食品与发酵工业 >

2025 , Vol. 51 >Issue 1: 108 - 115

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.038254

研究报告

生物可降解聚乳酸共衣康酸丁二醇酯/纳米二氧化硅包装材料对发酵酸奶贮藏品质及活菌数的影响

  • 蒋伟 ,
  • 陈钟生 ,
  • 张元 ,
  • 董同力嘎
展开
  • (内蒙古农业大学 食品科学与工程学院,内蒙古 呼和浩特,010018)
第一作者:硕士研究生(董同力嘎教授为通信作者,E-mail:dongtlg@imau.edu.cn)

收稿日期: 2023-12-13

  修回日期: 2024-02-04

  网络出版日期: 2025-01-23

基金资助

内蒙古自治区科技计划项目(2021GG0337);国家自然科学基金项目(21965026,52163012);内蒙古自治区青年科技人才发展项目(创新团队NMGIRT2310)

收起

Influence of biodegradable poly(L-lactic-co-butanediol itaconate) nano-silica packaging material on storage quality and viable bacteria count of fermented yogurt

  • JIANG Wei ,
  • CHEN Zhongsheng ,
  • ZHANG Yuan ,
  • DONG Tungalag
Expand
  • (College of Food Science and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China)

Received date: 2023-12-13

  Revised date: 2024-02-04

  Online published: 2025-01-23

Fold

摘要

探讨不同阻隔性的聚乳酸共衣康酸丁二醇酯/纳米二氧化硅共聚物薄膜[poly(L-lactic-co-butanediol itaconate) nano-silica copolymer films,PLBI-SiO2]包装对发酵酸奶贮藏效果,并对贮藏期间酸奶的理化指标和活菌数进行测定。结果表明:在4 ℃贮藏0～21 d期间,所有包装组的pH都呈现下降趋势,PLBI-SiO2 0.5%包装组与对照(市售)组在贮藏后期pH下降得到减缓;在贮藏期间,PLBI-SiO2 0.5%包装组与对照(市售)组能有效维持酸奶的质构特性与持水能力,同时也保持良好的感官评价与表观黏度;所有包装组的活菌数在整个贮藏期间都呈现逐渐降低的趋势,但随包装阻隔性的提高,下降幅度得到减缓,PLBI-SiO2 0.5%包装组与对照组在贮藏21 d时,保加利亚乳杆菌与嗜热链球菌都保持在107 CFU/mL以上。综合各项指标,PLBI-SiO2 0.5%包装组在贮藏21 d可以维持酸奶贮藏品质并几近于市售包装组,这为酸奶及其他发酵乳替代包装材料提供了一定的理论基础。

关键词： 酸奶; 贮藏; 纳米二氧化硅; 聚乳酸共衣康酸丁二醇酯纳米二氧化硅共聚物; 阻隔性

本文引用格式

蒋伟 , 陈钟生 , 张元 , 董同力嘎 . 生物可降解聚乳酸共衣康酸丁二醇酯/纳米二氧化硅包装材料对发酵酸奶贮藏品质及活菌数的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2025 , 51(1) : 108 -115 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.038254

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effect of poly(L-lactic-co-butanediol itaconate) nano-silica copolymer film packages with different barrier properties on the storage of fermented yogurt and to determine the physicochemical indexes of yogurt during storage and viable bacteria counts during storage.Results showed that during the storage period of 0-21 days at 4 ℃, the pH of all packaging groups showed a decreasing trend, and the pH decrease of the PLBI-SiO2 0.5% packaging group and the control (commercially available) group was slowed down in the late-stage of the storage period;During the storage period, the PLBI-SiO2 0.5% packaging group and the control (commercially available) group were able to maintain the texture and water holding capacity of the yogurt, and the sensory evaluation and the apparent viscosity of the yogurt.All packaging groups were able to maintain the physical and chemical indexes and live bacterial counts of the yogurt during the storage period;All packaging groups had the effect of fermented yogurt storage.The viable bacterial counts of all packaging groups showed a gradual decrease throughout the storage period, but the decrease was slowed down with the improvement of the barrier property of the packaging, and the viable bacterial counts of Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus in the PLBI-SiO2 0.5% packaging group and the control group both remained above 107 CFU/ml at 21 days of storage.Comprehensive indicators, the PLBI-SiO2 0.5% packaging group can maintain the storage quality of the yogurt and nearly compare with the commercially available packaging group at 21 days of storage, which provides a certain theoretical basis for alternative packaging materials for yogurt and other fermented milk.

Key words： yoghurt; storage; nano-silica; poly(L-lactic-co-butanediol itaconate) nano-silica copolymer; barrier properties

