研究报告

不同分离源消化伴生乳杆菌对鲊广椒品质和细菌类群的影响

  • 舒远琪 ,
  • 崔梦君 ,
  • 杨莹 ,
  • 李卫华 ,
  • 王婷 ,
  • 郭壮 ,
  • 王玉荣
展开
  • 1(湖北文理学院,湖北省食品配料工程技术研究中心,湖北 襄阳,441053)
    2(湖北文理学院,乳酸菌生物技术与工程襄阳市重点实验室,湖北 襄阳,441053)
    3(襄阳市公共检验检测中心,湖北 襄阳,441001)
第一作者:本科生(王玉荣副教授为通信作者,E-mail:wang_HFu6456@163.com)

收稿日期: 2025-07-19

  修回日期: 2025-10-11

  网络出版日期: 2026-06-15

基金资助

国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(32402047);湖北省高等学校优秀中青年科技创新团队计划项目(T2023022)

Effect of Companilactobacillus alimentarius from different isolation sources on quality and bacterial communities of Zha-chili

  • SHU Yuanqi ,
  • CUI Mengjun ,
  • YANG Ying ,
  • LI Weihua ,
  • WANG Ting ,
  • GUO Zhuang ,
  • WANG Yurong
Expand
  • 1(Hubei Provincial Engineering and Technology Research Center for Food Ingredients, Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang 441053, China)
    2(Xiangyang Lactic Acid Bacteria Biotechnology and Engineering Key Laboratory, Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang 441053, China)
    3(Xiangyang Public Inspection and Testing Center, Xiangyang 441001, China)

Received date: 2025-07-19

  Revised date: 2025-10-11

  Online published: 2026-06-15

摘要

为探究不同分离源消化伴生乳杆菌(Companilactobacillus alimentarius)对鲊广椒品质的影响,该研究采用仿生学设备结合高通量测序技术,分析了从辣椒酱和鲊广椒中分离的39株C.alimentarius所制备的鲊广椒样品在风味、滋味及细菌群落方面的差异。电子鼻分析显示,与分离自鲊广椒的C.alimentarius菌株相比,分离自辣椒酱的C.alimentarius菌株所制备的鲊广椒样品芳香类物质含量显著偏高(P<0.05),而硫化物和烷烃类物质含量显著偏低(P<0.05)。电子舌分析显示,分离自辣椒酱的C.alimentarius菌株所制备的鲊广椒样品鲜味、苦味、涩味和后味A(涩味回味)强度显著偏高(P<0.05),而酸味、咸味、后味B(苦味回味)和丰度(鲜味回味)强度显著偏低(P<0.05)。微生物计数结果显示,2组鲊广椒样品菌落总数和乳酸菌菌落总数之间差异不显著(P>0.05)。α多样性分析显示,分离自辣椒酱的C.alimentarius菌株制备的鲊广椒样品物种多样性更高(P<0.05)。群落结构分析显示,不同分离源C.alimentarius菌株制备的鲊广椒样品细菌群落结构存在显著差异(P<0.05),且魏斯氏菌属(Weissella)在辣椒酱分离源菌株制作的鲊广椒样品中显著富集(P<0.05)。直系同源蛋白数据库(clusters of orthologous groups of proteins,COG)分析显示,分离自辣椒酱的C.alimentarius制备的鲊广椒样品细菌群落在“翻译、核糖体结构和生物发生”和“复制、重组和修复”这2个功能基因显著高表达(P<0.05)。相关性分析显示,C.alimentarius的添加能够显著抑制鲊广椒的苦味和涩味(P<0.05)。由于辣椒酱分离源样品芳香类物质含量更高,鲜味更突出,细菌群落多样性更高,因而选用辣椒酱来源C.alimentarius菌株制备鲊广椒样品对于品质的提升具有积极作用。

本文引用格式

舒远琪 , 崔梦君 , 杨莹 , 李卫华 , 王婷 , 郭壮 , 王玉荣 . 不同分离源消化伴生乳杆菌对鲊广椒品质和细菌类群的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2026 , 52(10) : 145 -155 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.043960

