研究报告

乳酸保鲜即食湿面致腐微生物及生长特性分析

  • 张巧真 ,
  • 丁雅楠 ,
  • 顾丰颖 ,
  • 郭芹 ,
  • 屈阳 ,
  • 李甜 ,
  • 王锋 ,
  • 王强
展开
  • (中国农业科学院 农产品加工研究所,农业农村部农产品加工重点实验室,北京,100193)
硕士研究生(王锋研究员和王强研究员为共同通信作者,E-mail:fengwang88@163.com;wangqiang06@caas.cn)

收稿日期: 2022-08-20

  修回日期: 2022-09-12

  网络出版日期: 2023-08-30

Analysis of spoilage microorganisms and the growth characteristics in lactic acid preservative instant wet noodles

  • ZHANG Qiaozhen ,
  • DING Yanan ,
  • GU Fengying ,
  • GUO Qin ,
  • QU Yang ,
  • LI Tian ,
  • WANG Feng ,
  • WANG Qiang
Expand
  • (Key Laboratory of Agro-products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affair, Institute of Food Sciences and Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China)

Received date: 2022-08-20

  Revised date: 2022-09-12

  Online published: 2023-08-30

摘要

乳酸保鲜是即食湿面工业化加工过程中常用的抑菌工艺,降酸处理会导致即食湿面的微生物滋生,为明确低酸性乳酸保鲜即食湿面的优势致腐微生物及其生长特性,该研究以低酸性和酸性乳酸保鲜即食湿面为研究对象,分析其微生物多样性,同时结合传统分离培养方法,通过形态学和分子生物学鉴定获得了乳酸保鲜即食湿面中的降酸致腐优势菌种,同时研究了其生长特性。微生物多样性分析显示,低酸性乳酸保鲜即食湿面中的优势致腐微生物为芽孢杆菌属(Bacillus sp.)。通过传统分离鉴定,从低酸性乳酸保鲜即食湿面中分离获得4株解淀粉芽孢杆菌(Bacillus amyloliquefaciens)和1株耐寒短杆菌(Peribacillus frigoritolerans)。解淀粉芽孢杆菌为低酸性乳酸保鲜即食湿面致腐微生物中的优势菌,为非溶血性的兼性好氧菌,最大耐受pH值为4.70,最大耐盐质量分数12%,100 ℃热处理5 min仍有84.99%~92.71%的芽孢存活。该研究为乳酸保鲜即食湿面产业化降酸工艺改进及防腐保鲜技术开发提供了理论依据。

本文引用格式

张巧真 , 丁雅楠 , 顾丰颖 , 郭芹 , 屈阳 , 李甜 , 王锋 , 王强 . 乳酸保鲜即食湿面致腐微生物及生长特性分析[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2023 , 49(14) : 250 -256 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.033385

Abstract

Lactic acid preservation is a commonly used antibacterial process in the industrial processing of instant wet noodles. Acid-reducing leads to the growth of microorganisms. In order to identify the dominant spoilage microorganisms and their growth characteristics in slightly acidified preserved instant wet noodles using lactic acid, slightly acidified and acidified preserved instant wet noodles were used as the research objects to analyze the microbial diversity in this study. At the same time, combining with the traditional separation and culture methods, the dominant spoilage bacteria in lactic acid preserved instant wet noodles were obtained through morphological and molecular biological identification. The growth characteristics of dominant spoilage bacteria were also studied. The microbial diversity analysis showed that the dominant spoilage microorganisms in slightly acidified preserved instant wet noodles were Bacillus sp. Four strains of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and one strain of Peribacillus frigoritolerans were isolated from the spoilage slightly acidified preserved instant wet noodles. B. amyloliquefaciens were the dominant spoilage bacteria in the cultivable microorganisms of slightly acidified preserved instant wet noodles. They were non-hemolytic facultative aerobic bacterium with a maximum tolerance of pH 4.70 and a maximum salt tolerance of 12%. Spores could survive after heat treatment at 100 ℃ for 5 min, with a survival rate of 84.99%-92.71%. This study provided a theoretical basis for the improvement of industrial acid reduction technology and the development of preservation technology for fresh instant wet noodles.

