分析与检测

基于多重聚合酶链式反应和表面增强拉曼光谱技术的食源性病原菌检测模型的建立与比较

  • 庄蓓蓓 ,
  • 祁钊 ,
  • 周紫卉 ,
  • 黄昊 ,
  • 宋祥军 ,
  • 邵颖 ,
  • 涂健
展开
  • (安徽农业大学,兽医病理生物学与疫病防控安徽省重点实验室, 安徽 合肥,230036)
硕士研究生(涂健副教授为通讯作者,E-mail:tujian1980@126.com

收稿日期: 2019-12-12

  网络出版日期: 2020-05-19

基金资助

安徽高校协同创新项目(GXXT-2019-035);国家自然科学基金项目(31772707,31972644);安徽省中央引导地方科技发展专项项目(201907d06020016)

Establishment and comparison of foodborne pathogen detection models based on multiplex PCR and SERS

  • ZHUANG Beibei ,
  • QI Zhao ,
  • ZHOU Zihui ,
  • HUANG Hao ,
  • SONG Xiangjun ,
  • SHAO Ying ,
  • TU Jian
Expand
  • (Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pathobiology and Disease Control, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China)

Received date: 2019-12-12

  Online published: 2020-05-19

摘要

建立基于多重聚合酶链式反应(polymerase chain reaction, PCR)和表面增强拉曼光谱(surface-enhanced Raman scattering, SERS)的沙门氏菌、大肠杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌检测模型,优化检测方案,提高食源性病原菌检测效率。以病原菌hilA、uidA和clfA的基因序列设计特异性引物,优化多重PCR反应的扩增条件,检测多重PCR的特异性和灵敏性。通过SERS技术检测3种细菌并确定检测限,对3种病原菌进行主成分分析,然后对2种方法的检测限进行比较。结果显示,建立的多重PCR和SERS技术均可特异性地检测出沙门氏菌、大肠杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌,三重PCR反应的最低检测限为104 CFU/mL,最低检出DNA量为50 pg/μL,而SERS检测沙门氏菌最低检出量为103 CFU/mL,大肠杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌的最低检出量为104 CFU/mL。PCA分析的前2个主成分的累积贡献率达93.8%。与多重PCR相比,研究建立的SERS方法提高了沙门氏菌的检测限,敏感度更高,并且缩短了检测时间,对食品中食源性病原菌的监测起到指导作用。

本文引用格式

庄蓓蓓 , 祁钊 , 周紫卉 , 黄昊 , 宋祥军 , 邵颖 , 涂健 . 基于多重聚合酶链式反应和表面增强拉曼光谱技术的食源性病原菌检测模型的建立与比较[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2020 , 46(7) : 207 -212 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.023071

Abstract

The detection of common foodborne pathogens is an important prerequisite to ensure the safety of animal food. Consequently, developing effective methods for detecting common foodborne pathogens is necessary. In this study, surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) method was applied to detect three common foodborne pathogens (Salmonella spp., Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus) and compared with multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. Specific primers were designed for multiplex PCR based on gene hilA, uidA and clfA, and followed by the amplification condition optimized and the specificity and sensitivity of the multiplex PCR system evaluated. Besides, the detection limits of the two methods were compared. The results showed that both the multiplex PCR and SERS methods could specifically detect the three foodborne pathogens. For the multiplex PCR, the minimum detection limit for microbes was 104 CFU/mL while for DNA was 50 pg per reaction. For SERS method, the detection limits for Salmonella sp., E. coli and S. aureus were 103 CFU/mL, 104 CFU/mL and 104 CFU/mL, respectively. In addition, the cumulative contribution rate of the first two principal components in the SERS method reached 93.8% according to the principal component analysis (PCA). In summary, the SERS method applied in this study revealed higher sensitivity for Salmonella sp., and shorter detection time than multiplex PCR. Therefore, the SERS method exhibited a good prospect in detecting foodborne pathogens.

