分析与检测

食用槟榔卤水质地剖面分析及测试条件的优化

  • 李良怡 ,
  • 钱鑫 ,
  • 吴安琪 ,
  • 赵培瑞 ,
  • 李嘉灏 ,
  • 张家铭 ,
  • 赵野 ,
  • 周文化
展开
  • 1(特医食品加工湖南省重点实验室,湖南 长沙,410004)
    2(中南林业科技大学 食品科学与工程学院,湖南 长沙,410004)
第一作者:硕士研究生(周文化教授为通信作者,E-mail:zhowenhua@126.com)

收稿日期: 2021-08-16

  修回日期: 2021-09-17

  网络出版日期: 2022-06-10

基金资助

海南华创槟榔研究院长基金(HCBL2020YZ-001);湖南省创新平台与人才计划(2017TP1021);湖南省重点研发计划(2020NK2020);湖南省创新型省份建设专项(2019TP2011);长沙市自然科学基金资助项目(kq2014150);长沙市科技计划(KC17040007)

Texture profile analysis of edible betel nut brine and the optimization of testing conditions

  • LI Liangyi ,
  • QIAN Xin ,
  • WU Anqi ,
  • ZHAO Peirui ,
  • LI Jiahao ,
  • ZHANG Jiaming ,
  • ZHAO Ye ,
  • ZHOU Wenhua
Expand
  • 1(Hunan Key Laboratory of Processed Food for Special Medical Purpose, Changsha 410004, China)
    2(Food Science and Engineering, Central South Forestry University of Science and Technology University, Changsha 410004, China)

Received date: 2021-08-16

  Revised date: 2021-09-17

  Online published: 2022-06-10

摘要

该文研究了不同参数(测试速率、形变量)设置对食用槟榔卤水质地剖面分析(texture profile analysis, TPA)测试结果的影响。结果表明,形变量会导致槟榔卤水TPA测试结果中各指标参数发生显著变化,其中形变量与弹性、胶黏性、咀嚼性呈极显著正相关(P<0.01,R2=0.78~0.85),与弹性、回复性呈极显著负相关(P<0.01,R2=0.333,R2=0.795),而测试速率对各指标参数的影响较小。经过分析得知,测试速率为1.00 mm/s,形变量为40%较为合适。通过多项式拟合模型对硬度、咀嚼性和回复性进行回归方程拟合,拟合度R2分别达到0.999 37,0.999 45,0.997 99,具有统计学意义,可用于食用槟榔卤水质构的预测分析。该研究可为优化槟榔卤水质构测试条件提供一定的理论基础。

本文引用格式

李良怡 , 钱鑫 , 吴安琪 , 赵培瑞 , 李嘉灏 , 张家铭 , 赵野 , 周文化 . 食用槟榔卤水质地剖面分析及测试条件的优化[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2022 , 48(10) : 278 -283 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.028991

Abstract

In this paper, the effects of different parameters (test rate, deformation) on texture profile analysis (TPA) of edible betel nut brine were studied. The results showed that the significant differences in the parameters of the betel nut brine TPA test were affected by the shape variables. Among them, the shape variables were significantly positively correlated with elasticity, adhesiveness, and chewiness (P<0.01, R2=0.78-0.85), and wereSignificantly negative correlation (P<0.01, R2=0.333, R2=0.795) with elasticity and resilience. The analysis showed that the optimum test speed was 1.00 mm/s and the shape variable was 40%. A polynomial fitting model was used to fit regression equations for hardness, chewiness and resilience, and the fitting degree R2 reached 0.999 88, 0.999 43, and 0.991 63 respectively. This study could provide a theoretical basis for optimizing the TPA text conditions of edible nut brines.

