景迈山古茶园与生态茶园晒青茶品质特征的研究

  • 岩嘎 ,
  • 杨艳芬 ,
  • 杨梓泰 ,
  • 刘瑶 ,
  • 段红星 ,
  • 谢瑾 ,
  • 李家华 ,
  • 王凯博 ,
  • 刘本英 ,
  • 杨广容 ,
  • 马玉青
展开
  • 1(云南农业大学 茶学院,云南 昆明,650201)
    2(云南省农业科学院茶叶研究所,云南省茶学重点实验室,云南 昆明,650205)
第一作者:硕士研究生(杨广容副教授和马玉青助理研究员为共同通信作者,E-mail:2452739538@qq.com;1132410226@qq.com)

收稿日期: 2024-12-23

  修回日期: 2025-02-28

  网络出版日期: 2025-11-03

基金资助

云南省农业科学院应用基础预研专项(2023KYZX-03);云南省农业联合专项(202401BD070001-076);国家自然科学基金项目(32460778)

Quality characteristics of sun-dried green tea from ancient tea gardens and ecological tea gardens in Jingmai mountain

  • YAN Ga ,
  • YANG Yanfen ,
  • YANG Zitai ,
  • LIU Yao ,
  • DUAN Hongxing ,
  • XIE Jin ,
  • LI Jiahua ,
  • WANG Kaibo ,
  • LIU Benying ,
  • YANG Guangrong ,
  • MA Yuqing
Expand
  • 1(College of Tea, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China)
    2(Tea Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory for Tea Science, Kunming 650205, China)

Received date: 2024-12-23

  Revised date: 2025-02-28

  Online published: 2025-11-03

摘要

为阐明景迈山古树与生态茶园晒青茶的品质差异,该研究选取景迈山14个古茶园、8个生态茶园的鲜叶为原料按传统晒青茶的工艺加工制得的茶样为研究对象,进行感官审评和品质化学成分测定,结合相关性分析和主成分分析,从不同季节与栽培模式分析两类晒青茶在品质特征的差异。结果表明,从不同栽培模式看,古树晒青茶感官品质优于生态晒青茶,整体表现为外形条索紧结有毫、色泽墨绿,汤色黄绿明亮,香气清香,滋味浓醇回甘,叶底黄绿柔软、有芽;生态晒青茶则为外形条索紧结略有毫、色泽墨绿泛褐,黄绿较明亮,香气清香,滋味较浓醇,叶底黄绿。古树晒青茶氨基酸、咖啡碱、表儿茶素(epicatechin,EC)、表儿茶素没食子酸酯(epicatechin gallate,ECG)、没食子酸(gallic acid,GA)、儿茶素含量整体高于生态晒青茶,而黄酮和可溶性糖含量显著低于生态晒青茶,其他成分差异不显著。古树晒青茶在不同季节品质特征差异明显,秋季古树晒青茶整体优于明前、明后;但其汤色、叶底感官品质与春季相比欠佳,明前春茶叶底表现最佳,为黄绿、柔软、较匀亮、有芽,明后春茶汤色表现最佳,为浅黄绿、较明亮;明前春季古树晒青茶氨基酸、表没食子儿茶素(epigallocatechin,EGC)含量最高,明后春季古树晒青茶可溶性糖、黄酮、EC、儿茶素(catechin,C)、ECG、儿茶素总量最高,秋季古树晒青茶水浸出物、茶多酚、咖啡碱、表没食子儿茶素没食子酸酯、GA含量最高。该研究阐明了不同季节与栽培模式景迈山古树与生态茶园晒青茶的品质差异,对今后古茶树资源利用提供理论依据。

本文引用格式

岩嘎 , 杨艳芬 , 杨梓泰 , 刘瑶 , 段红星 , 谢瑾 , 李家华 , 王凯博 , 刘本英 , 杨广容 , 马玉青 . 景迈山古茶园与生态茶园晒青茶品质特征的研究[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2025 , 51(19) : 346 -354 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.041929