参考文献

[1] ARAYA M, MORELLI L, REID G,et al.Guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food[J].Joint FAO/WHO Working Group Report on Drafting Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food, 2002, 85:1-11.
[2] SHORI A B.Influence of food matrix on the viability of probiotic bacteria:A review based on dairy and non-dairy beverages[J].Food Bioscience, 2016, 13:1-8.
[3] CASTELLONE V, BANCALARI E, RUBERT J, et al.Eating fermented:Health benefits of LAB-fermented foods[J].Foods, 2021, 10(11):2639.
[4] MEEREBOER K W, MISRA M, MOHANTY A K.Review of recent advances in the biodegradability of polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) bioplastics and their composites[J].Green Chemistry, 2020, 22(17):5519-5558.
[5] SINGH S, RAY S S.Polylactide based nanostructured biomaterials and their applications[J].Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 2007, 7(8):2596-2615.
[6] IMRE B, PUKÁNSZKY B.Compatibilization in bio-based and biodegradable polymer blends[J].European Polymer Journal, 2013, 49(6):1215-1233.
[7] STEFANIAK K, MASEK A.Green copolymers based on poly(lactic acid)-short review[J].Materials, 2021, 14(18):5254.
[8] TESFAYE M, PATWA R, DHAR P, et al.Nanosilk-grafted poly(lactic acid) films:Influence of cross-linking on rheology and thermal stability[J].ACS Omega, 2017, 2(10):7071-7084.
[9] WU F, ZHANG B, YANG W, et al.Inorganic silica functionalized with PLLA chains via grafting methods to enhance the melt strength of PLLA/silica nanocomposites[J].Polymer, 2014, 55(22):5760-5772.
[10] SHI D W, LAI X L, JIANG Y P, et al.Synthesis of inorganic silica grafted three-arm PLLA and their behaviors for PLA matrix[J].Chinese Journal of Polymer Science, 2019, 37(3):216-226.
[11] MILLER C W, NGUYEN M H, ROONEY M, et al.The control of dissolved oxygen content in probiotic yoghurts by alternative packaging materials[J].Packaging Technology and Science, 2003, 16(2):61-67.
[12] CRUZ A G, CASTRO W F, FARIA J A F, et al.Stability of probiotic yogurt added with glucose oxidase in plastic materials with different permeability oxygen rates during the refrigerated storage[J].Food Research International, 2013, 51(2):723-728.
[13] DONG T, SONG S X, LIANG M, et al.Gas permeability and permselectivity of poly(L-lactic acid)/SiOx film and its application in equilibrium-modified atmosphere packaging for chilled meat[J].Journal of Food Science, 2017, 82(1):97-107.
[14] 张家涛, 赵文波, 胡健, 等.聚(L-乳酸-co-衣康酸丁二醇酯)/中空介孔SiO2微球复合薄膜的制备及对草莓包装中微气氛的调控作用[J].高分子材料科学与工程, 2023, 39(8):91-103.
ZHANG J T, ZHAO W B, HU J, et al.Preparation of poly(L-lactic-co-butanediol itaconate) membrane functionalized by hollow mesoporous SiO2 microsphere and its control of the micro atmosphere in strawberry packaging[J].Polymer Materials Science & Engineering, 2023, 39(8):91-103.
[15] TOKIWA Y, CALABIA B P.Biodegradability and biodegradation of poly(lactide)[J].Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2006, 72(2):244-251.
[16] BAN Q F, LIU Z H, YU C W, et al.Physiochemical, rheological, microstructural, and antioxidant properties of yogurt using monk fruit extract as a sweetener[J].Journal of Dairy Science, 2020, 103(11):10006-10014.
[17] FU R J, LI J, ZHANG T, et al.Salecan stabilizes the microstructure and improves the rheological performance of yogurt[J].Food Hydrocolloids, 2018, 81:474-480.
[18] 丛艳君, 易红, 郑福平.基于电子舌技术区分酸奶的滋味[J].食品工业科技, 2015, 36(4):49-52;56.
CONG Y J, YI H, ZHENG F P.Taste distinguishing of yoghourts using electronic tongue[J].Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2015, 36(4):49-52;56.
[19] BITTANTE G, CONTIERO B, CECCHINATO A.Prolonged observation and modelling of milk coagulation, curd firming, and syneresis[J].International Dairy Journal, 2013, 29(2):115-123.
[20] 孙健, 陈静, 翁心刚.酸奶的储存温度对产品品质的影响[J].食品工业科技, 2010, 31(12):140-141.
SUN J, CHEN J, WENG X G.Effect of storage temperature on yogurt quality[J].Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2010, 31(12):140-141.
[21] SAINT-EVE A, LÉVY C, LE MOIGNE M, et al.Quality changes in yogurt during storage in different packaging materials[J].Food Chemistry, 2008, 110(2):285-293.
[22] SAH B, VASILJEVIC T, MCKECHNIE S, et al.Physicochemical, textural and rheological properties of probiotic yogurt fortified with fibre-rich pineapple peel powder during refrigerated storage[J].LWT-Food Science and Technology, 2016, 65:978-986.
[23] KUMAR A, HUSSAIN S A, RAJU P N, et al.Packaging material type affects the quality characteristics of Aloe-probiotic lassi during storage[J].Food Bioscience, 2017, 19:34-41.
[24] 杨续金, 侯燕军, 呼斯乐, 等.凝固型绵羊奶酸奶的发酵特性及活菌数变化[J].食品科学, 2021, 42(20):69-74.
YANG X J, HOU Y J, HU S L, et al.Fermentation properties of set yogurt made from sheep milk and changes in viable bacterial count during cold storage[J].Food Science, 2021, 42(20):69-74.
[25] 王鑫磊, 王萌, 闫春晓, 等.马乳酒样乳杆菌ZW3对酸奶风味及质构的影响[J].食品科学, 2022, 43(10):119-123.
WANG X L, WANG M, YAN C X, et al.Effect of Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens ZW3 on the texture and flavor characteristics of yogurt[J].Food Science, 2022, 43(10):119-123.
[26] YANG C J, DING W, MA L J, et al.Discrimination and characterization of different intensities of goaty flavor in goat milk by means of an electronic nose[J].Journal of Dairy Science, 2015, 98(1):55-67.
[27] LIU D Y, ZHAO F, LI L, et al.Enhancing the antioxidant capacity and quality attributes of fermented goat milk through the synergistic action of Limosilactobacillus fermentum WXZ 2-1 with a starter culture[J].Journal of Dairy Science, 2024, 107(4):1928-1949.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

技术支持：北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司