生产与科研应用

干燥方法对方格星虫干品质及特征风味的影响

  • 牛改改 ,
  • 游刚 ,
  • 王培 ,
  • 张自然 ,
  • 郭德军 ,
  • 陈文娟
展开
  • (北部湾大学 食品工程学院,钦州市特色果蔬发酵重点实验室,广西高校北部湾特色海产品资源开发与高值化利用重点实验室,广西 钦州,535011)
硕士,讲师(游刚讲师为通讯作者,E-mail:yougang8901@163.com)。

收稿日期: 2019-06-10

  网络出版日期: 2020-02-11

基金资助

广西自然科学基金项目(2016GXNSFDA380009);广西高校中青年教师基础能力提升项目(2017K Y0810、2018KY0606);北部湾大学校级科研项目(2018K YQD59);广西高校北部湾特色海产品资源开发与高值化利用重点实验室(北部湾大学)项目(2016ZB06、2016ZB07)

Effects of different drying methods on the quality and characteristic flavor of dried Sipunculus nudus

  • NIU Gaigai ,
  • YOU Gang ,
  • WANG Pei ,
  • ZHANG Ziran ,
  • GUO Dejun ,
  • CHEN Wenjuan
Expand
  • (College of Food Engineering, Beibu Gulf University, Qinzhou Key Laboratory of Characteristic Fruits and VegetablesFermentation, Guangxi Colleges and Universities Key Laboratory of Development and High-value Utilization of Beibu GulfSeafood Resources, Beibu Gulf University, Qinzhou 535011,China)

Received date: 2019-06-10

  Online published: 2020-02-11

摘要

为研究3种干燥方法对方格星虫干(dried Sipunculus nudus, DSN)品质及特征风味的影响,实验对比分析干制品的感官评分、色泽、复水率、营养成分含量、挥发性盐基氮(total volatile basic nitrogen, TVB-N)含量、干燥时间和干燥能耗,并利用变异系数权重法综合评价干制品品质,结合电子鼻技术研究干制品特征风味。结果表明:真空冷冻干燥制得的DSN复水率最大,蛋白质和总糖含量最高,TVB-N含量与色差最小,但其能耗最高;真空干燥DSN感官评分最高。a*和干燥能耗在DSN品质评价中占较大比重,权重值分别为0.192和0.241;DSN品质综合评分结果:真空冷冻干燥>真空干燥>鼓风干燥。电子鼻能够区分不同干燥方法制备的DSN风味,6号(甲烷)、7号(无机硫化氢类)、8号(乙醇)和9号(有机硫化氢类)传感器对DSN风味识别起到主要作用。

本文引用格式

牛改改 , 游刚 , 王培 , 张自然 , 郭德军 , 陈文娟 . 干燥方法对方格星虫干品质及特征风味的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2019 , 45(23) : 128 -135 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.021306

Abstract

This research was aimed to investigate the effects of three drying methods on the quality and characteristic flavor of dried Sipunculus nudus (DSN). The sensory score, color, rehydration rate, nutrient content, total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N), drying time and energy consumption of DSN were compared and analyzed. Moreover, variation coefficient weighting method was applied to comprehensively evaluate the quality of DSN while electronic nose (EN) was combined to explore the characteristic flavor of DSN. Results showed that DSN prepared by vacuum freeze drying had the highest rehydration rate, protein and total sugar content, and the smallest TVB-N content and color difference, whereas its energy consumption was the highest. Vacuum dried DSN had the highest sensory score. a* and drying energy consumption accounted for a large proportion in DSN quality evaluation, with weights of 0.192 and 0.241, respectively. The comprehensive evaluation result for the quality of DSN dried by three methods was declining in the following order: vacuum freeze drying>vacuum drying>blast drying. Electronic nose can distinguish the flavor of DSN prepared by different drying methods. Sensors of 6 (methane), 7 (hydrogen sulfide), 8 (ethanol) and 9 (organic hydrogen sulfide) played an important role in the flavor recognition of DSN. These results help provide theoretical references for the drying process of DSN.

