共聚焦显微镜观察聚集体的结构组成,进一步探究了时间、温度、pH、孵育转速、超声波和表面疏水性等因素对聚集作用的影响,最后利用比较基因组学分析具有不同聚集能力菌株的功能基因差异。结果表明,筛选得到的北酸乳杆菌(Lactobacillus kitasatonis)Guxi82GMM和罗伊氏乳杆菌(Lactobacillus reuteri)984共聚率在10 min内可达42%~59%,共聚率与pH值、菌株表面疏水性之间存在显著相关性,但是与温度、孵育转速和超声处理等无关。比较基因组显示,不同聚集能力的菌株氨基酸表达水平存在显著差异,由此推测乳杆菌共聚集H. pylori的物质基础可能是其表面的蛋白分子。乳杆菌与H. pylori的共聚集能力是靶向性筛选缓解H. pylori感染益生菌的有效途径。

本文引用格式

李露露 , 王钧豪 , 叶亚明 , 赵学超 , 向卫兵 , 朱鹏飞 , 翟齐啸 . 乳杆菌与幽门螺杆菌共聚集的特性研究[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2022 , 48(21) : 1 -8 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.031353

Abstract

As a recognized pathogen, Helicobacter pylori can cause chronic gastritis, peptic ulcers, and gastric cancer. More than 50% of the world’s population is infected with this stomach bacterium. Studies have shown that disease severity in infected patients is related to the amount of H. pylori in the body. Currently, the conventional therapeutic option is triple therapy or bismuth-containing quadruple therapy, as recommended by the Maastriacht IV/Florence Consensus Report, which has a 10-day treatment eradication rate of over 90%. In addition to antibiotic therapy, there are many dietary treatments and Lactobacillus bacteria supplement therapy for H. pylori infection. Co-aggregation of Lactobacillus bacteria and pathogenic bacteria is described as the process by which genetically distinct bacteria are linked to each other by specific molecules. In disease states, specific co-aggregation as a means of restoring homeostasis has been widely discussed. Many studies have reported that Lactobacillus can prevent the development of pathogenic biofilms by co-aggregating pathogenic bacteria in the mouth, vagina, and gastrointestinal tract, thus alleviating the development of disease. To date, some studies have shown that reducing the load of H. pylori in the stomach via selective bacterial-bacterial cell interaction is a neoteric and efficient method against H. pylori infection. In this study, an in vitro screening model was constructed to evaluate the co-aggregation of 56 Lactobacillus strains with H. pylori, and the structural composition of the aggregates was observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM). These Lactobacillus strains, collected by the Biotechnology Center, School of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, came from wild-type strains of diverse origins, such as food sources or the gut flora of long-lived people. Then the effects of the time, temperature, pH, incubation speed, ultrasonic and surface hydrophobicity on the aggregation were further investigated. Due to the low pH of the human stomach and the peristalsis associated with digestion, these factors were considered in this study to evaluate Lactobacillus with the ability to co-aggregate H. pylori. Finally, a comparative genomics approach was used to analyze the differences of functional genes in strains with different aggregating abilities. The results showed that the co-aggregation ability of Lactobacillus and H. pylori was different between strains. Among them, Lactobacillus kitasatonis Guxi82GMM and Lactobacillus reuteri 984 had better co-aggregation effect, and their co-aggregation rate could reach 42%-59% within 10 min. There was a significant correlation between the co-aggregation rate and pH value and surface hydrophobicity of strain, but was not related to temperature, incubation speed and ultrasonic treatment. In addition, there were significant differences in amino acid expression levels among strains with different co-aggregative abilities, suggesting that the material basis of the co-aggregation of Lactobacillus and H. pylori might be surface protein on Lactobacillus. Therefore, the co-aggregation of Lactobacillus and H. pylori can occur rapidly and stably in the human stomach. The selected Lactobacillus can combine to the dissociative H. pylori surface through some specific surface components (such as surface proteins), and form larger aggregates to promote the elimination of pathogenic bacteria from the body. The co-aggregation ability of Lactobacillus and H. pylori is an effective way for targeted screening probiotics to alleviate H. pylori infection.

