Please wait a minute...
 
 
食品与发酵工业  2019, Vol. 45 Issue (9): 183-189    DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.019261
  生产与科研经验 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
高通量测序结合传统方法分析4℃下鲜切菠菜的菌群变化
郁杰1,3, 谢晶1,2,3,4*
1(上海海洋大学 食品学院,上海,201306)
2(农业农村部冷库及制冷设备质量监督检验测试中心(上海),上海,201306)
3(上海冷链装备性能与节能评价专业技术服务平台,上海,201306)
4(上海海洋大学 食品科学与工程国家级实验教学示范中心,上海,201306)
Analysis of microflora in fresh cut spinach at 4 ℃ by high throughputsequencing combined with traditional methods
YU Jie1,3, XIE Jing1,2,3,4*
1 (College of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China)
2(Quality Supervision, Inspection and Testing Center for Cold Storage and Refrigeration Equipment(Shanghai), Ministry of Agriculture, Shanghai 201306, China)
3(Shanghai Professional Technology Service Platformon Cold Chain Equipment Performance and Energy Saving Evaluation, Shanghai 201306, China)
4 (National Experimental Teaching Demonstration Center for Food Science and Engineering, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China)
下载:  HTML   PDF (3295KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 采用Illumina MiseqTM高通量测序技术结合传统检测方法,对4 ℃下贮藏的鲜切菠菜在贮藏过程中存在的腐败菌进行研究。结果表明:在科的分类标准下,在贮存初期,假单胞菌科和肠杆菌科为优势菌科,丰度分别占比48.99%、48.62%,从菌群变化的角度来看,随着贮藏时间的推移,假单胞菌科的丰度从初始丰度的48.99%到贮藏末期的70.27%;而肠杆菌科则从初始丰度的48.62%不断递减至21.75%。此时,假单胞菌科为贮藏末期的优势菌科;在属的分类标准下,假单胞菌属、泛菌属为贮存初期的优势菌属,丰度分别占比47.84%、30.7%,欧文氏菌属、布丘氏菌为次优势菌,丰度为8.09%和4.64%;贮存中期,假单胞菌属为优势菌属,其丰度上升至58.25%,而泛菌属丰度下降至13.94%,欧文氏菌属丰度基本保持不变达8.69%、布丘氏菌属丰度小幅上升至9.73%;在贮存末期,假单胞菌属占绝对优势,丰度占比68.97%,而泛菌属丰度仅占5.4%,欧文氏菌属占比10.7%,布丘氏菌属占比4%,假单胞菌属成为优势腐败菌属。高通量检测技术和传统检测方法相比,在鉴定样品DNA组成成分时可精确定量,提高了精度,节约了时间。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
郁杰
谢晶
关键词:  鲜切菠菜  高通量测序技术  传统检测方法  菌群演替    
Abstract: In order to analyze the types and quantities of spoilage bacteria in fresh-cut spinach stored at 4 ℃, high-throughput sequencing and traditional methods (physiological, biochemical, and morphological characterization) were used. The results showed that at early stage of storage, Pseudomonadaceae (48.99% abundance) and Enterobacteriaceae (48.62% abundance) were dominant species. Moreover, the abundance of Pseudomonadaceae rose to 70.27% at the end of storage while the abundance of Enterobacteriaceae decreased to 21.75%, therefore, Pseudomonadaceae was dominant at the end of storage. Furthermore, Pseudomonas and Pantoea were dominant bacteria during early storage period, as their abundances reached 47.84% and 30.7%, respectively. Erwinia and Buttiauxella were the second dominant bacteria with abundances of 8.09% and 4.64%, respectively. At middle stage of storage, the abundances of Pseudomonas, Pantoea, Erwinia, and Buttiauxella reached 58.25%, 13.94%, 8.69%, and 9.73%, respectively. At the end of storage, Pseudomonas was dominant and accounted for 68.97%, while Pantoea, Erwinia, and Buttiauxella only accounted for 5.4%, 10.7%, and 4%, respectively. Therefore, Pseudomonas was the main dominant spoilage bacteria. Additionally, compared with traditional methods, high-throughput detection technology can accurately quantify and identify DNA components, and also improve precisions and save time.
Key words:  fresh-cut spinach    high-throughput sequencing    traditional detection techniques    bacterial flora succession
收稿日期:  2018-11-06                出版日期:  2019-05-15      发布日期:  2019-06-06      期的出版日期:  2019-05-15
基金资助: 上海市绿叶菜产业体系建设项目;上海市科委公共服务平台建设项目(17DZ2293400)
通讯作者:  谢晶教授,E-mail:jxie@shou.edu.cn   
作者简介:  硕士研究生
引用本文:    
郁杰,谢晶. 高通量测序结合传统方法分析4℃下鲜切菠菜的菌群变化[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2019, 45(9): 183-189.
YU Jie,XIE Jing. Analysis of microflora in fresh cut spinach at 4 ℃ by high throughputsequencing combined with traditional methods[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2019, 45(9): 183-189.
链接本文:  
http://sf1970.cnif.cn/CN/10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.019261  或          http://sf1970.cnif.cn/CN/Y2019/V45/I9/183
[1] RAGAERT P, DEVLIEGHERE F, DEBEVERE J. Role of microbiological and physiological spoilage mechanisms during storage of minimally processed vegetables[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2007, 44(3): 185-194.
[2] GUTIERREZ J, BOURKE P, LONCHAMP J, et al. Impact of plant essential oils on microbiological, organoleptic and quality markers of minimally processed vegetables[J]. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 2009, 10(2): 195-202.
[3] POIMENIDOU S V, BIKOULI V C, GARDELI C, et al. Effect of single or combined chemical and natural antimicrobial interventions on Escherichia coli O157∶H7, total microbiota and color of packaged spinach and lettuce[J]. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2016, 220(2): 6-18.
