研究报告

低浓度微酸性电解水对纯培养及海虾中副溶血性弧菌与腐败希瓦氏菌的杀灭作用

  • 刘阳 ,
  • 王程可苡 ,
  • 杨宇 ,
  • 罗宗洪 ,
  • 常冠红 ,
  • 王新 ,
  • 张春玲
展开
  • (西北农林科技大学 食品科学与工程学院,陕西 杨凌,712100)
第一作者:硕士研究生(王新教授和张春玲讲师为通信作者,E-mail:xinwang7516@nwafu.edu.cn;zbh545400370@163.com)

收稿日期: 2023-03-10

  修回日期: 2023-04-08

  网络出版日期: 2024-03-15

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(31871894,U1703119)

Bactericidal effect of low concentration slightly acidic electrolyzed water on Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Shewanella putrefaciens in pure culture and shrimp

  • LIU Yang ,
  • WANG Chengkeyi ,
  • YANG Yu ,
  • LUO Zonghong ,
  • CHANG Guanhong ,
  • WANG Xin ,
  • ZHANG Chunling
Expand
  • (College of Food Science and Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China)

Received date: 2023-03-10

  Revised date: 2023-04-08

  Online published: 2024-03-15

摘要

为探究低浓度微酸性电解水(low concentration slightly acidic electrolyzed water, LcSAEW)对纯培养及海虾中的副溶血性弧菌与腐败希瓦氏菌的杀灭作用,该研究通过平板计数、生长曲线、电导率、膜电位、胞内物质渗漏量、活性氧和显微镜观察分析了LcSAEW对两种细菌的抑菌效果、细胞膜完整性以及细胞形态的影响。结果表明,有效氯浓度为4、8 mg/L的LcSAEW处理纯培养副溶血性弧菌与腐败希瓦氏菌30 s时,菌落数均降低8 lg CFU/mL以上。用10 mg/L的LcSAEW处理接种两种目标菌的海虾10 min后,菌落数分别降低1.6、1.25 lg CFU/mL。LcSAEW处理后,2种细菌的代谢活性和胞内ATP浓度均降低,而电导率、胞外DNA、蛋白质和K+含量均上升。此外,膜电位呈现超极化,胞内活性氧累积,细胞形态出现凹陷、皱缩现象。综上所述,LcSAEW可以破坏细胞结构、细胞膜通透性,导致细菌活性紊乱甚至凋亡。该研究可为LcSAEW在水产品中的应用提供理论依据。

本文引用格式

刘阳 , 王程可苡 , 杨宇 , 罗宗洪 , 常冠红 , 王新 , 张春玲 . 低浓度微酸性电解水对纯培养及海虾中副溶血性弧菌与腐败希瓦氏菌的杀灭作用[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2024 , 50(4) : 51 -58 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.035447

Abstract

This work was aim to investigate the bactericidal effect of low concentration slightly acidic electrolyzed water (LcSAEW) against Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Shewanella putrefaciens in pure culture and shrimp. In this study, the effects of LcSAEW on the antibacterial effect, cell membrane integrity and cell morphology of both bacteria were analyzed by plate counts, growth curves, conductivity, membrane potential, leakage of intracellular material, reactive oxygen species (ROS) and microscopic observation. The results showed that when pure cultures of V. parahaemolyticus and S. putrefaciens were treated with LcSAEW at available chlorine concentrations of 4 or 8 mg/L for 30 s, the colony count decreased by more than 8 lgCFU/mL. Treatment of shrimp inoculated with two target bacteria with 10 mg/L LcSAEW for 10 min resulted in a reduction in colony counts of 1.6 and 1.25 lgCFU/mL, respectively. The metabolic activity and intracellular ATP concentration were observed decreased in both type of bacteria, whereas, the conductivity, extracellular DNA, protein and K+ contents increased by LcSAEW treatment. In addition, the membrane potential showed hyperpolarization, the intracellular ROS accumulated, and the cell morphology appeared depression and shrinkage. In summary, LcSAEW can destroy cell structure, cell membrane permeability, and therefore, result in disturbance of bacterial activity, and even apoptosis occurs. This study provides a theoretical basis for the application of LcSAEW in aquatic products.