参考文献

[1] DO A D, CHANG C C, SU C H, et al.Lactobacillus rhamnosus JB3 inhibits Helicobacter pylori infection through multiple molecular actions[J].Helicobacter, 2021, 26(3):e12806.
[2] MALFERTHEINER P, MEGRAUD F, O’MORAIN C, et al.Current concepts in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection:The Maastricht III Consensus Report[J].Biomedicines, 2007, 56(6):772-781.
[3] MALFERTHEINER P, MEGRAUD F, O’MORAIN C A, et al.Management of Helicobacter pylori infection-the Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Report[J].Gut, 2017, 66(1):6-30.
[4] RIBEIRO A R S, DINIZ P B F, ESTEVAM C S, et al.Gastroprotective activity of the ethanol extract from the inner bark of Caesalpinia pyramidalis in rats[J].Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 2013, 147(2):383-388.
[5] SREEJA P S, ARUNACHALAM K, SAIKUMAR S, et al.Gastroprotective effect and mode of action of methanol extract of Sphenodesme involucrata var.paniculata (C.B.Clarke) Munir (Lamiaceae) leaves on experimental gastric ulcer models[J].Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 2018, 97:1 109-1 118.
[6] CHEN M J, CHEN C C, HUANG Y C, et al.The efficacy of Lactobacillus acidophilus and rhamnosus in the reduction of bacterial load of Helicobacter pylori and modification of gut microbiota:A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial[J].Helicobacter, 2021, 26(6):e12857.
[7] SCHELLENBERG J, SMORAGIEWICZ W, KARSKAWYSOCKI B.A rapid method combining immunofluorescence and flow cytometry for improved understanding of competitive interactions between lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and methicillin-resistant S.aureus (MRSA) in mixed culture[J].Journal of Microbiological Methods, 2006, 65(1):1-9.
[8] TANZER J M, THOMPSON A, LANG C, et al.Caries inhibition by and safety of Lactobacillus paracasei DSMZ16671[J].Journal of Dental Research, 2010, 89(9):921-926.
[9] LANG C, BÖTTNER M, HOLZ C, et al.Specific Lactobacillus/mutans Streptococcus co-aggregation[J].Journal of Dental Research, 2010, 89(2):175-179.
[10] EKMEKCI H, ASLIM B, OZTURK S.Characterization of vaginal lactobacilli coaggregation ability with Escherichia coli[J].Microbiology and Immunology, 2009, 53(2):59-65.
[11] HOLZ C, BUSJAHN A, MEHLING H, et al.Significant reduction in Helicobacter pylori load in humans with non-viable Lactobacillus reuteri DSM17648:A pilot study[J].Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins, 2015, 7(2):91-100.
[12] KOS B, ŠUŠKOVIĆAĆ J, VUKOVIĆAĆ S, et al.Adhesion and aggregation ability of probiotic strain Lactobacillus acidophilus M92[J].Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2003, 94(6):981-987.
[13] NIKOLIC M, JOVCIC B, KOJIC M, et al.Surface properties of Lactobacillus and Leuconostoc isolates from homemade cheeses showing auto-aggregation ability[J].European Food Research and Technology, 2010, 231(6):925-931.
[14] YUNGAREVA T, URSHEV Z.The aggregation-promoting factor in Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp.bulgaricus:Confirmation of the presence and expression of the apf gene and in silico analysis of the corresponding protein[J].World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2018, 34(7):97.
[15] BEAUSSART A, EL-KIRAT-CHATEL S, SULLAN R M A, et al.Quantifying the forces guiding microbial cell adhesion using single-cell force spectroscopy[J].Nature Protocols, 2014, 9(5):1 049-1 055.
[16] SCHACHTSIEK M, HAMMES W P, HERTEL C.Characterization of Lactobacillus coryniformis DSM 20001T surface protein CPF Mediating coaggregation with and aggregation among pathogens[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2004, 70(12):7 078-7 085.
