研究报告

酱油渣源副干酪乳杆菌体外安全性评价

  • 魏梓晴 ,
  • 詹紫瑶 ,
  • 王阿利 ,
  • 于茜雅 ,
  • 张沛 ,
  • 黄桂东 ,
  • 钟先锋
展开
  • 1(佛山科学技术学院 食品科学与工程学院,广东 佛山,528231)
    2(广东省传统发酵食品工程技术研究中心,广东 佛山,528231)
    3(广东省食品流通安全控制工程技术研究中心,广东 佛山,528231)
    4(佛山市酿造工程技术研究中心,广东 佛山,528231)
    5(佛山市农业生物制造工程技术研究中心,广东 佛山,528231)
第一作者:硕士研究生(黄桂东研究员为通信作者,E-mail:guidongh78@126.com)

收稿日期: 2021-08-02

  修回日期: 2021-10-25

  网络出版日期: 2022-06-23

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(32072198,31700056,31660459);广东省自然科学基金项目(2020A1515011444);广东省教育厅重点领域专项(2020ZDZX1029,2020ZDZX1046);佛山市科技奖培育入库项目(2020001003715)

In vitro safety evaluation of Lactobacillus paracasei from soy sauce residue

  • WEI Ziqing ,
  • ZHAN Ziyao ,
  • WANG Ali ,
  • YU Xiya ,
  • ZHANG Pei ,
  • HUANG Guidong ,
  • ZHONG Xianfeng
Expand
  • 1(Foshan University, College of Food Science and Engineering, Foshan 528231, China)
    2(Guangdong Traditional Fermented Food Engineering Technology Research Center, Foshan 528231, China)
    3(Guangdong Food Safety Control Engineering Technology Research Center, Foshan 528231, China)
    4(Foshan Brewing Engineering Technology Research Center, Foshan 528231, China)
    5(Foshan Agricultural Biological Manufacturing Engineering Technology Research Center, Foshan 528231, China)

Received date: 2021-08-02

  Revised date: 2021-10-25

  Online published: 2022-06-23

摘要

部分副干酪乳杆菌存在一定致病性,故食品源副干酪乳杆菌安全性评价仍是值得深入探讨的科学问题。该实验室前期从酱油渣中分离得到6株副干酪乳杆菌,分别为HT31、HT90、HT111、HT155、HT159、HT197,为了开发其使用价值,通过药敏试验、质粒提取实验、溶血实验、吲哚实验和氨基酸脱羧酶实验对其安全性展开评价。结果表明,在耐药性研究中,6株菌均对庆大霉素、复方新诺明呈现抗性,且均不含有质粒;5株菌(HT31、HT90、HT155、HT159、HT197)对青霉素、头孢噻吩、红霉素、氯霉素敏感,对环丙沙星中度耐药,HT111对青霉素、头孢噻吩、红霉素、氯霉素、环丙沙星敏感,说明庆大霉素、复方新诺明对6株菌的抑制效果较强,其他5种抗生素对6株菌的抑制效果较弱。在有害代谢产物研究中,6株菌均不产生精胺、尸胺、腐胺及色氨酸酶;HT197为β-溶血,HT31、HT90、HT111、HT155、HT159为α-溶血,其中HT31与HT111为轻微溶血。综上,HT197的安全性相对较低,不能作为益生及发酵菌株;HT31、HT90、HT111、HT155、HT159在耐药性检测、产有害代谢物方面相对安全,均没有出现β-溶血,由此可得出这5株副干酪乳杆菌具有良好的体外安全性,为其作为发酵剂应用于食品、解决酱油渣资源浪费问题提供科学依据。

本文引用格式

魏梓晴 , 詹紫瑶 , 王阿利 , 于茜雅 , 张沛 , 黄桂东 , 钟先锋 . 酱油渣源副干酪乳杆菌体外安全性评价[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2022 , 48(11) : 80 -86 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.028889