参考文献

[1] 孙彩玲,田纪春,张永祥.TPA质构分析模式在食品研究中的应用[J].实验科学与技术,2007,5(2):1-4.
SUN C L, TIAN J C, ZHANG Y X.Application of TPA text mode in the syudy of food[J].Experimental Science and Technology, 2007,5(2):1-4.
[2] MITCHELL J.Food texture and viscosity—Concept and measurement,[J].International Journal of Food Science and Technology,2003,38(8):839-840.
[3] 田祥磊,阮美娟.猪肉质地客观评价方法的研究[J].食品工业,2013,34(2):146-148.
TIAN X L, RUAN M J.Research on objective assessment method of pork texture [J].The Food Industry, 2013,34 (2):146-148.
[4] 何全光,黄梅华,张娥珍,等.芒果TPA质构测定优化及不同成熟度芒果质构特性分析[J].食品工业科技,2016,37(18):122-126;132.
HE Q G, HUANG M H, ZHANG E Z, et al.Optimization for mango texture profile analysis and characterization of teture to different maturity of mango [J].Food Industry Science and Technology, 2016,37 (18):122-126;132.
[5] 马庆华,王贵禧,梁丽松.质构仪穿刺试验检测冬枣质地品质方法的建立[J].中国农业科学,2011,44(6):1 210-1 217.
MA Q H, WANG G X, LIANG L S.Establishment of the detecting method on the fruit texture of Dongzao by puncture test[J].Sciention Agricultural Sinca, 2011,44 (6):1 210-1 217.
[6] 赵延伟,王雨生,陈海华.豆制品的质构与感官评定相关性的研究[J].青岛农业大学学报(自然科学版),2012,29(2):126-131;135.
ZHAO Y W, WANG Y S, CHEN H H.Corrlation between texture and sensory evaluation of bean products [J].Journal of Qingdao Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2012,29 (2):126-131;135.
[7] 邵兴锋,朱勇,张春丹.测试因素对苹果质地剖面分析结果的影响[J].中国食品学报,2011,11(6):199-205.
SHAO X F, ZHU Y, ZHANG C D.The Influence of measurement factors on the results of texture profile analysis of apple fruit [J].Journal of ChineseInstitute of Food Science and Technology, 2011,11 (6):199-205.
[8] 李良怡,潘飞兵,周文化,等.食用槟榔货架期内品质控制研究[J].食品与机械,2021,37(7):188-193,218.
LI L Y, PAN F B, ZHOU W H, et al.Study on quality control of edible Areca during shelf life [J].Food and Machinery, 2021,37(7):188-193,218.
[9] 王蓉,朱晓倩,范志红.红小豆质构测定方法优化及压力烹调对其质构品质的影响[J].中国食品学报,2016,16(10):251-257.
WANG R, ZHU X Q, FAN Z H.Optimization of texture analysis procedure and texture quality evaluation of pressure cooked adzuki bean [J].Journal of Chinses Institute of Food Science and Techology, 2016,16(10):251-257.
[10] 张秋会,宋莲军,黄现青,等.质构仪在食品分析与检测中的应用[J].农产品加工,2017(24):52-56.
ZHANG Q H, SONG L J, HUANG X Q, et al.Implication of texture analyzer in food analysis and detection[J].Agricultural Products Processing, 2017 (24):52-56.
[11] 王海鸥,姜松.质构分析(TPA)及测试条件对面包品质的影响[J].粮油食品科技,2004,12(3):1-4.
WANG H O,JIANG S.TPA and its effect on bread quality [J].Science and Technology of Cereals Oils and Foods, 2004,12 (3):1-4.
[12] 宋钰兴,邵兴锋,张春丹,等.测试条件的变化对草莓质地剖面分析结果的影响[J].食品科学,2011,32(13):15-18.
SONG Y X, SHAO X F, ZHANG C D, et al.effects of test conditions on texture profile analysis parameters of strawberry fruits[J].Food Science, 2011,32 (13):15-18.
[13] 刘亚平,李红波.物性分析仪及TPA在果蔬质构测试中的应用综述[J].山西农业大学学报(自然科学版),2010,30(2):188-192.
LIU Y P, LI H B.Review on application of texture analyzer and TPA in the assessment for fruits and vegetables texture[J].Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2010,30 (2):188-192.
[14] 郭风军,刘萌,冯雁丽,等.测试参数对杏果质地多面分析的影响[J].食品科学,2013,34(5):22-25.
GUO F J, LIU M, FENG Y L, et al.Effect of test parameters on texture profile analysis of apricot [J].Food Science, 2013,34(5):22-25.
[15] 朱津津,潘治利,谢新华,等.汤圆TPA质构特性测试条件的优化[J].食品科学,2013,34(6):171-174.
ZHU J J, PAN Z L, XIE X H, et al.Optimization of testing conditions for TPA analysis of rice dumplings [J].Food Science, 2013,34 (6):171-174.
[16] 姜松,边兴伟,赵杰文.测试条件对鸡肉火腿肠TPA质地参数的影响[J].食品科学,2009,30(1):54-58.
JIANG S, BIAN X W, ZHAO J W.Effect of experimental conditions on texture profile analysis(TPA) of chicken sausage[J].Food Science, 2009,30 (1):54-58.
[17] 杨玲,肖龙,王强,等.质地多面分析(TPA)法测定苹果果肉质地特性[J].果树学报,2014,31(5):977-985.
YANG L, XIAO L, WANG Q, et al.Study on texture properties of apple flesh by using texture profile analysis [J].Journal of Fruit Science, 2014,31 (5):977-985.
[18] SINGH V,GUIZANI N,AL-ALAWI A,et al.Instrumental texture profile analysis (TPA) of date fruits as a function of its physico-chemical properties[J].Industrial Crops & Products,2013,50:866-873.
[19] 谢小雷,李侠,张春晖,等.不同干燥方式对牛肉干物性特性的影响[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(S1):346-354;380.
XIE X L, LI X, ZHANG C H, et al.effects of different drying methods on physical characteristics of beef jerky [J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultunl Engineering, 2015,31 (S1):346-354;380.
[20] 任凯,陶康,于政鲜,等.TPA测试条件对豆腐质构测试结果的影响[J].中国调味品,2019,44(9):29-32,38.
REN K, TAO K, YU Z X, et al.effect of testing conditions on texture profile analysis (TPA) of tofu [J].China Condliment, 2019,44 (9):29-32,38.
[21] BOURNE M C.Food Texture and Viscosity:Concept and Measurement (2 ND edition)[M].Academic Press, 2002,128:182-186.
[22] 郎凯红,周显青,张玉荣.测试条件对大米凝胶质构特性测定结果的影响[J].粮食与饲料工业,2012(11):1-4.
LANG K H, ZHOU X Q, ZHANG Y R.Influence of test conditions on the gel properties of rice [J].Cereal and Feed Industry, 2012(11):1-4.
文章导航

/