两种冷却方式对宰后成熟过程中牛肉保水性的影响

  • 惠小洋 ,
  • 余群力 ,
  • 曹晖 ,
  • 韩广星 ,
  • 吴磊 ,
  • 韩玲
展开
  • 1(甘肃农业大学 食品科学与工程学院,甘肃 兰州,730070)
    2(陕西秦宝牧业股份有限公司,陕西 宝鸡,721000)
    3(山东绿润食品有限公司,山东 临沂,276000)
    4(河北福成五丰食品股份有限公司,河北 三河,065200)
硕士(余群力教授为通讯作者,E-mail:yuqunlihl@163.com)。

收稿日期: 2018-01-26

  网络出版日期: 2018-12-25

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(31460402) ;国家现代农业产业(肉牛牦牛)技术体系项目(CARS-38);甘肃省财政厅资助项目(牛羊肉安全高效屠宰加工关键技术研究)

Effect of chilling methods on water-holding capacity of beef during postmortem aging

  • XI Xiao-yang ,
  • YU Qun-li ,
  • CAO Hui ,
  • HAN Guang-xing ,
  • WU Lei ,
  • HAN Ling
Expand
  • 1(College of Food Science and Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)
    2(Shanxi Qinbao Animal Husbandry Co., Ltd., Baoji 721000, China)
    3(Shandong Lvrun Food Co., Ltd., Linyi 276000, China)
    4(Hebei Fucheng Cattle Food Co., Sanhe 065200, China)

Received date: 2018-01-26

  Online published: 2018-12-25

摘要

通过对牛背最长肌施以常规冷却和快速冷却处理,研究不同冷却方式对宰后成熟过程中牛肉保水性的影响。结果发现快速冷却使蛋白性质在宰后12 h内变化不显著,使葡萄糖、乳酸含量及糖酵解潜力出现峰值时间提前,且肌原纤维蛋白疏水性、浊度及乳化性变化是宰后48 h至72 h蛋白结合水的能力减弱。此外,快速冷却比常规冷却处理牛肉的表观持水力在宰后6 h内较高、48 h后较低;宰后168 h滴水损失和蒸煮损失分别降低0.11%和4.37%,且差异极显著(p<0.01),加压损失降低2.07%(p<0.05)。结果表明,快速冷却可在一定程度上提高原料肉质量,缩短僵化时间,提高保水性。

本文引用格式

惠小洋 , 余群力 , 曹晖 , 韩广星 , 吴磊 , 韩玲 . 两种冷却方式对宰后成熟过程中牛肉保水性的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2018 , 44(11) : 193 -199 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.016925

Abstract

The effects of different chilling methods on the water holding capacity were studied by the conventional chilling and rapid chilling treatment of the M. longissimus dorsi of cattle during postmortem aging. The results showed that the rapid chilling had no significant impact on protein properties within 12 h postmortem, the peak time of glucose, lactate and glycolytic shows earlier. The hydrophobicity, turbidity and emulsification of myofibrillar proteins change caused the water holding capacity weaker between 48 h to 72 h in postmortem. In addition, the apparent water holding capacity of beef in rapid chilling process was higher than that of conventional chilling treatment within 6 h postmortem, and went down after 48 h. The dripping loss and cooking loss decreased by 0.11% and 4.37% respectively after 168 h, the difference was significant (p<0.01), and the pressure loss decreased by 2.07% (p<0.05). The results show that rapid chilling can improve the quality of raw meat to a certain extent, shorten the aging time and improve water holding capacity.

