综述与专题评论

噬菌体防控沙门氏菌生物被膜的研究进展

  • 李晓宇 ,
  • 迟新月 ,
  • 王林会 ,
  • 马永生 ,
  • 魏炳栋 ,
  • 王丽丽 ,
  • 张慧君 ,
  • 孙晓雯 ,
  • 李仕彬 ,
  • 李纪彬 ,
  • 徐永平
展开
  • 1(大连理工大学 生物工程学院,辽宁 大连,116024)
    2(大连赛姆生物工程技术有限公司,辽宁 大连,116620)
    3(大连海洋大学 食品科学与工程学院,辽宁 大连,116023)
    4(吉林省农业科学院 畜牧分院,吉林 公主岭,136100)
博士,副教授(徐永平教授为通信作者,E-mail:xyping@dlut.edu.cn)

收稿日期: 2022-04-16

  修回日期: 2022-05-06

  网络出版日期: 2023-03-20

基金资助

辽宁省“兴辽英才计划”项目(XLYC1907085);大连市重点科技研发计划(2021YF16SN012);中央高校基本科研业务费(DUT20GJ217)

Research progress of bacteriophage control of Salmonella spp. biofilm

  • LI Xiaoyu ,
  • CHI Xinyue ,
  • WANG Linhui ,
  • MA Yongsheng ,
  • WEI Bingdong ,
  • WANG Lili ,
  • ZHANG Huijun ,
  • SUN Xiaowen ,
  • LI Shibin ,
  • LI Jibin ,
  • XU Yongping
Expand
  • 1(School of Bioengineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China)
    2(Dalian SEM Bio-Engineering Technology Co. Ltd., Dalian 116620, China)
    3(College of Food Science and Engineering, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian 116023, China)
    4(Branch of Institute of Animal Husbandry,Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Gongzhuling 136100, China)

Received date: 2022-04-16

  Revised date: 2022-05-06

  Online published: 2023-03-20

摘要

沙门氏菌是重要的食源性致病菌,控制食品中沙门氏菌的污染,特别是防止其形成生物被膜交叉污染食品,对保障食品安全具有重要意义。现阶段传统的物理性、化学性控制措施都存在一定的局限性,难以有效将沙门氏菌生物被膜完全去除,因此,亟待开发针对沙门氏菌生物被膜的新型控制和清除策略。近年来噬菌体作为一种安全、有效、无残留的天然抑菌剂受到了普遍关注,与化学消毒剂相比,其具有特异性强、自我增殖快、安全性高、研发时间短等突出优势,在食源性致病菌生物被膜的控制和清除领域已表现出巨大潜力。该文综述了沙门氏菌生物被膜的结构成分与形成过程,并重点介绍了国内外用噬菌体破解沙门氏菌生物被膜的作用机制与应用现状。针对噬菌体的未来研究方向进行了展望,以期为食品加工过程中沙门氏菌生物被膜的有效控制提供新的技术与策略。

本文引用格式

李晓宇 , 迟新月 , 王林会 , 马永生 , 魏炳栋 , 王丽丽 , 张慧君 , 孙晓雯 , 李仕彬 , 李纪彬 , 徐永平 . 噬菌体防控沙门氏菌生物被膜的研究进展[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2023 , 49(4) : 312 -317 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.032008

Abstract

Salmonella spp. is one of the most common causes of foodborne disease worldwide. It is well known that the paramount importance of controlling the cross-contamination and biofilm formation by Salmonella spp. for ensuring food safety. At present, it is difficult to effectively remove Salmonella spp. biofilm in the food industry due to the limitations of traditional physical and chemical control measures. Therefore, it is urgent to develop new control and removal strategies for Salmonella spp. biofilm. Recently, bacteriophages have attracted considerable attention as a safe and highly effective natural bacteriostatic agent. Compared with chemical disinfectants, it has outstanding advantages such as strong specificity, fast self-proliferation, high safety and short development time. It has shown great potential in the field of control and removal of biofilm of foodborne pathogens. Included are a review of the components and formation process of Salmonella spp. biofilm, and focuses on the mode of action and the potential application of bacteriophages for the control of Salmonella spp. biofilm, as well as some limitations and future research area to the adoption of bacteriophages are also discussed. In conclusion, this review will provide new technologies and strategies for the effective control of Salmonella spp. biofilm in food processing.

