研究报告

不同干燥方式对毛竹笋全粉中氨基酸含量和蛋白质结构的影响

  • 李艳艳 ,
  • 杨金来 ,
  • 吴琰 ,
  • 李彬 ,
  • 张甫生 ,
  • 吴良如 ,
  • 郑炯
展开
  • 1(西南大学 食品科学学院,重庆,400715)
    2(国家林业和草原局竹子研究开发中心,浙江省竹子高效加工重点实验室,浙江 杭州,310012)
    3(重庆市林业科学院,重庆,400036)
第一作者:本科生(吴良如研究员和郑炯副教授为共同通信作者,E-mail:bamshoots@163.com;zhengjiong_swu@126.com)

收稿日期: 2023-08-02

  修回日期: 2023-08-14

  网络出版日期: 2024-08-21

基金资助

浙江省重点研发计划项目(2020C02036);重庆市科技兴林项目(ZD2022-4);贵州省特色林业产业研发项目(2020-28);西南大学大学生创新创业训练计划项目(X202310635205)

Effects of different drying methods on amino acid content and protein structure of Phyllostachys pubescens shoot powder

  • LI Yanyan ,
  • YANG Jinlai ,
  • WU Yan ,
  • LI Bin ,
  • ZHANG Fusheng ,
  • WU Liangru ,
  • ZHENG Jiong
Expand
  • 1(College of Food Science, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China)
    2(Key Laboratory of High Efficient Processing of Bamboo of Zhejiang Province, China National Bamboo Research Center, Hangzhou 310012, China)
    3(Chongqing Academy of Forestry, Chongqing 400036, China)

Received date: 2023-08-02

  Revised date: 2023-08-14

  Online published: 2024-08-21

摘要

为探究不同干燥方式对竹笋全粉氨基酸含量及蛋白质结构的影响,该实验采用喷雾干燥(spray drying,SD)、热风干燥(hot air drying,HAD)、微波干燥(microwave drying,MD)、低温真空干燥(low-temperature vacuum drying,LVD)4种方式制备毛竹笋全粉(Phyllostachys pubescens shoot powder,PPSP),分析了4种干燥方式的PPSP氨基酸组成及含量,并基于拉曼光谱酰胺Ⅰ带比较了4组样品蛋白质二级结构变化。结果表明,LVD制备的PPSP总氨基酸含量最高,为29.19 g/100 g,其次为SD,HAD制备的PPSP总氨基酸含量最低。LVD组的PPSP中必需氨基酸含量最高,为10.43 g/100 g,占总氨基酸含量的35.73%。LVD和SD制备的PPSP中呈味氨基酸含量分别为17.58 g/100 g、15.81 g/100 g,显著高于HAD和MD组的呈味氨基酸含量。LVD样品中氨基酸组成最接近于标准模式谱。通过主成分分析提取出2个主成分,累计方差贡献率达89.45%,综合评分结果为:LVD>SD>MD>HAD,聚类热图将4种干燥方式分为3类。干燥后的PPSP蛋白质中β-折叠结构最高,占总二级结构的74.66%~83.35%,HAD样中β-折叠、α-螺旋结构含量明显高于其他样品。该研究可为毛竹笋干燥及竹笋全粉的开发利用提供理论参考。

本文引用格式

李艳艳 , 杨金来 , 吴琰 , 李彬 , 张甫生 , 吴良如 , 郑炯 . 不同干燥方式对毛竹笋全粉中氨基酸含量和蛋白质结构的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2024 , 50(15) : 241 -247 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.036959

Abstract

To explore the effects of different drying methods on the amino acid content and protein structure of bamboo shoot powder, Phyllostachys pubescens shoot powder (PPSP) were treated by spray drying (SD), hot air drying (HAD), microwave drying (MD), and low-temperature vacuum drying (LVD), the amino acid content was analyzed and the changes of protein secondary structure were compared based on Raman spectrum amide Ⅰ band.Results showed that the content of total amino acid of PPSP obtained by LVD was the highest (29.19 g/100 g), followed by SD, and the sample prepared by HAD was the lowest.The content of essential amino acids in PPSP dried using LVD was the highest (10.43 g/100 g), accounting for 35.73% of the total amino acid content.The content of flavorful amino acids in PPSP prepared by LVD and SD was 17.58 g/100 g and 15.81 g/100 g respectively, which was significantly higher than that in HAD and MD groups.The amino acid composition of LVD samples was closest to the standard model.Two principal components were extracted by principal component analysis, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 89.45%.The comprehensive score was LVD>SD>MD>HAD.The 4 drying methods were divided into 3 kinds by cluster heatmap.The β-fold structure of the dried PPSP protein was the highest, accounting for 74.66%-83.35% of the total secondary structure.The contents of β-fold and α-helix structures in HAD samples were significantly higher than those in other samples.This study can provide a theoretical reference for the drying of Phyllostachys pubescens shoot and the development and utilization of bamboo shoot powder.

