研究报告

植物乳植杆菌HQ-3全基因组测序及潜在益生功能挖掘

  • 张秀琼 ,
  • 张雨薇 ,
  • 付玥 ,
  • 邓佳伟 ,
  • 刘书亮 ,
  • 胡欣洁
展开
  • (四川农业大学 食品学院,四川 雅安,625000)
第一作者:硕士研究生(胡欣洁讲师为通信作者,E-mail:xinjiehu@sicau.edu.cn)

收稿日期: 2024-08-06

  修回日期: 2024-12-25

  网络出版日期: 2025-09-29

基金资助

四川省科技计划“揭榜挂帅”项目(2023YFN0101);四川省产教融合示范项目(000-2212129406)

Whole genome sequencing and potential probiotic function mining of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum HQ-3

  • ZHANG Xiuqiong ,
  • ZHANG Yuwei ,
  • FU Yue ,
  • DENG Jiawei ,
  • LIU Shuliang ,
  • HU Xinjie
Expand
  • (College of Food Science, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an 625000, China)

Received date: 2024-08-06

  Revised date: 2024-12-25

  Online published: 2025-09-29

摘要

植物乳植杆菌(Lactiplantibacillus plantarum)HQ-3是从豆豉中分离得到的乳酸菌,并在体外验证了其部分潜在益生特性。该研究采用高通量测序技术对HQ-3进行全基因组测序,并通过基因组分析挖掘其潜在益生功能特性。HQ-3基因组全长为3 422 620 bp, GC含量为44.41%,基因组含有5个质粒,共预测编码基因3 283个。在GO、KEGG、COG、CAZy、CARD 5个数据库中注释得到的基因数量分别为3 968、3 238、2 888、128、2个。基因组信息分析表明HQ-3基因组含有的胆盐水解酶基因、耐酸基因、黏附基因、细菌素基因、糖类转运相关基因、热休克蛋白相关基因、冷休克蛋白相关基因数量分别为4、9、1、6、20、8、3个。综上,HQ-3基因组测序和其潜在益生特性分析为HQ-3的益生功能开发提供了理论指导。

本文引用格式

张秀琼 , 张雨薇 , 付玥 , 邓佳伟 , 刘书亮 , 胡欣洁 . 植物乳植杆菌HQ-3全基因组测序及潜在益生功能挖掘[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2025 , 51(17) : 33 -39 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.040675

Abstract

Lactiplantibacillus plantarum HQ-3 was isolated from fermented soybean and has been validated in vitro for potential probiotic characteristics.In the study, high-throughput sequencing was employed to conduct whole-genome sequencing of HQ-3, and its potential probiotic functions were explored based on genomic analysis.The total genome length of HQ-3 was 3 422 620 bp, with a GC content of 44.41%;the genome contains five plasmids, and a total of 3 283 coding genes were predicted.Genes were annotated in the GO, KEGG, COG, CAZy, and CARD databases numbered 3 968, 3 238, 2 888, 128, and 2, respectively.Genomic analysis revealed that HQ-3 contains genes associated with bile salt hydrolase (4 genes), acid tolerance (9 genes), adhesion (1 gene), bacteriocin production (6 genes), carbohydrate transport (20 genes), heat shock proteins (8 genes), and cold shock proteins (3 genes).In conclusion, the whole-genome sequencing and potential probiotic function analysis of HQ-3 could provide theoretical guidance for the development of its probiotic properties.

