研究报告

干燥方式对糯米香叶干燥动力学及挥发性成分的影响

  • 薛晶晶 ,
  • 李山 ,
  • 许志杰 ,
  • 李岩冰 ,
  • 许航 ,
  • 吴薇 ,
  • 孙正光 ,
  • 白冰 ,
  • 杨靖
展开
  • 1(郑州轻工业大学 烟草科学与工程学院, 河南 郑州, 450001)
    2(甘肃烟草工业有限责任公司技术研发中心, 甘肃 兰州, 730050)
    3(贝尔香精香料(上海)有限公司, 上海, 201600)
    4(郑州轻大烟草产业技术研究院有限公司, 河南 郑州, 450001)
    5(江西中烟工业有限责任公司技术中心, 江西 南昌, 330096)
第一作者:硕士研究生(杨靖教授为通信作者,E-mail:13623810925@126.com)

收稿日期: 2024-07-11

  修回日期: 2024-08-15

  网络出版日期: 2025-06-19

基金资助

国家自然科学基金青年基金资助项目(81903507);香味前体物液相色谱-质谱数据库构建及应用研究(110202201053(SJ-03))

Effect of drying methods on drying kinetics and volatile components of Strobilanthes tonkinensis leaves

  • XUE Jingjing ,
  • LI Shan ,
  • XU Zhijie ,
  • LI Yanbing ,
  • XU Hang ,
  • WU Wei ,
  • SUN Zhengguang ,
  • BAI Bing ,
  • YANG Jing
Expand
  • 1(College of Tobacco Science and Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou 450001, China)
    2(Technology R&D Center, Gansu Tobacco Industry Co. Ltd. , Lanzhou 730050, China)
    3(Bell Flavors & Fragrances (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. , Shanghai 201600, China)
    4(Zhengzhou Qingda Tobacco Industry Technology Research Institute Co. Ltd. , Zhengzhou 450001, China)
    5(Technology Center, China Tobacco Jiangxi Industrial Co. Ltd. , Nanchang 330096, China)

Received date: 2024-07-11

  Revised date: 2024-08-15

  Online published: 2025-06-19

摘要

以糯米香叶为研究对象,探究热风干燥(hot air drying,HAD)40 ℃、热风干燥50 ℃(HAD 50 ℃)、热风干燥60 ℃(HAD 60 ℃)、微波真空(microwave vacuum drying,MVD)、真空冷冻(vacuum freeze drying,VFD)、自然晾干对糯米香叶干燥动力学及挥发性成分的影响。通过薄层干燥模型模拟糯米香叶6种干燥方式的干燥过程,利用电子鼻(E-nose)及顶空固相微萃取-气相色谱-质谱联用技术,分析不同干燥方式对挥发性成分的影响,并结合感官评价,确定糯米香叶适宜的干燥方式。结果表明,MVD干燥速率最高,自然晾干最低。Page模型为模拟糯米香叶干燥特性的最佳数学模型。不同干燥方式的挥发性成分的种类及含量差异显著,与电子鼻结果基本一致,6种干燥方式共检出9类61种挥发性成分,其中HAD 40 ℃、HAD 50 ℃、HAD 60 ℃、MVD、VFD、自然晾干分别检出42种、27种、28种、25种、38种、49种,HAD 50 ℃、HAD 60 ℃、MVD的挥发性成分损失显著,VFD和自然晾干能保留大部分醇类和酮类成分,HAD 40 ℃含氮化合物含量最高。感官评价表明:HAD 40 ℃的感官总评分最高,其茶汤呈现明亮的黄绿色,香气纯正,糯米特征香气更为明显,口感较醇厚,余味较强。偏最小二乘法共筛选出20种差异挥发性成分,能够有效区分糯米香叶的不同干燥方式。研究结果可为糯米香叶的精细化干燥加工提供理论依据。

本文引用格式

薛晶晶 , 李山 , 许志杰 , 李岩冰 , 许航 , 吴薇 , 孙正光 , 白冰 , 杨靖 . 干燥方式对糯米香叶干燥动力学及挥发性成分的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2025 , 51(11) : 342 -350 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.040461