参考文献

[1] CHAUHAN O P, UNNI L E, KALLEPALLI C, et al.Bamboo shoots:Composition, nutritional value, therapeutic role and product development for value addition[J].International Journal of Food and Fermentation Technology, 2016, 6(1):1.
[2] SATYA S, BAL L M, SINGHAL P, et al.Bamboo shoot processing:Food quality and safety aspect (a review)[J].Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2010, 21(4):181-189.
[3] WANG N, WU L R, ZHANG F S, et al.Modifying the rheological properties, in vitro digestion, and structure of rice starch by extrusion assisted addition with bamboo shoot dietary fiber[J].Food Chemistry, 2022, 375:131900.
[4] 蒋小雅, 郑炯.竹笋干燥技术及其对竹笋品质的影响[J].食品与发酵工业, 2016, 42(6):260-264.
JIANG X Y, ZHENG J.Research advances in drying technology and its impact on the quality of bamboo shoots[J].Food and Fermentation Industries, 2016, 42(6):260-264.
[5] 马尧. 不同干燥方式对黄花菜粉品质影响及喷雾干燥工艺优化[D].银川:宁夏大学, 2022.
MA Y.Influence of different drying methods on the quality of daylily powder and optimization of spray drying process[D].Yinchuan:Ningxia University, 2022.
[6] 胡强, 王延云, 王燕, 等.两种干燥方式对苦竹笋粉营养成分的影响[J].乐山师范学院学报, 2023,38(8):21-26.
HU Q, WANG Y Y, WANG Y, et al.Effects of two drying methods on nutrient composition of powder of bitter bamboo shoot[J].Journal of Leshan Normal University, 2023,38(8):21-26.
[7] TIAN Y T, ZHAO Y T, HUANG J J, et al.Effects of different drying methods on the product quality and volatile compounds of whole shiitake mushrooms[J].Food Chemistry, 2016, 197(Pt A):714-722.
[8] 耿想, 姚曦, 尤俊昊, 等.不同干燥方式对竹笋品质的影响[J].食品与发酵工业, 2022, 48(16):144-149.
GENG X, YAO X, YOU J H, et al.Effect of different drying methods on the quality of bamboo shoots[J].Food and Fermentation Industries, 2022, 48(16):144-149.
[9] 苏煌杰, 刘明鑫, 刘斌雄, 等.响应面法优化竹笋过热蒸汽与真空联合干燥工艺[J].食品工业科技, 2020, 41(5):182-187.
SU H J, LIU M X, LIU B X, et al.Optimization of superheated steam combined vacuum drying technology of bamboo shoots by response surface method[J].Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2020, 41(5):182-187.
[10] 孙鹤, 史梦佳, 谢洪轩, 等.不同干燥方式对牡蛎非挥发性呈味物质的影响[J].食品科技, 2022, 47(5):173-181.
SUN H, SHI M J, XIE H X, et al.Effects of different drying methods on nonvolatile flavor components in oyster[J].Food Science and Technology, 2022, 47(5):173-181.
[11] 崔春, 梁佳欣, 袁梦, 等.不同干燥方式对甘薯固体香料挥发性/半挥发性成分和表面结构的影响[J].食品工业科技, 2023, 44(10):27-35.
CUI C, LIANG J X, YUAN M, et al.Effects of different drying methods on volatile/semi-volatile components and surface structure of sweet potato solid spice[J].Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(10):27-35.
[12] YANG R L, LI Q, HU Q P.Physicochemical properties, microstructures, nutritional components, and free amino acids of Pleurotus eryngii as affected by different drying methods[J].Scientific Reports, 2020, 10(1):121.
[13] 杨苞梅, 姚丽贤, 国彬, 等.不同品种荔枝果实游离氨基酸分析[J].食品科学, 2011, 32(16):249-252.
YANG B M, YAO L X, GUO B, et al.Analysis of free amino acids in litchi fruits from different cultivars[J].Food Science, 2011, 32(16):249-252.
[14] 安朝丽门, 钱磊, 姜迎迎, 等.不同干燥方式对滑子蘑滋味物质的影响[J].保鲜与加工, 2022, 22(10):69-75.
