分析与检测

德尔卑沙门氏菌血清型分子检测靶点筛选及多重PCR检测方法的建立

  • 翟立公 ,
  • 杨剑婷 ,
  • 李永泉 ,
  • 王水平 ,
  • 王俊颖
展开
  • (安徽科技学院 食品工程学院,安徽 滁州,233100)
博士研究生,讲师(王俊颖助理实验师为通讯作者,E-mail:349347568@qq.com)。

收稿日期: 2018-11-05

  修回日期: 2018-12-03

  网络出版日期: 2019-05-14

基金资助

高校优秀青年人才支持计划重点项目(gxyqZD20 16219);安徽科技学院人才引进项目(SPYJ201602)

Screening serotype specific genes and developing a multiple PCR method to determine Salmonella enterica serovar Derby

  • ZHAI Ligong ,
  • YANG Jianting ,
  • LI Yongquan ,
  • WANG Shuiping ,
  • WANG Junying
Expand
  • (Food Engineering College,Anhui Science and Technology University, Chuzhou 233100, China)

Received date: 2018-11-05

  Revised date: 2018-12-03

  Online published: 2019-05-14

摘要

利用比较基因组技术筛选到德尔卑沙门氏菌(Salmonella Derby, SD)的血清型特异性基因,以此为靶点设计引物与139-141引物共同构建多重PCR检测体系,对其特异性、菌落灵敏度、抗干扰能力及人工污染等方面进行评价。当扩增出171、284和512 bp电泳条带时,检测结果为阳性。通过该方法检测39株沙门氏菌和18株非沙门氏菌,表现出100%特异性,该检测体系的DNA灵敏度为383.2 pg/μL,菌落灵敏度为52 CFU/mL。当SD与自然(猪肉、鸡肉和牛肉)的背景菌群浓度比为1∶104时,该检测体系能获得清晰、准确的3条扩增条带。在人工污染的猪肉、鸡肉和牛肉样品的检测中,增菌10 h,检测灵敏度为3.8 CFU/25g。该检测方法准确灵敏的检测SD,可在食品安全领域得到广泛应用。

本文引用格式

翟立公 , 杨剑婷 , 李永泉 , 王水平 , 王俊颖 . 德尔卑沙门氏菌血清型分子检测靶点筛选及多重PCR检测方法的建立[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2019 , 45(7) : 269 -275 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.019243

Abstract

In this study, serotype-specific genes of Salmonella enterica serovar Derby (SD) (RU61_00441, RU61_00445, RU61_00447, RU61_RS09205, and RU61_RS06985) were identified by bioinformatics and comparative genomics analysis. Primers based on RU61_00441 and RU61_00447, as well as 139-141 primer were used to develop a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. The assay was evaluated by its specificity, colony forming sensitivity, anti-interference ability, and artificial contamination. Positive results were showed with three specific bands: 171 bp, 284 bp, and 512 bp. There were 39 Salmonella strains and 18 non-Salmonella strains detected by this method, showing 100% specificity. The detection limits of this assay for DNA and colony forming were 383.2 pg/μL and 52 CFU/mL, respectively. When the background colony concentration ratio of SD to nature (pork, chicken, and beef) was 1∶104, three clear and accurate amplification bands were obtained. In artificially contaminated pork, chicken, and beef samples, this assay could detect as few as 3.8 CFU/25 g after 10 h enrichment. This method can detect SD accurately and sensitively, and therefore can be widely used for food safety.

