研究报告

基于全基因组测序平均核苷酸一致性的生胞梭菌(Clostridium sporogenes)鉴定

  • 曹艳花 ,
  • 冯会粉 ,
  • 程坤 ,
  • 刘波 ,
  • 都海渤 ,
  • 谢九艳 ,
  • 辛迪 ,
  • 姚粟
展开
  • (中国食品发酵工业研究院有限公司 中国工业微生物菌种保藏管理中心,北京,100015)
第一作者:硕士,高级工程师(姚粟教授级高级工程师为通信作者,E-mail: milly@china-cicc.org)

收稿日期: 2022-01-27

  修回日期: 2022-03-08

  网络出版日期: 2022-11-01

基金资助

国家微生物资源共享服务平台项目(NIMR-2021)

Identification of Clostridium sporogenes by average nucleotide identity based on whole genome sequencing

  • CAO Yanhua ,
  • FENG Huifen ,
  • CHENG Kun ,
  • LIU Bo ,
  • DU Haibo ,
  • XIE Jiuyan ,
  • XIN Di ,
  • YAO Su
Expand
  • (China National Research Institute of Food & Fermentation Industries, China Center of Industrial Culture Collection, Beijing 100015, China)

Received date: 2022-01-27

  Revised date: 2022-03-08

  Online published: 2022-11-01

摘要

基于全基因组测序通过平均核苷酸一致性鉴定生胞梭菌(Clostridium sporogenes)CICC 10385(=CMCC 64941)至种水平。通过形态学和生理生化特征分析获得CICC 10385的基础信息,并采用BGISEQ-500基因测序仪进行全基因组测序分析全基因组平均核苷酸一致性。结果显示,菌株CICC 10385的基因组大小为4 252 276 bp,含有58个contigs,基因组(G+C)mol%为27.9%。该菌16S rRNA基因序列与生胞梭菌(C.sporogenes)、肉毒梭菌(C.botulinum)、孔氏梭菌(C.combesii)和C.tepidum最为相似,平均核苷酸一致性(average nucleotide identity,ANI)分析显示,该菌与生胞梭菌(C.sporogenes)DSM 795T(GCA_001020205.1)ANI值为99.39%,与梭菌属其余菌种ANI值均低于95%,可将CICC 10385鉴定为生胞梭菌(C.sporogenes)。基于全基因组测序的ANI分析是一种准确有效的菌种鉴定方法,为该菌及梭菌属(Clostridium sp.)相关菌种鉴定研究提供了理论依据,为该菌的生物学功能研究奠定了基础。

本文引用格式

曹艳花 , 冯会粉 , 程坤 , 刘波 , 都海渤 , 谢九艳 , 辛迪 , 姚粟 . 基于全基因组测序平均核苷酸一致性的生胞梭菌(Clostridium sporogenes)鉴定[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2022 , 48(19) : 44 -49 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.031023

Abstract

Clostridium sporogenes CICC 10385 (= CMCC 64941) was identified by average nucleotide identity based on the whole genome sequencing to species level. The basic information of CICC 10385 was obtained by morphological and physiological and biochemical analysis. The whole genome of CICC 10385 was sequenced by BGISEQ-500 and analyzed the average nucleotide identity. The results showed that the genome size of CICC 10385 was 4 252 276 bp, containing 58 contigs, the genomic (G+C) mol% was 27.9%. Based on the analysis for the similarities of 16S rRNA gene sequences, most closely related to C. sporogenes, C. botulinum, C. combesii and C. tepidum. The ANI value of CICC 10385 and C. sporogenes DSM 795T (GCA_001020205.1) was 99.39%, and less than 95% to the other species of Clostridium. CICC 10385 can be identified as C. sporogenes by ANI with the whole genome sequencing technology. ANI analysis based on whole genome sequence should be an accurate and effective method for bacterial identification, which would supply the basis for the identification of Clostridium sp. and for the further study to biological research and application.