参考文献

[1] ELMAHDI S, DASILVA L V, PARVEEN S.Antibiotic resistance of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus in various countries:A review[J].Food Microbiology, 2016, 57:128-134.
[2] LOPATEK M, WIECZOREK K, OSEK J.Antimicrobial resistance, virulence factors, and genetic profiles of Vibrio parahaemolyticus from seafood[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2018,84(16):e00537-e00518.
[3] YANG Z Q, TAO X Y, ZHANG H, et al.Isolation and characterization of virulent phages infecting Shewanella baltica and Shewanella putrefaciens, and their application for biopreservation of chilled channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus)[J].International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2019, 292:107-117.
[4] TAO H, LIAO Q M, XU Y, et al.Efficacy of slightly acidic electrolyzed water for inactivation of Cronobacter sakazakii and biofilm cells[J].Journal of food protection, 2022, 85(3):511-517.
[5] KIM H J, TANGO C N, CHELLIAH R, et al.Sanitization efficacy of slightly acidic electrolyzed water against pure cultures of Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica, Typhimurium, Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus cereus spores, in comparison with different water hardness[J].Scientific Reports, 2019, 9(1):4348.
[6] ZHAO X M, MENG X M, LI W X, et al.Effect of hydrogen-rich water and slightly acidic electrolyzed water treatments on storage and preservation of fresh-cut kiwifruit[J].Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization, 2021, 15(6):5203-5210.
[7] YOON S R, LEE J Y, YANG J S, et al.Bactericidal effects of diluted slightly acidic electrolyzed water in quantitative suspension and cabbage tests[J].LWT-Food Science and Technology, 2021, 152:112291.
[8] BING S, ZANG Y T, LI Y J, et al.A combined approach using slightly acidic electrolyzed water and tea polyphenols to inhibit lipid oxidation and ensure microbiological safety during beef preservation[J].Meat Science, 2022, 183:108643.
[9] WANG Y, WU J E, YANG H S.Comparison of the metabolic responses of eight Escherichia coli strains including the “big six” in pea sprouts to low concentration electrolysed water by NMR spectroscopy[J].Food Control, 2022, 131:108458.
[10] LI H Y, LIANG D, HUANG J, et al.The bactericidal efficacy and the mechanism of action of slightly acidic electrolyzed water on Listeria monocytogenes' survival[J].Foods, 2021, 10(11):2671.
[11] RAHMAN S M E, PARK J H, WANG J, et al.Stability of low concentration electrolyzed water and its sanitization potential against foodborne pathogens[J].Journal of Food Engineering, 2012, 113(4):548-553.
[12] WANG J J, ZHANG Z H, LI J B, et al.Modeling Vibrio parahaemolyticus inactivation by acidic electrolyzed water on cooked shrimp using response surface methodology[J].Food Control, 2014, 36(1):273-279.
[13] FADHEL ABBA S ALBAAYIT S, MAHARJAN R, ABDULLAH R, et al.Evaluation of anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus property of zerumbone[J].Journal of Applied Biomedicine, 2022, 20(1):15-21.
[14] LIU Q, JIN X X, FENG X, et al.Inactivation kinetics of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella typhimurium on organic carrot (Daucus carota L.) treated with low concentration electrolyzed water combined with short-time heat treatment[J].Food Control, 2019, 106:106702.
[15] NAKA A, YAKUBO M, NAKAMURA K, et al.Effectiveness of slightly acidic electrolyzed water on bacteria reduction:In vitro and spray evaluation[J].PeerJ, 2020, 8:e8593.
[16] JO H Y, TANGO C N, OH D H.Influence of different organic materials on chlorine concentration and sanitization of slightly acidic electrolyzed water[J].LWT-Food Science and Technology, 2018, 92:187-194.
[17] QI H, HUNG Y C.Inactivation mechanism of ferrous and alkaline activated persulfate on Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Listeria monocytogenes[J].LWT-Food Science and Technology, 2019, 111:62-68.
[18] XIANG Q S, WANG W J, ZHAO D B, et al.Synergistic inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 by plasma-activated water and mild heat[J].Food Control, 2019, 106:106741.
[19] DING T, XUAN X T, LI J, et al.Disinfection efficacy and mechanism of slightly acidic electrolyzed water on Staphylococcus aureus in pure culture[J].Food Control, 2016, 60:505-510.
[20] JEYANTHI V, VELUSAMY P, KUMAR G V, et al.Effect of naturally isolated hydroquinone in disturbing the cell membrane integrity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa MTCC 741 and Staphylococcus aureus MTCC 740[J].Heliyon, 2021, 7(5):e07021.
[21] YANG X, HUANG E, YOUSEF A E.Brevibacillin, a cationic lipopeptide that binds to lipoteichoic acid and subsequently disrupts cytoplasmic membrane of Staphylococcus aureus[J].Microbiological Research, 2017, 195:18-23.
[22] LIU L, LAN W Q, WANG Y B, et al.Antibacterial activity and mechanism of slightly acidic electrolyzed water against Shewanella putrefaciens and Staphylococcus saprophytic[J].Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2022, 592:44-50.
[23] LIAO X Y, XUAN X T, LI J, et al.Bactericidal action of slightly acidic electrolyzed water against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus via multiple cell targets[J].Food Control, 2017, 79:380-385.
[24] SOKABE M, SAWADA Y, KOBAYASHI T.Ion channels activated by mechanical forces in bacterial and eukaryotic cells[J].Sub-cellular biochemistry.2015, 72:613-626.
[25] DU H C, YANG J E, LU X H, et al.Purification, characterization, and mode of action of plantaricin GZ1-27, a novel bacteriocin against Bacillus cereus[J].Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2018, 66(18):4716-4724.
[26] LI F F, ZHONG Q, KONG B H, et al.Synergistic effect and disinfection mechanism of combined treatment with ultrasound and slightly acidic electrolyzed water and associated preservation of mirror carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) during refrigeration storage[J].Food Chemistry, 2022, 386:132858.
[27] LOO S L, KRANTZ W B, FANE A G, et al.Bactericidal mechanisms revealed for rapid water disinfection by superabsorbent cryogels decorated with silver nanoparticles[J].Environmental science & technology, 2015, 49(4):2310-2318.
[28] GATASHEH M K M, SUBBARAM K, KANNAN H, et al.Generation of oxygen free radicals by proflavine:Implication in protein degradation[J].HAYATI Journal of Biosciences, 2017, 24(3):118-123.
[29] TIAN L, WANG X Y, ZHANG D, et al.Evaluation of the membrane damage mechanism of protocatechualdehyde against Yersinia enterocolitica and simulation of growth inhibition in pork[J].Food Chemistry, 2021, 363:130340.
[30] SHI C, SUN Y, ZHANG X R, et al.Antimicrobial effect of lipoic acid against Cronobacter sakazakii[J].Food Control, 2016, 59:352-358.
[31] KIM M J, MIKŠ-KRAJNIK M, KUMAR A, et al.Inactivation by 405±5 nm light emitting diode on Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella typhimurium, and Shigella sonnei under refrigerated condition might be due to the loss of membrane integrity[J].Food Control, 2016, 59:99-107.
文章导航

/