Abstract

Some Lactobacillus paracasei have certain pathogenicity, so the safety evaluation of food derived L. paracasei is still a scientific problem worthy of further discussion. Six strains of L. paracasei were isolated from soy sauce residue in our laboratory, which were HT31, HT90, HT111, HT155, HT159 and HT197. In order to develop its application value, this paper evaluated its safety by drug sensitivity test, plasmid extraction test, hemolysis test, indole test and amino acid decarboxylase test. The results showed that six strains were resistant to gentamicin and compound sulfamethoxazole, and none contain plasmids; five strains (HT31, HT90, HT155, HT159, HT197) were sensitive to penicillin, cephalothin, erythromycin and chloramphenicol, and moderately resistant to ciprofloxacin, HT111 was sensitive to penicillin, cephalothin, erythromycin, chloramphenicol and ciprofloxacin, indicating that gentamicin and compound sulfamethoxazole had strong inhibitory effect on six strains, while the other five antibiotics had weak inhibitory effect on six strains. In the study of harmful metabolites, none of the strains produced spermine, cadaverine, putrescine and tryptophan enzyme; HT197 was β- hemolysis, and HT31, HT90, HT111, HT155, HT159 were α- hemolysis, in which HT31 and HT111 were slight hemolysis. In conclusion, HT197 had relatively low safety and cannot be used as a probiotic and fermentation strain; HT31, HT90, HT111, HT155 and HT159 were relatively safe in drug resistance detection and production of harmful metabolites, and there was no evidence β- hemolysis. Thus, the five strains of L. paracasei have good safety, which provides a scientific basis for their application as starter in food and solving the waste of soy sauce residue resources.

