研究报告

产细菌素乳酸菌的筛选及其益生性能评价

  • 张乐 ,
  • 丁一珍 ,
  • 潘媛娜 ,
  • 李科 ,
  • 耿燕 ,
  • 周娟 ,
  • 许泓瑜 ,
  • 李恒 ,
  • 许正宏 ,
  • 史劲松
展开
  • 1(江南大学 生命科学与健康工程学院,江苏 无锡,214112)
    2(粮食发酵与食品生物制造国家工程研究中心,江苏 无锡,214112)
第一作者:硕士研究生(李恒副教授为通信作者,E-mail:liheng@jiangnan.edu.cn)

收稿日期: 2023-01-27

  修回日期: 2023-03-06

  网络出版日期: 2023-12-25

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(22278181);宁夏回族自治区重点研发计划(2020BFH02011)

Screening of bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria and the probiotic properties evaluation

  • ZHANG Le ,
  • DING Yizhen ,
  • PAN Yuanna ,
  • LI Ke ,
  • GENG Yan ,
  • ZHOU Juan ,
  • XU Hongyu ,
  • LI Heng ,
  • XU Zhenghong ,
  • SHI Jinsong
Expand
  • 1(College of Life Sciences and Health Engineering, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China)
    2(National Engineering Research Center for Food Fermentation and Food Biomanufacturing, Wuxi 214122, China)

Received date: 2023-01-27

  Revised date: 2023-03-06

  Online published: 2023-12-25

摘要

产细菌素乳酸菌可通过肠道微生态的调节发挥益生作用。研究从发酵食品中筛选到20株乳酸菌,通过排除有机酸和过氧化氢等干扰,获得一株抑菌能力较强的产细菌素的哈尔滨乳杆菌(Lactobacillus harbinensis)P1-1。对该菌株的肠道益生性能进行评价,并通过微生物共培养评价其与微生物之间的关系。结果显示,L.harbinensis P1-1在人工胃肠液中的存活率能达到90%以上,在1.2 g/L的胆盐中存活率高达56.2%,具有良好的胃肠道消化液耐受性。L.harbinensis P1-1能显著抑制条件致病菌大肠杆菌(Escherichia coli)ATCC 25922和表皮葡萄球菌(Staphylococcus epidermidis)ATCC 12228增殖,24 h抑菌率分别为86.3%和89.5%。采用共培养方法考察L.harbinensis P1-1的益生特性。L.harbinensis P1-1对益生菌L.plantarum CGMCC No.18389和E.coli Nissle 1917的生长均无明显影响,但可显著抑制2株条件致病菌的生长,存活率低于90%,同时益生菌与条件致病菌都可增强L.harbinensis P1-1的抑菌活性,表明L.harbinensis P1-1具有良好的肠道益生活性,具有进一步性能挖掘和应用拓展的潜力。

本文引用格式

张乐 , 丁一珍 , 潘媛娜 , 李科 , 耿燕 , 周娟 , 许泓瑜 , 李恒 , 许正宏 , 史劲松 . 产细菌素乳酸菌的筛选及其益生性能评价[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2023 , 49(22) : 19 -26 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.034949

Abstract

Bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria exhibit probiotic effects through regulating intestinal microecology. In the present study, a bacteriocin-producing strain of Lactobacillus harbinensis P1-1 with strong antibacterial ability was screened from 20 strains of lactic acid bacteria by eliminating the bacteriostasis effects of organic acid and hydrogen peroxide. The probiotic effects of L. harbinensis P1-1 were evaluated and the relationship between this strain and some other microorganisms were evaluated through microbial coculture. The results showed that the survival rate of L. harbinensis P1-1 in artificial gastrointestinal fluids could reach more than 90%, while the survival rate in 1.2 g/L bile salt was 56.2%. It indicated that this strain possessed good gastrointestinal digestive fluid tolerance. L. harbinensis P1-1 inhibited the proliferation of Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 12228 significantly with the inhibition rate reached 86.3% and 89.5% at 24 h, respectively. The co-culture method was utilized to investigate the probiotic properties of L. harbinensis P1-1. It showed L. harbinensis P1-1 exerted little effects on growth of the two probiotic L. plantarum CGMCC No.18389 and Escherichia coli Nissle 1917, while the growth of two conditional pathogens were both inhibited apparently with a survival rate of less than 90%. Meanwhile, the antibacterial activity of L. harbinensis P1-1 was enhanced by co-cultured with all these microorganisms, which represented that L. harbinensis P1-1 possessed positive intestinal prebiotic activity and had the potential for further exploration of its performance and application.