Abstract

The study investigated the impact of different drying methods, including hot air drying at 40 ℃ (HAD 40 ℃), hot air drying at 50 ℃ (HAD 50 ℃), hot air drying at 60 ℃ (HAD 60 ℃), microwave vacuum drying (MVD), vacuum freeze drying (VFD), and natural air drying, on the drying kinetics and volatile compositions of Strobilanthes tonkinensis Leaves.The drying processes of the six drying methods were simulated using a thin-layer drying model.The impact of these different drying methods on the volatile components was assessed through the utilization of an electronic nose (E-nose) in conjunction with headspace solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS).Additionally, organoleptic evaluations were conducted to determine the most suitable drying method for S. tonkinensis leaves.The results showed that the drying rate was highest for MVD and lowest for natural drying, with the Page model demonstrating the best fit for simulating the drying kinetics of S. tonkinensis leaves.Significant variations were observed in the types and concentrations of volatile components among different drying methods, aligning closely with the outcomes obtained from the electronic nose analysis.A total of 61 volatile components across 9 types were identified in the six drying methods, with 42, 27, 28, 25, 38, and 49 components detected in HAD 40 ℃, HAD 50 ℃, HAD 60 ℃, MVD, VFD, and natural drying, respectively.Significant losses of volatile components were observed in HAD 50 ℃, HAD 60 ℃, and MVD.HAD 50 ℃, MVD, VFD, and natural drying methods exhibited better preservation of alcohols and ketones.HAD 40 ℃ had the highest nitrogen compound content.In sensory evaluation, HAD 40 ℃ received the highest total sensory score, displaying a bright yellow-green color in the tea broth, a pure aroma with a distinct glutinous rice note, a mellow taste, and a lingering aftertaste.PLS-DA identified 20 distinct volatile components, enabling effective differentiation among the various drying methods applied to S. tonkinensis leaves.The study offers a theoretical foundation for the optimized drying and processing of S. tonkinensis leaves.