Abstract

To investigate the impact of Companilactobacillus alimentarius from different sources on the quality of Zha-chili, bionic devices and high-throughput sequencing technology were employed to analyze differences in flavor, taste, and bacterial communities among Zha-chili samples fermented with 39 C.alimentarius strains isolated from chili paste and Zha-chili.Electronic nose analysis revealed that the Zha-chili samples prepared using C.alimentarius strains sourced from chili paste exhibited significantly higher levels of aromatic compounds (P<0.05) and significantly lower levels of sulfides and alkanes (P<0.05) compared to those fermented with C.alimentarius strains isolated from Zha-chili.Electronic tongue analysis indicated that the Zha-chili samples prepared with C.alimentarius strains from chili paste had significantly higher intensities of umami, bitterness, astringency, and aftertaste-A (astringent aftertaste) (P<0.05) while showing significantly lower intensities of sourness, saltiness, aftertaste-B (bitter aftertaste), and richness (umami aftertaste) (P<0.05) compared to the samples made with strains isolated from Zha-chili.Microbial counting results indicated no significant differences in the total viable count and total lactic acid bacteria count between the two groups of Zha-chili samples (P>0.05).α-Diversity analysis demonstrated that samples prepared with C.alimentarius strains from chili paste exhibited higher species diversity (P<0.05).Community structure analysis revealed significant differences in the bacterial community structures of Zha-chili samples prepared using C.alimentarius strains from different sources (P<0.05), with Weissella significantly enriched in the samples made from strains sourced from chili paste (P<0.05).Clusters of orthologous groups of proteins (COG) database analysis indicated that the bacterial community in the Zha-chili prepared with C.alimentarius isolated from chili paste exhibited a more pronounced expression of functional genes related to “translation, ribosomal structure, and biogenesis” as well as “replication, recombination, and repair” (P<0.05).Correlation analysis revealed that the addition of C.alimentarius significantly suppressed the bitterness and astringency of Zha-chili (P<0.05).Given that samples sourced from chili paste exhibited higher levels of aromatic compounds, a more pronounced umami flavor, and greater bacterial community diversity, selecting C.alimentarius strains from chili paste for preparing Zha-chili samples positively impacts its quality.