Abstract

To elucidate the quality differences between sun-dried green tea made from ancient and ecological tea gardens in Jingmai mountain, this study selected fresh leaves from 14 ancient tea gardens and 8 ecological tea gardens in Jingmai mountain as raw materials.The tea samples were processed using the traditional processing technique of sun-dried green tea and subjected to sensory evaluation and chemical composition analysis.Correlation analysis and principal component analysis were employed to investigate the differences in quality characteristics between the two types of sun-dried green tea from different seasons and cultivation modes.The results indicated that the sensory quality of sun-dried green tea from ancient tea gardens was superior to that of ecological tea gardens in terms of cultivation mode.The teas of the ancient tea garden exhibited tightly rolled strips with visible pekoe, dark green color, bright yellow-green liquor, fresh aroma, rich and mellow taste with a sweet aftertaste, and yellow-green, soft, and bud-containing leaves.In contrast, the teas of the ecological tea garden showed tightly rolled strips with slight pekoe, dark green color with a brownish tint, relatively bright yellow-green liquor, fresh aroma, moderately rich taste, and yellow-green leaves.The teas of ancient tea garden generally had higher levels of amino acids, caffeine, epicatechin (EC), epicatechin gallate (ECG), gallic acid (GA), and catechins, while the flavonoid and soluble sugar content was significantly lower than that of the teas of ecological tea garden.However, there were no significant differences between the other components.The quality characteristics of the sun-dried green tea from ancient tea gardens were significantly different among seasons.Autumn ancient tree teas were generally superior to pre-Qingming and post-Qingming teas, although their liquor color and leaf appearance were inferior to those of spring teas.Pre-Qingming spring tea exhibited the best leaf appearance, characterized by yellow-green, soft, relatively bright, and bud-containing leaves, while post-Qingming spring tea showed the best liquor color, presenting as light yellow-green and relatively bright.Pre-Qingming spring ancient tree tea had the highest levels of amino acids and epigallocatechin (EGC) while post-Qingming spring ancient tree tea contained the highest levels of soluble sugars, flavonoids, EC, catechin (C), ECG, and total catechins.Autumn ancient tree teas had the highest levels of water extracts, tea polyphenols, caffeine, epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), and GA.This study clarified the quality differences between sun-dried green tea from ancient trees and ecological tea gardens in Jingmai Mountain both different cultivation modes and seasons.It will provide a theoretical basis for the utilization of ancient tea plant resources in the future.