[17] DUNNE C, DOLAN B, CLYNE M.Factors that mediate colonization of the human stomach by Helicobacter pylori[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2014, 20(19):5610.
[18] ARENAS J, NIJLAND R, RODRIGUEZ F J, et al.Involvement of three meningococcal surface-exposed proteins, the heparin-binding protein NhbA, the α-peptide of IgA protease and the autotransporter protease NalP, in initiation of biofilm formation[J].Molecular Microbiology, 2013, 87(2):254-268.
[19] KOLODZIEJEK A M, SINCLAIR D J, SEO K S, et al.Phenotypic characterization of OmpX, an Ail homologue of Yersinia pestis KIM[J].Microbiology, 2007, 153(9):2 941-2 951.
[20] KURODA M, ITO R, TANAKA Y, et al.Staphylococcus aureus surface protein SasG contributes to intercellular autoaggregation of Staphylococcus aureus[J].Biochemical & Biophysical Research Communications, 2008, 377(4):1 102-1 106.
[21] JACOBS A, CHENIA H Y.Biofilm formation and adherence characteristics of an Elizabethkingia meningoseptica isolate from Oreochromis mossambicus[J].Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, 2011, 10:16.
[22] ROSEN G, SELA M N.Coaggregation of Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum PK 1594 is mediated by capsular polysaccharide and lipopolysaccharide[J].FEMS Microbiology Letters, 2006, 256(2):304-310.
[23] OZDOGAN D K, AKCELIK N, ASLIM B, et al.Probiotic and antioxidative properties of L.lactis LL27 isolated from milk[J].Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, 2012, 26(1):2 750-2 758.
[24] THELLIN O, ZORZI W, ZORZI D, et al.Lysozyme as a cotreatment during antibiotics use against vaginal infections:An in vitro study on Gardnerella vaginalis biofilm models[J].International Microbiology Official Journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology, 2016, 19(2):101-107.
[25] BASCHONG W, SUETTERLIN R, LAENG R H.Control of autofluorescence of archival formaldehyde-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue in confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM)[J].The Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry, 2001, 49(12):1 565-1 572.
[26] TATUSOV R L, GALPERIN M Y, NATALE D A, et al.The COG database:A tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution[J].Nucleic Acids Research, 2000, 28(1):33-36.
[27] KATAKURA Y, SANO R, HASHIMOTO T, et al.Lactic acid bacteria display on the cell surface cytosolic proteins that recognize yeast mannan[J].Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2010, 86(1):319-326.
[28] COLLADO M C, MERILUOTO J, SALMINEN S.Adhesion and aggregation properties of probiotic and pathogen strains[J].European Food Research & Technology, 2008, 226(5):1 065-1 073.
[29] TONOIKE R, MOMOSE H.Studies on the aggregation of yeasts caused by lactobacilli[J].Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 1969, 35:D1.
[30] VINDEROLA C G, MEDICI M, PERDIGÓN G.Relationship between interaction sites in the gut, hydrophobicity, mucosal immunomodulating capacities and cell wall protein profiles in indigenous and exogenous bacteria[J].Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2004, 96(2):230-243.
[31] WAĆAS'G1ĞKO A, POLAK-BERECKA M, PADUCH R, et al.The effect of moonlighting proteins on the adhesion and aggregation ability of Lactobacillus helveticus[J].Anaerobe, 2014, 30:161-168.
[32] LIU Y, XIAO W, YU L, et al.Evidence from comparative genomic analyses indicating that Lactobacillus-mediated irritable bowel syndrome alleviation is mediated by conjugated linoleic acid synthesis[J].Food & Function, 2021, 12(3):1 121-1 134.
[33] CHEN Y, SONG J M, SUI S F, et al.DnaK and DnaJ facilitated the folding process and reduced inclusion body formation of magnesium transporter CorA overexpressed in Escherichia coli[J].Protein Expression and Purification, 2003, 32(2):221-231.
文章导航

/