参考文献

[1] DONG W W, SHEN H Y, LIU H M, et al.Unraveling the microbial community and succession during Zha-chili fermentation and their relationships with flavor formation[J].Food Research International, 2022, 157:111239.
[2] GUO Z, WANG Y R, XIANG F S, et al.Evaluating the flavor and divergent bacterial communities in corn-based Zha-chili[J].Food Bioscience, 2022, 46:101563.
[3] 黄璐晗, 尹小庆, 阚建全, 等.模糊数学感官评价结合响应面法优化鲊辣椒混菌发酵工艺[J].食品与发酵工业, 2024, 50(7):83-93.
HUANG L H, YIN X Q, KAN J Q, et al.Optimization of mixed strain fermentation process of Zha-chili by Fuzzy mathematics sensory evaluation combined with response surface methodology[J].Food and Fermentation Industries, 2024, 50(7):83-93.
[4] 莫玉花. 包谷酸辣子自然发酵过程中微生物变化、优势菌筛选及应用研究[D].长沙:湖南农业大学, 2017.
MO Y H.Microbial changes, screening of dominant microbes and its application during natural fermentation of spicy Bao gu suan[D].Changsha:Hunan Agricultural University, 2017.
[5] KOUTSOUMANIS K, ALLENDE A, ALVAREZ-ORDÓÑEZ A, et al. Update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 12: Suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until March 2020[J]. EFSA Journal, 2020, 18(7): e06174.
[6] BOURDICHON F, BUDDE-NIEKIEL A, DUBOIS A, et al.Inventory of microbial food cultures with safety demonstration in fermented food products Update of the Bulletin of the IDF N°377-2002, N°455-2012 and N°495-2018[J].Bulletin of the International Dairy Federation, 2022, 514.
[7] 熊世进. 老坛酸菜功能微生物代谢调控机制及其直投式发酵关键技术研究[D].南昌:南昌大学, 2024.
XIONG S J.Metabolism regulation mechanism of functional microbiota in laotan suancai and the key technology of direct vat set[D].Nanchang:Nanchang University, 2024.
[8] LIU D Q, ZHANG C C, ZHANG J M, et al.Dynamics of the glucosinolate-myrosinase system in Tuber mustard (Brassica juncea var.tumida) during pickling and its relationship with bacterial communities and fermentation characteristics[J].Food Research International, 2022, 161:111879.
[9] KARAMI S, ROAYAEI M, ZAHEDI E, et al.Antifungal effects of Lactobacillus species isolated from local dairy products[J].International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation, 2017, 7(2):77-81.
[10] 程驰新笑, 易宗伟, 王玉荣, 等.重庆东部地区鲊广椒乳酸菌分离鉴定及细菌菌群多样性分析[J].中国酿造, 2023, 42(9):49-54.
CHENG C X X, YI Z W, WANG Y R, et al.Isolation and identification of lactic acid bacteria and analysis of bacterial community diversity in Zha-chili samples collected from eastern Chongqing[J].China Brewing, 2023,42(9):49-54.
[11] 李悦琦, 熊英梅, 向秀连, 等.巴东地区鲊广椒细菌多样性分析及乳酸菌分离鉴定[J].中国酿造, 2023, 42(3):109-114.
LI Y Q, XIONG Y M, XIANG X L, et al.Bacterial diversity analysis, isolation and identification of lactic acid bacteria of Zha-chili in Badong region[J].China Brewing, 2023, 42(3):109-114.
[12] 席啦, 向凡舒, 张彦, 等.秭归地区鲊广椒中乳酸菌及细菌多样性研究[J].中国酿造, 2021, 40(11):122-126.
XI L, XIANG F S, ZHANG Y, et al.Lactic acid bacteria and bacterial diversity of Zha-chili in Zigui region[J].China Brewing, 2021, 40(11):122-126.
[13] 陈飞, 陈宇昱, 何双, 等.3种常用剁椒加工品种的质构品质及果胶特性[J].中国食品学报, 2022, 22(11):103-113.
CHEN F, CHEN Y Y, HE S, et al.Texture qualities and pectin characteristics of three pepper varieties for fermentation minced pepper processing[J].Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 2022, 22(11):103-113.
[14] WANI A K, AKHTAR N, SHER F, et al.Microbial adaptation to different environmental conditions:Molecular perspective of evolved genetic and cellular systems[J].Archives of Microbiology, 2022, 204(2):144.
[15] 向秀连, 赵慧君, 王玉荣, 等.食盐添加对鲊广椒感官品质及细菌类群的影响[J].食品工业科技, 2023, 44(17):108-114.
XIANG X L, ZHAO H J, WANG Y R, et al.The effect of salt addition on sensory quality and bacterial structure of Zhaguangjiao[J].Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(17):108-114.
