研究报告

不同乳酸菌抗氧化作用和胆固醇降解能力的初步研究

  • 徐超 ,
  • 章绍兵 ,
  • 孟珺 ,
  • 王敬丽 ,
  • 朱萌茜
展开
  • (河南工业大学 粮油食品学院,河南 郑州,450001)
第一作者:硕士研究生(章绍兵教授和孟珺副教授为共同通信作者,E-mail:shaobingzhang@126.com;mengjun2017@163.com)

收稿日期: 2022-03-03

  修回日期: 2022-03-31

  网络出版日期: 2023-02-15

基金资助

河南省重点研发与推广专项(科技攻关)(222102110080)

A preliminary study of the antioxidant effects and cholesterol degradation capacity of different lactic acid bacteria

  • XU Chao ,
  • ZHANG Shaobing ,
  • MENG Jun ,
  • WANG Jingli ,
  • ZHU Mengxi
Expand
  • (College of Grain & Oil Food, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

Received date: 2022-03-03

  Revised date: 2022-03-31

  Online published: 2023-02-15

摘要

为了筛选出具有良好抗氧化作用和胆固醇降解能力的乳酸菌,以商业化菌株Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG为阳性对照,评价了L.kefir BNCC 190565、L.acidophilus ATCC 4356、L.buchneri BNCC 187964、L.casei CICC 23184、L.plantarum subsp. plantarum CICC 20279这5株乳酸菌的基础益生活性、羟自由基清除能力、还原力和DPPH自由基清除率、降解胆固醇能力及α -葡萄糖苷酶抑制能力。结果表明,L.acidophilus ATCC 4356和L.plantarum subsp.plantarum CICC 20279具有最强的消化道耐受力及良好的益生特性;L.acidophilus ATCC 4356、L.plantarum subsp.plantarum CICC 20279和L.casei CICC 23184具有较强的抗氧化能力;6株菌对胆固醇的降解率均在50%以上,表现出了很强的胆固醇降解能力;L.buchneri BNCC 187964的α -葡萄糖苷酶抑制率显著高于L.rhamnosus GG,其余4株菌和L.rhamnosus GG没有显著性差异。对各项指标进行综合比较,发现L.acidophilus ATCC 4356和L.plantarum subsp.plantarum CICC 20279这2株菌有着突出的性能,具有很强的应用潜力。

本文引用格式

徐超 , 章绍兵 , 孟珺 , 王敬丽 , 朱萌茜 . 不同乳酸菌抗氧化作用和胆固醇降解能力的初步研究[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2023 , 49(2) : 152 -158 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.031305

Abstract

In order to screen out lactic acid bacteria with good antioxidant effect and cholesterol-degrading ability, Lactobacillus kefir BNCC 190565, Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356, Lactobacillus buchneri BNCC 187964, Lactobacillus casei CICC 23184, Lactobacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum CICC 20279 were evaluated with the commercial strain Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG as a positive control. The evaluation indexes included basic probiotic characteristics, hydroxyl radical scavenging ability, reducing ability and DPPH scavenging rate, cholesterol degradation ability and inhibition of α-glucosidase. The results showed that L. acidophilus ATCC 4356 and L. plantarum subsp. plantarum CICC 20279 had the best gastrointestinal tolerance and good probiotic characteristics; L. acidophilus ATCC 4356, L. plantarum subsp. plantarum CICC 20279 and L. casei CICC 23184 had better antioxidant capacity; The cholesterol degradation rate of the six strains were all above 50%, showing a strong cholesterol degradation ability; The α-glucosidase inhibition rate of L. brucei BNCC 187964 was significantly higher than that of L. rhamnosus GG, and the other four strains showed no significant difference with L. rhamnosus GG. The comprehensive comparison of various indexes indicated that L. acidophilus ATCC 4356 and L. plantarum subsp. plantarum CICC 20279 have outstanding properties and strong potential for application.