参考文献

[1] 魏明颖, 王玉涵, 杨倩, 等.肠道益生菌功能特性研究进展[J].粮食与油脂, 2020, 33(4):14-16.
WEI M Y, WANG Y H, YANG Q, et al.Research progress of functional properties of intestinal probiotics[J].Cereals & Oils, 2020, 33(4):14-16.
[2] LIU Q, YU Z M, TIAN F W, et al.Surface components and metabolites of probiotics for regulation of intestinal epithelial barrier[J].Microbial Cell Factories, 2020, 19(1):23.
[3] ANJANA, TIWARI S K.Bacteriocin-producing probiotic lactic acid bacteria in controlling dysbiosis of the gut microbiota[J].Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 2022, 12:851140.
[4] PLAZA-DIAZ J, RUIZ-OJEDA F J, GIL-CAMPOS M, et al.Mechanisms of action of probiotics[J].Advances in Nutrition, 2019, 10(suppl_1):S49-S66.
[5] XIN W G, LI X D, LIN Y C, et al.Whole genome analysis of host-associated Lactobacillus salivarius and the effects on hepatic antioxidant enzymes and gut microorganisms of Sinocyclocheilus grahami[J].Frontiers in Microbiology, 2022, 13:1014970.
[6] NAIMI S, ZIRAH S, BEN TAHER M, et al.Microcin J25 exhibits inhibitory activity against Salmonella Newport in continuous fermentation model mimicking swine colonic conditions[J].Frontiers in Microbiology, 2020, 11:988.
[7] YU H T, SHANG L J, YANG G X, et al.Biosynthetic microcin J25 exerts strong antibacterial, anti-inflammatory activities, low cytotoxicity without increasing drug-resistance to bacteria target[J].Frontiers in Immunology, 2022, 13:811378.
[8] HEILBRONNER S, KRISMER B, BRÖTZ-OESTERHELT H, et al.The microbiome-shaping roles of bacteriocins[J].Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2021, 19(11):726-739.
[9] 艾红英, 彭富强, 黄娟, 等.益生菌益生作用的新机制:作为肠道抗菌肽分泌的促进剂[J].中国兽医学报, 2016, 36(6):1076-1080.
AI H Y, PENG F Q, HUANG J, et al.A new mechanism of probiotics′ probiotic action—As a promoter of intestinal antimicrobial peptide secretion[J].Chinese Journal of Veterinary Science, 2016, 36(6):1076-1080.
[10] HU J, MA L B, NIE Y F, et al.A microbiota-derived bacteriocin targets the host to confer diarrhea resistance in early-weaned piglets[J].Cell Host & Microbe, 2018, 24(6):817-832.e8.
[11] MILAD A, VAHID L, AREZOO A, et al.Interesting probiotic traits of mother’s milk Lactobacillus isolates;from bacteriocin to inflammatory bowel disease improvement[J].Microbial Pathogenesis, 2021, 158:104998.
[12] HEENEY D D, ZHAI Z Y, BENDIKS Z, et al.Lactobacillus plantarum bacteriocin is associated with intestinal and systemic improvements in diet-induced obese mice and maintains epithelial barrier integrity in vitro[J].Gut Microbes, 2019, 10(3):382-397.
[13] 滕坤玲, 钟瑾.益生菌产生的细菌素及其功能机制[J].微生物学报, 2022, 62(3):858-868.
TENG K L, ZHONG J.Functions and mechanisms of bacteriocins produced by probiotics[J].Acta Microbiologica Sinica, 2022, 62(3):858-868.
[14] 刘树昕, 吴爱娟, 甄妮, 等.广谱抑菌乳酸菌的筛选及其细菌素相关基因分析[J].食品科学, 2020, 41(6):101-107.
LIU S X, WU A J, ZHEN N, et al.Screening for a strain of lactic acid bacteria with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity and analysis of its bacteriocin-related genes[J].Food Science, 2020, 41(6):101-107.
[15] VAN STADEN D A, BRAND A M, ENDO A, et al.Nisin F, intraperitoneally injected, may have a stabilizing effect on the bacterial population in the gastro-intestinal tract, as determined in a preliminary study with mice as model[J].Letters in Applied Microbiology, 2011, 53(2):198-201.
