研究报告

余甘子果实不同发育阶段品质比较

  • 宋志姣 ,
  • 梁凤鸣 ,
  • 章金龙 ,
  • 黄佳聪 ,
  • 李晓娇
展开
  • 1(保山学院 资源环境学院,云南 保山,678000)
    2(云龙县农业技术推广中心,云南 大理,672700)
    3(云南省保山市林业和草原技术推广站,云南 保山,678000)
第一作者: 博士,副教授(黄佳聪正高级工程师和李晓娇副教授为共同通信作者,E-mail:bs_hjc@126.com;lixiaojiao0622@163.com)

收稿日期: 2023-02-26

  修回日期: 2023-04-12

  网络出版日期: 2024-06-11

基金资助

国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFF13024);云南省科技厅地方高校联合专项(202101BA070001-067);保山市中青年学术带头人项目(保政复〔2019〕22号);云南省高校怒江河谷生物质资源高值转化与利用重点实验室建设项目

Comparison of nutritional quality during fruit development of Phyllanthus emblica

  • SONG Zhijiao ,
  • LIANG Fengming ,
  • ZHANG Jinlong ,
  • HUANG Jiacong ,
  • LI Xiaojiao
Expand
  • 1(College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Baoshan University, Baoshan 678000, China)
    2(Yunlong County Agricultural Technology Extension Center, Dali 672700, China)
    3(Forestry and Grassland Technology Extension Station of Baoshan City, Baoshan 678000, China)

Received date: 2023-02-26

  Revised date: 2023-04-12

  Online published: 2024-06-11

摘要

为了解余甘子果实品质随果实发育的动态变化规律,以‘高黎贡山’和‘保山2号’两个余甘子品种为研究材料,于4个不同发育阶段(7月16日、9月1日、10月15日、11月30日)分别采集两个品种的果实测定其水分、可溶性固形物、可食率、总酸、总糖、维生素C、单宁酸、多酚和没食子酸含量等指标,分析其动态变化规律;基于各品质指标间的相关性进行分析,并利用主成分分析对各发育阶段果实品质指标进行综合评价,以确定适宜采收期。结果表明,同品种余甘子所测定的品质指标在不同发育阶段差异极显著(P<0.01)。各个指标在果实发育趋向成熟的过程中的变化趋势因指标而异,总酸、总糖、维生素C和多酚含量随着果实不断发育呈先升高后降低的趋势,可溶性固形物含量则先降低后升高。‘高黎贡山’和‘保山2号’余甘子的总糖和多酚相关系数最高,均在0.9以上。基于所有品质指标测定及分析结果,认为10月15日左右为两个品种余甘子果实的最佳采收期,此时采摘的‘高黎贡山’和‘保山2号’余甘子总酸、维生素C、总糖、单宁酸、多酚含量均最高,‘高黎贡山’的可溶性固形物和‘保山2号’的没食子酸含量亦最高。

本文引用格式

宋志姣 , 梁凤鸣 , 章金龙 , 黄佳聪 , 李晓娇 . 余甘子果实不同发育阶段品质比较[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2024 , 50(9) : 255 -261 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.035274

Abstract

To decipher the dynamic changes in nutritional characteristics of Phyllanthus emblica fruits during fruit development, this study measured the nine nutritional components in fruit during four fruit development stages.For comparison purposes, two varieties of P.emblica cv.‘Gaoligong Mountain’ and ‘Baoshan No.2’ were used as samples.Correlations and principal component analysis of the quality indicators of fruits were conducted to determine the optimal time of harvest.Results showed significant differences (P<0.01) between each of the quality indicators in different developmental stages.Moreover, there were different trends of changes in each quality indicator during different development stages.Total acid, total sugar, vitamin C, and polyphenol content tended to increase and then decrease as the fruit developed, while soluble solids content tended to decrease and then increased.A strong correlation (r>0.9) was observed between total sugars and polyphenols in both two varieties.Results obtained from the current report showed that the best time to harvest both two varieties was around October 15.At this time, the highest contents of total acid, vitamin C, total sugar, tannins, and polyphenols were observed in both two varieties, as well as the highest content of soluble solids was observed in ‘Gaoligong Mountain’ and the highest content of gallic acid was observed in ‘Baoshan No.2’.