AN C, QIAN L, JIANG Y Y, et al.Effects of different drying methods on the taste substances of Pholiota microspora[J].Storage and Process, 2022, 22(10):69-75.
[15] 侯娜, 赵莉莉, 魏安智, 等.不同种质花椒氨基酸组成及营养价值评价[J].食品科学, 2017, 38(18):113-118.
HOU N, ZHAO L L, WEI A Z, et al.Amino acid composition and nutritional quality evaluation of different germplasms of Chinese prickly ash(Zanthoxylum bungeanum Maxim)[J].Food Science, 2017, 38(18):113-118.
[16] ARENTSON-LANTZ E, CLAIRMONT S, PADDON-JONES D, et al.Protein:A nutrient in focus[J].Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism = Physiologie Appliquee, Nutrition et Metabolisme, 2015, 40(8):755-761.
[17] MILLWARD D J.Amino acid scoring patterns for protein quality assessment[J].The British Journal of Nutrition, 2012, 108(Suppl 2):S31-S43.
[18] 葛帅, 王蓉蓉, 王颖瑞, 等.湖南常见辣椒品种游离氨基酸主成分分析及综合评价[J].食品科学技术学报, 2021, 39(2):91-102.
GE S, WANG R R, WANG Y R, et al.Principal component analysis and comprehensive evaluation of free amino acids of different peppers in Hunan[J].Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2021, 39(2):91-102.
[19] 唐史杰, 尹明雨, 松冈亮辅, 等.市售沙拉酱游离氨基酸组成的主成分分析与层次聚类分析[J].食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(10):222-228.
TANG S J, YIN M Y, MATSUOKA R, et al.The composition analysis of free amino acids in market salad dressings using principal component analysis and cluster analysis[J].Food and Fermentation Industries, 2021, 47(10):222-228.
[20] 李强, 何彩, 史星雲, 等.不同种源黑果枸杞果实游离氨基酸的品质评价[J].经济林研究, 2023, 41(1):26-35.
LI Q, HE C, SHI X Y, et al.Quality evaluation of free amino acids in fruits for different provenances of Lycium ruthenicum[J].Non-wood Forest Research, 2023, 41(1):26-35.
[21] ZHOU X X, JIANG S, ZHAO D D, et al.Changes in physicochemical properties and protein structure of surimi enhanced with camellia tea oil[J].LWT, 2017, 84:562-571.
[22] LI-CHAN E C Y.The applications of Raman spectroscopy in food science[J].Trends in Food Science & Technology, 1996, 7(11):361-370.
[23] LI-CHAN E, NAKAI S, HIROTSUKA M.Raman Spectroscopy as a Probe of Protein Structure in Food Systems[M]//YADA RY, JACKMAN RL, SMITH JL.Protein Structure-Function Relationships in Foods.Boston, MA:Springer, 1994:163-197.
[24] NGARIZE S, HERMAN H, ADAMS A, et al.Comparison of changes in the secondary structure of unheated, heated, and high-pressure-treated beta-lactoglobulin and ovalbumin proteins using Fourier transform Raman spectroscopy and self-deconvolution[J].Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2004, 52(21):6470-6477.
[25] 席宇航. 竹笋蛋白基食品胶体体系的构建与应用[D].杭州:浙江大学, 2022.
XI Y H.Construction and application of bamboo shoot protein-based food colloid system[D].Hangzhou:Zhejiang University, 2022.
[26] ELLEPOLA S W, CHOI S M, MA C Y.Conformational study of globulin from rice (Oryza sativa) seeds by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy[J].International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2005, 37(1-2):12-20.
[27] MA C Y, ROUT M K, PHILLIPS D L.Study of thermal aggregation and gelation of oat globulin by Raman spectroscopy[J].Spectroscopy, 2003, 17(2-3):417-428.
文章导航

/