食品与发酵工业 >

2023 , Vol. 49 >Issue 18: 170 - 177

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.032452

研究报告

文昌市椰子资源果实表型和品质综合评价

  • 郑奋 ,
  • 李智虓 ,
  • 李梓华 ,
  • 韩学倩 ,
  • 黄允 ,
  • 柯亚丽 ,
  • 陈丽 ,
  • 周韬
展开
  • 1(文昌市林业科学研究所,海南 文昌,571321)
    2(海南大学,热带特色林木花卉遗传与种质创新教育部重点实验室,海南省热带特色花木资源生物学重点实验室,海南五指山森林生态系统国家定位观测研究站,海南 海口,570228)
    3(海南大学 林学院,海南 海口,570228)
第一作者:学士,林业工程师(周韬讲师为通信作者,E-mail:zhoutao182@163.com)

收稿日期: 2022-05-26

  修回日期: 2022-06-28

  网络出版日期: 2023-10-25

基金资助

海南省重点研发项目(ZDYF2020046)

收起

Comprehensive evaluation of fruit phenotype and quality of coconut resource in Wenchang

  • ZHENG Fen ,
  • LI Zhixiao ,
  • LI Zihua ,
  • HAN Xueqian ,
  • HUANG Yun ,
  • KE Yali ,
  • CHEN Li ,
  • ZHOU Tao
Expand
  • 1(Wenchang Forest Research Institute, Wenchang 571321, China)
    2(Key Laboratory of Genetics and Germplasm Innovation of Tropical Special Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants, Key Laboratory of Germplasm Resources of Tropical Special Ornamental Plants of Hainan Province, Wuzhishan National Long Term Forest Ecosystem Research Station, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)
    3(College of Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)

Received date: 2022-05-26

  Revised date: 2022-06-28

  Online published: 2023-10-25

Fold

摘要

为了更好地开展椰子品种选育工作,以文昌市62份椰子资源的果实为材料,测定果实重量、椰子水重量、果形指数、可溶性固形物、维生素C、蛋白质含量和氨基酸含量等主要果实性状,对其进行相关性分析、主成分分析、聚类分析和综合排序。结果表明,果实表型和品质性状存在不同程度的变异,变异系数为7.29%~43.31%,其中蛋白质含量的变异系数最大,椰子水口感等果实风味指标存在中等的变异程度,pH值的变异系数最小。有28对指标的相关性达到了显著水平,101对指标的相关性达到了极显著水平。主成分分析提取了7个主成分,累积贡献率为80.85%。根据主成分分析结果计算得分并排序,DJ150、PL163、WC105、DG133、CX032、DJ014和DG135综合排名最高,果实品质较好。结合聚类分析的结果,最终筛选出DJ150、PL163、WC105、CX032和DJ014五份优质椰子资源,并将椰子果实品质评价因子简化为5个指标,分别是固酸比、维生素C、氨基酸、椰肉口感和可溶性固形物。研究结果可以为高种椰子品种选育工作提供数据支持。

关键词： 高种椰子; 主成分分析; 聚类分析; 果实综合评价

本文引用格式

郑奋 , 李智虓 , 李梓华 , 韩学倩 , 黄允 , 柯亚丽 , 陈丽 , 周韬 . 文昌市椰子资源果实表型和品质综合评价[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2023 , 49(18) : 170 -177 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.032452

