研究报告

基于膜分离-树脂吸附的黄酒降酸工艺及风味评价

  • 陈晨 ,
  • 谢海腾 ,
  • 赖敏辉 ,
  • 金青青 ,
  • 周建弟 ,
  • 钱斌 ,
  • 蒋予箭
展开
  • 1(浙江工商大学 食品与生物工程学院,浙江 杭州,310018)
    2(绍兴海纳膜技术有限公司,浙江 绍兴,312000)
    3(浙江古越龙山绍兴酒股份有限公司,浙江 绍兴,312000)
第一作者:硕士研究生(蒋予箭教授为通信作者,E-mail:13357180599@189.cn)

收稿日期: 2023-02-27

  修回日期: 2023-03-17

  网络出版日期: 2024-02-27

基金资助

绍兴市科技计划项目(2018B10005)

Acid reduction technology and flavor evaluation of Huangjiu based on membrane separation and resin adsorption

  • CHEN Chen ,
  • XIE Haiteng ,
  • LAI Minhui ,
  • JIN Qingqing ,
  • ZHOU Jiandi ,
  • QIAN Bin ,
  • JIANG Yujian
Expand
  • 1(School of Food and Biotechnology, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China)
    2(Shaoxing Haina Membrane Technology Co.Ltd., Shaoxing 312000, China)
    3(Zhejiang Guyue Longshan Shaoxing Wine Co.Ltd., Shaoxing 312000, China)

Received date: 2023-02-27

  Revised date: 2023-03-17

  Online published: 2024-02-27

摘要

该实验在优化膜分离预处理工艺参数的基础上,考察了采用膜分离-树脂吸附的物理方法来调整黄酒酸度指标的工艺过程,并对降酸黄酒的风味品质进行了比较分析。结果表明,在料液温度25 ℃,运行压力1.0 MPa,截留分子质量为200、1 000、2 000 Da的不同膜预处理条件下,D354树脂对高酸黄酒的降酸率分别达到47.0%、53.8%、68.1%。降酸黄酒样品中共检测到32种挥发性风味物质,200、1 000 Da膜预处理组获得的降酸黄酒样品中挥发性风味物质总含量分别达到1 975.89、1 919.80 mg/L,均显著高于未过膜处理组(1 727.04 mg/L)。层次聚类分析表明,1 000 Da和2 000 Da组之间的风味相似度更高,正交偏最小二乘判别分析表明11种化合物对降酸黄酒的风味差异贡献较高。选用1 000 Da膜预处理,结合10%填充比的D354树脂处理50 L高酸黄酒,总酸下降率达57.7%,氨基酸态氮保留率达98.8%,挥发性风味物质的保留率达80.0%。该研究为高酸黄酒的物理降酸提供了新的视角和应用场景。

本文引用格式

陈晨 , 谢海腾 , 赖敏辉 , 金青青 , 周建弟 , 钱斌 , 蒋予箭 . 基于膜分离-树脂吸附的黄酒降酸工艺及风味评价[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2024 , 50(2) : 247 -253 . DOI: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.035286

Abstract

In this study, the parameters of membrane separation pretreatment were optimized, and the feasibility of reducing the acidity of Huangjiu by the method of membrane separation-resin adsorption was investigated. Then, the flavor of Huangjiu after reducing acidity was evaluated. The results showed that under the Huangjiu temperature of 25 ℃ and the operating pressure of 1.0 MPa, the acid-reducing rate of high-acid Huangjiu after D354 resin adsorption reached 47.0%, 53.8%, and 68.1% respectively, after being pretreated with different membranes with a molecular weight of 200 Da, 1 000 Da, and 2 000 Da. A total of 32 volatile substances were detected in the Huangjiu samples after reducing acidity. The content of volatile substances in the 200 Da (1 975.89 mg/L) and 1 000 Da (1 919.80 mg/L) membrane pretreatment groups were significantly higher than group without membrane pretreatment (1 727.04 mg/L). In addition, the hierarchical cluster analysis showed that higher flavor similarity between 1 000 Da and 2 000 Da groups. Eleven volatile substances with significant differences between different deacidification Huangjiu groups were obtained based on the results of OPLS-DA combined the variable importance in projection. Using 1 000 Da membrane pretreatment combined with 10% filling ratio D354 resin adsorption to reduce the acidity of 50 L high-acid Huangjiu. The results showed that the total deacidification rate reached 57.7% and the retention rates of amino acid nitrogen and volatile components were 98.8% and 80%, respectively. In summary, this study provides a new perspective and application scenario for the physical deacidification of high-acid Huangjiu.

