食品与发酵工业 >

2024 , Vol. 50 >Issue 8: 138 - 145

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.036071

研究报告

植物乳杆菌SCB2505代谢物对液化沙雷氏菌的抑菌机理

  • 饶苇 ,
  • 陈奎霖 ,
  • 方子莹 ,
  • 陈昭民 ,
  • 方祥
展开
  • 1(华南农业大学 食品学院,广东 广州,510642)
    2(味燃食品生物科技(深圳)有限公司,广东 深圳,518040)
第一作者:学士(方祥教授为通信作者,E-mail:fxiang@scau.edu.cn)

收稿日期: 2023-05-16

  修回日期: 2023-06-05

  网络出版日期: 2024-06-11

基金资助

广东省种业振兴专项(2022-WPY-00-008)

收起

Antibacterial mechanism of Lactobacillus plantarum SCB2505 metabolites against Serratia liquefaciens

  • RAO Wei ,
  • CHEN Kuilin ,
  • FANG Ziying ,
  • CHEN Zhaomin ,
  • FANG Xiang
Expand
  • 1(College of Food Science,South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)
    2(Weyran Food Biotechnology (Shenzhen) Co.Ltd., Shenzhen 518040, China)

Received date: 2023-05-16

  Revised date: 2023-06-05

  Online published: 2024-06-11

Fold

摘要

液化沙雷氏菌是畜产食品在低温贮藏中的一种常见致腐菌和食源性病原菌。该实验通过最小抑菌浓度(minimum inhibitory concentration, MIC)和生长曲线分析植物乳杆菌SCB2505代谢物对液化沙雷氏菌的抑菌活性,并通过高温、过氧化氢酶及蛋白酶、pH处理和乳酸排除实验分析抑菌物质组成,再通过生物被膜抑制率、细胞壁和细胞膜完整性、菌体形态变化的研究来分析其抑菌机理。结果表明,植物乳杆菌SCB2505代谢物对液化沙雷氏菌的MIC为8 mg/mL,其抑菌物质的高温耐受性较好,pH越低其抑菌效果越好,但相同pH的乳酸溶液不具有抑菌活性,过氧化氢酶和蛋白酶对其抑菌圈大小有显著影响,推测抑菌物质可能为乳酸盐、细菌素与过氧化氢的复合物。植物乳杆菌SCB2505代谢物能明显抑制液化沙雷氏菌生物被膜合成,破坏细胞壁和细胞膜的完整性,使得菌体皱缩凹陷,甚至裂解死亡。该研究结果说明植物乳杆菌SCB2505代谢物作为天然防腐剂在动物食品防腐领域具有较好的应用前景。

关键词： 植物乳杆菌; 代谢物; 液化沙雷氏菌; 抑菌机理; 抑菌活性

本文引用格式

饶苇 , 陈奎霖 , 方子莹 , 陈昭民 , 方祥 . 植物乳杆菌SCB2505代谢物对液化沙雷氏菌的抑菌机理[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2024 , 50(8) : 138 -145 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.036071

Abstract

Serratia liquefaciens is a common spoilage bacteria and food-borne pathogen in animal-based food during low-temperature storage.In this study, the antibacterial activity of Lactobacillus plantarum SCB2505 metabolites against S.liquefaciens SCB2649 was investigated by measuring the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and growth curve. The composition of antibacterial substances was analyzed by high-temperature heat treatment, catalase and protease treatment, pH adjustment treatment, and lactic acid exclusion experiments.The antibacterial mechanism was studied by measuring the biofilm inhibition rate, the integrity of the cell wall and cell membrane, and the changes in cell morphology.Results showed that the MIC of L.plantarum SCB2505 metabolites against S.liquefaciens was 8 mg/mL.The antibacterial substances were found to well tolerate high temperature, hereby the relative antibacterial activity was 89.09% after heat treatment at 121 ℃.Catalase and protease could reduce the antibacterial activity of metabolites, but the relative antibacterial activity was still greater than 90%.pH adjustment had a significant effect on its antibacterial activity, whereby the lower the pH, the higher the antibacterial activity.However, it was verified that hydrogen ion concentration was not the main factor affecting the antibacterial activity, and it was speculated that the antibacterial substance was a complex of lactic acid, bacteriocin and hydrogen peroxide.The L.plantarum SCB2505 metabolites can inhibit the biofilm synthesis of S.liquefaciens, destroy the integrity of the cell wall and cell membrane, leading to shrinking and sagging of the cells, and even lysing and dead of the cells.These results show that the L.plantarum SCB2505 metabolites have a good application prospect as natural preservatives in the field of animal-based food preservation.