参考文献

[1] BEUCHAT L R, MANN D A, KELLY C A, et al. Retention of viability of Salmonella in sucrose as affected by type of inoculum, water activity, and storage temperature[J]. Journal of Food Protection, 2017, 80(9): 1 408-1 414.
[2] PARK S H, RICKE S C. Development of multiplex PCR assay for simultaneous detection of Salmonella genus, Salmonella subspecies I, Salm. Enteritidis, Salm. Heidelberg and Salm. Typhimurium[J]. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2015, 118(1): 152-160.
[3] LIU B, ZHOU X J, ZHANG L D, et al. Development of a novel multiplex PCR assay for the identification of Salmonella enterica Typhimurium and Enteritidis[J]. Food Control, 2012, 27(1): 87-93.
[4] BALE J, MEUNIER D, WEILL F-X, et al. Characterization of new Salmonella serovars by whole-genome sequencing and traditional typing techniques[J]. Journal of Medical Microbiology, 2016, 65: 1 074-1 078.
[5] 陈玲, 张菊梅,杨小鹃, 等. 南方食品中沙门氏菌污染调查及分型[J]. 微生物学报, 2013(12): 1 326-1 333.
[6] 王欢. 合肥地区鸡肉中沙门氏杆菌的食品安全风险评估[D]. 合肥:安徽农业大学, 2013.
[7] KEROUANTON A, HIRCHAUD E, ROSE V, et al. First complete genome sequence of a Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar derby strain associated with pork in France[J]. Genome Announcements, 2015, 3(4):e00853-15.
[8] FOIS F, PIRAS F, TORPDAHL M, et al. Occurrence, characterization, and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella enterica in slaughtered pigs in Sardinia[J]. Journal of Food Science, 2017, 82(4): 969-976.
[9] SIMON S, TROST E, BENDER J, et al. Evaluation of WGS based approaches for investigating a food-borne outbreak caused by Salmonella enterica serovar Derby in Germany[J]. Food Microbiology, 2018, 71: 46-54.
[10] HAYWARD M R, PETROVSKA L, JANSEN V A A, et al. Population structure and associated phenotypes of Salmonella enterica serovars Derby and Mbandaka overlap with host range[J]. Bmc Microbiology, 2016, 16(1):15.
[11] ZHAI L, YU Q, BIE X, et al. Development of a PCR test system for specific detection of Salmonella paratyphi B in foods[J]. Fems Microbiology Letters, 2014, 355(1): 83-89.
[12] WOODS D F, REEN F J, GILROY D, et al. Rapid multiplex PCR and real-time TaqMan PCR assays for detection of Salmonella enterica and the highly virulent serovars choleraesuis and paratyphi C[J]. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2008, 46(12): 4 018-4 022.
[13] KONG X, LU Z, ZHAI L, et al. Mining and evaluation of new specific molecular targets for the PCR detection of Salmonella spp. genome[J]. World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2013, 29(12): 2 219-2 226.
[14] RAHN K, DEGRANDIS S A, CLARKE R C, et al. Amplicification of an invA gene sequence of Salmonella typhimurium by polymerase chain reaction as a specific method of detection of Salmonella[J]. Molecular and Cellular Probes, 1992, 6(4): 271-279.
[15] KIM T-H, HWANG H J, KIM J H. Development of a novel, rapid multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection and differentiation of Salmonella enterica serovars Enteritidis and Typhimurium using ultra-fast convection polymerase chain reaction[J]. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, 2017, 14(10): 580-586.
[16] LEE S H, JUNG B Y, RAYAMAHJI N, et al. A multiplex real-time PCR for differential detection and quantification of Salmonella spp., Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and Enteritidis in meats[J]. Journal of Veterinary Science, 2009, 10(1): 43-51.
[17] YUAN M, XU L, CAO J, et al. Detection of foodborne Salmonella typhimurium and Salmonella enteritidis by diplex real-time PCR using TaqMan probe[J]. Journal of Hygiene Research, 2013, 42(3): 491-519.
[18] SAEKI E K, ALVES J, BONFANTE R C, et al. Multiplex PCR (mPCR) for the detection of Salmonella spp. and the differentiation of the Typhimurium and Enteritidis serovars in chicken meat[J]. Journal of Food Safety, 2013, 33(1): 25-29.
文章导航

/