参考文献

[1] 黄佳聪, 蒋华, 吴建花.云南余甘子[M].昆明:云南科技出版社, 2021.
HUANG J C, JIANG H, WU J H.Phyllanthus emblica of Yunnan Province[M].Kunming:Yunnan Science and Technology Press, 2021.
[2] PETRA H, HASHENDRA K, KENNETH J.A phylogenetic classification of Phyllanthaceae (Malpighiales;Euphorbiaceae sensu lato)[J].Kew Bulletin, 2006, 61(1):37-53.
[3] 李碧琳, 黄佳聪, 曹子林, 等.滇西地区余甘子新品种果实品质分析与综合评价[J].中国果树, 2022(11):72-76.
LI B L, HUANG J C, CAO Z L, et al.Analysis and comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality of new Phyllanthus emblica varieties in western Yunnan[J].China Fruits, 2022(11):72-76.
[4] ZHANG Y J, TANAKA T, YANG C R, et al.New phenolic constituents from the fruit juice of Phyllanthus emblica[J].Chemical & Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 2001, 49(5):537-540.
[5] PANCHABHAI T S, AMBARKHANE S V, JOSHI A S, et al.Protective effect of Tinospora cordifolia, Phyllanthus emblica and their combination against antitubercular drugs induced hepatic damage:An experimental study[J].Phytotherapy Research:PTR, 2008, 22(5):646-650.
[6] JAIJOY K, SOONTHORNCHAREONNON N, PANTHONG A, et al.Anti-inflammatory and analgesic activities of the water extract from the fruit of Phyllanthus emblica Linn.[J].International Journal of Applied Research in Natural Products, 2010, 3(2):48-58.
[7] 吴建花, 杨开保, 杨晏平, 等.滇西地区滇橄榄自然居群果实经济性状变异研究[J].云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2016, 31(2):281-287.
WU J H, YANG K B, YANG Y P, et al.Variation of fruit economic traits in natural populations of Phyllanthus emblica in western Yunnan[J].Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Natural Science), 2016, 31(2):281-287.
[8] 酆炳森, 刘凌霄, 孙杰, 等.不同采收成熟度黄金蜜桃果实的品质分析[J].食品与发酵工业, 2023,49(21):175-182.
FENG B S, LIU L X, SUN J, et al.Quality analysis of golden peach fruits with different harvest maturity[J].Food and Fermentation Industries, 2023,49(21):175-182.
[9] 刘祚祚, 赵雪竹, 蒲慧, 等.滇橄榄不同采摘期果实品质的变化规律[J].食品工业科技, 2022, 43(6):293-301.
LIU Z Z, ZHAO X Z, PU H, et al.Dynamic quality changes of Phyllanthus emblica L.in different picking periods[J].Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2022, 43(6):293-301.
[10] 陈玉婷, 傅曼琴, 吴继军, 等.不同生长时期茶枝柑果实品质分析[J].食品与发酵工业, 2023,49(10):251-258.
CHEN Y T, FU M Q, WU J J, et al.Analysis of Citrus reticulata ‘chachi’ quality during different growth periods[J].Food and Fermentation Industries, 2023,49(10):251-258.
[11] 郑浩, 杨倩雨, 李志强, 等.不同成熟度油橄榄果实表观与内在品质变化及相关性分析[J].核农学报, 2022, 36(6):1089-1099.
ZHENG H, YANG Q Y, LI Z Q, et al.Changes and correlation analysis of appearance and intrinsic quality of Olea europaea with different maturity[J].Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 36(6):1089-1099.