Abstract

Wenchang is the main coconut planting area in Hainan. To evaluate the fruit traits of tall coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) and provide references for coconut cultivars selection and quality improvement, an investigation of tall coconut germplasm resources in Wenchang city was completed in 2021. The fruits of 62 coconut resources were collected for fruit quality evaluation, the main fruit characteristics, such as fruit weight, coconut water weight, fruit shape index, total soluble solids, vitamin C, protein content, and amino acid content were measured, then correlation analysis, principal component analysis, cluster analysis, and comprehensive ranking were carried out. Results showed that there were varying degrees of variation in fruit phenotype and quality traits, and the coefficient of variation ranged from 7.29% to 43.31%, in which the coefficient of variation of protein content was the largest, fruit flavor indexes such as coconut water taste score were medium and the coefficient of variation of pH value was the smallest. Pearson correlation analysis was carried out on 22 traits of 62 resources. Results showed that the correlation between 28 pairs of indicators reached a significant level (P<0.05), and the correlation between 101 pairs reached a very significant level (P<0.01). Seven principal components were extracted by principal component analysis, and the cumulative contribution rate was 80.85%. According to the results of the principal component analysis, the comprehensive scores of germplasm resources were calculated and ranked. DJ150, PL163, WC105, DG133, CX032, DJ014, and DG135 ranked at the top, with high fruit quality. Combined with the results of cluster analysis, five high-quality coconut resources including DJ150, PL163, WC105, CX032, and DJ014 were finally selected, the evaluation factors of coconut fruit quality were simplified into five indexes, which were total soluble solid (TSS)-acid ratio, vitamin C, amino acid, coconut flavor, and total soluble solids. The research results can provide data support for the breeding of tall coconut varieties.

Key words： tall coconut; principal component analysis; cluster analysis; fruit comprehensive evaluation