参考文献

[1] WANG X L, MA Z, LI X P, et al.Food additives and technologies used in Chinese traditional staple foods[J].Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, 2018, 5(1):1-15.
[2] HAN T Y, YANG Z, YU C, et al.Effect of acidity regulators on the shelf life, quality, and physicochemical characteristics of fresh wet noodles[J].Journal of Cereal Science, 2022, 103:103409.
[3] HSUEH-LIANG L, DER-SHENG C, CHIN-HUNG T, et al.Effects of acidification on the extension of shelf life of Japanese wet-type noodles (woo-long noodle)[J].African Journal of Microbiology Research, 2016, 10(45):1 918-1 925.
[4] FU X W, HUANG B, DAN W, et al.Effect of organic-acid-soaking on the extension of the shelf life of fresh noodles[J].American Journal of Food Technology, 2015, 10(5):215-222.
[5] 张婉. 鲜熟面贮藏品质及货架期预测模型研究[D].北京:中国农业科学院, 2016.
ZHANG W.Study on storage quality and shelf-life prediction model of fresh cooked noodles[D].Beijing:Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2016.
[6] 许玉慧, 许喜林, 辛淑敏.即食湿面条中腐败微生物的分离和鉴定的初步研究[J].中国酿造, 2014, 33(7):68-71.
XU Y H, XU X L, XIN S M.Separation and identification of spoilage microorganisms in instant wet noodles[J].China Brewing, 2014, 33(7):68-71.
[7] 王欢, 李刚凤, 夏欣欣, 等.市售生鲜湿面中腐败菌的分离与鉴定[J].中国酿造, 2020, 39(9):148-151.
WANG H, LI G F, XIA X X, et al.Isolation and identification of spoilage bacteria in commercial fresh wet noodles[J].China Brewing, 2020, 39(9):148-151.
[8] 刘晓燕, 王玲玲, 栾会妮, 等.一株枯草芽孢杆菌的分离鉴定、生物学特性及其对水质净化的作用[J].微生物学通报, 2021, 48(2):449-461.
LIU X Y, WANG L L, LUAN H N, et al.Isolation and identification of a Bacillus subtilis strain for water purification[J].Microbiology China, 2021, 48(2):449-461.
[9] JEON H L, YANG S J, SON S H, et al.Evaluation of probiotic Bacillus subtilis P229 isolated from cheonggukjang and its application in soybean fermentation[J].LWT, 2018, 97:94-99.
[10] LU L H, LIU T T, LIU X L, et al.Screening and identification of purine degrading Lactobacillus fermentum 9-4 from Chinese fermented rice-flour noodles[J].Food Science and Human Wellness, 2022, 11(5):1 402-1 408.
[11] 何银, 唐杰, 张惟广.赤水晒醋中腐败微生物的生长特性研究[J].中国调味品, 2018, 43(2):17-22.
HE Y, TANG J, ZHANG W G.Study on the growth characteristics of spoilage microorganisms in Chishui sun vinegar[J].China Condiment, 2018, 43(2):17-22.
[12] LARSEN N, THORSEN L, KPIKPI E N, et al.Characterization of Bacillus spp.strains for use as probiotic additives in pig feed[J].Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2014, 98(3):1 105-1 118.
[13] 李彪, 李国长, 柳琴.微生物对小麦及其加工品污染的调查分析[J].粮食储藏, 2003,32(5):36-38.
LI B, LI G C, LIU Q.Investigation of microorganism contamination on wheat and its by-products[J].Grain Storage, 2003,32(5):36-38.
[14] LIU G H, LIU B, WANG J P, et al.Reclassification of Brevibacterium frigoritolerans DSM 8801 T as Bacillus frigoritolerans comb.nov.based on genome analysis[J].Current Microbiology, 2020, 77(8):1 916-1 923.
[15] MONTECILLO J A V, BAE H H.Reclassification of Brevibacterium frigoritolerans as Peribacillus frigoritolerans comb.nov.based on phylogenomics and multiple molecular synapomorphies[J].International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2022, 72(5). DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005389.
[16] XU Y H, YU Y, TIAN Y M, et al.Analysis of Beijing douzhir microbiota by high-throughput sequencing and isolation of acidogenic, starch-flocculating strains[J].Frontiers in Microbiology, 2018, 9:1142.
[17] MUSHTAQ H, JEHANGIR A, AHMAD GANAI S, et al.Biochemical characterization and functional analysis of heat stable high potential protease of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain HM48 from soils of Dachigam National Park in Kashmir Himalaya[J].Biomolecules, 2021, 11(1):117.
[18] KAHRAMAN S, AYDENIZ Y, GUZEL I, et al.Partial purification of α-amylase from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, a strain isolated from a novel source[J].Journal of Biotechnology, 2017, 256:S24.
[19] YING T T, WU P J, GAO L L, et al.Isolation and characterization of a new strain of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and its effect on strawberry preservation[J].LWT, 2022, 165:113712.
[20] 蒋凯丽, 周新丽, 高海燕.一株具有拮抗作用的解淀粉芽孢杆菌的筛选、鉴定及生物学特性研究[J].工业微生物, 2020, 50(1):8-13.
JIANG K L, ZHOU X L, GAO H Y.Screening, identification and biological characteristics of an antagonistic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens[J].Industrial Microbiology, 2020, 50(1):8-13.
[21] 王明. 内蒙古草原纤维素分解菌的筛选及秸秆乙醇发酵[D].扬州:扬州大学, 2021.
WANG M.Screening of cellulose degradation bacteria in Inner Mongolia grasslands and it′s ethanol fermentation from corn stalk[D].Yangzhou:Yangzhou University, 2021.
文章导航

/