Key words： Lactobacillus plantarum; metabolites; Serratia liquefaciens; antibacterial mechanism; antibacterial activity

参考文献

[1] 伊婷, 乔家运, 李玉鹏, 等.植物乳杆菌对小鼠体重、炎症反应及肠道健康的影响[J].动物营养学报, 2023, 35(4):2668-2676.
YI T, QIAO J Y, LI Y P, et al.Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum on body weight, inflammatory response and intestinal health of mice[J].Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2023, 35(4):2668-2676.
[2] MAO Y, ZHANG X J, XU Z H.Identification of antibacterial substances of Lactobacillus plantarum DY-6 for bacteriostatic action[J].Food Science & Nutrition, 2020, 8(6):2854-2863.
[3] SJÖGREN J, MAGNUSSON J, BROBERG A, et al.Antifungal 3-hydroxy fatty acids from Lactobacillus plantarum MiLAB14[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2003, 69(12):7554-7557.
[4] 高兆建, 黄亮浩, 丁飞鸿, 等.源自泡菜的植物乳杆菌产新型广谱抑菌细菌素的特性分析[J].食品科学, 2021, 42(10):171-177.
GAO Z J, HUANG L H, DING F H, et al.Characterization of novel broad-spectrum bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum from pickles[J].Food Science, 2021, 42(10):171-177.
[5] WANG D, LIU Y F, LI X P, et al.Unraveling the antibacterial mechanism of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum MY2 cell-free supernatants against Aeromonas hydrophila ST3 and potential application in raw tuna[J].Food Control, 2023, 145:109512.
[6] PENG S D, SONG J J, ZENG W Y, et al.A broad-spectrum novel bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum SHY 21-2 from yak yogurt:Purification, antimicrobial characteristics and antibacterial mechanism[J].LWT, 2021, 142:110955.
[7] LV X R, LIN Y, JIE Y, et al.Purification, characterization, and action mechanism of plantaricin DL3, a novel bacteriocin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa produced by Lactobacillus plantarum DL3 from Chinese Suan-Tsai[J].European Food Research & Technology, 2018, 244(2):323-331.
[8] 骆业巧, 司波.低温保存肉制品中液化沙雷氏菌的分离鉴定与耐药性分析[J].食品安全质量检测学报, 2019, 10(18):6119-6123.
LUO Y Q, SI B.Isolation, identification and drug resistance analysis of Serratia liquefaciens in low-temperature preserved meat products[J].Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2019, 10(18):6119-6123.
[9] 王文静, 韩月杰, 王立钊.低温肉制品微生物污染风险及防控关键技术[J].当代畜禽养殖业, 2018(11):40.
WANG W J, HAN Y J, WANG L Z.Risk of microbial contamination of low temperature meat products and key technologies for prevention and control[J].Modern Animal Husbandry, 2018(11):40.
[10] MACHADO S G, DA SILVA F L, BAZZOLLI D M S, et al. Pseudomonas spp. and Serratia liquefaciens as predominant spoilers in cold raw milk[J].Journal of Food Science, 2015, 80(8):M1842-M1849.
[11] SALGADO C A, BAGLINIÈRE F, VANETTI M C D.Spoilage potential of a heat-stable lipase produced by Serratia liquefaciens isolated from cold raw milk[J].LWT, 2020, 126:109289.
[12] MACHADO S G, HEYNDRICKX M, DE BLOCK J, et al.Identification and characterization of a heat-resistant protease from Serratia liquefaciens isolated from Brazilian cold raw milk[J].International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2016, 222:65-71.
[13] WANG G Y, WANG H H, HAN Y W, et al.Evaluation of the spoilage potential of bacteria isolated from chilled chicken in vitro and in situ[J].Food Microbiology, 2017, 63:139-146.
[14] MATAMOROS S, PILET M F, GIGOUT F, et al.Selection and evaluation of seafood-borne psychrotrophic lactic acid bacteria as inhibitors of pathogenic and spoilage bacteria[J].Food Microbiology, 2009, 26(6):638-644.
