·贮运与保鲜·

主成分分析法综合评价采收成熟度对金兰柚贮藏特性的影响

  • 林雄 ,
  • 李宏祥 ,
  • 张亚男 ,
  • 马巧利 ,
  • 陈金印
展开
  • 1(江西农业大学 农学院,江西省果蔬采后处理关键技术及质量安全协同创新中心,江西省果蔬保鲜与无损检测重点实验室,江西 南昌,330045)
    2(萍乡学院,江西 萍乡,337055)
硕士研究生(陈金印教授和马巧利讲师为共同通讯作者, E-mail:jinyinchen@126.com;zizaishanren@163.com)

收稿日期: 2019-12-18

  网络出版日期: 2020-06-11

基金资助

江西省柑橘产业体系基金(jxars-07);江西省“2011协同创新中心项目”(JXGS-05);国家自然科学基金青年项目(31501811);江西省教育厅自然科学基金(170251)

Effects of harvest maturity on storage properties of Jinlan pomelobased on principal component analysis

  • LIN Xiong ,
  • LI Hongxiang ,
  • ZHANG Yanan ,
  • MA Qiaoli ,
  • CHEN Jinyin
Expand
  • 1(Jiangxi Key Laboratory for Postharvest Technology and Nondestructive Testing of Fruits and Vegetables, Collaborative InnovationCenter of Postharvest Key Technology and Quality Safety of Fruits and Vegetables in Jiangxi Province,JiangxiAgricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China)
    2(Pingxiang University, Pingxiang 337055, China)

Received date: 2019-12-18

  Online published: 2020-06-11

摘要

为确定金兰柚的适宜采收成熟度,以盛花后158、173和188 d(成熟度Ⅰ、Ⅰ和Ⅲ)的果实为对象,检测了贮藏150 d内18个品质指标,并通过主成分分析法,综合评价了不同成熟度的果实贮藏特性。结果表明:成熟度Ⅲ的果实腐烂率和失重率显著低于成熟度Ⅰ和Ⅱ;成熟度Ⅱ和Ⅲ的果实色差指数显著高于成熟度Ⅰ;成熟度Ⅲ的总糖、蔗糖、糖酸比、Fe2+还原力明显高于成熟度I和II,总酸、葡萄糖、果糖、柠檬酸、奎尼酸、苹果酸、酒石酸、草酸和VC则相反,总酚及DPPH自由基清除率介于成熟度I和II之间。主成分分析表明,成熟度Ⅲ得分最高,且在60 d时达到最大值。综上,花后188 d(成熟度Ⅲ)采收的果实品质最佳、抗氧化能力最强,且在贮藏60 d左右上市品质最优。

本文引用格式

林雄 , 李宏祥 , 张亚男 , 马巧利 , 陈金印 . 主成分分析法综合评价采收成熟度对金兰柚贮藏特性的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2020 , 46(9) : 217 -224 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.023137

Abstract

To obtain the optimal harvesting maturity of Jinlan pomelo, 18 quality indexes of fruits harvested at 158, 173, and 188 days after blooming (maturityⅠ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ) were assayed during 150 days storage, and principal component analysis (PCA) was employed to comprehensively analyze the differences in storage characteristics arising from fruits with three maturities. The results showed that decay incidence and weight loss rate of fruit at maturity III were significantly lower than that of maturity I and II. Citrus color index (CCI) of maturity II and III were significantly higher than maturity I. The total sugar, sucrose, sugar/acid, FRAP of fruit at maturity III were obviously higher than those of fruit at maturity I and II, while total acid, glucose, fructose, citric acid, quinic acid, malic acid, tartaric acid, oxalic acid and ascorbic acid were in reverse; the content of total phenol and DPPH radical-scavenging activity of maturity III were among maturity I and II. PCA analysis showed that a comprehensive quality score of fruit at maturity III was highest among the three maturities during the whole storage, and the highest quality score was acquired by fruits of maturity III at 60 days postharvest. In summary, fruit harvest at 188 days post-bloom (maturity III) performed the best sensory quality and the highest antioxidant activity. The optimum storage period was 60 days.