参考文献

[1] 钱桢文, 吴宗文, 吴殿辉, 等. 强化乳酸菌酿造高酸黄酒工艺研究. 食品与发酵工业, 2022, 48(6): 168-173.
QIAN Z W, WU Z W, WU D H, et al. Brewing technology of high-acidity Huangjiu by bioaugmentation with lactic acid bacteria. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2022, 48(6): 168-173.
[2] 冯倩, 张燕, 赵轶男. 发酵果酒降酸工艺优化. 酿酒科技, 2021(2): 27-31.
FENG Q, ZHANG Y, ZHAO Y N. Optimization of acid-reducing process of fermented fruit wine. Liquor-Making Science & Technology, 2021(2): 27-31.
[3] TRAYNOR M, AHMAD I. Impact of a commercially available ion-exchange resin used in red wines to reduce toxic compounds: Effect on pH, oxidation-reduction potential, color, and sensory attributes. Journal of Food Science and Technology-Mysore, 2018, 55(12): 4859-4866.
[4] LI N, WEI Y, LI X M, et al. Optimization of deacidification for concentrated grape juice. Food Science & Nutrition, 2019, 7(6): 2050-2058.
[5] 李英蕊, 马玉蓉, 赵玲, 等. 青桔汁树脂降酸的工艺优化及青桔蜂蜜复合汁的初步开发. 中国果菜, 2021, 41(6): 5-10.
LI Y R, MA Y R, ZHAO L, et al. Optimization of resin reducing acid process of green orange juice and preliminary development of green orange-honey juice. China Fruit and Vegetable, 2021, 41(6): 5-10.
[6] BHATTACHARJEE C, SAXENA V K, DUTTA S. Fruit juice processing using membrane technology: A review. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 2017, 43: 136-153.
[7] PERVEA M N, MAHBOUBI A, UWINEZA C, et al. Factors influencing pressure-driven membrane-κassisted volatile fatty acids recovery and purification—A review. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 817: 152993.
[8] 陈丽花, 徐建芬, 程琳. 膜过滤对黄酒品质改良效果的研究. 酿酒科技, 2011(2): 43-46.
CHEN L H, XU J F, CHENG L. Research on membrane filtration to improve the quality of yellow rice wine. Liquor-Making Science Technology, 2011(2): 43-46.
[9] CASTRO-MUÑOZ R, BOCZKAJ G, GONTAREK E, et al. Membrane technologies assisting plant-based and agro-food by-products processing: A comprehensive review. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2020, 95: 219-232.
[10] UROŠEVIĆ T, POVERNOVIĆ D, VUKOSAVLJEVIĆ P, et al. Recent developments in microfiltration and ultrafiltration of fruit juices. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 2017, 106: 147-161.
[11] SALEHI F. Current and future applications for nanofiltration technology in the food processing. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 2014, 92(2): 161-177.
[12] 张雪艳, 陆茵, 张颖, 等. 黄酒常温微滤工艺影响因素及除菌效果研究. 宁波大学学报(理工版), 2021, 34(1): 110-115.
ZHANG X Y, LU Y, ZHANG Y, et al. Study on the factors affecting the microfiltration process of rice wine and the effect of sterilization. Journal of Ningbo University (Natural Science & Engineering Edition), 2021, 34(1): 110-115.
[13] 刘少璞, 周志磊, 姬中伟, 等. 全二维与一维气相色谱质谱联用技术解析苏派黄酒挥发性组分. 食品与发酵工业, 2022, 48(9): 223-229.
LIU S P, ZHOU Z L, JI Z W, et al. Characterization of the volatile profile of Jiangsu Huangjiu by GCx GC-TOFMS and GC-MS. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2022, 48(9): 223-229.
[14] 谢广发. 黄酒酿造技术. 第2版. 北京: 中国轻工业出版社, 2016: 171-174.
XIE G F. Brewing Technology of Huangjiu. 2nd edition. Beijing: China Light Industry Press, 2016: 171-174.
[15] 张林祥, 张蕾, 秦子涵, 等. 顶空-固相微萃取-气质联用法分析玫瑰醋挥发性风味物质及特征. 食品与发酵工业, 2022, 48(21): 269-275.
ZHANG L X, ZHANG L, QIN Z H, et al. Analysis of volatile flavor profile and characteristics of rosy vinegar based on HS-SPME-GC-MS profiles. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2022, 48(21): 269-275.
[16] JIANG B, XI Z M, LUO M J, et al. Comparison on aroma compounds in Cabernet Sauvignon and Merlot wines from four wine grape-growing regions in China. Food Research International, 2013, 51(2): 482-489.
[17] 朱小芳, 张凤杰, 俞剑燊, 等. 黄酒浸米水中细菌群落结构及优势菌代谢分析. 食品科学, 2017, 38(10): 82-86.
ZHU X F, ZHANG F J, YU J S, et al. Analysis of microbial community structure and metabolic characteristics of dominant microbes in rice milk for yellow wine Food Science, 2017, 38(10): 82-86.
[18] BUETTNER A. Springer Handbook of Odor. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2017.
[19] 蒋彰, 周志磊, 姬中伟, 等. 即墨黄酒煮糜工艺对挥发性物质的影响. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(5): 86-91.
JIANG Z, ZHOU Z L, JI Z W, et al. Effect of millet boiling process on volatile compounds in Jimo Huangjiu. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2021, 47(5): 86-91.
[20] 彭金龙, 张辉, 毛严根. 黄酒中高级醇含量的影响因素及控制措施研究进展. 酿酒科技, 2022(10): 76-80.
PENG J L, ZHANG H, MAO Y G. Research progress on influencing factors and control measures of higher alcohols in Huangjiu. Liquor-Making Science Technology, 2022(10): 76-80.
[21] 胡武瑶, 杨昳津, 窦慧, 等. 不同麦曲酿造黄酒中挥发性风味物质的代谢差异. 食品与发酵工业, 2020, 46(8): 226-233.
HU W Y, YANG Q J, DOU H, et al. Metabolic differences of volatile flavor compounds in Huangjiu fermented with different wheat Qu. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2020, 46(8): 226-233.
[22] 徐建芬, 张凤杰. 黄酒陈酿过程中香气物质、味觉特性和表面张力变化. 中国酿造, 2018, 37(1): 41-44.
XU J F, ZHANG F J. Changes of aroma substances, taste characteristics and surface tension during the aging process of Chinese rice wine. China Brewing, 2018, 37(1): 41-44.
文章导航

/