参考文献

[1] 杨瑞娟, 王桥美, 彭文书, 等.云南景迈山不同生境茶园根际土壤微生物群落多样性初步研究[J].热带作物学报, 2021, 42(4):1182-1189.
YANG R J, WANG Q M, PENG W S, et al.A preliminary study on the distribution diversity of rhizosphere soil microbial community in tea plantations with different habitats of jingmai mountain, Yunnan, China[J].Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2021, 42(4):1182-1189.
[2] 罗琼仙, 何青元, 汪云刚, 等.云南晒青茶初加工品质提升初探[J].福建茶叶, 2011, 33(6):26-27.
LUO Q X, HE Q Y, WANG Y G, et al.Preliminary study on improving the primary processing quality of Yunnan Sun-dried green tea[J].Tea in Fujian, 2011, 33(6):26-27.
[3] ZHANG W J, LIU C, YANG R J, et al.Comparison of volatile profiles and bioactive components of Sun-dried Pu-erh tea leaves from ancient tea plants on Bulang Mountain measured by GC-MS and HPLC[J].Journal of Zhejiang University:Science B, 2019, 20(7):563-575.
[4] 罗慧, 彭子宸, 王燕, 等.澜沧江流域不同茶区晒青茶品质比较[J].食品研究与开发, 2022, 43(23):145-151.
LUO H, PENG Z C, WANG Y, et al.Comparison on the quality of sun-dried tea from different tea areas in Yunnan Province[J].Food Research and Development, 2022, 43(23):145-151.
[5] 杨春华, 袁文侠, 张世浩, 等.景迈山7个村寨古树茶的品质特征[J].云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2024, 39(1):111-119.
YANG C H, YUAN W X, ZHANG S H, et al.Quality characteristics of ancient tree tea in seven villages of Jingmai Mountain[J].Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Natural Science), 2024, 39(1):111-119.
[6] 李兴凤, 杨艳, 刘学艳.云南双江不同季节晒青茶品质对比分析[J].热带农业科技, 2025, 48(1):53-57.
LI X F, YANG Y, LIU X Y.Comparative analysis of the quality of Sun-dried green tea in different seasons in Shuangjiang, Yunnan[J].Tropical Agricultural Science & Technology, 2025, 48(1):53-57.
[7] JIANG C K, MA J Q, LIU Y F, et al.Identification and distribution of a single nucleotide polymorphism responsible for the catechin content in tea plants[J].Horticulture Research, 2020, 7:24.
[8] ZHU M Z, LI N, ZHAO M, et al.Metabolomic profiling delineate taste qualities of tea leaf pubescence[J].Food Research International, 2017, 94:36-44.
[9] 雷林超, 赵明双, 龙宣蓉, 等.阿魏酸酯酶对晒青毛茶发酵过程的影响[J].食品与发酵工业, 2019, 45(14):128-132.
LEI L C, ZHAO M S, LONG X R, et al.Effects of ferulic acid esterase on fermentation process of Sun-dried tea[J].Food and Fermentation Industries, 2019, 45(14):128-132.
[10] YU Z M, YANG Z Y.Understanding different regulatory mechanisms of proteinaceous and non-proteinaceous amino acid formation in tea (Camellia sinensis) provides new insights into the safe and effective alteration of tea flavor and function[J].Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 2020, 60(5):844-858.
[11] 官兴丽, 肖海军, 梁俊涛, 等.云南西双版纳7个产地大树茶(晒青毛茶)品质分析[J].中国农学通报, 2012, 28(28):297-303.
GUAN X L, XIAO H J, LIANG J T, et al.Analysis of quality of big plant tea(crude green tea) of seven areas in Xishuangbanna of Yunnan[J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2012, 28(28):297-303.
[12] LIU M, TIAN H L, WU J H, et al.Relationship between gene expression and the accumulation of catechin during spring and autumn in tea plants (Camellia sinensis L.)[J].Horticulture Research, 2015, 2:15011.
[13] 叶心, 王力, 姜超, 等.升华法纯化茶叶咖啡碱及其对胶原酶和弹性蛋白酶的抑制作用研究[J].食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(10):43-49.
YE X, WANG L, JIANG C, et al.Purification of tea caffeine by sublimation and its inhibitory activity on collagenase and elastase[J].Food and Fermentation Industries, 2021, 47(10):43-49.
[14] CUI Y Q, LAI G P, WEN M C, et al.Identification of low-molecular-weight color contributors of black tea infusion by metabolomics analysis based on UV-visible spectroscopy and mass spectrometry[J].Food Chemistry, 2022, 386:132788.
[15] 杨广容, 王秀青, 谢瑾, 等.云南古茶园和现代茶园土壤养分与茶叶品质成分关系的研究[J].茶叶科学, 2015, 35(6):574-582.
YANG G R, WANG X Q, XIE J, et al.Analysis of the relationship between soil nutrients and tea main quality components of ancient tea arboretum and modern tea garden in Yunnan Province[J].Journal of Tea Science, 2015, 35(6):574-582.
[16] 陈玫, 夏丽飞, 梁名志, 等.勐海古树茶与生态茶品质化学研究[J].福建茶叶, 2012, 34(4):12-15.
CHEN M, XIA L F, LIANG M Z, et al.Study on quality chemistry of Menghai ancient tree tea and ecological tea[J].Tea in Fujian, 2012, 34(4):12-15.
[17] 王欣雨, 吴婷, 鲁倩, 等.云南双江4个山头晒青茶品质比较分析[J].食品安全质量检测学报, 2023, 14(5):243-250.
WANG X Y, WU T, LU Q, et al.Comparative quality analysis of sun-dried tea from 4 hills in Shuangjiang, Yunnan[J].Journal of Food Safety and Quality, 2023, 14(5):243-250.
[18] 杨广容, 王秀青, 李永梅, 等.景迈山茶园土壤养分与茶叶品质分析研究[J].云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2016, 31(3):519-527.
YANG G R, WANG X Q, LI Y M, et al.Study on soil nutrients and tea quality of ancient tea arboretum and modern terrace tea garden in jingmai mountain[J].Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Natural Science), 2016, 31(3):519-527.
[19] 张伟, 张艺成, 李玉玺.氟浓度对茶叶品质与金属元素含量的影响[J].江苏农业科学, 2012, 40(6):283-286.
ZHANG W, ZHANG Y C, LI Y X.Effect of fluorine concentration on tea quality and metal element content[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 40(6):283-286.
[20] 李芬, 陈春林, 田玉萍, 等.云南不同品种大叶种茶树生化成分季节变化特征分析[J].食品与生物技术学报, 2022, 41(3):88-95.
LI F, CHEN C L, TIAN Y P, et al.Seasonal variation of biochemical components of different cultivars of Camellia sinensis var.assamica in Yunnan[J].Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology, 2022, 41(3):88-95.
[21] 周玉忠, 陈林波, 田易萍, 等.云南大叶茶新材料儿茶素组分含量季节变化分析[J].中国农学通报, 2018, 34(32):78-82.
ZHOU Y Z, CHEN L B, TIAN Y P, et al.Seasonal variation of catechins components content of new materials of Yunnan large-leaf tea[J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(32):78-82.
文章导航

/