参考文献

[1] DUAN Y Q, ZHOU A J, WEN K L, et al.Upgrading VFAs bioproduction from waste activated sludge via co-fermentation with soy sauce residue[J].Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2018, 13(1):1-10.
[2] 王红涛. 地衣芽孢杆菌和乳酸菌用于发酵酱渣的研究[D].广州:华南理工大学, 2012.
WANG H T.The lactic acid bacteria and Bacillus licheniformis are used to ferment soy sauce residue[D].Guangzhou:South China University of Technology, 2012.
[3] KUMAR M, GHOSH M, GANGULI A.Mitogenic response and probiotic characteristics of lactic acid bacteria isolated from indigenously pickled vegetables and fermented beverages[J].World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2012, 28(2):703-711.
[4] POVEDA J M, NIETO-ARRIBAS P, SESEÑA S, et al.Volatile composition and improvement of the aroma of industrial Manchego cheese by using Lactobacillus paracasei subsp.paracasei as adjunct and other autochthonous strains as starters[J].European Food Research and Technology, 2014,238(3):485-494.
[5] FRANKO B, VAILLANT M, RECULE C, et al.Lactobacillus paracasei endocarditis in a consumer of probiotics[J].Medecine et Maladies Infectieuses, 2013, 43(4):171-173.
[6] 唐素婷, 区锡敏, 黄桂东, 等.酱油渣中副干酪乳杆菌的分离鉴定及抗氧化特性研究[J].食品与机械, 2019, 35(10):11-17;23.
TANG S T, OU X M, HUANG G D, et al.Isolation, identification and antioxidant properties of Lactobacillus paracasei from soy sauce residue[J].Food & Machinery, 2019, 35(10):11-17;23.
[7] 唐素婷, 区锡敏, 孙张乐, 等.酱油渣中乳酸菌的分离鉴定及其生长特性研究[J].食品研究与开发, 2019, 40(20):195-200.
TANG S T, OU X M, SUN Z L, et al.Isolation, identification and growth characteristics of lactic acid bacteria from soy sauce residue[J].Food Research and Development, 2019, 40(20):195-200.
[8] PISANO M B, VIALE S, CONTI S, et al.Preliminary evaluation of probiotic properties of Lactobacillus strains isolated from Sardinian dairy products[J].BioMed Research International, 2014, 2014:286390.
[9] 董春阳. 广州市售酸奶中乳酸菌的药物敏感性分析[D].广州:华南理工大学, 2013.
DONG C Y.Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of lactic acid bacteria isolated from yoghurts in Guangzhou[D].Guangzhou:South China University of Technology, 2013.
[10] Performance Standards for Antimicrobioal Susceptibility Testing;Twentieth Informational Supplement[M].Wayne:Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.2010.
[11] 区锡敏, 王阿利, 孙张乐, 等.酱醪源肠球菌的特性研究与安全性评价[J].食品与发酵工业, 2020, 46(9):83-88.
OU X M, WANG A L, SUN Z L, et al.Characteristic and safety assessment of Enterococcus sp.from soy sauce mash[J].Food and Fermentation Industries, 2020, 46(9):83-88.
[12] 王梦姣. 内蒙古牧区马奶及其制品中肠球菌属乳酸菌安全性评价[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2014.
WANG M J.Safety evaluation of lactic acid bacteria isolated from mare's milk and its products in pastoral areas of Inner Mongolia[D].Hohhot:Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2014.
[13] CARIOLATO D, ANDRIGHETTO C, LOMBARDI A.Occurrence of virulence factors and antibiotic resistances in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium collected from dairy and human samples in North Italy[J].Food Control, 2008, 19(9):886-892.
[14] HEMPEL S, NEWBERRY S J, MAHER A R, et al.Probiotics for the prevention and treatment of antibiotic-associated diarrhea:A systematic review and meta-analysis[J].JAMA, 2012, 307(18):1 959-1 969.
[15] LI L Z, GE H J, GU D, et al.The role of two-component regulatory system in β-lactam antibiotics resistance[J].Microbiological Research, 2018,215:126-129.
[16] KATZ L, ASHLEY G W.Translation and protein synthesis: Macrolides[J].Chemical Reviews, 2005,105(2):499-528.
[17] 张一爽. 副干酪乳杆菌抗生素耐药性分析及蛋白酶活性评价[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2020.
ZHANG Y S.Evaluation of antibiotic resistance and proteolytic ability of Lactobacillus paracasei strains[D].Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology, 2020.
[18] CLEMENTI F, AQUILANTI L.Recent investigations and updated criteria for the assessment of antibiotic resistance in food lactic acid bacteria[J].Anaerobe, 2011,17(6):394-398.
[19] 田原, 季子非, 郭浩南, 等.副干酪乳杆菌L1的安全性及益生性评价[J].食品工业科技, 2019,40(12):120-127.
TIAN Y, JI Z F, GUO H N, et al.Safety and probiotic evaluation of Lactobacillus paracasei L1[J].Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2019,40(12):120-127.
[20] 王英, 范琳琳, 施亚萍, 等.具有抗氧化功能的副干酪乳杆菌FM-LP-4和干酪乳杆菌FM-M9-1的安全性初步评价[J].中国乳品工业, 2019, 47(11):4-7;13.
WANG Y, FAN L L, SHI Y P, et al.Safety assessment of Lactobacillus paracasei FM-LP-4 and Lactobacillus casei FM-M9-1 with high anti-oxidative activity[J].China Dairy Industry, 2019, 47(11):4-7;13.
[21] DOMINGOS-LOPES M F P, STANTON C, ROSS P R, et al.Genetic diversity, safety and technological characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from artisanal Pico cheese[J].Food Microbiology, 2017, 63:178-190.
[22] IBRAHIM A, KAMAL N M, AWED S, et al.Pre-identification of lactic acid bacteria isolated during fermentation process of Egyptian Kishk[J].Alexandria Science Exchange Journal:An International Quarterly Journal of Science Agricultural Environments, 2015,36:104-121.
[23] BIN MASALAM M S, BAHIELDIN A, ALHARBI M G, et al.Isolation, molecular characterization and probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria in Saudi raw and fermented milk[J].Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2018, 2018:7970463.
[24] MARAGKOUDAKIS P A, ZOUMPOPOULOU G, MIARIS C, et al.Probiotic potential of Lactobacillus strains isolated from dairy products[J].International Dairy Journal, 2006,16(3):189-199.
[25] 徐传标, 霍冬雪, 胡淇淞, 等.海南发酵食品鱼茶中乳杆菌发酵特性的研究[J].食品工业科技, 2017,38(7):117-120.
XU C B, HUO D X, HU Q S, et al.Fermentation characteristics of Lactobacillus isolated in Hainan fermented food Yucha[J].Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2017,38(7):117-120.
文章导航

/