参考文献

[1] EFSA, ECDC.The European Union one health 2020 zoonoses report[J].EFSA Journal, 2021, 19 (12):e06971.
[2] LEE W H, JEON Y, CHUNG J S, et al.Global genomic variations of pathogenic bacteria Salmonella reading[J].Computational Molecular Bioscience, 2021, 11 (3):57-68.
[3] LI H Q, LI W W, DAI Y, et al.Characteristics of settings and etiologic agents of foodborne disease outbreaks—China, 2020[J].China CDC Weekly, 2021, 3 (42):889-893.
[4] SREY S, JAHID I K, HA S D.Biofilm formation in food industries:A food safety concern[J].Food Control, 2013, 31 (2):572-585.
[5] SIMÕES M, SIMÕES L C, MACHADO I, et al.Control of flow-generated biofilms with surfactants:Evidence of resistance and recovery[J].Food and Bioproducts Processing, 2006, 84 (4):338-345.
[6] YUAN L, HANSEN M F, RØDER H L, et al.Mixed-species biofilms in the food industry:Current knowledge and novel control strategies[J].Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 2020, 60(13):2 277-2 293.
[7] 檀利军, 王敬敬, 彭知云, 等.食品工业中混合菌生物被膜的形成、相互作用与新型控制策略[J].食品科学, 2022, 43(19):285-294.
TAN L J, WANG J J, PENG Z Y, et al.Formation, interaction and novel control strategies of mixed-species biofilm in the food industry[J].Food Science, 2022, 43(19):285-294.
[8] ROHWER F, SEGALL A M.In retrospect:A century of phage lessons[J].Nature, 2015, 528 (7 580):46-48.
[9] SULAKVELIDZE A.Safety by nature:Potential bacteriophage applications[J].Microbe Magazine, 2011, 6 (3):122-126.
[10] YIN W, WANG Y T, LIU L, et al.Biofilms:The microbial "protective clothing" in extreme environments[J].International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2019, 20 (14):3423.
[11] COSTERTON J W, LEWANDOWSKI Z, CALDWELL D E, et al.Microbial biofilms[J].Annual Review of Microbiology, 1995, 49:711-745.
[12] JONAS K, TOMENIUS H, KADER A, et al.Roles of curli, cellulose and BapA in Salmonella biofilm morphology studied by atomic force microscopy[J].BMC Microbiology, 2007, 7:70.
[13] ĆWIEK K, BUGLA-PŁOSKOŃSKA G, WIELICZKO A.Salmonella biofilm development:Structure and significance[J].Postępy Higieny i Medycyny DoŚwiadczalnej, 2019, 73:937-943.
[14] KOLENDA R, UGORSKI M, GRZYMAJLO K.Everything you always wanted to know about Salmonella type 1 fimbriae, but were afraid to ask[J].Frontiers in Microbiology, 2019, 10:1017.
[15] LATASA C, ROUX A, TOLEDO-ARANA A, et al.BapA, a large secreted protein required for biofilm formation and host colonization of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis[J].Molecular Microbiology, 2005, 58 (5):1 322-1 339.
[16] WHITE A P, GIBSON D L, COLLINSON S K, et al.Extracellular polysaccharides associated with thin aggregative fimbriae of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis[J].Journal of Bacteriology, 2003, 185 (18):5 398-5 407.
[17] PONTES M H, LEE E J, CHOI J, et al.Salmonella promotes virulence by repressing cellulose production[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015, 112 (16):5 183-5 188.
[18] IBÁÑEZ DE ALDECOA A L, ZAFRA O, GONZÁLEZ-PASTOR J E.Mechanisms and regulation of extracellular DNA release and its biological roles in microbial communities[J].Frontiers in Microbiology, 2017, 8:1390.
[19] WANG H, HUANG Y, WU S Y, et al.Extracellular DNA inhibits Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and S. enterica serovar Typhi biofilm development on abiotic surfaces[J].Current Microbiology, 2014, 68 (2):262-268.
[20] KHATOON Z, MCTIERNAN C D, SUURONEN E J, et al.Bacterial biofilm formation on implantable devices and approaches to its treatment and prevention[J].Heliyon, 2018, 4 (12):e01067.
[21] CHAN Y H, WU X H, CHIENG B W, et al.Superhydrophobic nanocoatings as intervention against biofilm-associated bacterial infections[J].Nanomaterials(Basel, Switzerland), 2021, 11 (4):1046.
[22] RABIN N, ZHENG Y, OPOKU-TEMENG C, et al.Biofilm formation mechanisms and targets for developing antibiofilm agents[J].Future Medicinal Chemistry, 2015, 7 (4):493-512.
[23] LAMAS A, REGAL P, MANUEL FRANCO C.Salmonella spp.-A Global Challenge[M].UK:IntechOpen, 2021.
[24] WEI J W, PENG N, LIANG Y X, et al.Phage therapy:Consider the past, embrace the future[J].Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(21):7654.
[25] AZEREDO J, GARCÍA P, DRULIS-KAWA Z.Targeting biofilms using phages and their enzymes[J].Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 2021, 68:251-261.
[26] HARPER D, PARRACHO H, WALKER J, et al.Bacteriophages and biofilms[J].Antibiotics, 2014, 3 (3):270-284.
[27] PIRES D P, OLIVEIRA H, MELO L D R, et al.Bacteriophage-encoded depolymerases:Their diversity and biotechnological applications[J].Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2016, 100(5):2 141-2 151.