参考文献

[1] HELLER H H.Certain genera of the Clostridiaceae:Studies in pathogenic anaerobes.V[J].Journal of Bacteriology, 1922, 7(1):1-38.
[2] BERGEY D H, HARRISON F C, BREED R S, et al.Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology[M].Baltimore:Williams & Wilkins Company, 1923.
[3] SKERMAN V B D, SNEATH P H A, MCGOWAN V.Approved lists of bacterial names[J].International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 1980, 30(1):225-420.
[4] 中国食品发酵工业研究院, 中国工业微生物菌种保藏管理中心.食品安全国家标准 食品微生物检验标准菌株图鉴[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社, 2014.
China National Research Institute of Food & Fermentation Industries, China Center of Industrial Culture Collection.National Food Safety Standard Food Microbiological Inspection Standard Strain Illustration[M].Beijing:China Light Industry Press, 2014.
[5] 谢文, 赵宏大, 纪绍梅.关于我国药品无菌试验用培养基质量的现状分析及改进建议[J].中国药事, 2010, 24(1):67-68.
XIE W, ZHAO H D, JI S M.Analysis on the current situation of the quality of media with sterility test and recommendations for improvement[J].Chinese Pharmaceutical Affairs, 2010, 24(1):67-68.
[6] 郑小玲, 杨丹燕, 李珏, 等.现代菌种鉴定技术在药品控制菌检查中的比较[J].中国卫生检验杂志, 2015, 25(5):658-660.
ZHENG X L, YANG D Y, LI J, et al.Comparison of modern strain identification technologies in drug control bacteria test[J].Chinese Journal of Health Laboratory Technology, 2015, 25(5):658-660.
[7] 顾兆姝. 欧、美、日、中现行版药典无菌试验的差异[J].中国药学杂志, 2005, 40(5):390-392.
GU Z S.Differences of sterility test in current editions of pharmacopoeias in Europe, America, Japan and China[J].Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, 2005, 40(5):390-392.
[8] 国家药典委员会编. 中华人民共和国药典:2020年版[M].四部.北京:中国医药科技出版社, 2020.
Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission.Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China 2020 edition[M].4th ed.Beijing:China Medical Science Press, 2020.
[9] 熊海元, 崔强.生孢梭菌孢子作为生物指示剂的研究[J].中国医药工业杂志, 2003, 34(7):354-356.
XIONG H Y, CUI Q.Study on Clostridium sporogenes spores used as a biological indicator[J].Chinese Journal of Pharmaceuticals, 2003, 34(7):354-356.
[10] 熊海元, 潘友文, 崔强, 等.生孢梭菌孢子作为生物指示剂用于残存概率灭菌工艺验证的可行性[J].中国药事, 2003, 17(9):577-579.
XIONG H Y, PAN Y W, CUI Q, et al.Use of Clostridium sporogenes spores as biological indicator during sterilization cycle validations[J].Chinese Pharmaceutical Affairs, 2003, 17(9):577-579.
[11] BRENNER D J, KRIEG N R, STALEY J T, et al.Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology[M].Boston:Springer US, 2005.
[12] SULAIMAN I M, MIRANDA N, SIMPSON S.MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis for the identification of foodborne Clostridium spp.[J].Journal of AOAC International, 2021, 104(5):1 381-1 388.
[13] SEO B, JEON K, BAEK I, et al.Clostridium fessum sp.nov., isolated from human faeces[J].International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2021, 71(1):004579.
[14] DOBRITSA A P, KUTUMBAKA K K, WERNER K, et al.Clostridium tepidum sp.nov., a close relative of Clostridium sporogenes and Clostridium botulinum group I[J].International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2017, 67(7):2 317-2 322.
[15] TAMURA K, PETERSON D, PETERSON N, et al.MEGA5:Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods[J].Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2011, 28(10):2 731-2 739.
[16] LI X, LI Y F, ZANG M Y, et al.Complete chloroplast genome sequence and phylogenetic analysis of Quercus acutissima[J].International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2018, 19(8):2 443.
[17] RICHTER M, ROSSELLÓ-MÓRA R.Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009, 106(45):19 126-19 131.
[18] KIM M, OH H S, PARK S C, et al.Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes[J].International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2014, 64(Pt 2):346-351.
[19] MEIER-KOLTHOFF J P, CARBASSE J S, PEINADO-OLARTE R L, et al.TYGS and LPSN:A database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes[J].Nucleic Acids Research, 2022, 50(D1):D801-D807.
[20] SANCHEZ RAMOS L, RODLOFF A C.Identification of Clostridium species using the VITEK® MS[J].Anaerobe, 2018, 54:217-223.
[21] 刘杰, 赵满仓, 周海峰.VITEK Ⅱ全自动微生物分析系统应用问题分析[J].中国医疗设备, 2013, 28(9):119-121.
LIU J, ZHAO M C, ZHOU H F.Analysis of application problems of VITEK Ⅱ automatic microbe identification system[J].China Medical Devices, 2013, 28(9):119-121.
[22] YOON S H, HA S M, LIM J M, et al.A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity[J].Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2017, 110(10):1 281-1 286.
[23] TINDALL B J, ROSSELLÓ-MÓRA R, BUSSE H J, et al.Notes on the characterization of prokaryote strains for taxonomic purposes[J].International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2010, 60(Pt 1):249-266.
文章导航

/