[12] 许奇志, 陈秀萍, 邓朝军, 等.不同成熟度“新白8号” 枇杷果实品质特性分析[J].中国南方果树, 2019, 48(2):71-74;81.
XU Q Z, CHEN X P, DENG C J, et al.Characteristics of fruit quality of xinbai No.8 loquat at different maturity[J].South China Fruits, 2019, 48(2):71-74;81.
[13] 杨晏平, 黄佳聪, 杨晓霞, 等.高黎贡山余甘子优良无性系选育结果初报[J].热带农业科学, 2020, 40(1):35-40.
YANG Y P, HUANG J C, YANG X X, et al.Breeding and selection of desirable clones of Phyllanthus emblica from Gaoligong mountain[J].Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 2020, 40(1):35-40.
[14] 罗存贞, 郭俊杰, 黄佳聪, 等.“保山2号” 余甘子优良无性系选育[J].林业科技通讯, 2018(6):3-6.
LUO C Z, GUO J J, HUANG J C, et al.Breeding of excellent clones of “Baoshan No.2” Phyllanthus emblica[J].Forest Science and Technology, 2018(6):3-6.
[15] 赵琼玲, 金杰, 罗会英, 等.不同颜色余甘子果实发育过程中5种生理指标的变化及其相关性[J].热带农业科学, 2018, 38(3):20-24.
ZHAO Q L, JIN J, LUO H Y, et al.Changes and correlation of 5 physiological indexes of different colors of Phyllanthus emblica fruit in the process of fruit development[J].Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 2018, 38(3):20-24.
[16] 李晓旭, 李家政.优化蒽酮比色法测定甜玉米中可溶性糖的含量[J].保鲜与加工, 2013, 13(4):24-27.
LI X X, LI J Z.Determination of the content of soluble sugar in sweet corn with optimized anthrone colorimetric method[J].Storage and Process, 2013, 13(4):24-27.
[17] 伍云卿, 涂杰峰, 范超.果蔬中单宁测定技术研究[J].中国农学通报, 2015, 31(11):166-169.
WU Y Q, TU J F, FAN C.Research on determination of tannin content in vegetable and fruit[J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015, 31(11):166-169.
[18] 郭炳春, 沈明娟, 叶征美, 等.余甘子总多酚提取工艺优化研究[J].热带作物学报, 2013, 34(12):2479-2483.
GUO B C, SHEN M J, YE Z M, et al.Optimization of the technology for extracting total polyphenols of Phyllanthus emblica[J].Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2013, 34(12):2479-2483.
[19] 郭俊凌, 李成亮, 郑怡萌, 等.茶叶中没食子酸含量测定的离子化萃取分离分光光度法研究[J].食品科学, 2010, 31(4):150-155.
GUO J L, LI C L, ZHENG Y M, et al.Ionization extraction-spectrophotometric determination of gallic acid in tea[J].Food Science, 2010, 31(4):150-155.
[20] 宋志姣, 樊金欣, 李德焕, 等.不同果桑品种加工品质评价[J].食品与发酵工业, 2020, 46(15):134-139.
SONG Z J, FAN J X, LI D H, et al.Evaluation of processing qualities of different mulberry varieties[J].Food and Fermentation Industries, 2020, 46(15):134-139.
[21] 张力. SPSS 13.0在生物统计中的应用[M].厦门:厦门大学出版社, 2006.
ZHANG L.Application of SPSS13.0 in Biostatistics[M].Xiamen:Xiamen University Press, 2006.
[22] 王建超, 陈志峰, 刘鑫铭, 等.不同品种余甘子果实营养成分分析与评价[J].果树学报, 2018, 35(1):108-117.
WANG J C, CHEN Z F, LIU X M, et al.Nutritional analysis and evaluation of fruits of Phyllanthus emblica[J].Journal of Fruit Science, 2018, 35(1):108-117.
文章导航

/