[28] LATKA A, MACIEJEWSKA B, MAJKOWSKA-SKROBEK G, et al.Bacteriophage-encoded virion-associated enzymes to overcome the carbohydrate barriers during the infection process[J].Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2017, 101 (8):3 103-3 119.
[29] KNECHT L E, VELJKOVIC M, FIESELER L.Diversity and function of phage encoded depolymerases[J].Frontiers in Microbiology, 2020, 10:2949.
[30] ROACH D R, DONOVAN D M.Antimicrobial bacteriophage-derived proteins and therapeutic applications[J].Bacteriophage, 2015, 5 (3):e1062590.
[31] KOVALENKO A O, CHERNYSHOV S V, KUTYSHENKO V P, et al.Investigation of the calcium-induced activation of the bacteriophage T5 peptidoglycan hydrolase promoting host cell lysis[J].Metallomics, 2019, 11 (4):799-809.
[32] RAHMAN M U, WANG W X, SUN Q Q, et al.Endolysin, a promising solution against antimicrobial resistance[J].Antibiotics(Basel, Switzerland), 2021, 10 (11):1 277.
[33] GONZÁLEZ S, FERNÁNDEZ L, GUTIÉRREZ D, et al.Analysis of different parameters affecting diffusion, propagation and survival of staphylophages in bacterial biofilms[J].Frontiers in Microbiology, 2018, 9:2348.
[34] VIDAKOVIC L, SINGH P K, HARTMANN R, et al.Dynamic biofilm architecture confers individual and collective mechanisms of viral protection[J].Nature Microbiology, 2018, 3 (1):26-31.
[35] YÜKSEL F N, BUZRUL S, AKÇELIK M, et al.Inhibition and eradication of Salmonella typhimurium biofilm using P22 bacteriophage, EDTA and nisin[J].Biofouling, 2018, 34 (9):1 046-1 054.
[36] TIWARI B R, KIM S, KIM J.A Virulent Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis phage SE2 with a strong bacteriolytic activity of planktonic and biofilmed cells[J].Journal of Bacteriology and Virology, 2013, 43 (3):186.
[37] KARACA B, AKCELIK N, AKCELIK M.Effects of P22 bacteriophage on Salmonella enterica subsp enterica serovar typhimurium DMC4 strain biofilm formation and eradication[J].Archives of Biological Sciences, 2015, 67 (4):1 361-1 367.
[38] JIANG L M, ZHENG R, SUN Q M, et al.Isolation, characterization, and application of Salmonella paratyphi phage KM16 against Salmonella paratyphi biofilm[J].Biofouling, 2021, 37 (3):276-288.
[39] ABDELHADI I M A, SOFY A R, HMED A A, et al.Discovery of polyvalent myovirus (vB_STM-2) phage as a natural antimicrobial system to lysis and biofilm removal of Salmonella typhimurium isolates from various food sources[J].Sustainability, 2021, 13(21):11602.
[40] KWON J, KIM S G, KIM H J, et al.Bacteriophage as an alternative to prevent reptile-associated Salmonella transmission[J].Zoonoses and Public Health, 2021, 68 (2):131-143.
[41] MILHO C, SILVA M D, ALVES D, et al.Escherichia coli and Salmonella Enteritidis dual-species biofilms:Interspecies interactions and antibiofilm efficacy of phages[J].Scientific Reports, 2019, 9(1):18183.
[42] HOSSEINIDOUST Z, TUFENKJI N, VAN DE VEN T G M.Formation of biofilms under phage predation:Considerations concerning a biofilm increase[J].Biofouling, 2013, 29 (4):457-468.
[43] GONG C, JIANG X P.Application of bacteriophages to reduce Salmonella attachment and biofilms on hard surfaces[J].Poultry Science, 2017, 96 (6):1 838-1 848.
[44] DE ORNELLAS DUTKA GARCIA K C, DE OLIVEIRA CORRÊA I M, PEREIRA L Q, et al.Bacteriophage use to control Salmonella biofilm on surfaces present in chicken slaughterhouses[J].Poultry Science, 2017, 96 (9):3 392-3 398.
[45] CHEN Y B, SUN E C, SONG J Y, et al.Three Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis bacteriophages from the Siphoviridae family are promising candidates for phage therapy[J].Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 2018, 64 (11):865-875.
[46] ISLAM M S, ZHOU Y, LIANG L, et al.Application of a phage cocktail for control of Salmonella in foods and reducing biofilms[J].Viruses, 2019, 11 (9):841.
[47] CHANDRA M, THAKUR S, CHOUGULE S S, et al.Combined effect of disinfectant and phage on the survivality of S.typhimurium and its biofilm phenotype[J].Internet Journal of Food Safety, 2015, 17:25-31.
[48] ZHANG Y, HUANG H H, DUC H M, et al.Endolysin LysSTG2:Characterization and application to control Salmonella Typhimurium biofilm alone and in combination with slightly acidic hypochlorous water[J].Food Microbiology, 2021, 98:103791.
[49] OLIVEIRA H, THIAGARAJAN V, WALMAGH M, et al.A thermostable Salmonella phage endolysin, Lys68, with broad bactericidal properties against gram-negative pathogens in presence of weak acids[J].PloS One, 2014, 9(10):e108376.
文章导航

/