[15] 周倩倩, 方士元, 梅俊, 等.丁香酚对腐败希瓦氏菌和荧光假单胞菌的抑制机理[J].食品科学, 2020, 41(9):1-6.
ZHOU Q Q, FANG S Y, MEI J, et al.Inhibitory mechanism of eugenol on Shewanella putrefaciens and Pseudomonas fluorescens[J].Food Science, 2020, 41(9):1-6.
[16] 石超. 柠檬醛对阪崎克罗诺肠杆菌抑菌和抗感染作用及其分子机制[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学食品科学, 2017.
SHI C.The antimicrobial activity and antiinfection effect against Cronobacter sakazakii of citral and mechanisms of action[D].Yangling:西北农林科技大学食品科学, 2017.
[17] 王琳, 李宇轩, 刘国荣, 等.金银花和蒲公英提取物对肉源性假单胞菌生物被膜的清除作用[J].食品工业科技, 2020, 41(12):106-111,120.
WANG L, LI Y X, LIU G R, et al.Scavenging effect of honeysuckle and dandelion extracts on the biofilm of Pseudomonas Stains from meat[J].Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2020, 41(12):106-111,120.
[18] 苏晓丹. 花椒精油和丁香精油的抑菌作用及对火腿防腐作用研究[D].太原:山西师范大学, 2019.
SU X D.Study on antibacterial effect of essential oil from pepper and clove and antiseptic effect on ham[D].Taiyuan:Shanxi Normal University, 2019.
[19] 陆振鑫, FRANK, SYSTERMANS.乳酸盐在肉制品中延长货架期和抑制致病菌的作用[J].中国食品添加剂, 2000(2):22-25.
LU Z X, FRANK, SYSTERMANS.Lactates extend shelf-life of meat products and control their pathogens[J].China Food Additives, 2000(2):22-25.
[20] GAO Z H, DALIRI E B M, WANG J, et al.Inhibitory effect of lactic acid bacteria on foodborne pathogens:A review[J].Journal of Food Protection, 2019, 82(3):441-453.
[21] WANG C J, CHANG T, YANG H, et al.Antibacterial mechanism of lactic acid on physiological and morphological properties of Salmonella enteritidis, Escherichia coli and Listeria monocytogenes[J].Food Control, 2015, 47:231-236.
[22] 肖梦圆, 武瑞赟, 谭春明, 等.群体感应系统及其抑制剂对细菌生物被膜调控的研究进展[J].食品科学, 2020, 41(13):227-234.
XIAO M Y, WU R Y, TAN C M, et al.Recent advances in understanding the role of quorum sensing system and quorum sensing inhibitors in regulating bacterial biofilm formation[J].Food Science, 2020, 41(13):227-234.
[23] RODRIGUES A C, ALMEIDA F A, ANDRÉ C, et al.Phenolic extract of Eugenia uniflora L.and furanone reduce biofilm formation by Serratia liquefaciens and increase its susceptibility to antimicrobials[J].Biofouling, 2020, 36(9):1031-1048.
[24] HAN Y J, CHEN W X, SUN Z C.Antimicrobial activity and mechanism of limonene against Staphylococcus aureus[J].Journal of Food Safety, 2021, 41(5):e12918.
[25] SUN Z L, ZHANG X X, WU H H, et al.Antibacterial activity and action mode of chlorogenic acid against Salmonella enteritidis, a foodborne pathogen in chilled fresh chicken[J].World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2020, 36(2):24.
[26] ZHANG G, MEREDITH T C, KAHNE D.On the essentiality of lipopolysaccharide to gram-negative bacteria[J].Current Opinion in Microbiology, 2013, 16(6):779-785.
[27] ALAKOMI H L, SKYTTÄ E, SAARELA M, et al.Lactic acid permeabilizes gram-negative bacteria by disrupting the outer membrane[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2000, 66(5):2001-2005.
[28] 窦勇, 姚妙爱, 闾怀中, 等.冷等离子体对单核增生李斯特菌的杀菌机理[J].中国农业科学, 2020, 53(24):5104-5114.
DOU Y, YAO M A, LYU H Z, et al.Antibacterial mechanism of cold plasma against Listeria monocytogenes[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(24):5104-5114.
[29] LINLEY E, DENYER S P, MCDONNELL G, et al.Use of hydrogen peroxide as a biocide:New consideration of its mechanisms of biocidal action[J].The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2012, 67(7):1589-1596.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

技术支持：北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司