参考文献

[1] 海南统计局, 国家统计局海南统计总队.2021年海南统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社, 2022.
Hainan Provincial Bureau of Statistics and Survey Office of National Bureau of Statistics in Hainan.Hainan Statistical Yearbook in 2021[M].Beijing:China Statistics Press, 2022.
[2] 范海阔. 椰子新品种“文椰2号”[J].中国果业信息, 2008(8):57.
FAN H K.A new coconut variety ‘wenye No.2’[J].China Fruit News, 2008(8):57.
[3] 范海阔, 覃伟权, 黄丽云, 等.椰子新品种‘文椰3号’[J].园艺学报, 2008, 35(6):927.
FAN H K, QIN W Q, HUANG L Y, et al.A new coconut cultivar ‘wenye 3’[J].Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2008, 35(6):927.
[4] 范海阔, 冯美利, 黄丽云, 等.椰子新品种‘文椰4号’[J].园艺学报, 2011, 38(4):803-804.
FAN H K, FENG M L, HUANG L Y, et al.A new coconut cultivar ‘Wenye 4’[J].Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2011, 38(4):803-804.
[5] 孙程旭, 范海阔, 曹红星, 等.椰子新品种‘文椰5号’[J].园艺学报, 2019, 46(7):1417-1418.
SUN C X, FAN H K, CAO H X, et al.A new coconut cultivar ‘Wenye 5’[J].Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2019, 46(7):1417-1418.
[6] 孙程旭, 范海阔, 张军, 等.椰子新品种‘文椰6号’[J].园艺学报, 2019, 46(8):1623-1624.
SUN C X, FAN H K, ZHANG J, et al.A new coconut cultivar ‘Wenye 6’[J].Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2019, 46(8):1623-1624.
[7] 冯美利, 刘立云, 李杰.海南椰子寒害落(裂)果调查初报[J].中国南方果树, 2008, 37(5):49-51.
FENG M L, LIU L Y, LI J.Preliminary report on the investigation of coconut fruit falling (cracking) caused by cold injury in Hainan[J].South China Fruits, 2008, 37(5):49-51.
[8] 黄丽云, 范海阔, 周焕起, 等.2008年海南省椰子寒害调查[J].中国果树, 2009(2):66-68.
HUANG L Y, FAN H K, ZHOU H Q, et al.Investigation on coconut chilling injury in Hainan province in 2008[J].China Fruits, 2009(2):66-68.
[9] 毛彧, 傅国华.海南椰子种质资源研究综述[J].安徽农业科学, 2011, 39(1):439-442.
MAO Y, FU G H.Research on coconut germplasm resource in Hainan province[J].Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 39(1):439-442.
[10] 易小平, 王家保, 易运智.海南椰子2种新类型[J].热带作物学报, 2004, 25(4):18-20.
YI X P, WANG J B, YI Y Z.Two new types of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) in Hainan island[J].Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2004, 25(4):18-20.
[11] 卢丽兰, 刘蕊, 肖勇, 等.椰子种质资源、栽培与利用研究进展[J].热带作物学报, 2021, 42(6):1795-1803.
LU L L, LIU R, XIAO Y, et al.Research progress on coconut germplasm resources, cultivation and utilization[J].Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2021, 42(6):1795-1803.
[12] 刘长姣, 杨越越, 王妮, 等.茚三酮比色法测定秋葵中氨基酸含量条件的优化[J].中国食品添加剂, 2018(1):187-193.
LIU C J, YANG Y Y, WANG N, et al.Optimization of detection conditions of amino acids in okra by ninhydrin colorimetric method[J].China Food Additives, 2018, (1):187–193.
[13] 孙程旭, 张军, 范海阔, 等.椰子资源形态和品质关键因子测评初步研究[J].热带作物学报, 2014, 35(12):2 355-2 361.
SUN C X, ZHANG J, FAN H K, et al.Test and assessment of critical morphological and quality factors of coconut resources[J].Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops,2014, 35(12):2 355- 2361.
[14] 曹红星, 孙程旭, 张军, 等.越南椰子资源果实品质分析及评价[J].热带作物学报, 2013, 34(12):2419-2423.
CAO H X, SUN C X, ZHANG J, et al.The evaluation and analyzed of fruit quality on vietnamese coconut resources[J].Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2013, 34(12):2419-2423.
[15] 尹欣幸, 王玉萍, 卢丽兰, 等.椰子落果的矿质元素、可溶性糖及生长调节剂含量分析[J].南方农业, 2021, 15(34):92-95.
YIN X X, WANG Y P, LU L L, et al.Analysis on the mineral elements, soluble sugar and growth regulator content due to the premature drop of coconuts[J].South China Agriculture, 2021, 15(34):92-95.
[16] 杨子琴, 李茂, 章笑赟, 等.饥饿胁迫对龙眼果实脱落及糖代谢的影响[J].果树学报, 2011, 28(3):428-432.
YANG Z Q, LI M, ZHANG X Y, et al.Effects of starvation stress on fruit abscission and sugar metabolism in longan[J].Journal of Fruit Science, 2011, 28(3):428-432.
[17] 江锡兵, 滕国新, 范金根, 等.长江中下游区板栗主栽品种果实表型和品质综合评价[J].林业科学研究, 2022, 35(1):70-81.
JIANG X B, TENG G X, FAN J G, et al.Comprehensive evaluation of fruit phenotype and quality of main Chinese chestnut cultivars in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze river[J].Forest Research,2022, 35(1):70-81.
[18] 喻华平, 赵志常, 高爱平, 等.基于主成分分析和聚类分析的23份黄皮种质资源的品质评价[J/OL].热带作物学报, 2022.https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1019.S.20220325.1448.004.html.
YU H P, ZHAO Z C, GAO A P, et al.Quality evaluation of 23 species of Clausena lansium(Lour.) Skeels germplasm resources based on principal component analysis and cluster analysis[J/OL].Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2022.https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1019.S.20220325.1448.004.html.
[19] 董琼, 李世民, 高尚杰, 等.不同种源树番茄果实品质比较及综合分析[J].食品与发酵工业, 2022, 48(4):266-273.
DONG Q, LI S M, GAO S J, et al.Comparison and comprehensive analysis the quality of Cyphomandra betacea from different provenance[J].Food and Fermentation Industries, 2022, 48(4):266-273.
[20] 杨玉宁, 陈松树, 高尔刚, 等.基于主成分分析的木通属植物果实品质评价[J].食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(9):191-200.
YANG Y N, CHEN S S, GAO E G, et al.Fruit quality evaluation of Akebia Decne based on principal component analysis[J].Food and Fermentation Industries, 2021, 47(9):191-200.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

技术支持：北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司