参考文献

[1] KRISTENSEN L, PURSLOW P P. The effect of ageing on the water-holding capacity of pork: Role of cytoskeletal proteins[J]. Meat Science,2001,58(1):17-23.
[2] 苏琳. 巴美肉羊肌纤维特性、糖酵解潜力对羊肉品质的影响和MyHC表达量分析[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2015.
[3] TAYLOR J M, HOPKINS D L. Patents for stretching and shaping meats[J]. Recent Patents on Food Nutrition & Agriculture, 2011, 3(2): 91-101.
[4] 王金枝,孔保华. 冷却肉的加工[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2003(10): 75-76.
[5] 罗欣,周光宏. 电刺激和延迟冷却对牛肉食用品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(1): 188-194.
[6] AED B, FAROUK M M, CASSIDY L, et al. Effects of rigor temperature and electrical stimulation on venison quality[J]. Meat Science, 2007, 75(4): 564-574.
[7] 李苗云,孙灵霞,周光宏,等. 冷却猪肉不同贮藏温度的货架期预测模型[J]. 农业工程学报, 2008, 24(4): 235-239.
[8] 陈韬,周光宏,徐幸莲. 快速冷却对猪肉品质的影响[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2006, 29(1): 98-102.
[9] 赵红艳. 低压电刺激和冷却方式对山羊肉品质影响的研究[D]. 昆明:云南农业大学,2009.
[10] MONIN G, SELLIER P. Pork of low technological quality with a normal rate of muscle pH fall in the immediate post-mortem period: The case of the Hampshire breed[J]. Meat Science, 1985, 13(1):49-63.
[11] FAROUK M M, WIELICZKO K J, MERTS I. Ultra-fast freezing and low storage temperatures are not necessary to maintain the functional properties of manufacturing beef[J]. Meat Science, 2004, 66(1): 171-179.
[12] 贾娜,李博文,孔保华. 盐水注射及食用胶对酱牛肉品质的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2015, 41(3): 96-99.
[13] XIONG Y L, LOU X, WANG C, et al. Protein extraction from chicken myofibrils irrigated with various polyphosphate and NaCl solutions[J]. Journal of Food Science, 2010, 65(1): 96-100.
[14] CHELH I, GATELLIER P, SANTÉ-LHOUTELLIER V. Technical note: A simplified procedure for myofibril hydrophobicity determination[J]. Meat Science, 2006, 74(4): 681-683.
[15] XIA X F, KONG B H, XIONG Y L, et al. Decreased gelling and emulsifying properties of myofibrillar protein from repeatedly frozen-thawed porcine longissimus muscle are due to protein denaturation and susceptibility to aggregation[J]. Meat Science, 2010, 85(85): 481-486.
[16] AGYARE K K, ADDO K, XIONG Y L. Emulsifying and foaming properties of transglutaminase-treated wheat gluten hydrolysate as influenced by pH, temperature and salt[J]. Food Hydrocolloids, 2009, 23(1): 72-81.
[17] 周玄. 宰后处理方式对冷却肉保水性的影响研究[D]. 长沙:湖南农业大学, 2012.
[18] RYU Y C, CHOI Y M, LEE S H, et al. Comparing the histochemical characteristics and meat quality traits of different pig breeds[J]. Meat Science, 2008, 80(2): 363.
[19] 王莉. 牦牛肉肌纤维类型组成及其代谢酶活力差异对宰后肉嫩度的影响[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学, 2016.
[20] HOVENIER R, KANIS E, ASSELDONK T V, et al. Genetic parameters of pig meat quality traits in a halothane negative population[J]. Livestock Production Science, 1992, 32(4): 309-321.
[21] WARRIS P D, BROWN S N. The relationship between initial pH, reflectance and Exudative in pig muscle[J]. Meat Science, 1987, 20:65-74.
[22] KING D A, DIKEMAN M E, WHEELER T L, et al. Chilling and cooking rate effects on some myofibrillar determinants of tenderness of beef[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2003, 81(6): 1 473.
[23] KAREV A R, FARZANEH M, KOLLÁR L E. Measuring temperature of the ice surface during its formation by using infrared instrumentation[J]. International Journal of Heat & Mass Transfer, 2007, 50(3): 566-579.
[24] 贾娜,王乐田,邵俊花,等. 芦丁对冷藏猪肉糜脂肪和蛋白氧化及品质特性的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2016, 42(10): 105-111.
[25] XIA X, KONG B, LIU J, et al. Influence of different thawing methods on physicochemical changes and protein oxidation of porcine longissimus muscle[J]. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 2012, 46(1): 280-286.
[26] 李银. 蛋白氧化对肌肉保水性的影响机制研究[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2014.
[27] 牛克兰,左惠心,余群力,等. 不同保水性牦牛肉品质比较及肌原纤维蛋白凝胶特性分析[J]. 食品工业科技, 2016, 37(23):81-85.
[28] DIAO X, GUAN H, ZHAO X, et al. Properties and oxidative stability of emulsions prepared with myofibrillar protein and lard diacylglycerols[J]. Meat Science, 2016, 115: 16-23.
文章导航

/