参考文献

[1] GORLACH S, WAGNER W, PODSEDEK A, et al.Polyphenols from evening primrose (Oenothera paradoxa) defatted seeds induce apoptosis in human colon cancer Caco-2 cells.[J].Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2011, 59(13):6 985-6 997.
[2] HASHEMI S M B,JAFARPOUR D,JOUKI M.Improving bioactive properties of peach juice using Lactobacillus strains fermentation:Antagonistic and anti-adhesion effects, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, and Maillard reaction inhibition[J].Food Chemistry, 2021,365:130501.
[3] 《中国心血管健康与疾病报告2020》编写组.《中国心血管健康与疾病报告2020》要点解读[J]. 中国心血管杂志, 2021, 26(3):209-218.
THE WRITING COMMITTEE OF THE REPORT ON CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH AND DISEASES IN CHINA. Interpretation of report on cardiovascular health and diseases in China 2020[J]. Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine, 2021, 26(3):209-218.
[4] FRANKS P W, MCCARTHY M I.Exposing the exposures responsible for type 2 diabetes and obesity[J].Science, 2016, 354(6 308):69-73.
[5] 郭翔. 降胆固醇益生乳酸菌筛选及其功能机理的研究[D].无锡:江南大学,2009.
GUO X.Screening and functional mechanism of cholesterol-lowering probiotic Lactobacillus[D].Wuxi:Jiangnan University, 2009.
[6] 张军蒙. 具有降血糖作用益生乳酸菌的筛选及其乳品的研究[D].西安:陕西科技大学, 2017.
ZHANG J M.Screening of probiotic lactic acid bacteria with hypoglycemic activity and its dairy study[D].XÍan:Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, 2017.
[7] 孟珺. 乳杆菌表层蛋白的理化性质和生物学功能研究[D].无锡:江南大学, 2016.
MENG J.Study of the physicochemical properties and biological functions of Lactobacillus surface layer proteins[D].Wuxi:Jiangnan University, 2016.
[8] 陈彬和. 大豆发酵液抗氧化性能研究[D].无锡:江南大学,2020.
CHEN B H.Study on the antioxidant activity of soybean fermentation broth[D].Wuxi:Jiangnan University, 2020.
[9] 王霄鹏. 益生菌的降脂作用及其功能性乳的研究[D].西安:陕西科技大学, 2016.
WANG X P.Study on the effect of probiotics and its functional milk[D].XÍan:Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, 2016.
[10] ZHANG J F, ZHENG Y G, SHEN Y C.Inhibitory effect of valienamine on the enzymatic activity of honeybee (Apis cerana Fabr.)α-glucosidase[J].Pesticide Biochemistry & Physiology, 2007, 87(1):73-77.
[11] 王明好. 产酸益生菌的培养和筛选研究[J].科学与财富, 2015(29):102-103.
WANG M H.Research on the culture and screening of acid-producing probiotics[J].Science and Wealth, 2015(29):102-103.
[12] 王磊. 酸乳用乳酸菌的筛选与应用研究[D].扬州:扬州大学,2021.
WANG L.Study on the screening and application of lactic acid bacteria for yoghurt[D].Yangzhou:Yangzhou University, 2021.
[13] 吕嘉枥,张军蒙,余芳, 等.具有α -葡萄糖苷酶抑制性益生乳酸菌的筛选[J].陕西科技大学学报(自然科学版),2017,35(1):129-133.
LYU J L, ZHANG J M, YU F, et al.Screening of probiotic lactic acid bacteria with α-glucosidase inhibition activity[J].Journal of Shaanxi University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2017,35(1):129-133.
[14] BERNET M F, BRASSART D, NEESER J R, et al. Lactobacillus acidophilus LA 1 binds to cultured human intestinal cell lines and inhibits cell attachment and cell invasion by enterovirulent bacteria[J].Gut, 1994, 35(4):483-489.
[15] ARGYRI A A, ZOUMPOPOULOU G, KARATZAS K A G, et al.Selection of potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria from fermented olives by in vitro tests[J].Food Microbiology, 2013, 33(2):282-291.
[16] 刘珊春, 赵欣, 李键, 等. 高抗氧化乳酸菌的筛选鉴定[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2017, 43(8):59-66.
LIU S C, ZHAO X, LI J, et al. Screening and identification of high antioxidant lactic acid bacteria[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2017, 43(8):59-66.
[17] XU R H, SHANG N, LI P.In vitro and in vivo antioxidant activity of exopolysaccharide fractions from Bifidobacterium animalis RH[J].Anaerobe, 2011, 17(5):226-231.
[18] DAS D, GOYAL A.Antioxidant activity and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) producing ability of probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum DM5 isolated from Marcha of Sikkim[J].LWT -Food Science and Technology, 2015, 61(1):263-268.
[19] ROY D, SIROIS S, VINCENT D.Molecular discrimination of lactobacilli used as starter and probiotic cultures by amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis[J].Current Microbiology, 2001, 42(4):282-289.
[20] TANG H Q, QIAN B J, XIA B, et al.Screening of lactic acid bacteria isolated from fermented Cornus officinalis fruits for probiotic potential[J].Journal of Food Safety,2018,38(6):1-9.
[21] 王霄鹏,吕嘉枥,闫亚梅,等.十株益生菌发酵液降脂能力研究[C].2015年陕西省食品科学技术学会学术年会.陕西省食品科学技术学会,2016:6.
WANG X P, LYU J L, YAN Y M, et al.Research on the lipid-lowering ability of ten probiotic fermentation broth[C].2015 Annual Conference of Shaanxi Food Science and Technology Society.Shaanxi Food Science and Technology Society, 2016:6.
[22] HASSAN A, DIN A U, ZHU Y, et al.Updates in understanding the hypocholesterolemia effect of probiotics on atherosclerosis[J].Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2019, 103(15):5 993-6 006.
[23] CARDULLO N, MUCCILLI V, PULVIRENTI L, et al.C-glucosidic ellagitannins and galloylated glucoses as potential functional food ingredients with anti-diabetic properties:A study of α-glucosidase and α-amylase inhibition[J].Food Chemistry, 2020,313:126099.
[24] WANG X W, HAN M Z, ZHANG M N, et al.In vitro evaluation of the hypoglycemic properties of lactic acid bacteria and its fermentation adaptability in apple juice[J].LWT-Food Science and Technology,2021,136:110363.
文章导航

/