[4] 徐晓霞, 陈安均,桑伟娜,等. 不同温度贮藏鲜切生菜腐败细菌的分离及鉴定[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2016, 42(1): 53-58.
[5] UFUK M, KASlM REZZAN. Yellowing of fresh-cut spinach (Spinacia oleracea, L.) leaves delayed by UV-B applications[J]. Information Processing in Agriculture, 2017, 4(3): 214-219.
[6] 宋晓雪, 胡文忠,毕阳,等. 鲜切果蔬中致腐微生物污染及其非热杀菌的研究进展[J]. 食品工业科技, 2014, 35(10): 351-354.
[7] 雷振河. 采用高通量测序技术分析清香型白酒酿造微生物[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2015, 41(9): 164-167.
[8] TASSIOS P T, MORAN-GILAD J. Bacterial next generation sequencing (NGS) made easy[J]. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 2018, 24(4): 332-334.
[9] 陈泽斌, 李冰,徐胜光,等. 高通量测序分析食用玫瑰花瓣内生细菌多样性[J]. 中国食品学报, 2017, 17(9): 227-235.
[10] PAILLART M J M, et al. Bacterial population dynamics and sensorial quality loss in modified atmosphere packed fresh-cut iceberg lettuce[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2017, 124: 91-99.
[11] 崔慧玲, 陈安均,罗婵,等. 鲜切生菜贮藏过程中优势腐败细菌的多样性分析[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2014, 40(7): 223-229.
[12] 中华人民共和国卫生部, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. GB 4789.2—2016, 食品微生物学检验,菌落总数测定[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2016.
[13] NIEMINEN T T, KOSKINEN K, LAINE P, et al. Comparison of microbial communities in marinated and unmarinated broiler meat by metagenomics[J]. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2012, 157(2): 142-149.
[14] 肖英平, 何祥祥,戴宝玲,等. 采样方法对冷鲜鸡表面细菌DNA提取及高通量测序结果的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2017, 38(24): 260-264.
[15] 储建军, 傅玲琳,王翀,等. 缢蛏冰温保活过程中菌相变化及优势腐败菌生长动力学建模[J]. 食品科学, 2017, 38(1): 110-115.
[16] 李晓然, 李洁,刘晓峰,等.利用高通量测序分析云南豆豉中细菌群落多样性[J]. 食品与生物技术学报, 2014,33(2):137-141.
[17] 雷昊, 谢晶,乔永祥,等. 臭氧水清洗结合气调包装对鲜切杭白菜保鲜效果的研究[J]. 食品与机械, 2017, 33(6): 110-113.
[18] 关统伟, 向慧平,王鹏昊,等. 基于高通量测序的郫县豆瓣不同发酵期细菌群落结构及其动态演替[J]. 食品科学, 2018, 39(4): 106-111.
[19] 余丹, 毛娉,宋颀,等. 基于高通量测序的传统甜面酱自然发酵过程中的微生物群落结构及其动态演替[J]. 微生物学通报, 2018, 45(5): 1 061-1 072.
[20] BOLIN H R, STAFFORD A E, KING A D, et al. Factors affecting the storage stability of shredded lettuce[J]. Journal of Food Science, 2010, 42(5): 1 319-1 321.
[21] 杨秋月. 芽苗菜优势腐败菌生长规律及控制技术研究[D]. 天津:天津科技大学, 2013.
[22] 张一敏, 朱立贤,张万刚,等. 生鲜牛肉中的腐败微生物概述[J]. 食品科学, 2018, 39(13): 289-296..
[23] WELLS J M, LIAO C H. The Diversity of the Pectolytic Fluorescent Pseudomonads[M]. Plant Pathogenic Bacteria. Springer Netherlands, 1987: 273-276.
[24] PINTOA L, IPPOLITOB A, BARUZZIA F. Control of spoiler Pseudomonas spp. on fresh cut vegetables by neutral electrolyzed water [J]. Food Microbiology, 2015, 50: 102-108.
[25] LIAO C H. Cloning of pectate lyase gene pel from Pseudomonas fluorescens and detection of sequences homologous to pel in Pseudomonas viridiflava and Pseudomonas putida[J]. The Journal of Bacteriology, 1991, 173(14): 4 386-4 393.
[26] ZUCKER M, HANKIN L, SANDS D. Factors governing pectate lyase synthesis in soft rot and non-soft rot bacteria [J]. Physiological Plant Pathology, 1972, 2(1): 59-67.
[27] LOCASCIO S J, BARTZ J A, WEINGARTNER D P. Calcium and potassium fertilization of potatoes grown in north Florida. 1. Effects on potato yield and tissue ca-concentration and K-concentrations[J]. American Potato Journal, 1992, 69(2): 95-104.
[28] BARRAS F, HARRIS S. Extracellular enzymes and their role in Erwinia virulence[J]. Methods in Microbiology, 1998, 27: 157-168.
[1] 郁杰, 张雨宸, 谢晶. 低强度UV-A光循环照射结合ε-聚赖氨酸处理对4 ℃下鲜切菠菜保鲜效果的研究[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2020, 46(18): 154-160.
[2] 郁杰, 张雨宸, 谢晶. 低强度UV-A光循环辐照对4 ℃下鲜切菠菜品质及抗氧化能力的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2019, 45(21): 139-146.
[3] 李小东, 高大禹, 田庆贞, 等. 芝麻香型白酒堆积发酵对入窖发酵过程及原酒品质的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2018, 44(5): 63-69.
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《食品与发酵工业》编辑部
地址:北京朝阳区酒仙桥中路24号院6号楼111室
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn