分析与检测

基于主成分分析法的不同甘薯醋品质评价

  • 陈善敏 ,
  • 黄平 ,
  • 王振帅 ,
  • 信思悦 ,
  • 盛怀宇 ,
  • 蒋和体
展开
  • 1 (西南大学 食品科学学院,重庆,400715)
    2 (重庆初好食品研究院有限公司,重庆,401336)
硕士研究生(蒋和体教授为通讯作者,E-mail:jheti@126.com)。

收稿日期: 2019-03-06

  网络出版日期: 2019-10-24

Quality evaluation of different sweet potato vinegars based on principalcomponent analysis

  • CHEN Shanmin ,
  • HUANG Ping ,
  • WANG Zhenshuai ,
  • XIN Siyue ,
  • SHENG Huaiyu ,
  • JIANG Heti
Expand
  • 1 (College of Food Science,Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China)
    2 (Chongqing Chuhao Food Research Institute, Chongqing 401336, China)

Received date: 2019-03-06

  Online published: 2019-10-24

摘要

为评价5种甘薯醋的综合品质,对不同甘薯醋的pH、总可溶性固形物(total soluble solid,TSS)、总糖、总酸、总多酚、总酯、 L*值、a*值、b*值、DPPH自由基清除率和ORAC值11个品质指标进行测定,并对其进行主成分分析。不同甘薯醋间pH、TSS、总酯和亮度值L*、红绿值a*、黄蓝值b*值存在显著性差异,渝紫7号与13-3-35的彩度值C*、总酚及抗氧化能力无显著性差异,而与其他醋差异显著。通过主成分分析将11个品质指标简化为2个主成分,主要反映营养成分、颜色和抗氧化能力信息。5种甘薯醋综合品质得分从高到低为13-3-35 >渝紫7号>渝15 >渝19 >渝27。本文筛选出可用于判断甘薯醋品质的6个指标,包括总酸、总酯、a*值、b*值、DPPH和ORAC值,为甘薯醋品质简易判断提供了一种方法。

本文引用格式

陈善敏 , 黄平 , 王振帅 , 信思悦 , 盛怀宇 , 蒋和体 . 基于主成分分析法的不同甘薯醋品质评价[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2019 , 45(17) : 240 -246 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.020447

Abstract

To evaluate the overall quality of five sweet potato vinegars, 11 quality indicators including pH, total soluble solid (TSS), total sugar, total acid, total polyphenol, total ester, values of L*, a*, and b*, as well as DPPH radical scavenging rate and ORAC value were measured. The results indicated that there were significant differences in pH, TSS, total ester content and L*, a*, and b* values among different sweet potato vinegars. Besides, there were no significant differences in chroma value C*, total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity between Yuzi 7 and 13-3-35, but they were significantly different from other vinegars. Principal component analysis extracted two principal components from 11 quality indicators, which mainly reflected nutrient composition, color, and antioxidant capacity. The comprehensive quality scores (from high to low) of five vinegars were 13-3-35, Yuzi 7, Yu 15, Yu 19, and Yu 27. Besides, total acid, total ester, a* value, b* value, DPPH radical scavenging rate and ORAC value that were selected by principal component analysis could be used to judge the quality of sweet potato vinegar, which provides a method for simple judgment of sweet potato vinegar quality.

参考文献

[1] ISHIDA H,SUZUNO H,SUGIYAMA N,et al.Nutritive evaluation on chemical components of leaves,stalks and stems of sweet potatoes (Ipomoea batatas Poir)[J].Food Chemistry,2000, 68(3):359-367.
[2] 李林静.南方主要甘薯品种的品质特性研究[D].长沙:中南大学, 2014.
[3] 张有林,张润光,王鑫腾.甘薯采后生理、主要病害及贮藏技术研究[J].中国农业科学, 2014, 47(3):553-563.
[4] 卢学兰,崔阔澍.四川甘薯产业发展及品种应用[J].中国种业,2019,3(4):30-35.
[5] 尹永祺,张书玉,韩永斌,等.紫甘薯醋酒精发酵阶段混菌发酵工艺条件优化[J].食品科学, 2013, 34(11):188-192.
[6] 张村雪,朱渭兵,李志西,等.紫甘薯醋及其不同发酵阶段产物的抗氧化活性[J].食品科学, 2013, 34(11):88-93.
[7] 乔羽,王如福,于迪,等. HS-SPME和GC-MS联用法对甘薯醋挥发性香气成分的分析[J].中国酿造, 2017,36(7):178-181.
[8] 张书玉.紫甘薯醋及其饮料生产工艺研究[D].南京:南京农业大学, 2012.
[9] 国内贸易部.SB/T 10203—1994,果汁通用试验方法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1994.
[10] 国家质量监督检验检疫总局.GB/T 12456—2008,食品中总酸的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008.
[11] 李坚,滕葳,柳琪,等.甘薯中胡萝卜素含量测定方法的探讨[J].莱阳农学院学报, 1991(2):154-157.
[12] GONNET J F.Colour effects of co-pigmentation of anthocyanin revisited-3. A further description using CIELAB differences and assessment of matched colours using the CMC model[J].Food Chemistry,2001,75(4):473-485.
[13] 向进乐,李志西,甘峰,等.枳椇果梗不同类型酚酸含量及抗氧化活性[J].食品与发酵工业, 2011, 37(8):106-111.
[14] 山西老陈醋地理标志保护办公室.GB/T 19777—2013,地理标志产品山西老陈醋[S].山西:2013.
[15] RUMBAOA R G O,CORNAGO D F,Geronimo I M.Phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of Philippine sweet potato ( Ipomoea batatas ) varieties[J].Food Chemistry,2009, 113(4):1 133-1 138.
[16] TEOW C C,TRUONG V D,MCFEETERS R F,et al.Antioxidant activities, phenolic and β-carotene contents of sweet potato genotypes with varying flesh colours[J].Food Chemistry, 2007, 103(3):829-838.
[17] 钟政昌,王婷,高根升,等.自然温度下光核桃果酒主发酵工艺优化[J].食品科学,2012,33(13):197-201.
[18] 胡志平,柯锋,叶静萱,等.三种香型白酒蒸馏前后总酯的差异性分析[J].酿酒科技,2018,55(5):89-91.
[19] CHAMPAGNE A,HILBERT G,LEGENDRE L,et al.Diversity of anthocyanins and other phenolic compounds among tropical root crops from Vanuatu,South Pacific[J].Journal of Food Composition and Analysis,2011,24(3):315-325.
[20] 石双妮,孟岳成,陈杰,等.紫薯花色苷分离纯化及主要成分的研究[J].食品科技,2015,40(2):254-258.
[21] 张小明.甘薯中β-胡萝卜素提取工艺及稳定性研究[D]. 石家庄,河北科技大学:2012.
[22] 敖艳,全沁果,马良,等.玉米须类胡萝卜素的提取及其稳定性[J]. 核农学报, 2017,31(10):1 946-1 954.
[23] 孙海燕.2种紫薯化学抗氧化能力比较[J].食品与发酵工业, 2017,43(3):167-172.
[24] 续洁琨,姚新生,栗原博.抗氧化能力指数(ORAC)测定原理及应用[J].中国药理学通报(8):1 015-1 021.
[25] MALIENAUBERT C,DANGLES O,AMIOT M J.COLOr stability of commercial anthocyanin-based extracts in relation to the phenolic composition.Protective effects by intra- and intermolecular copigmentation[J].Journal of Agricultural & Food Chemistry, 2001,49(1):170-186.
[26] 周敏娜,杨英杰,吕庆章.4种类胡萝卜素抗氧化性质的量化计算[J].计算机与应用化学,2011,28(10):1 305-1 308.
[27] 陆建超,郑必胜,颜盛繁,等.不同品种番薯抗氧化活性的对比及热加工稳定性[J].现代食品科技,2017,33(2):136-141.
[28] LIN C H,WEI Y T,CHOU C C.Enhanced antioxidative activity of soybean koji prepared with various filamentous fungi.[J].Food Microbiology,2006,23(7):628-633.
[29] 刘丙花,孙锐,王开芳,等.不同蓝莓品种果实品质比较与综合评价[J].食品科学,2019,40(1):78-84.
[30] 国家国内贸易局.GB/T 18187—2000,酿造食醋[S].石家庄,2000.
[31] 李甜.色泽测定方法的建立及紫薯酒等颜色变化的研究[D].大连:大连工业大学,2016.
文章导航

/