[16] SINGH J K, DEVI P B, REDDY G B, et al.Biosynthesis, classification, properties, and applications of Weissella bacteriocins[J].Frontiers in Microbiology, 2024, 15:1406904.
[17] LIU C, AN C, ZHANG J J, et al.Evaluation of safety and probiotic properties of Weissella spp.in fermented vegetables from Xi’an, Shaanxi, China[J].Food Science & Nutrition, 2025, 13(1):e4592.
[18] XIE Y Z, PEI F Y, LIU Y C, et al.Fecal fermentation and high-fat diet-induced obesity mouse model confirmed exopolysaccharide from Weissella cibaria PFY06 can ameliorate obesity by regulating the gut microbiota[J].Carbohydrate Polymers, 2023, 318:121122.
[19] HUANG Q, YE H X, YANG Y Y, et al.Physicochemical properties, antioxidant activities, and aromatic profile of yogurt co-fermented by Weissella cibaria G232 with traditional starters[J].Foods, 2025, 14(9):1607.
[20] YANG X H, HONG J Q, WANG L H, et al.Effect of lactic acid bacteria fermentation on plant-based products[J].Fermentation, 2024, 10(1):48.
[21] 高梦颖, 王浩宇, 谭小琴, 等.自然及人工接种发酵对细菌型豆豉食用品质的影响研究[J].食品与发酵工业, 2023, 49(13):136-143.
GAO M Y, WANG H Y, TAN X Q, et al.Effect of natural and artificial inoculation on the quality of bacterial fermented Douchi[J].Food and Fermentation Industries, 2023, 49(13):136-143.
[22] 马艳弘, 魏建明, 侯红萍, 等.发酵方式对山药泡菜理化特性及微生物变化的影响[J].食品科学, 2016, 37(17):179-184.
MA Y H, WEI J M, HOU H P, et al.Effects of fermentation methods on physicochemical and microbiological characteristics of pickled Chinese yam[J].Food Science, 2016, 37(17):179-184.
[23] ZHANG X, SHAN T T, JIA H, et al.Comparative evaluation of the effects of natural and artificial inoculation on soybean paste fermentation[J].LWT, 2022, 155:112936.
[24] 朱绍林, 陈其玲, 张婉雪儿, 等.不同发酵方式对慕萨莱思葡萄酒香气及感官特征的影响[J].中国酿造, 2025, 44(6):163-170.
ZHU S L, CHEN Q L, ZHANG W X E, et al.Effect of different fermentation methods on the aroma and sensory characteristics of Musalais wine[J].China Brewing, 2025, 44(6):163-170.
[25] 马文艺, 胡萍, 张玉龙, 等.乳酸菌强化发酵糟辣椒工艺优化及其品质分析[J].食品安全质量检测学报, 2025, 16(6):17-25.
MA W Y, HU P, ZHANG Y L, et al.Process optimization of fermented Capsicum annuum L.inoculated with lactic acid bacteria and its quality analysis[J].Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2025, 16(6):17-25.
[26] 何扬波, 李咏富, 钟定江, 等.红酸汤直投式发酵剂制备及其发酵效能分析[J].食品科技, 2023, 48(1):22-28.
HE Y B, LI Y F, ZHONG D J, et al.Preparation and fermentation efficiency analysis of directed vat set for red sour soup[J].Food Science and Technology, 2023, 48(1):22-28.
[27] JIAO Y, CHEN H D, HAN H, et al.Development and utilization of corn processing by-products:A review[J].Foods, 2022, 11(22):3709.
[28] BHAMBHANI S, KONDHARE K R, GIRI A P.Diversity in chemical structures and biological properties of plant alkaloids[J].Molecules, 2021, 26(11):3374.
[29] 马荣, 尚方正, 潘剑锋, 等.细胞内mRNA翻译影响因素及翻译组学的研究进展[J].生物技术通报, 2022, 38(12):115-126.
MA R, SHANG F Z, PAN J F, et al.Research progress in influencing factors of mRNA translation in cells and translatome[J].Biotechnology Bulletin, 2022, 38(12):115-126.
[30] YOHA K S, NIDA S, DUTTA S, et al.Targeted delivery of probiotics:Perspectives on research and commercialization[J].Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins, 2022, 14(1):15-48.
[31] 陈邵德罡, 王玉荣, 郭壮, 等.不同材质器皿对鲊广椒发酵品质的影响[J].食品研究与开发, 2024, 45(21):75-82.
CHEN S D G, WANG Y R, GUO Z, et al.Fermenters of different materials influence the fermentation quality of Zha-Chili[J].Food Research and Development, 2024, 45(21):75-82.
[32] 席啦, 熊英梅, 王玉荣, 等.大米和玉米比例对鲊广椒品质及细菌类群的影响[J].食品与发酵工业, 2022, 48(20):176-181.
XI L, XIONG Y M, WANG Y R, et al.Effect of the ratio of rice and corn on the quality and microbial diversity of Zha-chili[J].Food and Fermentation Industries, 2022, 48(20):176-181.
文章导航

/

〈 〉