[16] 李理, 郑茵, 费永涛. 一种哈尔滨乳杆菌及其应用: 中国, CN109504617B. 2021-03-30.
LI L, ZHENG Y, FEI Y T. A Lactobacillus harbinensis and its application: China, CN109504617B. 2021-03-30.
[17] 杨珍珠, 潘秭琪, 迟海, 等.羊奶源产细菌素乳酸菌筛选、鉴定及益生特性研究[J].中国食品学报, 2021, 21(11):71-77.
YANG Z Z, PAN Z Q, CHI H, et al.Screening, identification and probiotic characteristics of bacteriocin-producing strains of lactic acid bacteria from goat milk[J].Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 2021, 21(11):71-77.
[18] 程爽, 臧晋, 王崎锞, 等.河南淅川酸菜中乳酸菌的分离鉴定及其益生特性初探[J].中国调味品, 2022, 47(2):60-63;68.
CHENG S, ZANG J, WANG Q K, et al.Isolation, identification and probiotic properties exploration of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Xichuan pickles in Henan Province[J].China Condiment, 2022, 47(2):60-63;68.
[19] 饶瑜, 王猛, 蒋云璐, 等.筛选用于四川泡菜生物保鲜的产细菌素乳酸菌[J].食品科学, 2015, 36(3):171-177.
RAO Y, WANG M, JIANG Y L, et al.Isolation of bacteriocinogenic lactic acid bacteria for biopreservation of Chinese traditional Sichuan pickle[J].Food Science, 2015, 36(3):171-177.
[20] LIU Z J, XU C, TIAN R, et al.Screening beneficial bacteriostatic lactic acid bacteria in the intestine and studies of bacteriostatic substances[J].Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B, 2021, 22(7):533-547.
[21] BYAKIKA S, MUKISA I M, MUGABI R, et al.Antimicrobial activity of lactic acid bacteria starters against acid tolerant, antibiotic resistant, and potentially virulent E.coli isolated from a fermented Sorghum-millet beverage[J].International Journal of Microbiology, 2019, 2019:2013539.
[22] SABOORI B, SHAHIDI F, HEDAYATI S, et al.Investigating the probiotic properties and antimicrobial activity of lactic acid bacteria isolated from an Iranian fermented dairy product, kashk[J].Foods, 2022, 11(23):3904.
[23] KAČÁNIOVÁ M, BOROTOVÁ P, TERENJEVA M, et al.Bryndza cheese of Slovak origin as potential resources of probiotic bacteria[J].Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences, 2020, 14:641-646.
[24] 王艺宙, 方凯, 王慧, 等.嗜酸乳杆菌和酪酸梭菌协同抑制痢疾杆菌的活性研究[J].中国药科大学学报, 2015, 46(1):117-122.
WANG Y Z, FANG K, WANG H, et al.Synergistic inhibition of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Clostridium butyricum against Shigella flexneri in vitro[J].Journal of China Pharmaceutical University, 2015, 46(1):117-122.
[25] 魏晨阳, 彭晴, 乔宇, 等.表乳糖对长双歧杆菌抑制产气荚膜梭菌生长的影响[J].中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(3):54-61.
WEI C Y, PENG Q, QIAO Y, et al.Inhibiton of Bifidobacterium longum on the growth of Clostridium perfringens with epilactose as a carbon source[J].Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21(3):54-61.
[26] 史劲松, 钱建瑛, 吴艳丽, 等. 一株高产短链脂肪酸的植物乳杆菌制备酸乳的方法: 中国, CN110903996A. 2020-03-24.
SHI J S, QIAN J Y, WU Y L, et al. A method of producing yoghurt by Lactobacillus plantarum with high yield of short chain fatty acid: China, CN110903996A. 2020-03-24.
[27] WU A J, FU Y Q, KONG L Y, et al.Production of a class IIb bacteriocin with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity in Lactiplantibacillus plantarum RUB1[J].Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins, 2021, 13(6):1820-1832.
文章导航

/