参考文献

[1] Flora of China Editorial Committee.Flora of China.Vol.19[M].Beijing:Science Press, Beijing and Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St.Louis, 2011:381-429.
[2] 谭乐和, 尹桂豪, 章程辉, 等.超临界CO2萃取/气相色谱—质谱联用分析糯米香茶中的挥发油[J].热带作物学报, 2008, 29(4):530-534.
TAN L H, YIN G H, ZHANG C H, et al.Supercritical CO2 extraction and GC-MS analysis of leaf volatile constituents in Teucrium manghuaense[J].Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2008, 29(4):530-534.
[3] 张彦军, 徐飞, 谭乐和, 等.HS-SPME-GC/MS分析海南产糯米香叶的挥发性成分[J].热带作物学报, 2015, 36(3):603-610.
ZHANG Y J, XU F, TAN L H, et al.GC/MS analysis of volatiles in Strobilanthes tonkinensis leaf extracted by headspace solid-phase microextraction[J].Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2015, 36(3):603-610.
[4] SRIKUN N.In vitro propagation of the aromatic herb Strobilanthes tonkinensis Lindau[J].Agriculture and Natural Resources, 2017, 51(1):15-19.
[5] YU H, LI T N, RAN Q, et al.Strobilanthes cusia (Nees) Kuntze, a multifunctional traditional Chinese medicinal plant, and its herbal medicines:A comprehensive review[J].Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 2021, 265:113325.
[6] HUA J J, LI J, OUYANG W, et al.Effect of Strobilanthes tonkinensis Lindau addition on black tea flavor quality and volatile metabolite content[J].Foods, 2022, 11(12):1678.
[7] 吕金潇, 秦艳婷, 马笑宇, 等.不同配比糯香茯茶的品质分析[J].食品与发酵工业, 2025, 51(2):168-175.
LYU J X, QIN Y T, MA X Y, et al.Quality analysis of different ratios of Semnostachya menglaensis Tsui Fu-brick tea[J].Food and Fermentation Industries, 2025, 51(2):168-175.
[8] 徐秀娟, 薛云, 胡军, 等.糯米香净油的制备及其热裂解产物[J].烟草科技, 2023, 56(10):70-81.
XU X J, XUE Y, HU J, et al.Preparation of absolute oil from Strobilanthes tonkinensis Lindau and its pyrolysis products[J].Tobacco Science & Technology, 2023, 56(10):70-81.
[9] NAEF R, VELLUZ A, MAYENZET F, et al.Volatile constituents of Semnostachya menglaensis Tsui[J].Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2005, 53(23):9161-9164.
[10] YIN G H, ZENG H C, HE M J, et al.Extraction of Teucrium manghuaense and evaluation of the bioactivity of its extract[J].International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2009, 10(10):4330-4341.
[11] 李维莉, 马银海, 张亚平, 等.糯米香茶香气化合物的组分研究[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 31(11):53-56.
LI W L, MA Y H, ZHANG Y P, et al.Study on the constituents of volatile oils of Nuomi-scented tea[J].Journal of Southwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2009, 31(11):53-56.
[12] HAN X, SONG Z Q, LIU J W, et al.Effects of different drying methods on the quality of Bletilla striata scented tea[J].Molecules, 2023, 28(6):2438.
[13] 李官丽, 吴秋月, 陈锡霞, 等.干燥方式对油茶粉品质及挥发性风味物质的影响[J].食品与机械, 2024, 40(3):210-216.
LI G L, WU Q Y, CHEN X X, et al.Effects of drying methods on the quality and volatile flavor compounds of oil tea powder[J].Food & Machinery, 2024, 40(3):210-216.
[14] 金鑫, 段续, 任广跃, 等.不同干燥方式对无花果干燥特性及品质的影响[J].食品与发酵工业, 2024, 50(10):69-75.
JIN X, DUAN X, REN G Y, et al.Effects of different drying methods on drying characteristics and quality of figs[J].Food and Fermentation Industries, 2024, 50(10):69-75.
[15] 赵愉涵, 袁丽雪, 王敏, 等.不同干燥方式对芹菜叶品质的影响[J].食品与发酵工业, 2022, 48(8):205-211.
ZHAO Y H, YUAN L X, WANG M, et al.Effects of different drying methods on quality attributes of celery leaves[J].Food and Fermentation Industries, 2022, 48(8):205-211.
[16] JIAO Y F, TANG H Y, YAN Z, et al.Effect of different drying methods on quality of orange dark tea[J].Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization, 2024, 18(5):3244-3254.
[17] 叶秋萍, 余雯, 谢基雄, 等.不同干燥方式对茉莉花茶挥发性成分的影响[J].食品工业科技, 2024, 45(18):210-218.
YE Q P, YU W, XIE J X, et al.Effects of different drying methods on volatile components of jasmine tea[J].Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2024, 45(18):210-218.
[18] 陈苏森, 吉训志, 张映萍, 等. 不同干燥方式对斑兰叶挥发性成分的影响[J].中国热带农业, 2024(2):53-60.
CHEN S S, JI X Z, ZHANG Y P, et al. The effect of different drying methods on the volatile components of Pandanus amaryllifolius Roxb. leaves[J].China Tropical Agriculture, 2024(2):53-60.
[19] 易宇文, 何莲, 邓静, 等.基于电子鼻和气质联用识别不同工艺的俄色茶[J].食品工业科技, 2023, 44(18):361-370.
YI Y W, HE L, DENG J, et al.Identification of Malus toringoides(Rehd.) Hughes teas with different processes based on E-nose and GC-MS[J].Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(18):361-370.
[20] HE C J, LI Z Y, LIU H X, et al.Characterization of the key aroma compounds in Semnostachya menglaensis Tsui by gas chromatography-olfactometry, odor activity values, aroma recombination, and omission analysis[J].Food Research International, 2020, 131:108948.
[21] 古能平. 红茶加工过程中干燥工艺对其主要挥发性物质的影响[J].食品工业, 2018, 39(10):78-81.
GU N P.The effect of drying process on the main volatile substances in black tea processing[J].The Food Industry, 2018, 39(10):78-81.
[22] 周子丹, 彭文君, 倪家宝, 等.不同干燥方式对油菜蜂花粉色泽、酚酸含量和抗氧化活性的影响[J].食品科学, 2021, 42(17):76-83.
ZHOU Z D, PENG W J, NI J B, et al.Effects of different drying methods on color, phenolic acids contents and antioxidant activity of rape bee pollen[J].Food Science, 2021, 42(17):76-83.
[23] YUE Y M, ZHANG Q, WAN F X, et al.Effects of different drying methods on the drying characteristics and quality of Codonopsis pilosulae slices[J].Foods, 2023, 12(6):1323.
[24] 易宇文, 刘阳, 彭毅秦, 等.东坡肘子风味电子鼻分析与感官评价相关性探究[J].食品与发酵工业, 2018, 44(1):238-244.
YI Y W, LIU Y, PENG Y Q, et al.Research on the correlation between electronic nose analysis and sensory evaluation of Dongpo pork[J].Food and Fermentation Industries, 2018, 44(1):238-244.
[25] 刘红, 朱红英.基于电子鼻技术分析糯米香茶风味的研究[J].热带农业科学, 2011, 31(11):73-76.
LIU H, ZHU H Y.Classification of Teucrium manghuaense by using an electronic tongue[J].Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 2011, 31(11):73-76.
[26] 朱庆珍, 随新平, 王羽桐, 等.焙烤对核桃乳关键性香气成分的影响分析[J].精细化工, 2020, 37(12):2562-2570.
ZHU Q Z, SUI X P, WANG Y T, et al.Analysis of the effect of roasting on the key aroma compounds of walnut milk[J].Fine Chemicals, 2020, 37(12):2562-2570.
[27] 尹洪旭, 杨艳芹, 姚月凤, 等.基于气相色谱-质谱技术与多元统计分析对不同栗香特征绿茶判别分析[J].食品科学, 2019, 40(4):192-198.
YIN H X, YANG Y Q, YAO Y F, et al.Discrimination of different characteristics of chestnut-like green tea based on gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and multivariate statistical data analysis[J].Food Science, 2019, 40(4):192-198.
[28] XU J Y, ZHANG Y, YAN F, et al.Monitoring changes in the volatile compounds of tea made from summer tea leaves by GC-IMS and HS-SPME-GC-MS[J].Foods, 2022, 12(1):146.
[29] HE C, LI Y C, ZHOU J T, et al.Study on the suitability of tea cultivars for processing oolong tea from the perspective of aroma based on olfactory sensory, electronic nose, and GC-MS data correlation analysis[J].Foods, 2022, 11(18):2880.
[30] OUYANG J, JIANG R G, CHEN H Y, et al.Characterization of key odorants in ‘Baimaocha’ black teas from different regions[J].Food Chemistry:X, 2024, 22:101303.
文章导航

/

〈 〉