参考文献

[1] LI N, SHEN X, LIU Y, et al. Isolation, characterization, and radiation protection of Sipunculus nudus L. polysaccharide[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2016, 83:288-296.
[2] 陈细香, 林秀雁,卢昌义,等. 方格星虫属动物的研究进展[J]. 海洋科学, 2008, 32(6): 66-70.
[3] ZHANG C X, DAI Z R. Immunomodulatory activities on macrophage of a polysaccharide from Sipunculus nudus L.[J]. Food & Chemical Toxicology, 2011, 49(11): 2 961-2 967.
[4] MEYER A, LIEB B. Respiratory proteins in Sipunculus nudus--implications for phylogeny and evolution of the hemerythrin family[J]. Comparative Biochemistry & Physiology Part B Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, 2010, 155(2): 171-177.
[5] JIANG S, SHEN X, LIU Y, et al. Radioprotective effects of Sipunculus nudus L. polysaccharide combined with WR-2721, rhIL-11 and rhG-CSF on radiation-injured mice[J]. Journal of Radiation Research, 2015, 56(3): 515-522.
[6] 李俊伟, 郭永坚,胡瑞萍,等. 不同养殖方式方格星虫的营养组成比较[J]. 南方水产科学, 2018, 14(4): 80-87.
[7] 曾令彬, 赵思明,熊善柏,等. 风干白鲢的热风干燥模型及内部水分扩散特性[J]. 农业工程学报, 2008, 24(7): 280-283.
[8] ORTIZ J, LEMUS-MONDACA R, VEGA-GÁLVEZ A, et al. Influence of air-drying temperature on drying kinetics, colour, firmness and biochemical characteristics of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) fillets[J]. Food Chemistry, 2013, 139(1-4): 162-169.
[9] 张国琛, 毛志怀. 水产品干燥技术的研究进展[J]. 农业工程学报, 2004, 20(4): 297-300.
[10] AKONOR P T, OFORI H, DZIEDZOAVE N T, et al. Drying characteristics and physical and nutritional properties of shrimp meat as affected by different traditional drying techniques[J]. International Journal of Food Science, 2016, 2016: 1-5.
[11] FU X, LIN Q, XU S, et al. Effect of drying methods and antioxidants on the flavor and lipid oxidation of silver carp slices[J]. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 2015, 61(1): 251-257.
[12] 刘书成, 张常松,吉宏武,等. 不同干燥方法对罗非鱼片品质和微观结构的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(15): 221-227.
[13] 何学连, 过世东. 白对虾真空干燥的研究[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2008, 34(6): 89-94.
[14] 董志俭, 孙丽平,李冬梅,等. 不同干燥方法对南美白对虾品质的影响[J]. 食品工业科技, 2017, 38(5): 219-222;227.
[15] 任广跃, 刘亚男,乔小全,等. 基于变异系数权重法对怀山药干燥全粉品质的评价[J]. 食品科学, 2017, 38(1): 53-59.
[16] 周禹含, 毕金峰,陈芹芹,等. 不同干燥方式对枣粉品质的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2014, 35(11): 36-41.
[17] 李宝玉. 不同干燥方式对香蕉产品品质的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2016, 37(15): 100-106.
[18] NATHAKARANAKULE A, KRAIWANICHKUL W, SOPONRONNARIT S. Comparative study of different combined superheated-steam drying techniques for chicken meat[J]. Journal of Food Engineering, 2007, 80(4): 1 023-1 030.
[19] DURANCE T D, WANG J H. Energy consumption, density, and rehydration rate of cacuum microwave- and hot-air convection- dehydrated tomatoes[J]. Journal of Food Science, 2010, 67(6): 2 212-2 216.
[20] BEAUDRY C, RAGHAVAN G S V, RATTI C, et al. Effect of four drying methods on the quality of osmotically dehydrated cranberries[J]. Drying Technology, 2004, 22(3): 521-539.
[21] 金洋, 张洪超,薛张芝,等. 不同干燥方法对乌贼品质及微观结构的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2017, 38(15): 189-195.
[22] NIAMNUY C, DEVAHASTIN S, SOPONRONNARIT S. Effects of process parameters on quality changes of shrimp during drying in a jet-spouted bed dryer[J]. Journal of Food Science, 2010, 72(9): E553-E563.
[23] SAGAR V R, KUMAR P S. Recent advances in drying and dehydration of fruits and vegetables: a review[J]. Journal of Food Science & Technology, 2010, 47(1): 15-26.
[24] 贾真, 罗章秀,方婷,等. 不同干燥方式对鲍鱼品质特性的影响[J]. 食品工业, 2017(6): 51-55.
[25] 靳肖, 周德庆,孙永. 鱿鱼丝氧化三甲胺热分解模拟体系的研究[J]. 食品工业科技, 2011(3): 106-108.
[26] 牛改改, 游刚,宋静静,等. 加工方法对方格星虫肉营养组分及特征风味的影响[J]. 食品工业科技, 2018, 39(23): 64-68;75.
[27] PHAT C, MOON B K, CHAN L. Evaluation of umami taste in mushroom extracts by chemical analysis, sensory evaluation, and an electronic tongue system[J]. Food Chemistry, 2016, 192: 1 068-1 077.
[28] GÓMEZ A H, HU G, WANG J, et al. Evaluation of tomato maturity by electronic nose[J]. Computers & Electronics in Agriculture, 2012, 54(1): 44-52.
文章导航

/