参考文献

[1] ZHANG L H, MA H C, KULYAR M F, et al.Complete genome analysis of Lactobacillus fermentum YLF016 and its probiotic characteristics[J].Microbial Pathogenesis, 2022, 162:105212.
[2] MILLER B J, FRANZ C M A P, CHO G S, et al.Expression of the malolactic enzyme gene (mle) from Lactobacillus plantarum under winemaking conditions[J].Current Microbiology, 2011, 62(6):1682-1688.
[3] DE ANGELIS M, GOBBETTI M.Environmental stress responses in Lactobacillus:A review[J].Proteomics, 2004, 4(1):106-122.
[4] 胡斌. 植物乳杆菌胆盐耐受评价及内在影响因素分析[D].无锡:江南大学, 2015.
HU B.Evaluation of bile salt resistance and analysis of internal affecting factors in Lactobacillus plantarum[D].Wuxi:Jiangnan University, 2015.
[5] GLAASKER E, KONINGS W N, POOLMAN B.Osmotic regulation of intracellular solute pools in Lactobacillus plantarum[J].Journal of Bacteriology, 1996, 178(3):575-582.
[6] ERCAN O, WELS M, SMID E J, et al.Genome-wide transcriptional responses to carbon starvation in nongrowing Lactococcus lactis[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2015, 81(7):2554-2561.
[7] OLIVER J D.Recent findings on the viable but nonculturable state in pathogenic bacteria[J].FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 2010, 34(4):415-425.
[8] SCHOUG Å, FISCHER J, HEIPIEPER H J, et al.Impact of fermentation pH and temperature on freeze-drying survival and membrane lipid composition of Lactobacillus coryniformis Si3[J].Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2008, 35(3):175-181.
[9] 李宝坤. 乳酸杆菌冷冻干燥生理损伤机制及保护策略的研究[D].无锡:江南大学, 2011.
LI B K.Study on the physiology mechanism of cell damage caused by freeze-drying and protection strategies of Lactobacillus[D].Wuxi:Jiangnan University, 2011.
[10] 杨扬. 植物乳杆菌CAUH2氧化胁迫反应机制及转录因子CopR在氧化胁迫应答中的作用[D].北京:中国农业大学, 2018.
YUNG Y.The oxidative stress response mechanism and functional role of transcription factor CopR in oxidative stress in Lactobacillus plantarum CAUH2[D].Beijing:China Agricultural University, 2018.
[11] MAYHEW M, DA SILVA A C R, MARTIN J, et al.Protein folding in the central cavity of the GroEL-GroES chaperonin complex[J].Nature, 1996, 379(6564):420-426.
[12] 刘超楠, 蔡熙姮, 张新宇, 等.植物乳杆菌基因组学研究进展[J].食品科技, 2020, 45(11):1-7.
LIU C N, CAI X H, ZHANG X Y, et al.Progress in genomics of Lactobacillus plantarum[J].Food Science and Technology, 2020, 45(11):1-7.
[13] EVANOVICH E, DE SOUZA MENDONÇA MATTOS P J, GUERREIRO J F.Comparative genomic analysis of Lactobacillus plantarum:An overview[J].International Journal of Genomics, 2019, 2019(1):4973214.
[14] HARRIS M A, CLARK J, IRELAND A, et al.The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource[J].Nucleic Acids Research, 2004, 32(Database issue):D258-D261.
[15] KANEHISA M, GOTO S.KEGG Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes[J].Nucleic Acids Research, 2000, 28(1):27-30.
[16] TATUSOV R L, FEDOROVA N D, JACKSON J D, et al.The COG database:An updated version includes eukaryotes[J].BMC Bioinformatics, 2003, 4:41.
[17] CANTAREL B L, COUTINHO P M, RANCUREL C, et al.The carbohydrate-active EnZymes database (CAZy):An expert resource for glycogenomics[J].Nucleic Acids Research, 2009, 37(suppl_1):D233-D238.
[18] 朱琦琦, 何维, 余东梅, 等.产纤溶酶的乳酸菌筛选及其潜在益生特性[J].基因组学与应用生物学, 2021, 40(S2):2626-2634.
ZHU Q Q, HE W, YU D M, et al.Screening of lactic acid bacteria producing fibrinolytic enzyme and its potential probiotic characteristics[J].Genomics and Applied Biology, 2021, 40(S2):2626-2634.
[19] FOLEY M H, O'FLAHERTY S, ALLEN G, et al.Lactobacillus bile salt hydrolase substrate specificity governs bacterial fitness and host colonization[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021, 118(6):e2017709118.
[20] 邓东, 颜宁.MFS超家族转运蛋白结构基础及转运机制[J].科学通报, 2015, 60(8):720-728.
DENG D, YAN N.Structural basis and transport mechanism of the major facility superfamily(MFS) transporter[J].Chinese Science Bulletin, 2015, 60(8):720-728.
[21] YU Y X, ZONG M L, LAO L F, et al.Adhesion properties of cell surface proteins in Lactobacillus strains in the GIT environment[J].Food & Function, 2022, 13(6):3098-3109.
[22] SÁENZ Y, ROJO-BEZARES B, NAVARRO L, et al.Genetic diversity of the pln locus among oenological Lactobacillus plantarum strains[J].International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2009, 134(3):176-183.
[23] DIEP D B, MYHRE R, JOHNSBORG O, et al.Inducible bacteriocin production in Lactobacillus is regulated by differential expression of the pln operons and by two antagonizing response regulators, the activity of which is enhanced upon phosphorylation[J].Molecular Microbiology, 2003, 47(2):483-494.
[24] NAVARRO L, ROJO-BEZARES B, SÁENZ Y, et al.Comparative study of the pln locus of the quorum-sensing regulated bacteriocin-producing L.plantarum J51 strain[J].International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2008, 128(2):390-394.
[25] 朱琦琦. 产纤溶酶植物乳杆菌的筛选及其纤溶酶酶学性质研究[D].雅安:四川农业大学, 2020.
ZHU Q Q.Screening of Lactobacillus plantarum producing fibrinolytic enzyme and study on the characterizations of fibrinolytic enzyme[D].Ya'an:Sichuan Agricultural University, 2020.
[26] 李敏, 李伟程, 刘亚华, 等.乳酸乳球菌乳酸亚种IMAU11823全基因组测序及胞外多糖基因簇分析[J].中国食品学报, 2021, 21(4):256-266.
LI M, LI W C, LIU Y H, et al.Complete genome sequence of Lactococcus lactis subsp.lactis IMAU11823 and analysis of the exopolysaccharide biosynthesis gene cluster[J].Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 2021, 21(4):256-266.
[27] 李庆伟, 徐静, 李瑶.热休克蛋白进化及生物学功能研究进展[J].辽宁师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 47(1):78-85.
LI Q W, XU J, LI Y.Research progress on function and evolution of heat shock protein[J].Journal of Liaoning Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2024, 47(1):78-85.
[28] KIM W S, KHUNAJAKR N, REN J, et al.Conservation of the major cold shock protein in lactic acid bacteria[J].Current Microbiology, 1998, 37(5):333-336.
文章导航

/

〈 〉