参考文献

[1] 赵晓东, 戴祥生, 黄小英, 等.加快吉安市井冈蜜柚产业发展的思考与建议[J].中国果业信息,2017,34(2):14-15;19.
[2] 刘瑞莲, 张鸣飞, 许让伟, 等.采收时期对贮藏期温州蜜柑果实失水率的影响[J].浙江柑橘,2019,36(3):7-11.
[3] 陈楚英, 刘善军, 简火仔, 等.不同采收期对‘新余蜜桔’采后生理特性和耐贮性的影响[J].中国农学通报,2019,35(27):58-64.
[4] 阚超楠, 刘善军, 陈明, 等.不同采收期对‘翠冠’梨常温货架期果实色泽和质地的影响[J].江西农业大学学报,2018,40(1):49-55.
[5] 韦强, 黄漫青, 刘畅, 等. 采收成熟度对红色甜椒贮藏品质的影响[J]. 食品工业科技, 2015, 36(16):355-358;363.
[6] 周姣, 吴颖峰, 余伟, 等.新疆巴仁杏采收与贮运技术研究[J].食品研究与开发,2019,40(12):109-115.
[7] 李宏祥, 马巧利, 林雄, 等. PCA综合分析采收成熟度对金沙柚贮藏品质的影响[J].食品工业科技,2019(18):255-262;272.
[8] 李宏祥, 马巧利, 林雄, 等.采收成熟度对桃溪蜜柚贮藏品质及抗氧化性的影响[J].食品与发酵工业,2019,45(13):191-198.
[9] 李俭,周小娟,钟灶发,等.南康不同柚子品种果实品质分析[J].安徽农业科学,2019,47(14):216-219.
[10] 牟红梅,于强,李庆余,等.基于主成分分析的烟台地区西洋梨果实品质综合评价[J].果树学报,2019,36(8):1 084-1 092.
[11] 林媚,吴韶辉.浙江省12个柑橘品种果实品质分析与评价[J].浙江农业科学,2019,60(6):963-966.
[12] 曹建康, 姜微波, 赵玉梅. 果蔬采后生理生化实验指导[M]. 北京:中国轻工业出版社, 2007.
[13] 胡志群, 王惠聪, 胡桂兵.高效液相色谱测定荔枝果肉中的糖、酸和维生素C[J]. 果树学报,2005,22(5): 582-585.
[14] CHEN M, JIANG Q, YIN X R, et al.Effect of hot air treatment on organic acid and sugar-metabolism in Ponkan (Citrus reticulata) fruit [J]. Scientia Horticulturae,2012,147(4): 118-125.
[15] 张昭.中国地方柚果实酚类物质含量及其抗氧化活性分析[D].重庆:西南大学, 2015.
[16] 杜丹丹,李建科.Folin-Ciocalteu比色法测定石榴皮多酚含量条件的优化[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2011,39(5):190-196.
[17] BRAND-WILLIAMS W, CUVELIER M E, BERSET C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity [J]. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 1995, 28(1): 25-30.
[18] YAMAGUCHI T, TAKAMURA H, MATOBA T, et al. HPLC method for evaluation of the free radical scavenging activity of foods by using 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl [J]. Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry, 1998, 62(6): 1 201-1 204.
[19] BENZIE I F, STRAIN J J. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of "antioxidant power": the FRAP assay [J].Analytical Biochemistry, 1996, 239(1): 70-76.
[20] 吴宝玉.不同采收期和贮藏方式的瓯柑品质变化研究[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2014.
[21] MARTIN L B B, ROSE J K C. There's more than one way to skin a fruit: formation and functions of fruit cuticles[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2014, 65(16): 4639–4651.
[22] HE Y, HAN J, LIU R, et al. Integrated transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses of a wax deficient citrus mutant exhibiting jasmonic acid-mediated defense against fungal pathogens[J]. Horticulture Research, 2018, 5(1): 43.
[23] WU J X,XU Z L,ZHANG Y J,et al. An integrative analysis of the transcriptome and proteome of the pulp of a spontaneous late-ripening sweet orange mutant and its wild type improves our understanding of fruit ripening in citrus[J].Journal of Experimental Botany,2014,65(6): 1 651-1 671.
[24] 邓秀新, 彭抒昂. 柑橘学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社,2013.
[25] 倪伟, 盖瑞, 于文章,等.不同授粉组合对苹果果实ASA含量及抗氧化协同酶、糖酸组分动态变化的影响[J].果树学报,2017,34(6):670-681.
[26] 孟德梅, 奚志嫒, 张亚璇, 等.两种采收期香菇营养品质和抗氧化能力比较[J].中国食品学报,2018,18(4):228-234.
文章导航

/