参考文献

[1] WALLACE F M, ANDALORO B, FALLON D, et al. Detection of Salmonella species in a variety of foods by the DuPontTM BAX system Real-Time PCR assay for Salmonella: first action 2013.02[J].Journal of AOAC International,2014,97(3):868-875.
[2] BIRAN D, RON E Z. Extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli[J].Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology,2018,416:149-161.
[3] ZHAO X, WEI C, ZHONG J, et al. Research advance in rapid detection of foodborne Staphylococcus aureus[J].Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment,2016,30(5):1-7.
[4] KUMAGAI Y, GILMOUR S, OTA E, et al. Estimating the burden of foodborne diseases in Japan[J].Bulletin of the World Health Organisation,2015,93(8):540-549.
[5] YENI F, ACAR S, POLAT Ö G, et al. Rapid and standardized methods for detection of foodborne pathogens and mycotoxins on fresh produce [J].Food Control,2014,40(1):359-367.
[6] MIRHOSSEINI S A , FOOLADI A I , AMANI J , et al. Production of recombinant flagellin to develop ELISA-based detection of Salmonella enteritidis[J]. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 2017,48(4):774-781.
[7] 闫晗,吕国钦,张洋,等.乳品中3种常见细菌多重PCR检测方法的建立[J].食品与发酵工业,2015, 41(7):149-154.
[8] SHIGEMURA K, SHIRAKAWA T, OKADA H, et al. Rapid detection and differentiation of Gram-negative and Gram-positive pathogenic bacteria in urine using TaqMan probe[J].Clinical and Experimental Medicine,2005,4(4):196-201.
[9] CHEN P, LI Y, CUI T, et al. Nanoparticles based sensors for rapid detection of foodborne pathogens[J].International Journal of Agricultural & Biological Engineering,2013,6(1):28-35.
[10] LIN C C, LIN C Y, KAO C J, et al. High efficiency SERS detection of clinical microorganism by AgNPs-decorated filter membrane and pattern recognition techniques [J].Sensors & Actuators B Chemical,2017,241:513-521.
[11] LAN S, PING Z, DAWEI Z, et al. Rapid detection of Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium by surface-enhanced Raman scattering [J].Optoelectronics Letters,2015,11(2):157-160.
[12] WANG J, WU X, WANG C, et al. Facile synthesis of Au-coated magnetic nanoparticles and their application in bacteria detection via a SERS method[J].ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces,2016,8(31):19 958-19 967.
[13] CHO I H, BHANDARI P, PATEL P, et al. Membrane filter-assisted surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy for the rapid detection of E. coli O157:H7 in ground beef [J].Biosensors & Bioelectronics,2015,64:171-176.
[14] 胡玉兰,黄亚伟,王若兰,等.便携式拉曼光谱仪在食品检测中的应用[J].食品工业科技,2017,38(17):319-323.
[15] 段贵娇,张健伟,张志彬,等.表面增强拉曼光谱技术检测食品及农产品中的非法添加剂[J].食品与发酵工业,2019,45(10):272-277.
[16] GONG Q, LI Z, NIU M. A pilot study on PCR-based detection of four foodborne pathogenic microorganisms[J].Food Measure,2018,12(2):675-682.
[17] WEI C, ZHONG J, HU T, et al. Simultaneous detection of Escherichia coli, O157:H7, Staphylococcus aureus, and Salmonella, by multiplex PCR in milk[J].Biotech,2018,8(1):76-82.
[18] MARWA K, MAHMOUD A, REFAAT I H, et al. Antibacterial effect of various shapes of silver nanoparticles monitored by SERS[J].Talanta,2015,138:183-189.
[19] WU X, HAN C, CHEN J, et al. Rapid detection of pathogenic bacteria from fresh produce by filtration and surface-enhanced raman spectroscopy [J].Jom,2016,68(4):1 156-1 162.
[20] SUNDARAM J, PARK B, KWON Y, et al. Surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) with biopolymer encapsulated silver nanosubstrates for rapid detection of foodborne pathogens[J].International Journal of Food Microbiology,2013,167(1):67-73.
[21] 杨丹婷. 氨基甲酸乙酯和大肠杆菌的表面增强拉曼光谱检测方法[D].杭州:浙江大学,2013.
[22] WANG P, PANG S, CHEN J, et al. Label-free mapping of single bacterial cells using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy [J].Analyst,2016,141(4):1 356-1 363.
[23] CHONGWEN W, BING G, QIQI L, et al. Combined use of vancomycin-modified Ag-coated magnetic nanoparticles and secondary enhanced nanoparticles for rapid surface-enhanced Raman scattering detection of bacteria[J].International Journal of Nanomedicine,2018,13:1 159-1 178.
[24] GUVEN B, BASARAN-AKGUL N, TEMUR E, et al. SERS-based sandwich immunoassay using antibody coated magnetic nanoparticles for Escherichia coli enumeration[J].The Analyst,2011,136(4):740-748.
[25] CHEN J, PARK B, HUANG Y W, et al. Label-free SERS detection of Salmonella typhimurium on DNA aptamer modified AgNR substrates[J].Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization,2017,11(4):1-7.
[26] ZHANG C, WANG C, XIAO R, et al. Sensitive and specific detection of clinical bacteria: Via vancomycin-modified Fe3O4@Au nanoparticles and aptamer-functionalized SERS tags[J].Journal of Materials Chemistry B,2018,6(22):3 751-3 761.
文章导航

/